Wright pledges to back DOE loan office for nuclear
Why it matters: The House GOP's reconciliation budget proposes to eliminate unused IRA loan funding, though the DOE's budget proposal includes funding to keep the loan office open.
"I do think it's a helpful tool to launch nuclear energy, which is why we're requesting money to do just that," Wright told the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
Wright also told an audience on Monday that he's working with Congress to maintain a level of funding for LPO for transmission projects.
What they're saying: Rep. Bob Latta, chair of E&C's energy subcommittee, agreed with Wright's assessment of LPO.
"This level of government subsidy is irresponsible and unsustainable, focused on misguided priorities and was often done to the detriment of free markets and private enterprise," Latta said.
Between the lines: Wright's vision for LPO will likely be diminished compared with the Biden administration's dramatic expansion.
In fact, former President Biden's flurry of post-Election Day loan approvals are coming under scrutiny, Wright said.
The agency's review of the DOE awards had uncovered "deeply concerning" decisions that were made "without proper due diligence," Wright said.
Friction point: Some Democrats pressed Wright to tell Republicans to pull back proposed cuts in the reconciliation bill.
"It looks like you and I agree on at least one issue, and that is that nuclear energy is worth investing in and that the Loan Programs Office has an important role to play," E&C ranking Democrat Frank Pallone said.
Pallone cited South Carolina's Republican Gov. Henry McMaster's letter to lawmakers that the DOE loan authority and nuclear tax credits are essential to restarting a nuclear plant there.
What's next: Speaker Mike Johnson and House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole met with the subcommittee chairs last week about spending priorities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
22 minutes ago
- New York Post
NY Dems aim to de-mask ICE agents to scare them off their raids — NOT to protect the public
Supporters claim a bill introduced by Democratic state lawmakers last month banning ICE agents and police from wearing masks during raids will ensure safety and prevent authoritarianism. One backer, Sen. Patricia Fahy, fumes that ICE is 'operating like masked militias' and 'paramilitary secret police' and so must be reined in. Nonsense: The awkwardly and misleadingly named Mandating End to Lawless Tactics Act is actually little more than an attempt to thwart immigration enforcement by making ICE agents fear for their personal safety. It joins similar efforts in other states and in Congress to 'unmask ICE.' In the words of GOP Sen. George Borrello, 'This bill is driven by ideology, not a genuine concern for public safety.' The Left's hypocrisy on this issue is staggering. Progressives — including many of the MELT Act's supporters in the Legislature — have opposed mask bans for criminal suspects and rioters, such as Nassau County's common-sense ban, which has exceptions for law enforcement. Yet for all their sympathy for those involved with the criminal-justice system, they have no qualms about painting cops as criminals and subjecting them to mask bans. If these lawmakers truly cared about public safety, they'd go after the rioters and real criminals who've routinely hidden their identities to evade accountability following the 2020 George Floyd unrest and Oct. 7 demonstrations. ICE and other law enforcement don't mask up because they have machinations of becoming a 'paramilitary secret police.' They do so to keep themselves and their families safe from multinational gangs such as Tren de Aragua. Facial-recognition technology, now rapidly improving due to AI, gives anyone — including nefarious actors like Antifa or cartel members — the ability to reverse image search the unmasked face of an ICE agent. They can then obtain and post their names, addresses and information about their relatives to social media. While the Justice Department can prosecute those responsible for such doxxing, it is nonetheless a frequent threat to agents and loved ones. Addresses of hotels where agents stay during operations are routinely spread on social media so that protesters can harass them. Agitators are so well-organized that an app was created to report and rush to ICE raid locations, as seen in Los Angeles riots this year. The Department of Homeland Security has reported an 830% increase in assaults on ICE personnel this year, attributed to an increase in doxxing and rhetoric against agents. Worse still, even if the MELT Act passes, its effects would be largely symbolic. Lawmakers like Fahy clearly don't understand federalism. Because the Constitution gives federal law precedence, any federal regulation would immediately supersede the MELT Act if passed, rendering it largely symbolic. Additionally, federal agents are immune from state criminal prosecution