CPI not qualified to talk on AIADMK-BJP alliance: EPS
Mr. Palaniswami was reacting to Mr. Mutharasan's charge in Salem last week that the AIADMK leader had aligned with the BJP without consulting others in his party, prompting members to leave the party in recent weeks. Mr. Mutharasan was referring to former AIADMK leaders A. Anwhar Raajhaa and V. Maitreyan joining the DMK recently. 'Mr. Mutharasan (CPI) has no locus standi to talk about our alliance (AIADMK-BJP). What do the ruling DMK and Communist parties have in common in terms of ideology and principles to forge an alliance for polls?' he asked.
Mr. Palaniswami said the Communist parties changed colour according to the political situation. But, the AIADMK's decisions were based on principles. In the 2021 Assembly polls, the AIADMK won 10 seats out of 11 seats in the Salem region despite fighting the election without an alliance,' he claimed
Mr. Palaniswami was referring to the CPI State secretary's assertion that the AIADMK would be routed in Salem region, including Mr. Palaniswami's home turf of Edappadi constituency in the 2026 poll.
Highlighting the steady increase in prices of essential commodities, the AIADMK leader blamed DMK president and Chief Minister M.K. Stalin for not taking effective steps to contain inflation. On the other hand, under his leadership, the AIADMK regime kept prices under control even during the pandemic (COVID-19) by creating a Price Stabilisation Fund. Essential commodities were brought from other States and sold at lower prices to meet the demand in Tamil Nadu. This helped contain the rising prices. 'The DMK is only good at bringing down the curtains on good initiatives like Amma clinics launched by the AIADMK. They (DMK) closed 2,000 such clinics in Tamil Nadu, but once the AIADMK returns to power in 2026, 4,000 AMMA clinics will be opened,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Round-table discussion planned on Friday on implications of U.S. tariff policies for Kerala
A round-table discussion is being organised in the capital on Friday at the behest of the State government to identify the sector-specific risks and mitigation strategies in connection with the Kerala-specific implications of the U.S. tariffs on India. Organised by the Gulati Institute of Finance and Taxation, an autonomous institute under the Finance Department (GIFT), and the Kerala State Planning Board, the round table will assess, among other things, the direct and indirect impacts of the 'penal tariffs' on Kerala's export sectors, particularly the agriculture sector, marine products and spice-based commodities. Finance Minister K.N. Balagopal will inaugurate the round table discussion on 'The impact of U.S. penal tariffs with a special focus on Kerala' at Hotel Mascot here on Friday. Earlier this month, Mr. Balagopal had warned that the looming 'tariff war' could have harder economic impacts than COVID-19 and urged GIFT to organise the round table to chart the way forward for the State. The round table aims to generate actionable ideas for strengthening the State's economic resilience in an era of shifting global alignments and politicised trade by bringing together different stakeholders from academia, industry and policy circles, GIFT said. 'Tariffs on fisheries, coir, textiles, tea, coffee and spices, among others, threaten the rural export economy, while parallel concerns such as potential tightening of U.S. immigration (H1B) policies amplify the risks,' according to GIFT. The double whammy of reduced export demand and softened remittance inflows jeopardise growth prospects, public finances and social stability, it added. Sector-specific risks, especially for MSME-dominated export clusters, opportunities for trade diversification, value addition and digital market access as strategic responses to trade realignments, will come up for discussion at the event. It is also expected that a major outcome of the event will be policy recommendations that can be submitted to the State government and the Union Ministry of Commerce. Representatives of commodity boards, export promotion councils, industry associations, and policy think-tanks are expected at the one-day event.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Elon Musk Wants to Give You Money for Nothing
A Journal report last week explained how tech titans, including Tesla's Elon Musk and OpenAI's Sam Altman, envision a 'massive wealth-redistribution system' to placate worries over technology displacing human work. Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey and Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes have spent millions in recent years on pilot projects that offer unconditional monthly cash payments to low-income people. Software billionaire Marc Benioff, another 'evangelist for universal basic income,' according to the Journal, 'sees Covid-19 stimulus checks as a model for broader income distribution.' Oh, brother. It's often forgotten that in the early days of the country's 'war on poverty,' the general understanding was that you alleviate privation by reducing dependency on the government and creating incentives to become more productive. The goal was 'to help our less fortunate citizens to help themselves,' President John F. Kennedy said. 