
Bihar SIR: Gopalganj sees largest dip in voters at over 15%, Seemanchal's Kishanganj & Purnia follow
New Delhi: Gopalganj, Kishanganj and Purnia in Bihar saw the highest percentage of voter deletion in the draft rolls released by the Election Commission (EC) pursuant to its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise.
Data pertaining to the exercise shows that while Gopalganj saw a 15.01 percent dip in voters as compared to the numbers that it had on 24 June before the exercise began, Purnia saw a 12.08 percent deletion whereas it was 11.82 percent in Kishanganj. These are followed by Madhubani (10.44 percent) and Bhagalpur (10.19 percent).
Two of these five districts with the highest percentage of voter deletions come under the Seemanchal region, which has the highest percentage of Muslim population in the eastern state. Among Bihar's districts, Kishanganj has the highest Muslim population (68 percent), and Purnia has about 38 percent Muslim population according to the 2001 Census.
The Seemanchal region encompasses four districts of Araria, Kishanganj, Purnia and Katihar. Also referred to as the Kosi-Seemanchal area, it includes Saharsa, Supaul, and Madhepura along with the aforementioned 4 districts.
A district-wise breakdown of the draft electoral roll revision, seen by ThePrint, shows that voters have been deleted at an average of 8.06percent per district. Out of these 7 districts, four—Kishanganj, Purnia, Katihar (8.27 percent) and Saharsa (9.46 percent)—saw deletions above the average percentage of deletions. The remaining three saw deletions below average: Araria (7.59 percent), Supaul (7.81 percent) and Madhepura (6.85 percent).
While Patna district saw the highest dip with 3.95 lakh voters not included in the electoral draft roll, its percentage dip remained below average at 7.84 percent.
The EC has clarified that claims, objections can be filed between 1 August and 1 September to add the name of any eligible elector, or to delete the name of any ineligible elector.
'All eligible electors are appealed to check their names in the draft list, and if their name does not exist in the list, they should fill and submit Form 6 along with the Declaration Form…As per SIR orders, NO NAME CAN BE DELETED from the draft Electoral Roll, by the concerned ERO/AERO without giving a hearing to the elector and subsequently passing a written order, which is appealable to the DM and the CEO,' it said in a press note on 1 August.
The electoral roll exercise is under challenge before the Supreme Court, with pleas filed by several petitioners including Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra, Bharat Jodo Abhiyan national convener Yogendra Yadav, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) MP Manoj Jha, and non-profit organisations Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL).
The petitioners have alleged that the exercise is arbitrary, and have also questioned the timeline as well as the timing of the exercise, with the Bihar elections set to take place later this year. This, they contend, can lead to removal of lakhs of genuine voters, leading to their disenfranchisement.
(Edited by Tony Rai)
Also Read: What an idea, SIRji! 'Dog Babu' gets residence certificate in Bihar, Oppn has a field day
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
21 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Abhishek Banerjee takes lead after new role, holds organisational meets
Synopsis Following his appointment as Trinamool's Lok Sabha leader, Abhishek Banerjee is actively engaging in organizational affairs, aiming to resolve internal conflicts and fortify the party's presence in North Bengal, particularly targeting areas where the BJP holds sway, in preparation for the 2026 assembly elections. He is also focusing on booth-level organization and fair practices. After taking over as Trinamool's leader of Lok Sabha, there is a distinct shift in the party leadership with its national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee taking a more active role in organisational matters, holding meetings with various districts, including Jalpaiguri and Malda leadership, trying to iron out factional feud and target the North Bengal seats, ahead of the 2026 assembly is also focussing on organisational structure and strengthening of the North Bengal districts where BJP has a stronghold. He has held several meetings with Jalpaiguri district party leadership and Malda, where there are warring sections within the Trinamool. On Tuesday, he also held a virtual meeting with several districts and outlined the role of the Trinamool Congress leadership about the proposed Special Intensive Revision, similar to what happened in Bihar, and directed them to identify the booth level officers (BL0s). Abhishek has given a message to party leaders to inform Trinamool state president or his office in case any biased or undemocratic activity is found, sources new role assumes significance ahead of the 2026 polls and amid a feud between Trinamool MPs - Kalyan Banerjee and Mahua Moitra.


Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
The Spectator wins defamation claim brought by Muslim activist who criticised Hindus
TOI correspondent from London : The Spectator magazine and Douglas Murray have won a defamation case brought by a Muslim online influencer who stirred up trouble during the 2022 Leicester riots. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Mohammed Hijab, a YouTuber with 1.3 million followers, whose real name is Mohammed Hegab, claimed that an article in the Spectator about the riots, titled 'Leicester and the downside with diversity' and published in Sept 2022, defamed him. The author, Murray, wrote Hijab was a 'a street agitator' who 'cropped up in Leicester to whip up his followers'. He wrote: 'Among other things he (Hijab) told them that Hindus are ridiculous people, not least because of their belief in reincarnation.' Hijab sued for defamation claiming he lost thousands of pounds in fees as a result of the article. But in a judgment handed down on Tuesday in the high court, Justice Johnson found that what Murray wrote about Hijab is 'substantially true, and it is not materially inaccurate'. Hijab's claim was that his comments were not about Hindus but 'the Hindutva' in Leicester which, Hijab, claimed 'promotes conspiracy theories, including that Muslim men conspire to convert Hindu women to Islam'. Johnson wrote: 'When asked to name anyone in the world who subscribed to the Hindutva ideology but who was not Hindu [Hijab] was able to give only one name: Benjamin Netanyahu.' He also said Hijab 'lied on significant issues, with the consequence that his evidence, overall, is worthless'. Johnson pointed out a video of Hijab's speech in Leicester shows him, 'far more vividly than is conveyed by the words of the article, directly whipping up a large group of masked men and ridiculing Hinduism'.


New Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Remedy for paradox of having umpteen proofs but no identity
The Election Commission's special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar and proposal to extend it to other states have stirred the hornet's nest of identity yet again. But identity challenges being faced by Indians run far deeper than the EC's periodic revisions. For many, it's 'a million mutinies a day' as different authorities periodically unleash their own dream projects on identifying or improvising on the identification of their subjects. Consider the nationwide systems. The passport system commenced in 1920 and was revamped in 1967. In 2024, there were 9.3 crore valid passports. Electoral identification dates back to the first general elections of 1951-52. The first major attempt to issue an Electoral Photo ID Card (EPIC) was initiated by the EC during 1993-96. In 2024, there were 97 crore voters with EPICs for many of them. The Permanent Account Number was introduced by the Central Board of Direct Taxes in 1972, initially as an option but made mandatory for taxpayers from 1976. The latest data says there are 78 crore PAN cards. In the mid-2000s came the brilliant idea of a unique ID for every resident—Aadhaar—using biometric imprints. The Unique Identification Authority of India was set up in 2009 and the first Aadhaar card issued in 2010. After a checkered trajectory, the UIDAI has issued Aadhaar cards to about 135 crore residents. EPIC and passports are treated as universal proofs of identity, date of birth, and address. However, they do not offer universal coverage. EPIC is for citizens above 18 years, while passports cover only about 6.5 percent of the population. PAN, though available to a wider demography, is primarily a specific-purpose identifier for tax and financial transactions, and not an address proof. Aadhaar, with the largest coverage, has become just another ID. While it is accepted for its biometric features, it is neither a proof of nationality nor of date of birth. There are also about 5 dozen other IDs accepted by various state-level authorities. All these IDs suffer from duplication and fakery due to the incentive structures in our ground-level governance systems. Recent reports of the CBI unearthing 8.5 lakh 'mule accounts' across certain banks, likely the tip of an iceberg, and the growing incidence of identity theft in financial crimes reveal deeper structural vulnerabilities of the fragmented and often unreliable identity architecture.