logo
Davey proposes major shake-up of green energy contracts to ‘slash bills'

Davey proposes major shake-up of green energy contracts to ‘slash bills'

Sir Ed Davey will propose that all green energy projects be moved to a Government subsidy scheme in a speech accusing Nigel Farage and Kemi Badenoch of peddling 'myths' about net zero.
The Liberal Democrat leader will call for a 'rapid' transition to Contracts for Difference (CfD), which work by guaranteeing generators a fixed 'strike price' for electricity regardless of the wholesale price.
CfDs are awarded by Government auction to firms bidding to produce renewable energy for the UK grid, with developers either paid a subsidy up to the strike price or repaying the surplus while the market price fluctuates.
In a speech at the Institute for Public Policy Research think tank, Sir Ed will say that only 15% of green power is produced under such contracts, with the rest still coming from an old legacy scheme.
The 2002 Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROC) scheme, which does not involve a strike price guarantee, closed to new generation in 2017 but still governs some projects on contracts due to expire by 2037.
Sir Ed will argue that the ROC scheme was introduced 'when ministers didn't have the foresight to realise that renewable power would get so much cheaper over the next two decades'.
He will call on ministers to move all legacy agreements on to CfD, saying the transition would slash household energy bills by 'breaking the link' between gas prices and electricity costs.
The party leader is expected to say: 'People are currently paying too much for renewable energy.
'But not for the reasons Nigel Farage would have you believe.
'Because generating electricity from solar or wind is now significantly cheaper than gas – even when you factor in extra system costs for back-up power when the wind isn't blowing or the sun isn't shining.
'But people aren't seeing the benefit of cheap renewable power, because wholesale electricity prices are still tied to the price of gas.'
Sir Ed will add: 'Unlike Contracts for Difference, companies with ROCs get paid the wholesale price – in other words, the price of gas – with a subsidy on top.
'Subsidies paid through levies on our energy bills – costing a typical household around £90 a year.'
The Lib Dem leader will describe the legacy system as 'manifestly unfair' for consumers and call on the Government to 'start today a rapid process of moving all those old ROC renewable projects on to new Contracts for Difference.'
Taking aim at the Reform UK and Tory leaders, who have both expressed scepticism about the Government pledge to achieve net zero by 2050, Sir Ed will say: 'The narrative – seized upon by Nigel Farage and Kemi Badenoch – says the reason energy bills are so high is that we're investing too much in renewable power.
'And if we just stopped that investment – and relied more on oil and gas instead – bills would magically come down for everyone.
'The experience of record high gas prices in recent years shows that's not true… we know that tying ourselves ever more to fossil fuels would only benefit foreign dictators like Vladimir Putin – which is probably why Farage is so keen on it.
'But refusing to engage hasn't stopped his myths from spreading, from gaining traction in the new world of fake news. So we must change that.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Votes at 16 policy ‘hopelessly confused', claim Conservatives
Votes at 16 policy ‘hopelessly confused', claim Conservatives

Leader Live

time20 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Votes at 16 policy ‘hopelessly confused', claim Conservatives

Paul Holmes asked in the Commons why the Government plans to lower the voting age while 16 and 17-year-olds are not allowed to buy lottery tickets or alcohol. He summoned democracy minister Rushanara Ali to the despatch box to take questions about the Government's plans, which it had originally set out in a written statement. Conservative shadow housing, communities and local government minister Mr Holmes told MPs: 'This strategy has finally revealed their ambition for allowing a 16-year-old to vote in an election but not stand in it, probably because young people are being abandoned in droves by the Labour Party. 'So, why does this Government think a 16-year-old can vote but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket, an alcoholic drink, marry, or go to war, or even stand in the elections they're voting in? 'Isn't the Government's position on the age of majority just hopelessly confused?' Responding, Ms Ali said: 'This Government was elected on a manifesto that committed to granting 16-year-olds the right to vote and protecting our democracy from foreign money. 'So, can I remind (Mr Holmes) that his party lost the election in the worst general election defeat for decades? It's no wonder that the party opposite are scared of the electorate. 'The truth is, young people deserve to have stake and to have a say in the future of our democracy. Young people can vote for any party they like, and it speaks volumes that (Mr Holmes) would prefer for them to be silenced.' Ministers will bring forward a bill before 2029 which will include extending the right to vote to 16 and 17-year olds, and work to create a system of automated voter registration, according to the Government. Teenagers aged 16 or over can already vote in Holyrood, Senedd and local government elections in Wales and Scotland, but not in UK parliamentary elections. The Government has also vowed to close 'loopholes' which allow foreign donors to give political parties money through UK-based companies. Ms Ali said the Conservatives 'sat in government for 14 years and did nothing to close the gaping loopholes allowing foreign interference and foreign money to enter' the system. She later set out that the Government would 'give courts the powers to increase sentences for those who are hostile to candidates', and added: 'An aggravated factor for intimidatory offence will be introduced allowing courts to pass proper sentences. 'We will also remove the requirement to publish addresses of candidates, and we will consult with the Crown Prosecution Service and Sentencing Council and other judicial bodies.' Mr Holmes had earlier asked why the Government had chosen to announce the changes in writing. 'Instead of the democracy minister using this democratic chamber to announce a new wide-ranging strategy on democracy, the Government chose to announce it to the press in the Monday Number 10 lobby briefing, typical of Government by press release,' he said. 'Why has there been no consultation of political parties to date?' Liberal Democrat Cabinet Office spokeswoman Sarah Olney said there are 'many aspects' of the proposals which her party supports. She asked: 'Will they finally scrap first-past-the-post and introduce fair votes via proportional representation?' Ms Ali replied: 'The Government has no plans to change the electoral system for UK parliamentary and local elections.' The minister also took a question about banning cryptocurrency donations. Labour former minister Liam Byrne said: 'I welcome the measures to take out dark money from our politics, but they will mean nothing unless we move forward aggressively to ban cryptocurrency donations into British politics. 'They are used for money laundering, they are used to disguise dark money, they have no role in British politics. Will she confirm the elections bill will ban cryptocurrency donations?' Ms Ali said: 'Our reforms on political finance to further strengthen our democracy will apply to all donations, regardless of form, and that includes cryptocurrency.'

