Best money market account rates today, August 15, 2025 (up to 4.41% APY return)
It's more important than ever to compare MMA rates and ensure you earn as much as possible on your balance.
A look at the best money market account rates today
Although money market account rates are elevated by historical standards, the national average rate for MMAs is just 0.62%, according to the FDIC. The good news: Top high-yield money market accounts offer well over 4% APY — more than six times the national average.
That's why it's important to shop around before opening a money market account. Interest rates vary widely, but there are several banks (in particular, online banks) and credit unions with highly competitive offers.
Here's a look at some of the top MMA rates available today:Additionally, the table below features some of the best savings and money market account rates available today from our verified partners.
This embedded content is not available in your region.
Why do online banks have the best money market account rates?
Online banks operate exclusively via the web. This significantly reduces their overhead costs, so they're able to pass those savings onto customers in the form of high deposit rates and low fees. If you're searching for the best money market account rates, online banks are a great place to start.
That said, online banks aren't the only place you can find savings accounts with rates of 4% to 5% APY. Credit unions are not-for-profit financial cooperatives, and are also know for providing competitive rates and fewer fees. Many credit unions have certain requirements that must be met in order to become a member, though there are some that allow just about anyone to join.
Read more: Are online banks really safe?
Should you open a money market account?
Money market accounts can be a great option for short-term savings goals, like building an emergency fund or setting aside money for an upcoming expense. They generally offer higher interest rates than regular savings accounts, and they provide easier access to your money compared to some other options like certificates of deposit (CDs).
Money market accounts are also considered low-risk, and they are FDIC-insured up to the standard $250,000 per depositor, per institution. This makes them safer than money market funds, which can be subject to market risk.
However, keep in mind that many money market accounts require a minimum balance to open the account and earn the highest advertised rate. If you can't maintain this balance, you might incur fees or miss out on the best rates.
And although you can generally access your funds as needed, MMAs may limit the number of transactions you can make each month. If you need frequent access to your money, this might be a consideration.
Read more: Is there a penalty for withdrawing from your money market account?
When a money market account makes sense:
You want to earn more interest than a regular savings account without locking up your money in a CD.
You can maintain the minimum balance to avoid fees.
You want to keep funds easily accessible for emergencies or near-term expenses.
Frequently asked questions — money market rates
What are money market interest rates right now?
Currently, the average money market account rate is 0.63%. However, several high-yield accounts pay upwards of 4% or more. If you're considering opening a money market account, be sure to shop around and compare rates.
Where can I get 12% interest?
There is no one account or investment that guarantees a 12% return. However, if your goal is to earn a strong return on your money and grow your wealth significantly, investing in market securities such as stocks, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds is the best strategy for doing so. The stock market returns about 10% per year, on average.
If you aren't sure where to start, it can be helpful to speak with a financial advisor about your financial goals and priorities. Alternatively, you can sign up with a robo-advisor, which is an automated, cost-effective option for managing your portfolio.
Read more: Robo-advisor: How to start investing right away
This embedded content is not available in your region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
First Eagle Investments Announces Closing of Majority Investment by Genstar Capital
Firm enters a new phase in its evolution while preserving its independence and investment-led culture NEW YORK, August 18, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--First Eagle Investments ("First Eagle"), an independent, privately owned investment management firm, today announced the closing of a majority investment in the company by private equity funds managed by Genstar Capital ("Genstar"), a leading private equity firm focused on targeted segments of the financial services, software, healthcare and industrials sectors. First announced in March, the deal bolsters First Eagle's ongoing strategy of investing in its core business while also thoughtfully expanding the range of high-quality, differentiated investment solutions available to clients globally. With approximately $161 billion in assets under management as of June 30, 2025, First Eagle manages equity, fixed income, alternative credit and multi-asset strategies grounded in a benchmark-agnostic, downside-aware approach. "This is an exciting moment for First Eagle," said Mehdi Mahmud, President and Chief Executive Officer. "Genstar's partnership will accelerate the pace at which we expand our investment capabilities and client reach, both organically and through acquisitions, without compromising our independence and autonomy. Our commitment to client outcomes remains undivided, and we expect this new dynamic will enhance the value we are able to deliver to them." "We've long admired First Eagle's thoughtful approach to building enduring client relationships," said Tony Salewski, Managing Partner of Genstar Capital. "As majority investor, we're excited to support Mehdi and the team as they build on that foundation—scaling the firm's strengths, pursuing thoughtful growth, and continuing to meet the evolving needs of investors with clarity and conviction." The closing also marks the successful exit of previous majority owners Blackstone and Corsair, which first invested in First Eagle in 2015. Over nearly a decade of partnership, First Eagle broadly diversified its product suite—most notably through the acquisition of alternative credit capabilities—and expanded its distribution footprint across institutional and wealth channels. First Eagle's leadership will continue to oversee the firm's day-to-day operations and set its strategic direction, with the philosophy and culture of its investment teams