logo
What will be in the spending review 2025? The winners and losers

What will be in the spending review 2025? The winners and losers

Timesa day ago

Rachel Reeves will unveil a £39 billion package today to build new social housing across the country as she pledges to use her spending review to 'invest in Britain's renewal'.
As part of the government's pledge to build 1.5 million new homes by 2030 the chancellor will announce plans to almost double support for affordable home building.
It will form part of around £100bn worth of new investment in infrastructure that she claims will create 'jobs and prosperity' in parts of the country that have been left behind.
But she will also concede that 'too many people in too many parts of the country' are yet to feel any economic improvement in their finances, promising that the purpose of the spending review is to 'change that'.
However, the increased capital spending will come alongside real terms cuts in some day-to-day government spending as ministers prioritise the NHS and defence for the bulk of the additional money being provided by the Treasury.
So, who exactly are the winners and losers?
Housing and councils
Angela Rayner, the housing secretary
Angela Rayner was one of the last cabinet ministers to agree her department's funding with the Treasury — but has come away with what ministers are claiming is the biggest boost to social and affordable housing investment in a generation.
Under the plans the Treasury will invest £39bn of public money to build new council and social homes to rent over the next decade. The money — which equates to around £3.9bn a year — is significantly more than the £2.3 billion spent on the Affordable Homes Programme under the last government.
Rayner's allies argued that building more council houses was not only critical to meet Labour's election pledge to build 1.5 million new homes by the end of the Parliament — but will ultimately save the government money.
They said it would help reduce a projected rise in the benefit bill, due to high private sector rents, while cutting the cost of temporary homeless accommodation that is pushing councils towards bankruptcy. However the government has yet to put a figure on how many new homes will be built each year under the new scheme amid concerns that there is not the workforce in place to achieve the government's targets.
Reeves is to put a £39 billion 'affordable housing' plan at the heart of her multi-year spending review, the Financial Times reported.
The Treasury said the amount earmarked for affordable homes over 10 years represented 'the biggest boost to social and affordable housing investment in a generation'.
Health
Wes Streeting, the health secretary
The NHS will be the biggest overall winner in the spending review, receiving a £30 billion rise in its day-to-day spending budget, making up about 60 per cent of the cash increase in the chancellor's overall day-to-day spending envelope, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
But health service managers are still warning it will not be enough to meet the government's ambition for reducing waiting time targets. In fact, Wes Streeting, the health secretary, initially asked for a real-terms 4 per cent rise in his budget but had to settle for a 2.8 per cent rise.
There are also concerns in the department that although day-to-day spending will rise, infrastructure budgets will remain flat in real terms.
NHS managers have long warned that it is hard to improve productivity in the health service when staff have to work in buildings that are not fit for purpose and with outdated IT infrastructure. Reeves has concluded she wants to target infrastructure spending in other areas, such as transport and net zero, where the government is more likely to get an economic return on its investment.
The agreement is also complicated by the need for the NHS to pay more for medicines amid pressure from President Trump and to boost Britain's life sciences industry. The Treasury has refused to allocate extra funds, insisting that the department find the additional cash within existing budgets.
Defence
The other big winner from today's announcement will be the armed forces, which will see their budgets increase to hit the government target of spending 2.5 per cent of GDP on defence by 2027.
The increase will be funded by cuts to international aid and will leave defence spending about £6.4 billion higher than if it had remained at the existing level.
A key decision Reeves and Sir Keir Starmer will have to make today is whether to go beyond this and increase spending still further towards the end of the decade to meet the prime minister's aspiration of hitting 3 per cent of GDP in the next parliament, 'as economic and fiscal conditions allow'.
The announcement comes before a meeting of Nato leaders this month, which is expected to agree to Trump's demand of increasing core defence spending to 3.5 per cent, accompanied by a further 1.5 per cent on defence-related infrastructure. No date has yet been set for when Nato members will have to meet this pledge.
Schools
Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary
Ministers have already announced that schools will receive an extra £4.5 billion a year in core funding by 2029, in part to pay for reforms under which more children with special educational needs will be taught in mainstream schools.
The rise includes spending pledges that have already been made, including the cost of expanding free school meals for all pupils whose families claim universal credit and the £615 million allocated to schools to fund the new pay settlement for teachers.
But while this extra money may sound generous on paper, in practice schools will receive £1.5 billion each year up until 2028-29, when the cumulative increase reaches £4.5 billion compared with this year. Boiled down, this means the spending rise for education in this review totals a real-term lift of 0.4 per cent.
