Japan's Topix hits record high on Wall Street rally, solid earnings
The broader Topix was up nearly 1 per cent at 2,993.14, as of 0206 GMT. Earlier in the session, the benchmark index hit an all-time peak of 2,993.21.
The Nikkei climbed 0.9 per cent to 41,151.07.
Both indexes were on track for a third consecutive session of gains, provided the current momentum holds.
The three-day rally follows a sharp decline on Monday, when the Nikkei posted its largest drop in two months amid growing concerns over the U.S. economy and trade.
"The market is now convinced that the U.S. economy will not slow down," said Hiroyuki Ueno, chief strategist, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Asset Management.
"That is important for the Bank of Japan's decision process for raising interest rates. With solid corporate earnings results and a trend for wage increases, the market now expects the BOJ to raise rates by the end of the year," Ueno said.
However, government data released on Wednesday indicated that Japan's real wages fell for a sixth consecutive month in June, as inflation continued to outpace pay growth. The trend clouded the outlook for a BOJ policy shift, with wage growth seen as a key indicator for sustainable inflation.
There is growing expectation that the U.S. Federal Reserve could begin cutting interest rates as early as September to support the economy.
Shares of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group rose 1.8 per cent, providing the biggest boost to the Topix, while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group gained 1.56 per cent.
M3's shares surged 22 per cent after Goldman Sachs raised the target price for the medical services platform operator to 2,300 yen from 2,250 yen.
Cosmetic maker Shiseido jumped 10 per cent.
Chip-making equipment maker Tokyo Electron fell for a third day, falling 2.7 per cent on Thursday to weigh on the Nikkei the most.
Chip-testing equipment maker Advantest fell 0.7 per cent.
Shares of chipmakers declined on concerns over a potential slowdown in global chip production after U.S. President Donald Trump said Washington would impose a tariff of about 100 per cent on semiconductor chips imported from countries not producing in America or planning to do so.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
6 hours ago
- CNA
I made an investment mistake. How do I recover from it?
Have you ever made an investing mistake, one that you really regretted? One of my earliest and most painful investing lessons was when I bought into SingPost in 2015. I thought the company had solid fundamentals and growth potential, based on what my broker told me. He urged me to buy, saying it was such a no-brainer move that he had already persuaded his parents to invest in it as well. At around S$2 (US$1.55) a share, he made it sound like a steal. But shortly afterwards, the stock kept sliding. Today, it's worth around S$0.60, which is a staggering 70 per cent loss from when I first bought into it. Maybe you've been in the same boat as me. Perhaps you didn't act decisively enough in the recent market crash, and you're kicking yourself now when you see stocks fly and the indexes hitting new all-time highs. Or maybe you bought into a stock that tanked overnight or went all-in on a cryptocurrency project that collapsed overnight. Now you're staring at the red numbers in your portfolio, wondering what went wrong and asking yourself: "How do I bounce back from this?" LEARNING FROM INVESTMENT LOSSES The sinking feeling of sadness, frustration and despair when you lose money can be traumatising, but here's the truth you need to hear: no investor, no matter how experienced, has a 100 per cent win rate anyway. We've all made mistakes. When it comes to investing, those mistakes can be particularly painful, not just because it is our money on the line. Making the wrong investment choices can also hurt our confidence and make us question our beliefs in our own decision-making. Just ask the 700 investors who bought into a bogus cryptocurrency mining investment here, or the 947 investors who fell for the fraudulent nickel investment scheme – including venture capitalists and private bankers. But what matters from here is not harping on the mistake; instead, it is what you do next. With my SingPost experience, I took great pains to ask myself: "What is the lesson to be learnt here?" Reflecting deeply on this question, I realised that I had put too much trust in "stock tips" from professionals and failed to do my own in-depth research and analysis before I made a decision. I learnt that I had to pay more attention to competitors in the same space, because SingPost clearly was no match for them. I also realised that just because someone is licensed as a professional, doesn't mean that they can't get it wrong sometimes. The lessons I learnt from this mistake, as well as others I've made over the years, have helped me to become a better investor over time. STOP LIVING IN THE PAST In the aftermath of an investment gone wrong, it's tempting to slip into a downward spiral of regret and beat ourselves up for losing money. In trying to make sense of things, we can end up obsessing over all the "what ifs". We think over and over: "Why did I trust that advice? Why didn't I exit sooner? How could I be so foolish?" But hindsight is always 20-20. There's no point in always looking in the rear view mirror – we have to focus on the road ahead in order to keep moving forward. Our success will depend on our ability to invest for the future, while adapting and charting a new course of action whenever a failure occurs. That's why the far more productive approach is to extract the lessons from the losses. What does it reveal about ourselves as investors? Does it reveal biases and assumptions we didn't know we had, for instance? Does it show any gaps in our thinking and reasoning? In the wake of an investing mistake, here are some questions I now focus on: Was this a failure in due diligence? Did I blindly follow someone else's advice without