With the pvt sector indifferent to R&D, India risks missing the deep-tech bus, or getting locked out
Medium- and Long-Term Plan for the Development of Science and Technology (2006-20):
This aimed to make China an 'innovation-oriented nation'.
Made in China 2025:
It targeted dominance in 10 hi-tech sectors.
Thousand Talents Plan (2008):
This programme was launched to reverse brain drain, and attract global researchers. It has received massive state support through guidance funds, industrial subsidies and tech-focused SOEs.
China also doubled down on patenting, domestic standards and end-to-end industrial ecosystems, from semiconductors to green energy. R&D investment surged past 2.5% of GDP, with a rapidly rising share from the private sector. Today, China leads the world in AI patents, EV production, solar capacity and quantum publications.
Meanwhile, India faces similar vulnerabilities China faced 25 years ago: imported chips, weak indigenous IP, low- tech exports and a fragmented research base. And the response has been uneven.
GoI has launched Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF), a ₹1 lakh cr R&D fund, expanded PLI schemes, and invested in semiconductors, space tech, clean energy and quantum. For the first time, the government is adopting a full-spectrum approach to funding research and innovation across all technology readiness levels (TRLs).
While ANRF will focus on early-stage discovery (TRLs 1-3) and improve ease of doing science with DST, a soon-to-be-finalised ₹1 lakh cr R&D fund should drive private investment in mid-to-late-stage innovation (TRLs 4-9) through long-term, near-zero-interest loans. This fund shifts focus from grants to outcome-linked support for developing commercially viable tech. While the need for greater funding in basic research is acknowledged, GoI is laying the essential groundwork to build a self-sustaining R&D ecosystem.
Yet, the private sector remains risk-averse, contributing barely a third of national R&D. India's R&D-to-GDP ratio remains stuck below 0.7%, with little traction in patenting or deep-tech commercialisation. The innovation pipeline is still thin.
Ex-Intel CEO Andrew Grove made the line, 'Let's be paranoid' - with its philosophy of the importance of proactive preparedness for unexpected changes and strategic inflection points - famous. And, yet, even Intel wasn't paranoid enough. It missed the AI inflection point, and today Nvidia has overtaken it in valuation, strategic relevance and tech leadership.
A similar inversion is unfolding between China and the US, driven by who innovates faster and scales deeper. Unfortunately, while GoI is paranoid, India's private sector isn't.
In 2024, Foundation for Advancing Science & Technology (FAST) published a comparative study, 'State of Industry R&D in India', of 59 Indian and 60 global firms across six key sectors: pharma, software, defence, chemicals, automobiles, and energy. The study, conducted between FY16 and FY23, reveals a persistent input-output gap. Global firms, on average, reported 2.9x R&D intensity (spend as % of revenue), 3.7x share of PhD-qualified employees, and 2.9x R&D spending as share of profits than Indian firms.
On output indicators, the disparity is starker. Global firms generated 13.1x patents and 1.3x scientific publications per billion dollars of revenue compared to their Indian counterparts.
In software, global firms had 32x R&D intensity and 12.1x patents by revenue.
In pharma, India's strongest sector, R&D intensity (5.8%) lagged far behind global peers (17.3%).
The only parameter where Indian firms outperformed was in R&D disclosure, with an average disclosure score of 6.2 (out of 10) vs 3.7 for global firms.
The European Commission recently released the EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard 2024. It presents data on the top global 2,000 companies investing in R&D. They invested ₹1,257.7 bn in R&D in 2023. Indian firms accounted for ₹5.5 bn, or about 0.4%, of global industrial R&D investment, with only 15 companies featuring among the world's top 2,000 R&D spenders.
This places India behind not only advanced economies like the US (₹531.8 bn, 681 firms) and China (₹215.8 bn, 524 firms), but also innovation-intensive small economies such as South Korea (₹42.5 bn, 40 firms), Taiwan (₹24.7 bn, 55 firms), and Ireland (₹10.4 bn, 24 firms).
Sustained long-term economic growth is driven by investments in knowledge and innovation. India's failure to internalise this principle within its industrial ecosystem suggests presence of constraints: low absorptive capacity, weak industry-academia linkages, and limited interest from the private sector in high-risk R&D.
Persistent underrepresentation of Indian firms in global innovation rankings reflects a missing industrial policy focus on Schumpeterian creative destruction, without which India risks being confined to low-value segments of GVCs.
In Liu Cixin's 2008 science fiction novel, The Three-Body Problem, the world gets paralysed by the sudden collapse of scientific progress. Stagnation is the real nightmare. It's not fiction any more. For India, the risk isn't that we fail. It's that we're too comfortable even to try. Innovation can't be outsourced.
