
No More Food Dye in Froot Loops? Not So Fast.
Same cereal. Same sugary taste. Different hues.
A box of Froot Loops sold in the United States contains vivid rings of red, orange, green, purple, yellow and blue — neon colors derived from synthetic dyes, like Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5, Blue No. 1 and Yellow No. 6. In a box sold in Canada, the colored rings obtain paler shades from the juices of blueberries, watermelon and huito, an Amazonian fruit. And not a single one is blue.
The manufacturer in both countries, WK Kellogg, formerly known as the Kellogg Company, can clearly make Froot Loops without synthetic dyes. The question is: Will it and other big food companies adopt the approach in United States? And will consumers, raised on color-popping cereals, flame-colored nacho chips and neon blue sports drinks consume those foods if they are a bit more … beige?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, wants them to. On Tuesday, Mr. Kennedy, who has long criticized artificial dyes used in Froot Loops and other processed foods as part of a larger food system that he says contributes to chronic disease and poor health, announced that he had reached 'an understanding' with major food manufacturers to remove commonly used petroleum-based food colorings from their products by 2026.
The meaning of 'an understanding' remains unclear. No food companies attended the press conference, and few have said they will remove synthetic colors, which the Food and Drug Administration currently allows. But a shift may be coming. This week, citing expected demand from consumers, the beverage giant PepsiCo, which also makes Doritos and Lay's potato chips, said it would either phase out synthetic colors or offer consumers natural color options in the next couple of years.
Mr. Kennedy is perhaps hoping that using his bully pulpit as head of the agency that oversees the F.D.A. will be enough to push big food companies to change their ways. They have responded to pressure before. About a decade ago, a number of companies tried shifting to natural colors. Most notably, Kraft Macaroni & Cheese successfully replicated its characteristic orange noodles by switching to turmeric and paprika. But other companies struggled. Some reverted to synthetic dyes after sales slumped.
For some critics of synthetic dyes, however, Mr. Kennedy's announcement was a disappointment. Dr. Peter Lurie, a former F.D.A. official and the executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said the government should move more forcefully to eliminate the dyes.
'History tells us that relying on voluntary food industry compliance has all too often proven to be a fool's errand,' Dr. Lurie said in a statement.
Rewriting the Recipe
No matter how much pressure Washington exerts, shifting to natural colors won't happen overnight. It is not as easy as simply replacing Yellow No. 6 with carrot juice, said James Herrmann, director of food colors at Sensient Technologies, a company that manufactures colors — both artificial and natural — for the food and beverage industry.
It can take up to two years to develop the seeds, grow the plants and concoct the combination of, say, red cabbage and black carrot extract that produces a desired shade, he said. And it's not just getting the color right. Food companies are likely to have to make adjustments to their manufacturing processes and facilities.
Light and heat are enemies of natural colors, causing them to fade, change or even, in some cases, separate, Mr. Herrmann said. Natural colors must be kept cool, and they have a relatively short shelf life, which means adding refrigeration and ensuring a steady supply of them, he said. He added that colors from carrot or beet juice and their synthetic cousins might have different viscosities, requiring factories to change pumps or the piping used to apply the colors.
Also, more natural dye is needed to achieve a satisfying color than synthetic dye, so recipes may have to be reformulated. 'Your sugar or flour may be off,' Mr. Herrmann said.
And that's assuming enough carrots, cabbage, beets and spirulina (an algae) are available to replicate the oranges, greens and blues of chips and sports drinks. Mr. Herrmann, whose company uses proprietary seeds for most of its colorings, said he wouldn't 'put the seed in the ground for the crop until we know there's a customer there for it.'
'If everybody switches at once,' he added, 'there is simply not enough material around the world available to meet the demand.'
Because it can take 10 times as much material from natural colors to mimic a small amount of synthetic dyes, costs could very likely climb as well.
Late Tuesday, the Consumer Brands Association, the trade organization for the food industry, said in a statement that the ingredients in the food supply 'have been demonstrated to be safe' and 'removing these safe ingredients does not change the consumer packaged goods industry's commitment to providing safe, affordable and convenient product choices to consumers.'
