logo
‘It took four years and 183 viewings to sell my flat – then I made a loss'

‘It took four years and 183 viewings to sell my flat – then I made a loss'

Telegraph18-05-2025
Buying a home is often a pivotal milestone. It can be an emotional anchor for those settling down and a way to signal their ascendancy into adulthood.
After decades of soaring house prices, many expect them to keep rising – so that a profit is guaranteed when they come to sell. But that is not always the case, especially for those who have not owned their home for long.
Katherine Ormerod, a writer and author, knows this better than anyone.
In 2016, she bought a house with her boyfriend, a 'tiny, tiny' flat in Kilburn, north London. Three years later, with a young child and pregnant again, the couple decided to put the flat back on the market. It was in immaculate condition, in Zone 2 and less than three minutes' walk to a Tube station, so – they figured – the buyers would come.
But it wasn't quite that simple. The property wouldn't budge. To make matters worse, lockdown hit a few months in, scuppering an initial offer.
It took four years and 183 house viewings to secure a buyer, a process that Ormerod describes as 'mental torture'.
When the sale finally happened in 2023, Ormerod and her partner technically banked a price £10,000 higher than they'd bought at. But this marginal increase was more than offset by fees, meaning when they did the maths, they were in the red.
'If you add up all the money, we obviously made a financial loss on the property,' she said. ' We paid stamp duty, we paid lawyer fees, we spent a lot on storage,' she explains.
In addition, they had to pay a punitively high mortgage rate for several months after a buyer fell through at the last minute, on top of paying rent on their new place.
Given the value of the flat grew by just 1.8pc over seven years, this was not enough to recoup the amount of money, or time, that they had pumped into the house. And it increased by far less than inflation, which averaged around 3.8pc per year in this period.
Ormerod calculates that the couple would have roughly broken even if they hadn't bought the flat, but had instead paid rent during this period, assuming they'd found a high-interest refuge for the funds they spent on a deposit (plus what they paid in mortgage interest and fees).
'There's no question that, for us, it was a really bad investment.'
Losses on losses
Ormerod, 41, is not alone. Last year, 91pc of people sold their UK homes for more than they paid, according to Hamptons. In other words, almost one tenth of sellers made a loss, nationally. That excludes people who made losses from fees and legal costs, like Ormerod, meaning the true proportion of loss-makers is likely higher.
The picture is even worse in London. Last year, 14pc of Londoners sold their property for less than what they bought it for, putting Ormerod in good company. Between 2016 and the end of 2024, the average London property increased in value by just 9pc, according to Land Registry data.
It's particularly bad for flats and maisonettes in London, which rose 3pc on average in that period. As such, flat owners are four times more likely than house owners nationally to sell at a loss, according to Hamptons.
This is having a knock-on effect on people's lives, says Lucian Cook, of Savills.
'One of the features of the recent housing market has been relatively weak numbers of those moving up a rung on the housing ladder. People have been living in their first and second homes for longer, often delaying a move up the ladder until it becomes a necessity.
'In part, that is because of the higher interest rate environment, but it also reflects their struggles in accumulating enough housing wealth to give them the confidence to do so.
'The issue has been particularly acute in London, where house price growth has been lower than elsewhere in the UK over the past nine years or so. That has meant the ability to trade up in the capital has been heavily dependent on their ability to pay down their mortgage debt.'
Last year, property returns in percentage terms hit the lowest point since 2015, when Hamptons' records began. They have steadily fallen since the peak in 2016, before the Brexit vote, when the average home sold at a 60pc premium.
Equity gains from property are getting smaller and taking longer to cash in, exacerbated by higher mortgage and transaction costs. The average homeowner has gained £91,820 in property value, equating to a 42pc profit on average over 8.9 years.
Sarah Coles, a personal finance adviser at Hargreaves Lansdown, says that it's worth remembering that not all home investments work out.
'In the UK people have come to think of property as something that generally tends to rise in price, so during those times when prices fall, it can feel discombobulating.'
She added selling at a loss is particularly 'unsettling' for first-time homeowners with little equity, and for older people downsizing, hoping to fund their retirement care.
Even the ultra-wealthy occasionally suffer the downsides of property investments. Singer, Ellie Goulding, reportedly made a loss on her £3m London town house post-divorce, while British mogul, Bobby Arora, recorded a 30pc loss on his luxury Belgravia property.
Stories like Ormerod's paint a bleak picture for the cohort of first-time buyers who bought in 2016 at the top of the market, particularly for those buying flats in London. Ormerod says she chose to speak publicly because so few people talk about 'ballsing it up'.
It was a painful experience that she says others need to be more aware of.
'People talk about buying and selling as if it's this really normal, straightforward and light-hearted thing. And actually, for so many people, it's much more like being on the precipice of financial longevity and potential ruin.'
Though financially, she did survive, she says she went through an immeasurable mental tax.
Looking forward
Today, Ormerod reflects philosophically on the sale.
'I always try to stay positive and think, perhaps if we hadn't been putting that money into our mortgage every month, maybe we wouldn't have been saving it so consistently.'
She adds she feels privileged to have been in a position to buy a house at all.
Time has proven a healer too, and two years since they sold they are now considering buying again, although it could be tricky given they're both self-employed (which, she notes, makes securing a fresh mortgage from the bank more difficult).
But Ormerod says that she doesn't regret the loss-making sale, having given her the opportunity to raise her children in a dream (rented) home outside central London.
'It was worth every penny of heartache,' she says. 'Loss and gain are subjective.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fears over bioethanol plant ‘putting £1.25 billion jet fuel project in jeopardy'
Fears over bioethanol plant ‘putting £1.25 billion jet fuel project in jeopardy'