doing my own homework? Was this something I could have predicted ahead of time, with the knowledge and information I had? There are some investment losses that can only be attributed to bad luck or a black swan event that no one can predict. For these scenarios, there is no point in beating yourself up over it. But when the loss occurred because of a gap in our process, then the onus is on us to learn to correct it. YOU ONLY NEED A FEW BIG WINNERS Remember: no one has a perfect track record in investing. Not American hedge fund manager Ray Dalio. Not investment fund founder Cathie Wood. Not even Warren Buffett. The investing legend has famously admitted to some big blunders, such as buying Dexter Shoe Company with Berkshire Hathaway shares, or losing hundreds of millions from holding onto computer giant IBM for too long, believing it would be able to reinvent itself. Just like us, the greatest investors in the world have taken hits to their portfolio. But what sets them apart is their ability to learn, adapt and stay in the game. Here's a secret: what matters isn't avoiding mistakes entirely but ensuring that your winners more than make up for your losers. Even if a few of our investing positions go to zero, we still have other positions in our portfolio. And the gains from these other counters can often overshadow the losses incurred by the rest. This was my own experience, as I watched stocks I own – like iFast, DBS and Meta – grow into multi-baggers over time. These multi-baggers are investments that multiply in value, delivering returns of two times, five times, or even 10 times our original capital. They're the outliers in our portfolio that can more than make up for past mistakes, and can significantly accelerate our wealth when held with conviction over the long term. I've owned iFast since it was S$1 a share, and DBS at under S$14. Today, they've increased in value by more than 800 per cent and 300 per cent respectively – and are still growing as we speak. These alone more than make up for what I lost with SingPost and other mistakes. STAY IN THE GAME This is the beauty of investing: your downside is capped, but your upside knows no bounds. If you invest S$1,000 in a company and it fails, you lose S$1,000. But if you invest S$1,000 in the next Apple, Nvidia or Tesla while it is still undervalued – something with the potential to grow five or 10 times bigger over time – that single investment can not only cover multiple losing counters but also put you ahead. That's why I choose to focus on fundamentally strong companies, buying into them when the market is pessimistic or irrational. And I don't lose sight of this even when luck turns against me, or when I get things wrong sometimes. At the end of the day, what matters is your entire investment portfolio rather than obsessing over the outcome of each individual position. So as Idina Menzel sings: "Let it go". Let your losers go, but not the lessons. Double down on your research. Look for opportunities. And keep your emotions in check. Investing isn't about getting it right every single time. It is about staying in the game, learning as you go, and making better and better plays as you grow. Not every loss is our fault. But if we don't take every opportunity to learn, we'll have no one to blame but ourselves.
Independent Singapore
14 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Maid who endured poor working conditions says no to contract renewal after employer refused pay raise, denied vacation leave, and changed rest days
SINGAPORE: Fed up with her poor working conditions and stagnant pay, a domestic helper shared on social media that she's decided not to renew her contract with her employers. In an anonymous post on the Direct Hire Transfer Singapore Maid/Domestic Helper Facebook group, she explained that throughout her two years of employment, she had to pay for all her personal necessities, including toiletries such as shampoo, shower gel, and toothpaste, using her own money. Adding to her challenges, the helper said she often had to buy her own food, particularly fruits, fish, and vegetables, as the family generally provided only one proper meal per day, which was dinner. Beyond the lack of support for basic needs, the helper said that the extensive level of surveillance in the household made her feel deeply uncomfortable and intruded upon. According to her, the employer had installed '10 CCTV cameras' throughout the home, including one in her bedroom, and placed a tracker on her house key that was connected to their mobile phones. The final breaking point, however, came when her employer recently informed her that if she chose to continue working for them, she would not be given a pay raise, would be denied a one-month vacation leave (which she had requested), and that her off days would be changed. 'My day off, they said they would allow me to have two days off a month, but only on weekdays, not on weekends, which I don't like,' she wrote. 'Like, hello, I will go out alone, so it feels lonely because my friends' day off is only on Sundays. My previous contract gave me one day off a month, and it was on a Sunday, but then it suddenly changed.' 'I hope you find an employer who values and respects you as a person.' Her story drew support from other domestic workers online, many of whom said they could relate to her experience. Some encouraged her to look for an employer who would treat her with more respect and care. 'You're right to prioritise your own needs and well-being. It doesn't sound like your employer was treating you with the respect and care that you deserve,' one wrote. 'You're taking a big step by standing up for yourself and choosing to look for a new opportunity. I hope you find an employer who values and respects you as a person. You deserve it!' 'Good decision, sister..a lot of employers here [are like that] actually,' another commented. 'I hope you feel better after sharing your feelings. Since you already made up your mind not to renew, then no need to dwell too much on it. Let go and move on,' a third added. Are employers obligated to give their helpers a pay raise? Employers are not legally required to increase their helpers' wages. However, the Ministry of Manpower encourages employers to do so as a way to recognise and reward their helpers' good performance and dedication. MOM also recommends offering a 'contract gratuity,' which is a bonus paid at the end of the contract, to motivate helpers to maintain or improve their work. Read also: Maid asks if she was wrong to request S$10k loan in exchange for renewing contract