Stacy Flathau, a co-chief corporate affairs officer at WK Kellogg, said in an emailed statement that 85 percent of its cereals contained no artificial colors, but that it was removing synthetic colors from those sold in schools. The company added that it was looking forward to working with the F.D.A. to identify ways to remove artificial colors from foods containing them.
Growing Colors From Scratch
Concerns about the safety of food colorings, especially regarding behavior in children, have been on the rise. A 2021 health assessment by the State of California suggested that 'synthetic food dyes are associated with' behaviors 'such as inattentiveness, hyperactivity and restlessness in sensitive children.' In Europe, food containing some dyes come with a warning label to that effect. Health Canada, which allows the use of food dyes but with strict restrictions on the amounts, notes on its website that it deems the evidence of those effects in children to be insufficient.
California banned artificial dyes in school meals in 2024, and just last month, West Virginia enacted a statewide ban, the most comprehensive in the country. More states are considering restrictions.
Sensient had been building its portfolio of natural colors, assuming that, by 2030, food companies will have moved away from synthetics. But the timeline could be speeding up.
Sensient develops its natural colors starting with the seed. It has developed a variety of beets, for instance, that are larger and more saturated in color, Mr. Herrmann said. The company provides those seeds to contract farmers around the world. After the produce is harvested, Sensient pulps, pulverizes and strains the purple sweet potatoes, red radishes and grapes into a rainbow of extracts, powders and liquids.
The process also eliminates the flavors of most of the underlying fruits, vegetables or other plants, but not all.
'You're never going to take the taste out of strawberry juice. 'It's going to be a little acidic, a little strawberry-ish. And that works well for a strawberry flavor in a kids' cereal,' said Linsey Herman, a vice president of research and development at Nature's Path, which makes organic cereals and other foods. 'But nobody is dying for a carrot-flavored cereal.'
Even though the color, whether natural or synthetic, doesn't often change the taste profile of the frosted pastry or chip or soda, the appearance does signal certain flavors — or intensity of flavors — to consumers, said Charles Spence, a professor of food psychology at the University of Oxford.
'If you reduce the color saturation level of a drink, your mind may tell you it's going to taste less sweet or less sour than the original color,' Mr. Spence said. 'Duller hues may signal that this is a duller flavor or stale for some people, while for others it may signal that it's a more natural color, something found more in nature.'
In recent years, Mr. Herrmann said, about 80 percent of new foods and beverages hitting the market were being made with natural colors. But food companies have dragged their feet on making the switch with popular existing products over fear that consumers may spurn them.
'They have to understand what their die-hard fans want,' he said, 'and make sure the natural product reaches the synthetic shades as closely as possible.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US health chief says Sen. Cassidy promised pick on vaccine panel
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he told U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy that he would allow Cassidy to pick a candidate for a key panel of vaccine advisers. Cassidy, a Republican, serves as chairman the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. "What I told Senator Cassidy is that I would allow him to put one of his candidates on, which we're going to do," Kennedy said on Thursday during an interview on Fox News' "The Story with Martha MacCallum," referring to the vaccine advisory panel. Kennedy on Wednesday named eight members to serve on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, which advises the agency on who should get the shots after they are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, after gutting the panel last week.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Meet the vaccines skeptics that are now part of RFK Jr.'s vaccine approval committee
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., has announced new members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's vaccine advisory panel. Earlier in the week, the secretary made waves when he purged all 17 former members, citing 'historical corruption at ACIP.' 