North Wales Chronicle

time12 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Fears over bioethanol plant ‘putting £1.25 billion jet fuel project in jeopardy'

Crisis talk are ongoing to save Vivergo Fuels, near Hull, following the decision to end the 19% tariff on United States bioethanol imports as part of the recent UK-US trade deal. On Friday, Meld Energy said the situation is putting its plans for a 'world-class' green jet fuel project on the Humber in jeopardy. Earlier this year, Meld Energy signed a £1.25 billion agreement with Vivergo Fuels to anchor a Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) facility at Saltend Chemicals Park in Hull. Meld Energy CEO and founder Chris Smith said: 'We're excited about the potential to bring our sustainable aviation fuel project to the Humber – one of the UK's most important industrial and energy hubs. 'But, for projects like ours to succeed and the flow of vital investment to be forthcoming, we need a strong and integrated low-carbon ecosystem. 'A bioethanol plant on site at Saltend is a critical part of that mix. Without it, we'd have to consider alternative locations overseas where that infrastructure is already in place.' Mr Smith was speaking as the Vivergo plant was expecting its last scheduled wheat delivery from a farm in Lincolnshire on Friday, as the site continues to wind down. Vivergo Fuels managing director Ben Hackett wrote to wheat growers earlier this year explaining that the plant will only be able to honour existing contractual obligations for wheat purchases while uncertainty continues. Mr Hackett said: 'Building a future fuels cluster here in Hull would deliver major economic, environmental and strategic benefits not just for the Humber, but for the whole country. 'We have the site, the skills, the supply chain and the ambition to lead the way on sustainable aviation fuel. 'But, without urgent Government support for British bioethanol, the UK risks losing that opportunity, along with the jobs and billions of pounds in investment that depend on it.' Last month, the firm, which is owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said it is was beginning consultation with staff to wind down the plant, which employs more than 160 people, due to the uncertain situation – a process which could see production stop before September 13, if support is not provided. It said Britain's two largest bioethanol producers – Vivergo Fuels and Ensus in Teesside – are now in urgent negotiations with the Government. The firms say the UK-US trade deal and regulatory constraints on the industry have made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products. A Government spokesperson said: 'We recognise this is a concerning time for workers and their families which is why we entered into formal discussions with the company on potential financial support last month. 'We will continue to take proactive steps to address the long-standing challenges the company faces and remain committed to working closely with them throughout this period to present a plan for a way forward that protects supply chains, jobs and livelihoods.' The Government said officials and ministers have met with Vivergo and Ensus consistently over the last few months to discuss options to address 'significant challenges' that the bioethanol industry has been facing for some time. It said engagement with the companies 'continues at pace' and external consultants have been brought in to help.

British steelmakers boosted by change to EU tariffs
British steelmakers boosted by change to EU tariffs