'We must find ways of returning far more of our dependent people to independence.' Paying people not to work might lift families above the poverty line, but it also increases dependency. In the 1960s and '70s, as welfare-state programs proliferated, the number of people receiving public assistance more than doubled. Giving out money for nothing is a concept typically associated with the political left. Yet over the decades luminaries on the right—Richard Nixon, Milton Friedman, Charles Murray—have advocated policies that would provide a federally guaranteed income floor and relieve able-bodied adults of the need to work. Given the economic uncertainty surrounding AI, the idea of a social insurance program in the form of a minimum level of income for everyone has an understandable appeal. But be wary of tech moguls preaching supposedly altruistic wealth-redistribution schemes to burnish their public image. As with the environmental, social and governance advocacy, there's an agenda beneath the happy talk. Silicon Valley would do better to focus less on some liberal concept of social responsibility and more on innovations that will improve productivity and produce profits for shareholders. Mr. Musk and company didn't become rich at the expense of the poor, and taking from workers to give to those who refuse to work is a recipe for resentment and a bumper crop of layabouts. Some argue that we already have a kind of guaranteed-income system that's implemented haphazardly via hundreds of welfare programs at the federal, state and local levels. A single unrestricted cash-transfer system that replaces the welfare state bureaucracy, the thinking goes, would be more efficient. Unfortunately, the country's thriving poverty industry, which includes powerful lobbyists and politicians who get elected to protect it, are unlikely to take that trade. The more probable outcome is that an income guarantee would be added to the hundreds of existing entitlement programs instead of replacing them. Nor do we have any reason to believe that issuing no-strings-attached cash stipends to poor families works as intended. 'Significant but indirect evidence has suggested that unconditional cash aid would help children flourish,' the New York Times reported last month. 'But now a rigorous experiment, in a more direct test, found that years of monthly payments did nothing to boost children's well-being, a result that defied researchers' predictions.' The study, titled 'Baby's First Years,' concluded that after four years of monthly payments of $333, children whose parents received money 'fared no better than similar children without that help.' Co-author Greg J. Duncan, an economist at the University of California, Irvine, told the Times that he was 'very surprised—we were all very surprised' by the results. 'The money did not make a difference.' That study didn't find that mothers worked less, but other research involving larger stipends has concluded they can negatively affect work habits. Last year, the National Bureau of Economic Research published a working paper on the employment effects of guaranteed income, which was described as the most comprehensive study of its kind to date. Researchers found that families who received $1,000 monthly payments for three years worked fewer hours. The problem America faces today is a lack of work incentives, and that problem is exacerbated by government programs that make not working more attractive than getting a job. 'Nearly 7 million men in the prime of life—over a tenth of the 25-to-54 age group—are neither working nor looking for work these days,' writes Nicholas Eberstadt of the American Enterprise Institute. 'Today, for every 'prime age' man who is actually unemployed—out of a job but looking—there are three who are neither working nor looking for work.' The reasons for this are complex, but it isn't hard to understand why giving people more money to live on without working won't help matters.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Justice Sudershan Reddy, a man of the masses, says Speaker Appavu
Justifying the DMK's decision to support joint Opposition parties' Vice-Presidential candidate Sudershan Reddy, a 'man of the masses', Tamil Nadu Assembly Speaker M. Appavu has slammed the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance for reposing its faith in a 'RSS man', who has done nothing good for Tamil Nadu and the Tamils even though he is from this State. After garlanding the statue of freedom fighter Ondieervan at the memorial in Palayamkottai on Wednesday, Mr. Appavu said, Justice Reddy had passed a judgment that the governments, while taking back the lands assigned to the poor after a period, should ensure the disbursal of all compensation applicable to other patta lands, including compensation for structures if any created on the land. His judgment also paved way for the constitution of Special Investigation Team to retrieve the black money stashed in foreign banks. When Ambani brothers fought over winning the rights for oil and gas exploration in Krishna Godhavari Basin, Justice Sudershan Reddy's judgment stopped their attempt by giving the rights to Oil and Natural Gas Commission, a public sector undertaking. His ruling in 2010 on this issue led to Mukesh Ambani paying a hefty fine a couple of years ago. On the question of supporting Mr. Radhakrishnan, a Tamilian, the Speaker wondered if the BJP leaders from Tamil Nadu, including Union Minister L. Murugan and party's State president Nainar Nagenthiran had done anything good for the State and the Tamils. 'Will Mr. Radhakrishnan, if elected, take any effective step to permanently end the frequent attacks on the Tamil fishermen by the SriLankan navy? What did Mr. Murugan and Mr. Nainar Nagenthiran do to get Tamil Nadu's share of ₹2,151 crore under the Samagra Siksha Abhiyan from the Union Government?,' Mr. Appavu asked. On the Bill introduced in the Parliament on Wednesday by Home Minister Amit Shah empowering the Governors to sack Chief Ministers and the Ministers if they were held on serious charges and kept in custody for 30 days, the Speaker replied that it was nothing but ploy by the BJP government at the Centre to crush political opponents troubling the Union Government.