'The most outrageous example of ACIP's malevolent malpractice has been its stubborn unwillingness to demand adequate safety trials before recommending new vaccines for our children,' he wrote in a post on X. In their place, Kennedy hand picked eight members, who he said were individuals 'committed to evidence-based medicine, gold-standard science, and common sense' and who wouldn't be 'ideological anti-vaxxers.' He noted that each of them have committed to 'demanding definitive safety and efficacy data before making any new vaccine recommendations' and that the committee would review safety and efficacy data for the current schedule. But, the moves have been concerning to experts, who noted that several members have been critical of vaccines. The fired panel members have said that their ousting signaled that scientific expertise was 'no longer of use' under Kennedy and that that decision would 'undermine public trust in the vaccine process,' in a time when vaccine hesitancy has led to the spread of measles and other disease. So, who are the new members Kennedy says will help to restore that trust? Here's what and who to know... Dr. Robert Malone is a former mRNA researcher who has been a close advisory to Kennedy. Kennedy said he has served in advisory roles for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Defense. He earned a medical degree from Northwestern University in 1991 and has taught at the University of California at Davis and the University of Maryland. He runs a wellness institute and a popular blog, and has been active on social media and in various outlets. He rose to prominence during the pandemic, relaying conspiracy theories about the vaccines and Covid. He has promoted alternative treatments for the virus and measles. He's claimed that millions of Americans were hypnotized into taking the shots and suggested that the vaccines cause a form of AIDS. Malone said in a post on X that he will do his best "to serve with unbiased objectivity and rigor.' 'I have attended many, many ACIP meetings in the past on behalf of clients. I played a key role in enabling advanced development of the Merck Ebola vaccine. I have deep expertise and experience in influenza vaccines and vaccine manufacturing technology, and have spoken on this issue at the WHO by invitation,' he said. Dr. Martin Kulldorff is a biostatistician and epidemiologist. He's a founding member of the D.C.-based Academy for Science and Freedom at the nonsectarian Christian Hillsdale College. The academy aims to 'combat the recent and widespread abuses of individual and academic freedom made in the name of science' and 'educate the American people about the 'free exchange of scientific ideas and the proper relationship between freedom and science in the pursuit of truth.' Formerly a professor at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Kulldorf wrote in an op-ed that telling the 'truth' had gotten him fired. 'Bodily autonomy is not the only argument against Covid vaccine mandates. They are also unscientific and unethical,' wrote Kulldorff. On LinkedIn, he has said the National Institute of Health had failed Americans during the pandemic. Notably, he was a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, along with NIH head Jay Bhattacharya, which was an October 2020 letter maintaining that pandemic shutdowns were causing harm. He has posted on X in support of the positions of Kennedy, Bhattacharya, and new FDA Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Dr. Vinay Prasad. Kennedy said Kulldorff has served on the Food and Drug Administration's Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee and the CDC's Vaccine Safety Subgroup of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. He noted Kulldorff also developed widely used tools such as SaTScan and TreeScan for detecting disease outbreaks and vaccine adverse events, and said he was an advocate for 'evidence-based approaches to pandemic response.' On Thursday, Endpoints News reported that Kulldorff and Malone were paid hundreds of dollars an hour to be a part of cases challenging the safety and efficacy of drugmaker Merck's HPV and MMR shots. Malone confirmed he had done 'expert witness consultation.' A request for comment from Kulldorff was not immediately returned. Dr. Retsef Levi is a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He also serves as the faculty leader for Food Chain Supply Analytics. Prior to working at MIT, he spent nearly 12 years as an officer in the Intelligence Wing of the Israeli Defense Forces. An MIT bio page for Levi says he leads several industry-based collaborative research efforts with local hospitals and that he has been on contract to address risk related to 'economically motivated adulterations of food manufactured in global supply chains.' His pinned tweet claims that mRNA vaccines 'cause serious harm including death, especially among young people.' 'We have to stop giving them immediately!' he urged. 'From what I've seen so far, I think it's obvious that these mRNA vaccines should not be given to anybody young or healthy. It is also not at all clear to me that they should be given to anybody, based on the evidence,' he said in a new interview. 'I am honored with this opportunity and humbled by the responsibility,' he wrote. A registered nurse and a regional director for the National Association of Catholic Nurses, Vicky Pebsworth has been listed as a board member and volunteer director for the National Vaccine Information Center, a group previously described in The Washington Post as 'the oldest anti-vaccine advocacy group' in the country. She earned a doctorate in public health and nursing from the University of Michigan. She has worked in the health care field in various capacities for more than 45 years. She is a former member of the FDA's Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee and the National Vaccine Advisory Committee's 2009 H1N1 Vaccine Safety Risk Assessment Working Group and Vaccine Safety Working Group (Epidemiology and Implementation Subcommittees), according to Kennedy. 