when acting within the scope of their authority. The MELT Act would also require that all law enforcement agents display their names or badge numbers on their uniforms, hamstringing the plainclothes units of local New York police departments, which now must only provide this information verbally. Some of the bill's supporters mention a more realistic point that masking without wearing identification might allow for easier impersonation of ICE officers. They might also argue that a lack of masking deters possible police misconduct, despite the widespread use of body cameras. Those are valid concerns. But there are ways to protect the public even with masked law enforcement. Public-education campaigns should remind residents that ICE agents and other law enforcement are legally required to identify themselves as police as soon as it is practicable and safe to do so. New Yorkers under arrest should keep in mind their constitutional protections, such as the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. Masked or not, imposters can still pose as ICE or any other law-enforcement officers. Requiring names or badge numbers does nothing if there's no reliable way to immediately verify the person's legitimacy. The answer isn't a largely symbolic law to neuter real agents; it's to strengthen identification through local cooperation. The only way to fully reassure New Yorkers is cooperation between local police and ICE, whether via collaborative task forces, such as through the federal 287(g) program already adopted by several counties, or by having nearby officers accompany raids to keep public order, which would help quickly debunk any imposters. This type of public partnership would not be a political statement about immigration, rather a commonsense way to put the public at ease and ensure all involved in raids are safe. The MELT Act is symbolic theater that punishes law enforcement while doing nothing to realistically stop imposters. New Yorkers would be safer if lawmakers scrapped this bill and instead fostered real cooperation between local police and ICE to deter fraud and protect both the public and the agents doing dangerous work. Paul Dreyer is a cities policy analyst at the Manhattan Institute.
Wall Street Journal
23 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Newsom's Map Gambit Is a Short-Term Play
Gavin Newsom is doing what he does best: seeking attention. The California governor is succeeding even as his policies fail. He proposes to redraw the state's congressional map to parry a similar move by Texas Republicans. It's a gambit to elevate himself as his party's standard-bearer. It's also a blue herring. Denounce Donald Trump and Texas Republicans for undermining democracy, and maybe Americans will overlook how Democrats have entrenched one-party rule in California to such ill effect.
Politico
39 minutes ago
- Politico
Playbook: Trump's crackdown hits Washington
Presented by With help from Eli Okun, Bethany Irvine and Ali Bianco Good morning. I'm Zack Stanton. Get in touch. DRIVING THE DAY THE IN-BETWEEN: Yesterday morning, just off of 14th Street NW, a group of masked law enforcement officers arrested a moped driver. Onlookers stood near a coffee shop and the entrance to a luxury condo building, recording the altercation on their phones; WaPo reporter Dan Rosenzweig-Ziff was among them. Shouts from the crowd that the officers — whose vests read simply 'police' — identify the agency with which they were affiliated were dismissed. 'Do I have to answer to you?' one officer barked back, his question rhetorical. 'You've gotta answer to somebody,' yelled a pedestrian. The officers never identified themselves, never provided their badge numbers, never revealed their agency. They took the moped driver into an unmarked SUV and spirited him off, destination unknown. A block away, the weekend brunch service at Le Diplomate continued without interruption. Welcome to the first weekend of President Donald Trump's crackdown on Washington, D.C., which, serious as it has been, is just a prelude — and things could quickly get much more intense. Three Republican-led states — West Virginia, Ohio and South Carolina — 'said Saturday they will send up to 750 National Guard troops to join 800 already mobilized in D.C.,' WaPo's Karen DeYoung and Gaya Gupta report. It's not a leap to imagine that other GOP states will scramble to follow suit, given the chance to publicly and tangibly show their support for the Trump administration: 'Trump: Yes or no?' continues to be the dividing line defining American politics. And troops deployed to DC 'are preparing to start carrying weapons in the coming days,' WSJ's Vera Bergengruen and colleagues scooped, 'a major shift that comes days after President Trump said he was deploying them to 'take back' the capital from what he described as violent criminals.' Broadly, there is agreement that this is a city on the brink. The real differences come over why and what sits on the