Japan's government to subsidize universities accepting foreign researchers
In response to the moves in the US to cut research personnel and financial aid, universities and other institutions in Japan are stepping up efforts to lure talented researchers abroad to improve their capabilities.
The education ministry will provide a total of 3.3 billion yen, or about 23 million dollars, over a period of three years starting this fiscal year, to support such efforts financially.
Domestic universities that plan to accept young talented researchers and Ph.D. students, including Japanese nationals based abroad, will be eligible.
The ministry plans to take emergency measures to use some of the profits generated from what is known as the University Fund.
Ministry officials say the subsidies can be used to pay salaries for researchers and research expenses, as well as to cover the costs of lab equipment.
They say they will screen plans submitted by universities to improve their research capabilities. They plan to complete the selection process by September.
They also say they will consider taking additional measures, depending on such factors as the contents of universities' plans.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
21 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Executive Order Sets No Date to Cut Auto Tariff;U.S., Japan Begin to Diverge on What Agreement Means
Uncertainty has yet to be dispelled over details of an agreed-upon automobile tariff to be imposed on Japan by the United States. An executive order issued Thursday by the White House to impose a 15% tariff on Japan will place a heavy burden on Japanese companies. But the order did not specify an actual date for when the duty on automobiles will be reduced from the current 27.5% to 15%. The Japanese government has boasted of that reduction as the key result of its recent tariff negotiations with the United States. 'It is so disappointing, as we were hoping that [the auto tariff] would be reduced at the same time as the reduction of the 'reciprocal tariff,'' an executive of a leading automaker said after learning that the executive order issued by U.S. President Donald Trump made no mention of an automobile tariff. Since April, a 27.5% tariff has been levied on automobiles. The recent Japan-U.S. agreement is supposed to reduce the tariff to 15%, but when it will be implemented is uncertain. The car tariff squeezes manufacturers' bottom lines. 'It is becoming a burden day by day,' said a senior automaker official. 'We hope the updated tariff rate will be applied as soon as possible.' Economic revitalization minister Ryosei Akazawa said Friday, 'We will urge [the United States] to take steps to fulfill the agreement as soon as possible.' However, the reciprocal tariff and the car tariff are based on different laws. The United Kingdom waited more than a month to see a lower tariff levied on its cars after reaching an agreement with the United States. Many products affected Meanwhile, the reciprocal tariff on most Japanese exports will be set at 15% from Thursday. 'While the hurdle has been lowered [from the initially announced rate], the impact of the tariff remains unclear,' said Hitoshi Suzuki, president of sake brewery Ichinokura Co. in Osaki, Miyagi Prefecture. Riding a Japanese cuisine boom, Ichinokura has built up its exports to the United States, and the tariff hike comes as a significant blow. Sake was subject to nearly zero tariffs at 3 cents per liter, but that will now rise to 15%. Tariffs on fishery products will also increase. A seafood processing company in Mombetsu, Hokkaido, has doubled its scallop exports to the United States since China imposed an import ban on Japanese seafood products in 2023. 'If we pass on the tariff increase through our prices, customers in the United States may hesitate to buy,' the president of the company said. According to the Japanese government, products with original tariff rates of 15% or higher will continue to be subject to the same tariff rates. This was a special measure agreed upon between the European Union and the United States, and Japan had also agreed to the same mechanism. However, this was not explicitly stated in Thursday's executive order. Even Akazawa, who led the negotiations, told reporters Friday, 'We need to examine the details' of the agreements. No joint document made The lack of a joint agreement document has also made the deal unclear. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview with Fox News on July 23, 'We'll evaluate [Japan's performance] every quarter and if the president's unhappy then we'll boomerang it back to the 25% tariff rate, both on cars and the rest of their products.' Itochu Corp. Executive Vice President Tsuyoshi Hachimura said Friday at a press conference: 'The agreement has not been put into writing, and there is even talk of evaluating [Japan's performance], so nothing has been decided yet. At this stage, it is better not to be too positive.' The government also intends to take domestic measures. 'We will make every effort to mitigate the impact on industry and employment, such as providing financial support,' Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said when he heard opinions from the automobile industry in Tokyo on Thursday. Saisuke Sakai of Mizuho Research & Technologies, Ltd. pointed out uncertainty for companies, saying that the impact on small and medium-sized enterprises would be particularly significant. 'It is necessary for the public and private sectors to work together not only to provide financial support to companies but also to help them shift away from dependence on exports to the United States and develop products with high added value,' Sakai said.