'Her son — her only child — experienced serious, long-term health problems following receipt of seven live virus and killed bacterial vaccines administered during his 15-month well-baby visit which sparked her interest in vaccine safety research and policymaking and chronic illness and disability in children,' a bio page for her says. Dr. Joseph Hibbeln has worked at the National Institutes of Health since the late 1990s. He formerly served as the Acting Chief of of the Section on Nutritional Neurosciences. He is also a psychiatrist and neuroscientist, with work focused on how nutrition affects the brain, including the potential benefits of seafood consumption during pregnancy. He attended the University of Chicago for his undergraduate degree and received his medical degrees from the University of Illinois at Chicago in 1988. He served his residency at UCLA in 1992. He serves as a Captain in the United States Public Health Service. Recently, he wrote to ask another LinkedIn user about their position regarding 'closing nearly all vaccine research' at the Department of Health and Human Services. Dr. Cody Meissner is a former member of the committee and a professor of pediatrics at the Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine. He is the Chief of Pediatric Infectious Diseases at Tufts Children's Hospital and has served as a member of the Human Health and Services (HHS) Tick-borne Diseases Working Group. He has been the principal investigator for numerous vaccine clinical trials and the HHS Chair of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. He's held an advisory role at the Food and Drug Administration. Florida Republican Governor Ron Santis has quoted him as saying that closing schools during the Covid pandemic had 'aggravated the issue of inequity in our society.' Dr. James Pagano is an emergency medicine physician with more than 40 years of clinical experience. He also did his residency at UCLA. 'Dr. Pagano served on multiple hospital committees, including utilization review, critical care, and medical executive boards. He is strong advocate for evidence-based medicine,' Kennedy said. Dr. Michael Ross is a Virginia-based obstetrician and gynecologist who previously served on a CDC breast and cervical cancer advisory committee. He is described as a 'serial CEO and physician leader' in a bio page for Havencrest Capital Management, a private equity investment firm where he is an operating partner. He recently started a position as the chief medical officer for the Maryland-based AI start-up Manta Pharma. He is a clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at George Washington University and Virginia Commonwealth University. 'He has advised major professional organizations, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and contributed to federal advocacy efforts around women's health and preventive care. His continued service on biotech and healthcare boards reflects his commitment to advancing innovation in immunology, reproductive medicine, and public health,' Kennedy said. With reporting from The Associated Press


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Confused over the conflicting COVID vaccine guidance? Here's what to know
Federal health officials have in recent weeks given conflicting — and at times confusing — guidance around who should get vaccinated against COVID-19. These changes mark a significant departure from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's previous recommendations, which advised everyone 6 months and older to get the vaccine. On May 20, Dr. Marty Makary, commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, published an article in the New England Journal of Medicine saying the FDA will make the vaccine available only to adults 65 and older and people with at least one underlying medical condition — meaning vaccines will no longer be recommended for healthy adults under 65. On May 27, Health Secretary and longtime vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr. unilaterally announced that the federal government no longer recommends the vaccine for children and pregnant women, and that the vaccine was removed from the immunization schedule recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But days later, the CDC partly contradicted this pronouncement, saying the vaccine will remain on the childhood immunization schedule — but added a new clarification that parents should consult with their children's doctor when deciding whether to get their child immunized. The CDC offered no formal guidance on whether pregnant women should get the vaccine, though its website lists pregnancy as an underlying condition that puts someone at higher risk of severe COVID and thus makes them eligible for vaccination going forward. What should you do? One practical thing to keep in mind, according to some experts, is you may just want to wait and see how things