unchanged. First Eagle's leadership team has retained a meaningful ownership stake in the firm, underscoring its ongoing commitment to the company's success as it enters its next phase of growth alongside Genstar. About First Eagle Investments First Eagle Investments is an independent, privately owned investment management firm headquartered in New York with approximately $161 billion in assets under management as of June 30, 2025. Dedicated to providing prudent stewardship of client assets, the firm focuses on active, fundamental and benchmark-agnostic investing, with a strong emphasis on downside mitigation. With a heritage dating back to 1864, First Eagle strives to help clients avoid permanent impairment of capital and earn attractive returns through widely varied economic cycles. The firm's investment capabilities include equity, fixed income, alternative credit and multi-asset strategies. For more information, please visit About Genstar Capital Genstar Capital ( is a leading private equity firm that has been actively investing in high-quality companies for over 30 years. Based in San Francisco, Genstar works in partnership with its management teams and its network of strategic advisors to transform its portfolio companies into industry-leading businesses. Genstar currently has approximately $50 billion of assets under management and targets investments focused on targeted segments of the financial services, software, healthcare, and industrials industries. With the investment from Genstar, First Eagle joins a portfolio of leading platforms within the investment management ecosystem, including ACA Group, Apex Group, Ascensus, Cerity Partners, Cetera Financial Group, Docupace, Mercer Advisors, Numerix, Orion and others. About Blackstone Blackstone is the world's largest alternative asset manager. Blackstone seeks to deliver compelling returns for institutional and individual investors by strengthening the companies in which the firm invests. Blackstone's $1.2 trillion in assets under management include global investment strategies focused on real estate, private equity, credit, infrastructure, life sciences, growth equity, secondaries and hedge funds. Further information is available at Follow @blackstone on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), and Instagram. About Corsair Corsair is a specialist investment firm offering opportunities for investors and solutions for companies across its private markets Buyouts and Infrastructure businesses. The firm's buyouts business is a financial services investor focused on making control investments in three verticals: Payments, Software, and Business Services. The infrastructure business operates as a strategic partnership with Investcorp as of December 2023. Investcorp Corsair focuses primarily on value-add opportunities in transportation, logistics, and associated infrastructure subsectors, blending operating platforms and deep sectoral expertise with equity sponsorship. Corsair has invested $13.6 billion in capital across buyouts and infrastructure since inception. For more information, please visit and follow us on LinkedIn. View source version on Contacts First Eagle InvestmentsPholida Genstar CapitalFGS GlobalGenstarCapital@ BlackstoneMatt CorsairProsek PartnersTrevor Gibbons/Ryan Smithpro-corsair@
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
AI could deliver $920B in annual net benefits to S&P 500 firms
-- Artificial intelligence could generate annual net benefits of roughly $920 billion for S&P 500 companies, according to Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS). The bank said in a note Monday that its analysis points to '$13-16 trillion in long-term market value creation potential for the S&P 500' driven by AI adoption. The report highlights that '90% of occupations will to some degree be impacted by AI automation and augmentation,' with the potential benefits coming from both cost reductions and productivity gains. Morgan Stanley noted that agentic AI, essentially software-based applications, will likely have 'a broader impact on jobs relative to embodied AI,' with greater scope for augmentation rather than outright replacement. Sector exposure is said to vary widely. The bank found that Consumer Staples Distribution/Retail, Real Estate Management & Development, and Transportation could each see savings above 100% of estimated 2026 pretax earnings. Health Care Equipment & Services was also flagged as a major beneficiary. By contrast, Technology Hardware & Equipment and Semiconductors show relatively muted effects. Morgan Stanley emphasised that the value creation potential, equal to 24-29% of current S&P 500 market capitalisation, is 'fundamentally bullish for AI enablers and adopters.' It added that the return on the roughly $3 trillion in expected global AI capex through 2028 in areas such as data centres and chips 'is attractive.' While the $920 billion figure represents a full-adoption scenario that may take years to achieve, the bank argued that the long-term opportunity is likely far larger. 'AI adoption market value creation potential, beyond the confines of the S&P 500, is likely to be multiples of the $13-16 trillion,' Morgan Stanley said. Related articles AI could deliver $920B in annual net benefits to S&P 500 firms Madrigal stock falls after Novo Nordisk's Wegovy wins FDA approval for MASH Evercore ISI initiates tactical calls on BJ's, Target and Lowe's ahead of earnings
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
The Great Gambling Class Action Wave: A Payout For Lawyers, Not Players
Class action lawsuits in the gambling industry are everywhere, but a closer look reveals a startling truth: They have become a new, industrialized legal business model where the lawyers get paid, but most players see little to nothing. From DraftKings to sweepstakes casinos, law firms are filing often, promising justice and accountability for operators. The headlines certainly make it sound like players are winning big. We hear of a $155 million settlement against Big Fish Games, a $12 million payment from FanDuel and DraftKings, and a $3.5 million settlement from SpinX Games. Even Coinbase paid $2.25 million over a crypto sweepstakes controversy. But these numbers tell only half the story. The journey from a lawsuit filing to a meaningful payout is a brutal one for class members, but often a highly profitable one for the legal firms behind the litigation. The filing frenzy: a numbers game The class action landscape is a numbers game. While filing a lawsuit might seem straightforward, the journey is not. According to empirical studies, nearly four out of every five lawsuits initially filed as class actions are never actually