If there's a gap between what scientists are doing and what businesses need, then companies must invest in R&D, collaborate with academia, and shape research. If the private sector stays disengaged, we'll keep watching others lead. We just aren't paranoid enough.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Talent density and family businesses making PE buyouts exciting: ChrysCapital's Rajiv Batra
Bengaluru: India's consumer industry is seeing more family-run businesses achieving scale, which is resulting in attractive buyout opportunities cropping up for private equity firms, a senior executive at ChrysCapital told Mint. Moreover, generational wealth and businesses are exchanging hands within family-run businesses, prompting many entrepreneurs to sell parts of their business and creating more instances for buyouts, said Rajiv Batra, director and consumer sector lead at ChrysCapital, said. 'We see the share of buyouts increasing in the next 5-7 years. As long as there are strong underlying trends and a good team, we will evaluate both minority investments as well as buyouts in the space." He added that the availability of talent—especially those that are being groomed by large multinational companies and Indian conglomerates—is on the rise. 'This gives us the confidence that if a buyout or control deal is available and we get the right talent, it's worth pursuing." ChrysCapital's thesis comes on the heels of its acquisition of desserts chain Theobroma for an 85% stake, marking its first buyout in the consumer sector, it said on Wednesday. It is also the firm's first transaction in the consumer foods space. The deal reportedly values the Mumbai-based quick-service restaurant (QSR) chain at ₹2,400 crore. Batra declined to comment on the valuation. Currently, the firm has no plans of drastically changing how the patisserie chain operates, given that it believes that Theobroma is at the centre of the Western dessert opportunity in India. 'With the existing management team as well as the founders with their 15% stake, we should be able to work together to create strong outcomes for everyone in the coming year," said Batra. The PE firm previously invested in Wow Skin Care and kids' retailer FirstCry in the consumer segment. In September last year, Mint was the first to report that ChrysCapital was among the three private equity firms to have submitted binding bids to acquire Theobroma Foods. In March, Mint reported that the homegrown investment firm is poised to acquire a controlling stake in the bakery chain for ₹2,200-2,300 crore. The Theobroma acquisition Founded in 2004 by sisters Kainaz Messman Harchandrai and Tina Messman Wykes, Theobroma has grown from a single Colaba café into a pan-India Western desserts platform, operating nearly 250-plus company-owned outlets across 45 cities. Known for its brownies, cakes, and patisserie offerings, Theobroma has created a premium positioning in the quick-service restaurant segment. In fact, the brand's positioning as a 'mass premium' offering is what attracted ChrysCapital to the company in the first place. 'They have a very good premium connect, at least in the metros. The business has gone beyond metros to tier-2 cities in the last few years. We're looking at both markets to scale the business even further," said Batra. 'You can't ignore one versus the other. On the mass side, you still have a large part of the belly of the India market that is waiting to be tapped." ChrysCapital's traditional holding period for companies that have strong economics and are growing well is between 5-6 years. However, the firm didn't say what sort of returns it was expecting a company like Theobroma or future investments from the sector to provide. ChrysCapital is looking to double down on the QSR segment, with emphasis on India's growing affinity for cafes and gourmet offerings. The firm has noticed that Indian consumer behaviour has shifted as well, with more people seeking out organised, experience-led food consumption. 'I am hoping a good player emerges in the Mexican and Chinese cuisine segment, that can give a good luxury experience for Indian consumers at scale," Batra added. The firm is inching closer toacquiring homegrown desserts chain The Belgian Waffle Co., in a deal that values the nine-year-old company at ₹1,300 crore, Mint reported in August last year. If it goes through, it'll be the second premium QSR brand to be added to ChrysCapital's portfolio. 'We had been spending a lot of time on relevant deals in QSR, but luck was not on our side. We did make a play at 2-3 of these [companies] but were not able to get to the finish line either basis price or sometimes even conviction. All these things worked in our favour this time," according to Batra. New fund target Armed with a $2.2 billion new fund that it raised earlier this year, ChrysCapital is looking to write larger cheques and build a bigger portfolio in India. 'QSR is a space we have tracked closely, and there are enough examples in India and around the world where firms have made money. There's also a noticeable shift from Indian desserts to Western desserts, so we were looking for opportunities, keeping in mind this macro trend," he said. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas and Co. served as Chryscapital's legal counsel on the Theobroma deal, and Deloitte was its financial and tax advisor. Founded in 1999, ChrysCapital has raised nearly $8 billion across 10 private equity funds, a continuation fund, and a public markets fund. From its private equity funds, ChrysCapital has invested $5.5 billion in more than 100 deals and realized almost $8 billion from over 80 exits.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
White House orders major Smithsonian review to remove divisive content and highlight American values
