Local government confusion
For the last year or more the government has been berating councils for being poor fiscal managers, insisting they need to refocus on core services and cut out wasteful spending.
As well, there has been unhelpful and unfocused speculation about the future role of regional councils.
To add to the messy mix, last week the government announced a confusing set of restrictions on councils' planning programmes to stop them doing work which will not align with the forthcoming laws replacing the existing Resource Management Act.
Plan reviews and changes will be stopped through an Amendment Paper to the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill, expected to become law next month.
There will be mixed views about whether councils are irresponsible big spenders on vanity projects or whether the majority of rates rises are the result of them finally trying to catch up with years of underspending on infrastructure.
What people believe is the truth may depend on the size of their rates increase and whether they take issue with some aspect of council spending they think is unnecessary.
It is convenient for the government to point the finger at local government for the impact rates rises are having on the cost of living. It diverts attention from other living cost pressures, among them continuing food price rises. Despite its big talk about reining in the dominant supermarkets, nothing changes.
The Regulatory Impact Statement on the Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill which passed its first reading in Parliament late last week made the point cost pressures on councils were being driven by capital and operating cost escalation, flowing from supply chain upheaval and a tight labour market during the pandemic and "accelerated headline inflation since".
"Infrastructure costs have long been a major cause of rate increases, with councils needing to upgrade infrastructure, especially for water and wastewater treatment plants, and invest in more infrastructure to meet growth demands.
"Around two-thirds of capital expenditure for councils is applied to core infrastructure, not including libraries and other community facilities, or parks and reserves."
What the government considers is OK for council spending and what is not has not always been clear, but the Bill attempts to shed some light on that.
It defines the core services of a local authority as network infrastructure, public transport services, waste management, civil defence emergency management, libraries, museums, reserves and other recreational facilities.
It has also tinkered with the definition of the purpose of local government to include supporting local economic growth and development.
But the purpose also states it is to enable democratic local decision-making and action by and on behalf of communities.
Councillors and wannabe councillors around the country might wonder what that means when it appears the central government is wanting much greater influence.
Many will be feeling betrayed by the failure of the National Party to live up to its promises of devolution and localism.
Local Government NZ president Sam Broughton summed up that feeling at the organisation's conference last week, saying it felt like "every party in opposition is a localist and then as soon as they're in power, they become a creature that draws all the more power to themselves."
Local government minister Simon Watts is still talking up plans for a rates cap, saying the government is working at pace on a model for it, despite National not seeming to have the backing of its coalition partners.
NZ First leader Winston Peters was scathing about it, quoted as saying "every other party is interfering in local government" and his party had never done this.
He suggested central government could not preach to local government when it did not have its own spending under control.
Whatever happens next, it is clear there is much to do to improve the relationship and trust between central and local government and to ensure the word local is not becoming a synonym for national. Further preaching and scolding will not achieve that.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Techday NZ
2 hours ago
- Techday NZ
Wise urges New Zealand MPs to end NZD $667m FX fee losses
Wise has urged Parliament to address what it describes as misleading bank fees on foreign transactions, claiming these are costing New Zealanders hundreds of millions of New Zealand dollars each year. The call was made as part of Wise's submission to Parliament's Finance and Expenditure Select Committee on the Financial Markets Conduct Amendment Bill 2025, which is currently under consideration. Wise contends that changes are needed to protect both consumers and businesses who are affected each time a currency conversion takes place, whether through sending money overseas, shopping online, travelling abroad, or operating businesses internationally. Hidden costs Research commissioned by Wise from Edgar, Dunn & Company indicated that New Zealanders lost a total of NZD $667 million to hidden foreign exchange (FX) payment fees in 2023. According to projections, this figure is set to increase to NZD $991 million by 2029 if current practices continue. Wise argues that these losses are primarily due to banks advertising "fee-free" international transactions while actual costs are concealed via inflated exchange rates. Tristan Dakin, Country Manager ANZ at Wise, stated: "New Zealanders think they're getting a good deal because they see 'no fees' or 'zero commission'. But the real cost is hidden in the exchange rate mark-up, which can be vastly different to the rate you find on Google. By ensuring more transparency, parliament can put millions back into the wallets of consumers, while removing barriers for small businesses that want to expand internationally." Regulatory context New Zealand currently has no specific legal requirements in place to tackle the problem of hidden FX costs in cross-border banking and payments. However, Wise's submission follows growing discussions in both local and international contexts about the need to enhance competition and transparency. Last year, the New Zealand Commerce Commission noted there "appears to be room to improve competition" in this area, and the G20 is already working towards making international payments more affordable, faster, and more transparent worldwide. Dakin also