certified. That's an 80% failure rate right out of the gate. These cases are often dismissed or revert to individual claims too small to pursue economically. As John Holden, a law professor at Oklahoma State University, explains, 'When you announce that you're filing a class action lawsuit against DraftKings or a sweepstakes company, you're at the starter pistol of an ultra marathon.' This high-volume, high-risk approach is particularly evident in the gambling industry. Multiple class actions against VGW Holdings (the company behind LuckyLand Slots and Chumba Casino) were dismissed, often due to enforceable arbitration clauses that force disputes into individual arbitration, fundamentally undermining the class action's purpose. This industrialized approach to litigation — where a law firm files a similar case against different companies dozens of times — is a strategy of volume. The hope is that a few will survive the 'significant early filters' of the motion to dismiss and motion for class certification, which the Institute for Legal Reform highlights as key hurdles. Another issue: making sure people in the 'class' want to be part of the whole shebang. 'Class actions do have a number of unique hurdles, such as class certification motions and fairness hearings, that we don't see in other forms of litigation, but it's due to the fact that attorneys are hoping to represent individuals who usually haven't affirmatively opted in to such a representation and will lose the right to sue individually if they don't opt out of the class,' said Evan Davis, head of the gaming and sports practice at Royer Cooper Cohen Braunfeld LLC. 'The court needs to ensure that these individuals are being treated fairly by the court system and that they are receiving an appropriate benefit from the litigation.' The settlement reality check Even when cases survive and result in settlements, the outcomes for individual players are often underwhelming. A study of federal court class actions found that in over half of all cases studied, members of the proposed class received zero relief. When settlements are reached, the gap between the headline amount and what players actually receive is enormous. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reported that the median claims rate was just 9% in 2019. For settlements involving over 2.7 million class members, the average claims rate dropped to a mere 1.4%, as reported by Harvard Law professor William B. Rubenstein. This leaves a significant portion of the settlement pool unclaimed. While the lawyers take a guaranteed, substantial cut — often in the millions — the payouts for individuals are typically modest, often in the double and low triple digits. The low participation rates are due to practical frustrations: Settlement notifications often look like junk mail, and the claim process can be onerous. The extended timeline of class action litigation, which adds 'many additional months to your case,' as Holden said, also creates financial pressure that pushes firms toward settlement. 'They take even longer than regular litigation because you've got to go find the class, you've got to get the class certified,' Holden noted. 'So basically you're having this other legal process play out before you get to the next legal process. You're adding on many additional months to your case.' This extended timeline creates financial pressure, especially when facing well-resourced defendants. 'If you were to bring a class action against Google or something, they have infinite money — they can litigate forever if they wanted to,' Holden explained. 'Certainly the top tiers of the gambling industry are incredibly well resourced, so efficiency sort of pushes towards settlement for a lot of these.' As one analysis noted, sweepstakes casino operators 'will invariably settle' to avoid a jury trial that could fundamentally dismantle their business models. This creates a cycle where companies pay to continue operating while plaintiffs' attorneys develop increasingly sophisticated strategies for the next round of litigation. But settling may be losing some luster, Davis points out. 'Some of the recent gaming-related class actions that have been filed are somewhat unique because they are being brought pursuant to state laws and in some cases limited to individuals within certain states — they are not traditional nationwide class actions like you'd typically see in antitrust or pharmaceutical cases,' Davis said. 'This means that a settlement of one case won't necessarily affect the cases that have been filed alleging violations of other states' laws, which in turn means that a defendant may be less likely to settle because it will still be incurring significant legal costs in defending the remaining cases.' The new legal playbook Gaming companies aren't sitting idle. The rise of this legal cottage industry has spurred a sophisticated defense playbook that goes well beyond seeking quick settlements. Arbitration clauses have become powerful weapons, forcing disputes into individual arbitration rather than collective lawsuits. Perhaps the most intriguing development is the increasing use of civil RICO claims. Attorneys are drawing parallels to successful litigation against the opioid industry, alleging that gambling companies use systemic fraudulent practices to foster addiction. The approach got a boost when Schlesinger Law Offices publicly committed to taking legal action against online sports betting platforms, explicitly drawing parallels to their work against Big Tobacco and stating their intent to pursue companies for 'allegedly pushing problem gamblers into debt through deceptive, predatory, and harmful business practices.' Holden sees these cases as potentially a world apart from typical consumer protection class actions. 'When you see particular individuals associated with them, like a lawyer who litigated tobacco litigation, it triggers that this is perhaps different than some of these other ones that are out there,' he said. This is a stark contrast to the historical context of gambling litigation, where compulsive gamblers had a 'long, unsuccessful history' of lawsuits against the industry. The rapid expansion of online gambling has created new vulnerabilities that this new legal cottage industry is actively exploiting. The great gambling class action wave is not about to end. As long as the potential for multimillion-dollar legal fees exists, a steady stream of lawsuits from opportunistic lawyers will follow. For the law firms involved, the odds are in their favor, as this is a high-volume business. But for individual players hoping for significant compensation, the odds remain stubbornly long — much like the games themselves.