The White House is doing a full internal review of exhibits and materials at the Smithsonian Institution, which runs many major public museums in the U.S. This review follows President Donald Trump's order about what should and should not be shown in these museums. A letter from three top Trump aides—Lindsey Halligan, Vince Haley, and Russell Vought—tells Smithsonian secretary Lonnie Bunch III that the review aims to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan stories, and restore public trust in cultural institutions. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program The move is part of the Trump administration's effort to influence US cultural and historical institutions and remove materials focusing on diversity. Earlier this year, Trump signed an executive order accusing the Smithsonian of promoting "divisive, race-centered ideology" that portrays American and Western values negatively. Vice President JD Vance was assigned to stop government spending on exhibits or programs that divide Americans by race or conflict with federal law and policy, as per the report by CNN. ALSO READ: Atlanta rapper T-Hood killed in Gwinnett county shooting after domestic dispute What the review will check The letter says the review will focus on several important areas. It will look at the content shown to visitors in the museums, how items are selected for the exhibits, and the plans for current and future exhibitions. The review will also check how materials and collections are used, and the rules for the stories and information that are shared with the public. In the first phase, the review will cover eight Smithsonian museums located in Washington, DC. Live Events These include the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of Natural History, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, the National Museum of the American Indian, the National Air and Space Museum, the Smithsonian American Art Museum, the National Portrait Gallery, and the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, as per reports. Smithsonian's response to the plan More museums will be included in a second phase, but those will be announced later. The Smithsonian said it is "reviewing" the letter and plans to work 'constructively' with the White House, according to the report by CNN. The Smithsonian stressed its work is based on strong research and factual history and will continue to collaborate with the White House, Congress, and its Board of Regents. The Smithsonian is the world's largest museum group with 21 museums and the National Zoo. Nearly 17 million people visited last year. Almost all museums have free admission. The Smithsonian started its own review in June and says it stays nonpartisan and unbiased in presenting facts and history. It is willing to make changes if needed to meet its standards. The letter asks each museum to name a contact person to share plans for programming about America's 250th anniversary, as stated by CNN report. ALSO READ: CoreWeave stock rises fast with AI growth and Microsoft support, but faces risks from share sales and big deal Museums must send a full list of: Current and planned exhibitions and budgets Traveling exhibitions and plans for next three years Internal guidelines like staff manuals and job descriptions Internal communications about how artwork is chosen and approved All this material must be sent within 30 days, after which White House officials will do on-site visits and walkthroughs. Within 75 days, voluntary interviews with curators and senior staff will be scheduled by the Trump administration. Within 120 days, museums should start fixing content by removing divisive or ideological language and replacing it with unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions in exhibits and displays. Last month, the National Museum of American History removed a temporary placard about Trump's two impeachments, which caused public criticism. The museum later said the removal was temporary and denied any government pressure. The placard was put back with some changes and placed lower in the exhibit, as per the report by CNN. FAQs Q1. What is the White House review of the Smithsonian about? The White House is reviewing Smithsonian exhibits to remove divisive content and promote American values, as ordered by President Donald Trump. Q2. Which Smithsonian museums are included in the first review phase? Eight museums in Washington, DC, including the National Museum of American History and the Air and Space Museum, are part of the first phase.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
US offers $5 million reward for arrest of Haitian gang leader
The United States offered a $5 million reward on Tuesday for the arrest of Haitian gang leader Jimmy "Barbeque" Cherizier for allegedly violating US sanctions. Haitian gang leader Jimmy "Barbeque" Cherizier has been under US Treasury Department sanctions since 2020 and UN sanctions since 2022.(REUTERS) Cherizier, 48, and another man, Bazile Richardson, have been indicted on charges of conspiring to transfer funds from the United States to fund gang activities in Haiti, the Justice Department said. "There's a good reason that there's a $5 million reward for information leading to Cherizier's arrest," US Attorney Jeanine Pirro said at a press conference. "He's a gang leader responsible for heinous human rights abuses, including violence against American citizens in Haiti." Cherizier has been under US Treasury Department sanctions since 2020 and UN sanctions since 2022. The former policeman heads an alliance of gangs in Haiti dubbed the "G9 Family," whose members are accused of murder, robbery, extortion, rape, targeted assassinations, drug trafficking and kidnappings. The alliance participated in an organised assault last year that ultimately led to the resignation of Prime Minister Ariel Henry, who was replaced by a frail transitional council. The Justice Department said that Cherizier and Richardson, a naturalised US citizen who was arrested in Texas last month, raised funds from members of the Haitian diaspora in the United States and had the money transferred to intermediaries in the Caribbean nation. Cherizier allegedly used the funds to pay salaries to members of his gang and purchase firearms. Haiti is the poorest country in the Western hemisphere, with swaths of the country and the vast majority of the capital, Port-au-Prince, under the control of armed gangs. Despite the deployment of a Kenyan-led multinational force to back up Haiti's police, violence has continued to soar. At least 3,141 people have been killed in the first half of this year, according to figures released last month by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. "Cherizier and (Richardson) sought to raise funds in the United States to bankroll Cherizier's violent criminal enterprise, which is driving a security crisis in Haiti," Assistant Attorney General John Eisenberg said. 'The National Security Division does not tolerate criminal gang fundraising in the United States, and will continue to pursue those who enable Haiti's violence and instability.'