commented: "What the banks are doing right now is unfair, misleading, and is somehow perfectly legal. That needs to change, or they will continue to take an unfair share from Kiwi consumers and businesses. With the Financial Markets Conduct Amendment Bill 2025 and the growing international calls for reform, it's only a matter of time before governments all around the world take action on misleading FX fees." He added: "New Zealand has an incredible opportunity to set an example for the rest of the world. These proposed reforms offer a practical, low-cost solution that would help Kiwis make better choices and save money, while driving competition and innovation in the space." Proposed measures Wise's submission recommends several changes be included in the Bill. First, they suggest that all banks and financial service providers should be required to display the full cost of a transfer upfront, showing both fixed fees and exchange rate mark-ups. Wise also calls for a ban on advertising that implies transfers are "fee-free" when costs are actually embedded in the exchange rate. It believes that standardising how prices are displayed would make it easier for consumers and businesses to compare service providers effectively, and that key terms like "mid-market exchange rate" should be clearly defined to maintain consistency across the sector. The G20 has also cited the importance of enhancing cross-border payments, arguing that faster, cheaper, more transparent and more inclusive services would benefit citizens and economies worldwide by supporting economic growth, trade, development, and financial inclusion. Wise referenced this international perspective to highlight the relevance of its recommendations in the New Zealand context. Committee consideration The Financial Markets Conduct Amendment Bill 2025 remains before the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee, which is expected to report later in the year. Wise, supported by the data from its commissioned research, is urging policymakers to act in order to address what it sees as a lack of transparency and competition in cross-border payments. The company's submission is part of a wider movement across several jurisdictions to regulate and clarify the costs of international money transfers and currency exchanges, amid projections of growing sums lost to hidden fees in the years ahead.
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Wise Urges Parliament To Act On Misleading Foreign Transaction Fees That Cost Kiwis Hundreds Of Millions Each Year
As the Financial Markets Conduct Amendment Bill 2025 moves through parliament, Wise highlights the full scale of the problem to MPs Wellington: Wise is calling for more transparency and fairness on foreign transactions, as New Zealand consumers and businesses continue to be ripped off by hidden fees. In a submission to Parliament's Finance and Expenditure Select Committee on the Financial Markets Conduct Amendment Bill 2025, Wise explains how banks claim to provide 'fee-free' cross currency services while hiding true costs behind inflated transfer rates. According to research by Edgar, Dunn & Company, commissioned by Wise, New Zealand consumers lost a total of NZD 667 million due to hidden FX payment fees in 2023, with this figure projected to increase to NZD 991 million by 2029.1 Tristan Dakin, Country Manager ANZ at Wise says: 'New Zealanders think they're getting a good deal because they see 'no fees' or 'zero commission'. But the real cost is hidden in the exchange rate mark-up, which can be vastly different to the rate you find on Google. By ensuring more transparency, parliament can put millions back into the wallets of consumers, while removing barriers for small businesses that want to expand internationally.' Growing push to tackle hidden FX While there are no current laws in place in New Zealand to address the issue, momentum for change is growing. Last year, the NZ Commerce Commission said there 'appears to be room to improve competition' in the space. And internationally, the G20 is acting on its roadmap for making international payments cheaper, faster, and more transparent. Dakin adds: 'What the banks are doing right now is unfair, misleading, and is somehow perfectly legal. That needs to change, or they will continue to take an unfair share from Kiwi consumers and businesses. With the Financial Markets Conduct Amendment Bill 2025 and the growing international calls for reform, it's only a matter of time before governments all around the world take action on misleading FX fees. New Zealand has an incredible opportunity to set an example for the rest of the world. These proposed reforms offer a practical, low-cost solution that would help Kiwis make better choices and save money, while driving competition and innovation in the space', says Dakin. The Bill is currently before Parliament's Finance and Expenditure Committee which is due to report on 19 October. Wise is calling for the following changes: Require banks and financial service providers to show the full cost of a transfer upfront, including both fixed fees and exchange rate markups. Ban advertising that claims transfers are 'fee-free' when a fee is hidden in the exchange rate. Standardise how pricing is shown, so people can compare providers easily. Define key terms like 'mid-market exchange rate' to ensure consistency. 1 The 2023 hidden fee data from Edgar, Dunn, and Company (EDC) were calculated based on the exchange rate margin offered by the largest banks in New Zealand when their customers move money from the country. Fee data from 2024 to 2029 are projected based on expected GDP growth of New Zealand. About Wise: Wise is a global technology company, building the best way to move and manage the world's money. Wise has more than 400,000 active New Zealand customers. With Wise Account and Wise Business, people and businesses can hold 40 currencies, move money between countries and spend money abroad. Large companies and banks use Wise technology too; an entirely new network for the world's money. One of the world's fastest growing, profitable tech companies, Wise launched in 2011 and is listed on the London Stock Exchange under the ticker, WISE. In fiscal year 2025, Wise supported around 14.8 million personal customers and 700,000 business customers, processing approximately £145.2 billion in cross-border transactions, and saving customers an estimated £2 billion.