other side. These are the in-between times, when we're in transit from the world that was to the world that will be. For critics of the president, of whom there are many in Washington, what has happened in the city — the effective sidelining of locally elected officials, the federal takeover of the city's police, the surge of National Guard troops, the masked and unidentified federal police officers, the Humvees parked outside Union Station, conveniently located for the cameras — is enough to draw suggestions of creeping authoritarianism. … And yet, for all the outrage, yesterday's protest march from Dupont Circle to the White House numbered only in the 'scores' of demonstrators, per NYT's Alyce McFadden. For supporters of the president's actions, crime in the district is a blaring crisis that merits an overwhelming federal response to avoid something like failed-state status. They point out that crime, while on a downward trend, is unacceptably commonplace (the district's homicide rate is still 'almost as high as New York's at its most dangerous, in 1990,' NYT's Maureen Dowd notes). It demands a round-the-clock response, with FBI agents patrolling the street on foot. … And yet, much of the federal response has been concentrated in some of the safest areas of the city rather than those neighborhoods most devastated by crime. More than half of the district's homicides last year occurred across the Anacostia River in Wards 7 and 8, The Atlantic's Michael Powell writes; as recently as Friday, they had yet to see much of a federal response, per USA Today's Josh Meyer. Which inevitably raises a question: How much of this is for the spectacle? 'What's happening here in Washington, DC, is just a stunt,' Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said this morning on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' 'Trump didn't like the fact that the walls were closing in on him … and so, true to form, he just decided to create a new news cycle.' There may be an element of that, but the argument also presents something of a messaging difficulty for Democrats: If it's a distraction, why should Americans take it seriously? SUNDAY BEST … — Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the war in Ukraine and potential consequences for Russian President Vladimir Putin, on ABC's 'This Week': 'I think ultimately, if this whole effort doesn't work out, then there is going to have to be additional consequences to Russia. But we're trying to avoid that by reaching a peace agreement. … The problem is this: the minute you levy additional sanctions, strong additional sanctions, the talking stops. … You've probably just added six, eight, nine, 12 more months to the war, if not longer. … That's what happens if you do that.' — Special envoy Steve Witkoff on the war in Ukraine and the details of a potential peace deal, on 'Fox News Sunday': '[Trump] understands that it is for the Ukrainians to decide how they might land swap, how they might make a deal with the Russians on different territories there. … I think the president supports a peace deal … and he got through almost all of it in Alaska.' On security guarantees: 'It means that the United States is potentially prepared to be able to give Article V security guarantees but not from NATO, directly from the United States, and other European countries.' — Witkoff on the potential trilateral to end the war in Ukraine, on CNN's 'State of the Union': 'My belief, my view is that we are going to get to a trilateral. And what we're trying to accomplish on Monday is get some consensus from President Zelenskyy and his team. We had some really good, specific, granular conversation on the plane ride home with President Zelenskyy about what he would be seeking.' — Jake Sullivan, former national security adviser, on the war in Ukraine and a potential peace deal, on 'Fox News Sunday': 'I think we will all see what comes out of that meeting on Monday. But critically, handing away more Ukrainian territory than Russia has been able to take militarily, giving it to Russia diplomatically, I think this would, as President Zelensky has said, just set Russia up to attack Ukraine in the future.' TOP-EDS: A roundup of the week's must-read opinion pieces. 