Luke Sibieta, a research fellow at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said it was also unclear if the money included the teacher pay settlement reached last year.
If so this would probably mean a real-terms budget freeze — although a shrinking school-age population means this would still result in a 3 per cent rise in spending per pupil by the end of the parliament.
Energy and net zero
Ed Miliband, the energy security and net-zero secretary
Despite being among the last few ministers to agree their spending settlement with the Treasury, Ed Miliband 's department is likely to emerge as one of the biggest winners of the spending review as Reeves doubles down on Labour's clean-power pledge.
Miliband will get more than £14 billion to fund the new Sizewell C nuclear power station, as well as a further £2.5 billion to develop a new generation of smaller modular reactors, and additional funding for carbon capture and storage.
The energy secretary has also won out in a Whitehall row over the future of the government's warm-homes plan. The Treasury had looked to reduce some of the £13.2 billion earmarked for the scheme, which will subsidise households to install energy efficiency measures such as solar panels and insulation. Miliband is expected to get the vast majority of this funding in an effort to meet Labour 's pledge to cut household energy bills by 2030.
Home Office
Yvette Cooper, the home secretary
The Home Office was the last government department to settle its spending plan with the Treasury after it was in effect imposed upon Cooper.
Reeves has refused to meet her colleague's demands for extra police funding, despite warnings that it means the government could miss its flagship pledges on law and order and a public intervention by police chiefs who said they faced 'stark choices'.
It is understood that police spending will increase in real terms each year of this spending review period, which ends in 2028-29. However, it remains unclear whether this boost will match the more than £1 billion that officers say is needed to cover existing gaps.
• Early prison releases risk public safety, police warn
Cooper is unhappy with the final settlement amid concerns it is not enough to meet the government's pledge to recruit 13,000 neighbourhood officers by 2029. The real-terms rise in police funding will also mean deeper cuts to other areas of her department.
The Border Force has warned that any cuts made to its £1.2 billion budget could result in anything from longer queues at airports to threats to 'national security'.
Environment
Reeves is once again looking to farmers as she seeks to pare back government spending. This time the debate is over Britain's flagship post-Brexit farming subsidies, which appear likely to be slashed for all but a few small farms.
Sources at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, led by Steve Reed, said that the subsidies, which financially reward farmers for sustainable practices, will be severely cut in the spending review.
Labour will honour its budget promise of £5 billion in farming funding for 2024-26, so cuts would hit many farms from 2026 onwards.
The package of subsidies was introduced to replace the European Union's common agricultural policy after Brexit. It is designed to encourage farmers financially to look after nature and the soil instead of rewarding them for growing crops or tending livestock.
In future the scheme will be targeted at small farms, meaning larger, wealthier farms will lose access to funding for nature-friendly practices.
Coming off the back of the government's decision to reduce inheritance tax relief for farmers, it is likely to go down badly with rural communities.
Transport
Reeves announced £15 billion worth of funding for local transport infrastructure, predominantly in the north of England and the Midlands.
The transport spending will be focused on seats that Labour needs to hold in the face of a growing challenge from Reform. The focus will be on projects that will bring spades in the ground by the time of the next election.
Reeves has told colleagues that she wants people to see and feel the outcome of the investment, which includes trams in Manchester and Birmingham, the Tyne and Wear Metro and a mass-transit system around Bristol.
There is not expected to be money for big transport projects in London as ministers look to rebalance spending away from the capital.
Science and technology
The government has said it will spend £86 billion on the science and technology sector by the end of this parliament as it looks to support the tech industries to boost economic growth.
The package will help fund research into drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries, and include up to £500 million for regions across the UK. Local leaders will have a say on how it is spent.
While this may sound like a lot of money, the £86 billion figure is the sum of all government spending on 'research and innovation' over four years and the annual spend will be £22.5 billion by 2029-30. This represents a 3 per cent real-terms rise in budget in 2029-30 compared with the present financial year.
Justice
Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary
Three prisons will be built, starting this year, after a £4.7 billion funding commitment in the spending review in an attempt to grapple with the prisons crisis.
The justice secretary Shabana Mahmood's speedy settlement was crucial as she was forced to announce plans to curb prison overcrowding when government projections showed that jails would fill up in November.
The plans for 'record expansion' of the prison estate came alongside measures that meant offenders would spend only 28 days on recall to prison if they breached their licence conditions.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cardiff University defends job cuts process amid crisis claims
Cardiff University defends job cuts process amid crisis claims