Rhyl Journal

time12 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

British steelmakers boosted by change to EU tariffs

The EU has agreed to more than double the UK's tariff-free quota for certain steel products in a move the Government described as a 'direct win' from Sir Keir Starmer's deal with the bloc earlier this year. At May's UK-EU summit, Sir Keir and European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen agreed to restore Britain's steel quotas to historic levels after they were slashed in March. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the announcement was 'yet another positive step forward for the UK steel sector' that would give producers 'certainty'. The agreement comes at a difficult time for the industry, which continues to face 25% tariffs on exports to the US. An agreement with President Donald Trump to effectively reduce those tariffs to zero is yet to come into effect, but Britain has been protected from the 50% tariff Mr Trump imposed on steel from the rest of the world last month. UK Steel director general Gareth Stace said Friday's change was 'excellent news' for the sector that had been 'plagued by problems' in exporting steel to the EU. He added: 'The quota will restore historic trade flows and is good news for both UK steelmakers and their EU customers.' The decision means the UK can export 27,000 tonnes of 'category 17' steel – which includes angles and sections of steel – to the EU each quarter without paying tariffs. The figure had been cut to 10,000 tonnes after the EU introduced a cap intended to prevent a single exporter dominating the market. In total, the UK exports around 2.4 million tonnes of steel to the EU, worth nearly £3 billion and accounting for 75% of British steel exports. Ministers expect the change to help protect jobs in the industry, which has been a priority for the Labour Government since coming to power. In April, the Government used an almost unprecedented weekend recall of Parliament to take control of British Steel to prevent the shutdown of its blast furnaces and maintain the UK's primary steel-making capacity. British Steel's interim chief operating officer Lisa Coulson said: 'The removal of EU tariffs on British-made steel is a significant boost to our business. 'The EU is an important market to us, particularly for the products our highly skilled colleagues manufacture in Scunthorpe, Teesside, and Skinningrove.' But Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith described the quota as 'tiny' and 'embarrassing from a Government which has nothing to show on removing the US tariffs on steel which the PM claimed to have delivered back in May'. He added: 'It's a paltry return for giving up 12 years of fishing rights and tying the energy costs of every business to a higher cost EU emissions regime over which the UK will have no say. 'When Labour nationalised British Steel we said they had no plan. This government by press release shows we were right.'

Fears over bioethanol plant ‘putting £1.25 billion jet fuel project in jeopardy'
Fears over bioethanol plant ‘putting £1.25 billion jet fuel project in jeopardy'

Rhyl Journal

time12 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Fears over bioethanol plant ‘putting £1.25 billion jet fuel project in jeopardy'

Crisis talk are ongoing to save Vivergo Fuels, near Hull, following the decision to end the 19% tariff on United States bioethanol imports as part of the recent UK-US trade deal. On Friday, Meld Energy said the situation is putting its plans for a 'world-class' green jet fuel project on the Humber in jeopardy. Earlier this year, Meld Energy signed a £1.25 billion agreement with Vivergo Fuels to anchor a Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) facility at Saltend Chemicals Park in Hull. Meld Energy CEO and founder Chris Smith said: 'We're excited about the potential to bring our sustainable aviation fuel project to the Humber – one of the UK's most important industrial and energy hubs. 'But, for projects like ours to succeed and the flow of vital investment to be forthcoming, we need a strong and integrated low-carbon ecosystem. 'A bioethanol plant on site at Saltend is a critical part of that mix. Without it, we'd have to consider alternative locations overseas where that infrastructure is already in place.' Mr Smith was speaking as the Vivergo plant was expecting its last scheduled wheat delivery from a farm in Lincolnshire on Friday, as the site continues to wind down. Vivergo Fuels managing director Ben Hackett wrote to wheat growers earlier this year explaining that the plant will only be able to honour existing contractual obligations for wheat purchases while uncertainty continues. Mr Hackett said: 'Building a future fuels cluster here in Hull would deliver major economic, environmental and strategic benefits not just for the Humber, but for the whole country. 'We have the site, the skills, the supply chain and the ambition to lead the way on sustainable aviation fuel. 'But, without urgent Government support for British bioethanol, the UK risks losing that opportunity, along with the jobs and billions of pounds in investment that depend on it.' Last month, the firm, which is owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said it is was beginning consultation with staff to wind down the plant, which employs more than 160 people, due to the uncertain situation – a process which could see production stop before September 13, if support is not provided. It said Britain's two largest bioethanol producers – Vivergo Fuels and Ensus in Teesside – are now in urgent negotiations with the Government. The firms say the UK-US trade deal and regulatory constraints on the industry have made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products. A Government spokesperson said: 'We recognise this is a concerning time for workers and their families which is why we entered into formal discussions with the company on potential financial support last month. 'We will continue to take proactive steps to address the long-standing challenges the company faces and remain committed to working closely with them throughout this period to present a plan for a way forward that protects supply chains, jobs and livelihoods.' The Government said officials and ministers have met with Vivergo and Ensus consistently over the last few months to discuss options to address 'significant challenges' that the bioethanol industry has been facing for some time. It said engagement with the companies 'continues at pace' and external consultants have been brought in to help.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store