Votes at 16 policy ‘hopelessly confused', claim Conservatives
Votes at 16 policy ‘hopelessly confused', claim Conservatives

North Wales Chronicle

time20 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Votes at 16 policy ‘hopelessly confused', claim Conservatives

Paul Holmes asked in the Commons why the Government plans to lower the voting age while 16 and 17-year-olds are not allowed to buy lottery tickets or alcohol. He summoned democracy minister Rushanara Ali to the despatch box to take questions about the Government's plans, which it had originally set out in a written statement. Conservative shadow housing, communities and local government minister Mr Holmes told MPs: 'This strategy has finally revealed their ambition for allowing a 16-year-old to vote in an election but not stand in it, probably because young people are being abandoned in droves by the Labour Party. 'So, why does this Government think a 16-year-old can vote but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket, an alcoholic drink, marry, or go to war, or even stand in the elections they're voting in? 'Isn't the Government's position on the age of majority just hopelessly confused?' Responding, Ms Ali said: 'This Government was elected on a manifesto that committed to granting 16-year-olds the right to vote and protecting our democracy from foreign money. 'So, can I remind (Mr Holmes) that his party lost the election in the worst general election defeat for decades? It's no wonder that the party opposite are scared of the electorate. 'The truth is, young people deserve to have stake and to have a say in the future of our democracy. Young people can vote for any party they like, and it speaks volumes that (Mr Holmes) would prefer for them to be silenced.' Ministers will bring forward a bill before 2029 which will include extending the right to vote to 16 and 17-year olds, and work to create a system of automated voter registration, according to the Government. Teenagers aged 16 or over can already vote in Holyrood, Senedd and local government elections in Wales and Scotland, but not in UK parliamentary elections. The Government has also vowed to close 'loopholes' which allow foreign donors to give political parties money through UK-based companies. Ms Ali said the Conservatives 'sat in government for 14 years and did nothing to close the gaping loopholes allowing foreign interference and foreign money to enter' the system. She later set out that the Government would 'give courts the powers to increase sentences for those who are hostile to candidates', and added: 'An aggravated factor for intimidatory offence will be introduced allowing courts to pass proper sentences. 'We will also remove the requirement to publish addresses of candidates, and we will consult with the Crown Prosecution Service and Sentencing Council and other judicial bodies.' Mr Holmes had earlier asked why the Government had chosen to announce the changes in writing. 'Instead of the democracy minister using this democratic chamber to announce a new wide-ranging strategy on democracy, the Government chose to announce it to the press in the Monday Number 10 lobby briefing, typical of Government by press release,' he said. 'Why has there been no consultation of political parties to date?' Liberal Democrat Cabinet Office spokeswoman Sarah Olney said there are 'many aspects' of the proposals which her party supports. She asked: 'Will they finally scrap first-past-the-post and introduce fair votes via proportional representation?' Ms Ali replied: 'The Government has no plans to change the electoral system for UK parliamentary and local elections.' The minister also took a question about banning cryptocurrency donations. Labour former minister Liam Byrne said: 'I welcome the measures to take out dark money from our politics, but they will mean nothing unless we move forward aggressively to ban cryptocurrency donations into British politics. 'They are used for money laundering, they are used to disguise dark money, they have no role in British politics. Will she confirm the elections bill will ban cryptocurrency donations?' Ms Ali said: 'Our reforms on political finance to further strengthen our democracy will apply to all donations, regardless of form, and that includes cryptocurrency.'

World's largest crane ‘Big Carl' lifts reactor dome into place at Hinkley Point C
World's largest crane ‘Big Carl' lifts reactor dome into place at Hinkley Point C

Glasgow Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

World's largest crane ‘Big Carl' lifts reactor dome into place at Hinkley Point C

The crane, nicknamed Big Carl, lifted the 14-metre tall steel construction onto Hinkley Point C's second reactor building. The placement of the dome allows the fit-out of the 44-metre-high second reactor to accelerate. Big Carl, the world's largest crane, was used to lift the dome into the second reactor at Hinkley Point C (Ben Birchall/PA) The twin nuclear reactors at the site in Somerset will provide reliable zero-carbon electricity for more than six million homes, boosting Britain's energy security for decades to come. The Government has recently committed to building the Sizewell C plant in Suffolk and the development of new small modular reactors (SMRs). Stuart Crooks, chief executive officer of Hinkley Point C, said: 'Restarting the industry has been hard, but the second of our two identical units shows the big benefits of repeating an identical design. 'Build and repeat is the best way to build new nuclear with time savings already at 20% to 30%. 'All our experience and innovation will benefit Sizewell C from the start.' When it is completed Hinkley Point C will be the first nuclear power station built in the UK in 30 years (Ben Birchall/PA) Energy minister Michael Shanks added: 'Hinkley Point C will deliver the next generation of clean, homegrown nuclear power, creating high quality jobs and growth in Somerset and across its supply chains.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store