BBC News

time11 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Cardiff University defends job cuts process amid crisis claims

Cardiff University bosses have defended the way a process to cut hundreds of jobs and axe some departments has been evidence to a Senedd Committee, Vice Chancellor Prof Wendy Larner said it had been "difficult" but they had taken "the right approach".Prof Larner was asked whether announcing plans to close some departments, including nursing and then "backtracking" had been wise in view of the impact on staff morale and the institution's comes after a union claimed the process had led to a "severe and urgent mental health crisis" among staff. Proposals initially included cutting 400 jobs and closing some subject areas including music, modern languages and nursing, which will now be during the consultation period and more than 150 staff leaving voluntarily also led to a reduction in the number of posts to be cut - currently down to 69 by 2029-30 Prof Larner told MSs. She said she was "delighted by the quality of the alternative proposals" which enabled them to change the initial plans "quite significantly".But she confirmed the business case going to the university council for sign off on 17 June would still mean stopping ancient history and religion and asked whether she had any regrets about the process, she said she regretted that some members of staff had learnt their jobs were at risk through media coverage after a "leak" of also expressed regret that the university had received an "undue share of attention" for the cuts despite many other universities facing similar challenges."Our intention all the way through has been to ensure that Cardiff University is successful for the future," she said. Prof Larner and chairman of the University Council Patrick Younge's appearance in front of MSs follows the University and College Union's (UCU) claim there was a "total health and safety crisis" at the said there had been a "comprehensive breakdown of trust and morale" between university bosses and staff."I think we've worked really hard to do what we can to ensure that staff have been adequately supported", said Prof Younge said the university had been "blindsided" by the UCU referring it to the Health and Safety Executive when it was due to agree a strategy to address the union's to the union's move, he said he was "deeply disappointed in some of the behaviours." Mr Younge outlined the financial challenges facing the university and said its reserves had to be spent on securing the university's future - including improving halls of residence which, he said, required a spend of £300m to £ about the university's new campus in Kazakhstan's capital, Astana, Prof Larner said the university had spent money on "due diligence" but the campus, which opens in September, was paid for by partners in said so far there had been 186 application for the two foundation courses initially offered on the site which was part of a "slow rollout".In response, Cardiff UCU said it remained "deeply concerned" about the proposed added the changes risked affecting the university's "ability to contribute" to teaching, research and training in Wales.

Grandfather left £45k out of pocket after purchasing a caravan from Haven Holidays – ‘the worst decision I've ever made'
Grandfather left £45k out of pocket after purchasing a caravan from Haven Holidays – ‘the worst decision I've ever made'

The Sun

time12 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Grandfather left £45k out of pocket after purchasing a caravan from Haven Holidays – ‘the worst decision I've ever made'