CNA
a day ago
- CNA
Commentary: Espionage and tariffs can't tarnish TSMC's crown
TOKYO: An attempt to steal trade secrets from the world's largest chipmaker and renewed tariff threats on semiconductors are bending Taiwan's 'silicon shield'. But it's not breaking just yet. Still, heavy is the head of TSMC, whose technology everybody wants a piece of. Less than a day after news broke that TSMC fired several employees for a suspected attempt to obtain critical information on its cutting-edge manufacturing, US President Donald Trump threatened new chip tariffs 'of approximately 100 per cent'. On Thursday, Taiwan confirmed that TSMC is exempt from the latest levies due to its investments in the US. But Trump still sowed a lot of confusion after stating in an interview earlier this week that Taiwan was 'coming over and spending US$300 billion in Arizona, building the biggest plant in the world'. TSMC had previously only committed US$165 billion, suggesting negotiations might not be over. Trump likely realized that new, sky-high tariffs on TSMC would be a blow to US tech ambitions. Domestic titans at the heart of maintaining America's lead over China, such as Nvidia and Apple, are TSMC's biggest customers. And fresh levies would be an own-goal for the Stargate artificial intelligence infrastructure plans Trump announced earlier this year, which rely on hundreds of thousands of advanced chips. The news of a tariff reprieve helped drive TSMC's shares to a record on Thursday. TSMC's multi-billion-dollar expansion efforts in the US haven't always gone over well at home. Some patriotic Taiwanese want the chipmaker to keep core technologies within the self-ruled island as a safeguard from potential Beijing aggression. But expanding manufacturing to the US will only strengthen Taiwan's alliance with Washington and give its footprint room to grow. It's also worth recognising that TSMC and Silicon Valley are on the same side when it comes to countering China. MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS OVER LEAK Still, tariffs may not be the company's biggest headache. The potential corporate espionage is far more than a run-of-the-mill commercial intellectual property theft. It's being investigated under Taiwan's national security law and has the potential to spiral into a broader geopolitical spat. At this stage, there are more questions than answers. The scope of the leak, the perpetrator and the motive haven't been disclosed. Still, TSMC has said it was able to identify the issue 'early'. On Thursday, Tokyo Electron confirmed that a former employee was involved in the case, though said an internal probe hadn't found evidence of the confidential information being shared with a third party. Local prosecutors have made half a dozen arrests, and the people involved were reportedly targeting information on the company's 2-nanometer production – the most advanced chip manufacturing technology in the world. Besides TSMC, there are only three other companies that are actively trying to mass produce the cutting-edge chips: Samsung, Intel and Japan's long-shot startup Rapidus. Many of them rely on the same suppliers, such as Tokyo Electron. Acquiring the critical know-how for smaller chip node production can cost tens of billions of dollars in research and development. There are other reasons so few firms are capable of attempting this. Even with the R&D knowledge, it still requires massive investments in fabrication plants and tooling equipment, as well as access to a very limited supply of trained engineers to compete at scale. Taiwan and TSMC have spent decades building this foundation, and there aren't clear shortcuts to leapfrog the company's dominance – even unethical ones. Countries and companies have poured billions trying to eclipse TSMC's virtual monopoly on advanced chipmaking, but these hard-won gains can't be spread (or stolen) overnight. The firm is also no stranger to talent poaching and other attempts at IP theft; it's a systemic issue in an industry where the strategic importance is so high. The most recent case is spurring international whodunnit intrigue, but more importantly it shows that the company has beefed up internal security protocols to rapidly respond. CRUCIAL FOR TSMC TO MAINTAIN ITS EDGE It can't be overstated how important it is for TSMC to maintain its technology edge. Some 24 per cent of the most-recent quarterly revenue came from its 3-nanometer tech. Demand is already high for the company's next-generation nodes, set to go into mass production later this year. TSMC's dominance gives it the power to set prices at a time when the foreign exchange rate is unfavourable and trade uncertainty looms. This tech advantage has not just proven crucial for TSMC's business. It is giving Taiwan's government leverage via so-called semiconductor diplomacy. The potential leak gives new fuel to critics of President Lai Ching-te, who has had a rough few weeks. As the first chips-related case involving the National Security Act, it's imperative that authorities investigate and respond to the fullest extent of the law. Taipei must set a precedent with this case to deter any future attempts. As my colleague Howard Chua-Eoan has written, history shows us that technological secrets and monopolies have a hard time staying that way in the long run. For now, TSMC is selling the shovels during a global AI gold rush. Even tariff threats and espionage attempts can't tarnish its crown just yet.