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Leading Employment Platform Urges New Zealand Businesses To Prepare For ‘Wage Secrecy' Changes
Press Release – Employment Hero With New Zealands pay transparency bill gaining momentum, Employment Hero urges businesses to get ahead by doing three things – reviewing pay structures, updating employment contracts, and preparing clear explanations of how pay is determined. Wellington Global employment authority Employment Hero, a leading people, payroll and benefits software provider, has encouraged New Zealand employers to prepare for The Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Bill before it comes into effect. The bill aims to prevent employers from enforcing pay secrecy clauses in employment contracts, making it legal for employees to openly discuss their salaries without fear of reprisal. The National Party backed the bill at its first reading and signalled during the second reading debate that it would maintain its support, increasing the likelihood that the bill will become law. 'The legislation is designed to promote greater pay transparency and equality, helping to identify and address unjustified pay disparities. While it's a welcome change that will bring New Zealand in line with countries that have implemented similar measures, such as Australia and the UK, employers should take proactive steps now to prepare for if the Bill passes,' said Sanam Ahmadzadeh Salmani, Employment Counsel at Employment Hero and workplace law commentator. 'This is an opportunity for employers to drive better pay transparency and better outcomes for both businesses and employees. Aligning with the legislation will not only ensure compliance if and when required but can also improve employee satisfaction and retention. Employees want to know they're being treated fairly and businesses that embrace this change will likely see stronger engagement and loyalty. 'By preparing and making any changes before the Bill passes, employers will be on the front foot and can avoid being caught out later down the track,' added Ahmadzadeh Salmani. Ahmadzadeh Salmani highlights three key actions employers should take to prepare: Conduct a pay review 'Start by reviewing your current pay structures – look for any discrepancies and understand the reasons behind them – whether it's due to role differences, experience or something else. Being proactive here will help you not only stay compliant, but to spot payroll red flags early,' advises Ahmadzadeh Salmani. Review employment contracts 'Employers should also review employment agreements for any clauses that restrict pay discussions. These might not be labelled as 'pay secrecy' and they could be buried under general confidentiality or remuneration clauses. Having a clear plan of what needs updating now puts you in a better legal position once the Bill is passed,' adds Ahmadzadeh Salmani. Prepare clear explanations 'Transparency doesn't stop at removing secrecy clauses. Employers need to be ready to explain how pay is determined and what data or criteria is used, how performance factors in and how employees can progress. This builds trust and reduces confusion or resentment,' she adds. Employment Hero provides free resources to New Zealand businesses on employment law updates and compliance via its website. The latest resource, including Employee Remuneration Disclosure can be found here. About Employment Hero Employment Hero is revolutionising the world of work with the introduction of the world's first Employment Operating System (eOS), a solution designed to address the $20 billion problem of inefficient employment processes globally. eOS is the next generation of employment technology, a revolutionary system that simplifies and automates complex employment processes, allowing businesses to streamline workflows, reduce administrative burden, and focus on growth Employment Hero services over 300,000 businesses globally and its core platform reduces admin time by up to 80%. By launching employers toward their goals, powering more productive teams and taking employment to rewarding new heights, Employment Hero is revolutionising the employment marketplace.