shake out. The next updated COVID vaccine, for 2025-26, won't be rolled out until the fall. And before then, we may get more clarity on who it will be recommended for — and thus whom health insurers will cover it for. Insurers typically pay for vaccines only if they're recommended by the federal government. We may get clarification this month: The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, an outside panel of scientific experts that advises the CDC on vaccine recommendations, is scheduled to meet June 25-27 to vote on 2025-26 COVID vaccine recommendations. Historically, this panel has advised the CDC director on vaccine recommendations, and the CDC then communicates its recommendations with the public. Kennedy bypassed this long-held protocol by going ahead and changing vaccine recommendations without input from the CDC's advisory panel. As it stands: Adults 65 and over The recommendation for this group is not changing. Adults 65 and older should get the COVID vaccine every six months. This group can expect to get the same access to vaccination as they've had since the pandemic began, meaning their insurer should continue covering it since the federal government recommends it for them. People 6 months and older with at least one underlying medical condition The vaccinations are also still recommended for those in this age group with one or more underlying conditions putting them at higher risk for severe COVID. Pregnant women The federal government's position on whether pregnant women should get immunized is unclear. While Kennedy said the vaccine for pregnant women was no longer recommended by the CDC, the FDA's Makary said a day later that the decision to vaccinate should be made by the pregnant person and their doctor. Infectious disease experts and obstetricians urge pregnant women to get the vaccine. This is because pregnant people who get COVID are more likely to develop severe disease, need hospitalization and ICU care, and experience pregnancy complications including preeclampsia, miscarriage, preterm birth and higher likelihood of developing blood clots, said Nadia Roan, a UCSF professor and senior investigator at Gladstone Institutes who studies immunology. 'There's a ton of data that's been generated over recent years suggesting that boosting or vaccination during pregnancy is beneficial,' said Roan, who is researching COVID boosters in pregnant people. Also, getting immunized during pregnancy is the only way to pass protection on to the fetus, and have the infant protected in early life. 'If you vaccinate and you're in the third trimester, you're essentially vaccinating your fetus,' said Dr. George Rutherford, a professor emeritus of epidemiology and biostatistics at UCSF. 'That's a good thing because it's not approved for people under 6 months yet. So this is how we get to that population.' If you're pregnant and wondering whether you should get the current 2024-25 vaccine now — in case you can't get the updated 2025-26 vaccine later due to new federal recommendations that have yet to be determined — 'I'd say yes because I'm not sure it'll be covered in the fall,' said Dr. Peter Chin-Hong, an infectious-disease specialist at UCSF. 'It's not harmful, particularly if you haven't had one in the last year,' he said. The vaccine is safe to get at all stages of pregnancy, he said. Healthy adults under 65 For this group, whether to get vaccinated is a little more open to interpretation, experts said, and can factor in things like each person's risk tolerance, job and living situation. 'I'd talk to their health care provider at the end of the day to help guide them more,' Chin-Hong said. 'Everyone has different situations and circumstances.' You may want to lean toward vaccination if, for instance, you plan to travel this summer (when abroad, you don't have access to your usual health care providers) or if you live with immunocompromised or older adults and want to lower the chances of spreading COVID to them. 'In general, (healthy adults) are going to do fine, so to me it's really about protecting the people who are most vulnerable,' Chin-Hong said. Children About 2,000 children in the U.S. have died from COVID since 2020, and more than 200,000 have been hospitalized. Those numbers are much lower compared with people in higher-risk groups, especially those over 65, and most healthy children likely experience mild or moderate symptoms. Still, many infectious diseases experts say the benefits of vaccination do still outweigh the risks — though that calculus is much closer than it is for pregnant people and adults over 65. 'It's a small number compared to deaths in many other age ranges, but that's deaths, many of which could've been prevented if they were vaccinated,' said Dr. John Swartzberg, a clinical professor emeritus of infectious diseases at UC Berkeley School of Public Health. The vaccines have proved safe and effective in children, lower the likelihood of severe disease, and help reduce long COVID risk, Roan said. 'The risks (of vaccination) are very low, and these vaccines have been shown to be safe,' Roan said. 'So I think the benefits definitely outweigh the risks. But it's up to each individual to make that decision.'