9 THINGS FOR YOUR RADAR 1. TO RUSSIA, WITH LOVE: European and NATO leaders announced today that they'll also be flying to Washington for Trump's meeting tomorrow with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. European leaders hope their rally-around-Zelenskyy effort will help prevent a repeat of February's Oval Office blowup, AP's Samya Kullab and John Leicester report. Who's coming: European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she will join the peace talks at Zelenskyy's request. Also joining: French President Emmanuel Macron, British PM Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. Why they're coming: Trump already backed away from the idea of a ceasefire first, so Europe wants to make sure Ukraine's key red lines aren't crossed — namely, that it won't have to cede huge swaths of territory in the name of peace, POLITICO's Gabriel Gavin and colleagues write from Europe. Ukraine is ready to talk territorial concessions, Zelenskyy told reporters today, but only starting from the contact line of fighting (meaning: not the ever-envied eastern Donetsk region). More from our colleagues in Europe The cause for concern: When Trump called Zelenskyy yesterday, he said Russian President Vladimir Putin would respect the existing frontlines IF Ukraine agreed to cede all of the Donetsk region — which Zelenskyy rejected, Reuters' Steve Holland and colleagues report. Putin seemed ready to concede the current frontlines in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, but on the whole, the proposal leaves Putin with the upper hand, Axios' Barak Ravid and Dave Lawler write. Trump also said he could see a trilateral meeting with both Zelenskyy and Putin happening as soon as Friday. A silver lining: Trump told the European leaders yesterday during their post-summit call that he's open to U.S. security guarantees in Ukraine, saying that Putin understood that peace in Ukraine would require Western troops on the ground, WSJ's Bojan Pancevski and colleagues scooped. Big read: 'How Will the War in Ukraine End? Two Scenarios,' by WSJ's Marcus Walker: 'Ukraine could lose land but survive as a secure and sovereign, if shrunken, nation state. Alternatively, it could lose both land and sovereignty, falling back into Moscow's sphere of influence.' Coming soon: 'BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA. STAY TUNED! President DJT,' Trump wrote on Truth Social this morning. 2. GAZA LATEST: The Trump administration announced yesterday that it paused approvals of visitor visas for Gazans — blocking a key vehicle for immigrants looking for medical care in the U.S. NYT's Hamed Aleaziz and Ken Bensinger report the pause came after intense lobbying from far-right activist and MAGA influencer Laura Loomer, who alleged, without evidence, that the nonprofit HEAL Palestine — which has facilitated flights carrying Palestinian children — is connected to Hamas. On the ground: Israel is readying plans for a mass movement of Palestinians southward as it prepares to launch its military offensive in Gaza City and greater central Gaza, per AP's Natalie Melzer. Hamas rejected Israel's plans today, calling the relocation a new wave of genocide and displacement,' per Reuters. The plans come as Israeli families grow concerned the new offensive could risk the lives of the hostages who are still alive — a worry that has helped propel a nationwide strike in Israel today, NYT's Johnatan Reiss and Aaron Boxerman report. The crisis continues: 'Gaza's Other Crisis — Not Enough Clean Drinking Water,' by WSJ's Margherita Stancati and Abeer Ayyoub 3. RED LIGHT REDISTRICTING: Texas Democrats are expected to return to the state legislature tomorrow following weeks of protest and a weekend that saw more than 150 rallies across 34 states at which activists blasted Trump's moves to draw new red seats, POLITICO's Shia Kapos reports. On the left: The redistricting fight brought together progressive and establishment Democrats, who are embracing fighting fire with fire to mount a nationwide resistance to Trump, AP's Bill Barrow writes. On the right: The push is also giving a national stage to Texas AG Ken Paxton, who has a history of 'audacious legal moves' that benefit his party and is staring down an intense primary against GOP incumbent Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), as CNN's Eric Bradner breaks down. Meanwhile, in California: 'California's resistance to Donald Trump is running into an uprising from within,' POLITICO's Will McCarthy and Jeremy White report from Norco. Democratic leaders 'believed they were making lasting inroads in Southern California's Riverside County, the fourth most populous in the state. But far from transforming into a Democratic stronghold, the region is fast becoming a hotbed for Donald Trump-inspired showmen and a political farm system for some of the most powerful and notable members of the Republican bench.' 4. IMMIGRATION FILES: The Trump administration's latest strategy for employing more ICE agents includes an enticing $50,000 signing bonus and up to $60,000 in student loan forgiveness — part of a larger blitz that removed age caps and promotes ICE as a father-son bonding experience, WSJ's Victoria Albert and Jack Morphet write this morning. DHS says it's working: more than 110,000 people have applied. Meanwhile, immigration arrest levels dipped by 13 percent last month, per NPR. The latest in the City of Angels: 'Immigration agent fires shots at vehicle with people inside in San Bernardino operation,' by LA Times' Brittny Mejia 5. ELECTION DAY IN BOLIVIA: 'A Latin American experiment in socialism could be nearing its end,' by WaPo's Samantha Schmidt and Gabriel Díez Lacunza: 'For nearly two decades, politics in Bolivia has been dominated by one man[:] Evo Morales, acolyte of Fidel Castro and Hugo Chávez, antagonist of the United States … But the movement he built now verges on collapse. The economy, now in the hands of a former protégé, is struggling through its worst crisis in decades … The presidential election on Sunday could mean the end of a socialist era. Two right-leaning candidates are leading in the polls. And for the first time since Morales was elected president in 2005, neither he nor a stand-in will be on the ballot.' 