NHK
2 hours ago
- NHK
NHK survey: nearly half foresee increase in nuclear arms
An NHK survey shows nearly half of respondents predict either no change or actually an increase in the number of nuclear weapons that currently exist around the world. NHK surveyed by mail 3,600 people aged 18 or older across Japan from May through July ahead of the 80th anniversary of the US atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The response rate was 55.3 percent. When asked how they view the US atomic bombings, 67 percent said it is unforgivable even now, while 20 percent said that it was unavoidable. In contrast, an NHK survey 10 years ago conducted by telephone showed 49 percent said it cannot be forgiven, while 40 percent said it was unavoidable. But, the results cannot be precisely compared due to different survey methods. Asked what they think will happen to nuclear weapons that exist now, only 2 percent said that they will be completely abolished, and 11 percent said they cannot be completely abolished but their number will decrease substantially. Thirty-six percent predicted a slight decrease, while 49 percent said there will be no change, or they will actually increase in number. The 2015 survey showed 2 percent, 12 percent, 45 percent and 32 percent, respectively. Professor Kawano Noriyuki at the graduate school of Hiroshima University said that people are aware that an ultimate goal, and an ideal, is clearly a world without nuclear arms as those in the atomic bombed cities are pursuing. But he adds that they also know it cannot happen amid escalating tensions in some parts of the world. Kawano said that people are standing on a major threshold: whether to accept the current reality, or take a specific action toward the goal. He said the atomic-bombed cities are facing a major challenge.
Japan Times
7 hours ago
- Japan Times
Japan to ramp up measures against foreign election interference
Japan plans to enhance its surveillance and regulatory measures to prevent foreign interference in elections. The Cabinet Secretariat's National Cybersecurity Office will play a key role in identifying problems that must be addressed to create a system for dealing with threats in an integrated manner. In last month's Upper House election, foreign actors were suspected to be behind the spread of disinformation on social media. Election interference "poses a risk to democracy, but there's no specific body to handle it," cybersecurity minister Masaaki Taira told a news conference Friday, stressing the need to create a body to oversee measures. Election interference often involves information manipulation and propaganda aimed at influencing public opinion and policy decisions. By spreading disinformation and extremist discourse on the internet during elections, foreign actors seek to destabilize political systems through social divisions while supporting the campaigns of specific candidates and parties. Professor Takamichi Saito of Meiji University's Cybersecurity Laboratory said that election interference is "part of military strategy." Russia and China are suspected of meddling in Britain's 2016 referendum on whether to leave the European Union, in U.S. presidential elections since the same year and in the 2024 Taiwanese presidential election. In last month's Upper House election, some information was spread in an unnatural manner on social media, likely by automated bots. Some accounts on X linked to websites likely associated with Russia were frozen. Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Kazuhiko Aoki told a news conference during the election campaign period that Japan "has become a target of influence operations" by foreign actors. Currently, the Cabinet Secretariat and the Foreign and Defense ministries are tasked with gathering and analyzing information, while the communications ministry is tasked with asking social media platform operators to address inappropriate posts. A cross-agency effort is becoming necessary as the threat of election interference grows. Key issues to be considered by the government include establishing measures to block content, such as the removal of problematic posts and bot accounts. The government faces a difficult challenge in determining how to conduct fact checks and regulate radical statements, including those labeling foreign nationals as enemies. A legal framework on the matter must be consistent with constitutionally protected freedom of speech, so designing such a system is expected to be a complicated procedure. "There are a wide range of issues to consider, such as how much obligation to impose on social media platform operators," a government source said. The National Cybersecurity Office was established last month to oversee active cyberdefense policy. The office will play a central role in investigating suspected interference in the Upper House race and measures other countries take against such interference.