A GRANDFATHER has been left £45,000 out of pocket after purchasing a caravan from Haven Holidays. Despite the vehicle being worth less than £15,000, spiralling costs have left him saying "it's the worst decision I've ever made". 3 3 Christopher Jeff, 60, bought the caravan in 2023 in Doniford Bay holiday park, Somerset in 2023. He and his wife Ida, 56, had first visited 13 years ago before deciding to put some of his pension money towards the vehicle when they visited with their grandson Theo two years ago. He told BPM Media: "We knew we couldn't afford a brand new caravan but we found what we thought was a nice one that was a bit older for £14,859. "I had to cash in a good chunk of my pension to pay for the caravan. "I thought it would be worth it for some family holidays away from the rat race." The old caravan quickly began racking up additional costs, as Christopher spent more than £10,000 refitting the caravan he purchased as a leaseholder from Haven Holidays. This included kitting the vehicle out with a microwave, fridge freezer and bedding - costing around £5,000. On top of these costs, the couple were "encouraged" to buy side decking, a storage box and a bench, all of which came to just under £5,000. Even the ground rent - a fee paid by leaseholders to freeholders - was more than Christopher and Ida expected. This added another £6,000 in annual fees - a cost that has since gone up to £8,161. Haven Holidays say that the purchase and license agreement clearly states the total site fees, the basis for fee increases, and the period the park is open. Christopher says that Haven Holidays advised the couple to rent out the caravan to help cover their growing expenses. However, in order to cover the thousands of pounds in ground rent, the caravan would need to be rented out every single week of the season for £450. This was made even more difficult by the fact that Haven Holidays were reportedly offering cheaper rents on their own caravans. Christopher said: "Haven were undercutting us by renting their own caravans cheaper all season long - sometimes £150 for a week in the off season." As a result, the couple only managed to rent the caravan out for five weeks in 2024. With much of the annual cost unaccounted for, Ida's income from working in sales was used to cover the shortfall. Christopher estimates that the caravan costs £1,500 a day of use in real terms, as 30 days onsite has cost the couple £45,000. He said: "It's just too expensive to own one of these units. We have only holidayed in it for ten long weekends." The couple faced further financial insecurity after a national grid failure damaged a lot of electrical appliances at the park, leading them to be told their boiler would need replacing. However, after three months and three visits from contractors, they were eventually told they didn't need any repairs as they had a water heater, not a boiler. A spokesperson for Haven Holidays say that they worked "as quickly as possible" to fix issues and that this was at no cost to Mr Jeff. The costs have become so unbearable that the couple has tried to sell the caravan - but this too would lose them money. While they paid nearly £15,000 for the vehicle, they are yet to receive an offer for more than £3,000, with Haven Holidays taking a 15% commission of any sales. Mr Jeff said: "Nobody wants to buy a caravan and take on the commitment of paying over £8,000 for nine months of caravan access. "Especially when you can't rent it out and break even because its cheaper for guests to go directly through Haven." In a desperate bid to resolve their financial problems, they reached out to European Consumer Claims who have taken on the case with the hopes of getting the couple their money back. CEO of ECC Greg Wilson said: "When we first started looking into holiday park consumer abuse we were aware that there were issues. However the sheer scale of wrongdoing was shocking even to us." The company is working with leading consumer lawyers to seek financial compensation for people who have been swindled by unexpected fees. Haven owns a number of holiday parks around the UK, primarily found along the coastline, including in Yorkshire, the Lake District, Scotland and Cornwall. A Haven Holidays spokesperson said: "Haven is committed to ensuring full transparency at every stage of the buying and selling process and clearly communicates with owners the different options available to them - including the total site fees for that year, the basis for subsequent increases and period the park is open during the year – as well as any associated terms and conditions. "The decking was installed at Mr. Jeffs' request; however, the other items mentioned (including the storage box, microwave, fridge freezer, bedding, and bench) were not purchased from Haven, and we are therefore unable to comment on them.'

M&S shoppers race to buy £35 ‘slimming' butter yellow summer dress that ‘hides lumps and bumps' and ‘doesn't crease'
M&S shoppers race to buy £35 ‘slimming' butter yellow summer dress that ‘hides lumps and bumps' and ‘doesn't crease'

The Sun

time12 minutes ago

  • The Sun

M&S shoppers race to buy £35 ‘slimming' butter yellow summer dress that ‘hides lumps and bumps' and ‘doesn't crease'

MARKS & SPENCER is finally back in action, and fashion fans have been rushing to pick up the retailer's new £35 summer dress. The textured midi dress (which comes in the colour of the season) has been praised by shoppers for its flattering fit that "hides lumps and bumps". M&S Textured V-Neck Midi Column Dress, £35 Featuring a fitted silhouette with breathable textured material and airy short sleeves, the butter yellow number is perfect for summer. The M&S V-Neck Column Dress is finished with a knot design at the front, giving a stylish twist on a staple piece. It comes in butter yellow and black colourways, with regular, petite and tall sizes available — although several sizes have already sold out. The wearable style could be dressed up or down for most occasions, and it would look great teamed with sandals and sunglasses for a comfortable holiday outfit. As the textured design gives a dressy feel, it would also pair well with heels and chunky gold jewellery for a summer evening look. The high-street dress has received rave reviews from Marks & Spencer shoppers, with a 4.6-out-of-5 star rating. One customer wrote: "Excellent dress that skims the body to create a slimming effect. The textured material is good quality and it washes well, no ironing required as it always looks as good as new. It's true to size as well, more colours and styles please." Another added: "I purchased the yellow colour in store, and liked it that much that I ordered the black when it came back in stock as it's so flattering. M&S Textured V-Neck Midi Column Dress, £35 It's so curve enhancing and it's not too short, plus no lumps and bumps are shown. The material is thin but soft, and it isn't see through. It's so great for summer." Marks & Spencer gave an update earlier on its cyber attack this week, confirming that the retailer is accepting orders again for the first time since the attack in April. Shoppers are now able to order online again, but the retailer has warned that deliveries may take up to 10 days. If you don't know where to begin with your online order, Fashion Editor Abby McHale has handpicked the M&S pieces worth adding to your basket before they sell out. M&S' £35 midi dress isn't the only butter yellow piece causing a stir, as Sainsbury's shoppers have been racing to pick up a similar version from the supermarket. The £28 summer dress has been praised for hiding mum tum, with its relaxed cut and flattering puffed sleeves. It also has a stylish gingham print that's perfect for summer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store