6. CUTTING DEEP: North Carolina was the latest state to pass a Medicaid expansion, but budget challenges and cuts from Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act mean the state is slashing Medicaid funding to doctors, hospitals and other providers, WaPo's Paige Winfield Cunningham reports. Devdutta Sangvai, North Carolina's top health officer, said the cuts will have 'serious and far-reaching consequences.' … In another swing state, a mix of bad weather and cuts to agricultural research and farm programs are blighting Michigan's cherry farmers, Reuters' P.J. Huffstutter writes. 7. TRADING PLACES: The US-EU trade deal is being held up by disagreements on language involving the EU's digital rules, FT's Alice Hancock and colleagues report. A formal statement was expected to land just days after Trump and von der Leyen announced the deal, but the U.S. has been trying to keep the door open to cracking down on the Digital Services Act, the landmark regulation on Big Tech that the EU isn't budging on. On the domestic side, six months after Trump announced his plans to manage tariffs through an 'External Revenue Service' the agency's creation has been stalled — in part because tariff revenue has 'fallen short of the president's forecasts,' POLITICO's Ari Hawkins writes. 'They haven't figured out what they want,' one person close to the White House told Ari. 8. FIT FOR A PRINCE: 'Blackwater's Erik Prince Muscles Back Into the Mercenary Business,' by WSJ's Benoit Faucon and Vera Bergengruen: '[Erik] Prince showed drone footage of his mercenaries in Haiti helping hunt and kill alleged gang members under a government contract he struck in March. For an asking price of at least $10 million a year … Prince said he could do the same in Peru's gold country … Prince, who is back in the good graces of the White House, believes his mercenaries can pick up the slack for international security jobs the Trump administration would prefer not to pay for. He says he wants to turn a profit in countries desperate for U.S. assistance.' 9. TECH CORNER: 'Sam Altman's campaign to keep ChatGPT on top,' by POLITICO's Christine Mui and Chase DiFeliciantonio: 'Sam Altman, the driving force behind ChatGPT's meteoric rise, is running a team of veteran political operatives, campaigning to secure his company OpenAI's future. Only in this case, there's no gray-at-the-temples candidate. … Over the past year alone, the world's most closely watched AI company has hired more than half a dozen political insiders who are well-connected to the Democratic establishment … But it underscores how OpenAI sees its deep-blue home of California as vital for its global ambitions — tied to a planned business makeover that the state's top attorney can summarily shut down.' TALK OF THE TOWN Melania Trump sent a letter to Vladimir Putin calling for peace in Ukraine and the protection of innocent children. SPOTTED: Dan Bongino at the AMC in Georgetown last night. MEDIA MOVE — Claire Heddles is joining the Miami Herald as senior political correspondent. She previously was a fellow at NOTUS. BIPARTISAN WEDDING — Meg Makarewicz, chief of staff to Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.), got married to Mike Rorke, chief of staff to Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.), on Saturday at Saint John's Resort in Plymouth, Michigan. Both Makarewicz and Rorke are proud Michigan grads. Pic, courtesy of Rep. Dingell … Another pic. HAPPY BIRTHDAY: Sen. Dave McCormick (R-Pa.) (6-0) … Jon Lovett of Crooked Media … ABC's Brittany Shepherd … Louisa Terrell … former Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.) … Jamie Gillespie … former Rep. David Price (D-N.C.) … Ron Bonjean of Rokk Solutions … Sonali Dohale … Daniel Penchina … Sabrina Schaeffer of the R Street Institute … Mike Buczkiewicz of 'Morning Joe' … Caroline Boothe Olsen … Philip de Vellis of Beacon Media … Elise Foley … Ben Brody … Fox News' Will Ricciardella … American Trucking Associations' Jessica Gail … Nick Hawatmeh … Andrea Christianson … Diane Shust … Dave Toomey … David Kusnet … Dynamic SRG's Darren Rigger … Rebecca Alcorn of Mindset … Belgian Embassy's Maite Morren … Natalia Latif of New Heights Communications … The Guardian's Ella Creamer Send Playbookers tips to playbook@ or text us on Signal here. Playbook couldn't happen without our editor Zack Stanton, deputy Garrett Ross and Playbook Podcast producer Callan Tansill-Suddath.
