Marc Klasfeld makes feature debut with horror film Do Not Enter: ‘I have waited decades…'
Also read: Do Not Enter trailer: Release date, cast, plot and all you need to know | Watch
The cast leans into genre favorites: Adeline Rudolph (Sabrina, Mortal Kombat 2) leads as Diane. Nicholas Hamilton (IT) plays Tod. Francesca Reale (Stranger Things) shows up as Cora, with Jake Manley (The Order), Laurence O'Fuarain (Game of Thrones), and Kai Caster (Yellowstone) rounding out the crew. Javier Botet - whose twisted limbs have scared audiences in The Conjuring and Alien: Covenant - shows up as something called the Pale Creature. So, yes, it's going to get weird.
From viral hits to a haunted hotel
For Klasfeld, this film has been a long time coming. 'I have waited decades to find the right feature film project to which I could truly dedicate myself,' he said. 'The passion I have found to make Do Not Enter all it can be is extraordinary, and I honestly can't wait for the world to see what we have in store,' he added.
This is the guy behind the See You Again music video, which has racked up over 5.5 billion views. But even with that kind of viral legacy, Klasfeld admits this film took everything.
Also read: Listicle: 10 horror movies Hollywood wishes it had made
A new horror vision from familiar names
The script comes from Grudge and Texas Chainsaw Massacre writer Stephen Susco, adapted from a novel by First Blood creator David Morrell. Production is backed by Suretone Pictures' Jordan Schur.
Do Not Enter doesn't just want to scare - it aims to build a world where greed, ghosts, and live streams collide. And judging by the trailer? It is going to be one hell of a ride.
FAQs:
1. What is Do Not Enter about?
A group of livestreaming explorers search for hidden mob money in a haunted hotel and run into supernatural horrors.
2. Who directed Do Not Enter?
Marc Klasfeld, known for music videos, makes his feature film directorial debut.
3. Who stars in Do Not Enter?
The cast includes Adeline Rudolph, Nicholas Hamilton, Francesca Reale, and Javier Botet.
4. What was Do Not Enter previously titled?
The film was originally titled Creepers.
5. Is Do Not Enter based on a book?
Yes, it is adapted from a novel by David Morrell, the author of First Blood.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
'Final Destination 7' announced with ‘Bloodlines' co-writer returning to pen the franchise's next chapter
A seventh part in the 'Final Destination' series is officially in the works at New Line with 'Bloodlines' co-writer Lori Evans Taylor taking on the script for the new film. Collectively returning as producers are Craig Perry, Sheila Hanahan Taylor, Jon Watts, Dianne McGunigle and Toby Emmerich for the Warner Bros. and New Line project, while Warren Zide is slated to be the executive producer. The next installment in works 'Final Destination: Bloodlines,' the sixth movie in the now 25-year-old horror franchise, debuted No 1 at the global box office this past May, and opened to a domestic total of 51 million dollars - the best in franchise history - and subsequently earned a total of 286 million dollars globally, which officially made it the largest film in the franchise. To date, this film series, shaped by fate, has grossed over 983 million dollars globally, now ranking it as New Line's third-largest horror franchise behind 'The Conjuring' universe and the 'It' movies. How 'Bloodlines' brought the franchise back to life Taylor and Gary Busick co-wrote the screenplay for 'Final Destination: Bloodlines,' rebooting a franchise that has been dormant these last 14 years after 2011's 'Final Destination 5.' Taylor and Busick collaborated with directors Zach Lipovsky and Adam Stein on a story that would expand the franchise mythology through a multigenerational narrative in which Death—the omnipresent and faceless antagonist of the franchise—returns to claim victims across a single bloodline. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Critical acclaim and calculated chaos Variety praised 'Final Destination: Bloodlines' as 'clever, unpredictable and fun,' spotlighting co-writers Lori Evans Taylor and Gary Busick for their ability to orchestrate 'one impishly dangerous situation after another.' The review commended the duo for maintaining the franchise's hallmark tension, noting that each death sequence was crafted with just enough realism to keep viewers on edge—without asking them to suspend disbelief.
India Today
3 days ago
- India Today
AI in filmmaking: Innovation or a threat to creative freedom?
If the digital world wasn't enough, there are digital babies. Al avatars, and deceased celebrities are being resurrected on-screen. In 2025, AI isn't just part of everyday life and movie-making toolbox—it's shaping entire stories, performances, and now, controversially, the last two years alone, AI has left its fingerprints on some of the most celebrated films. 'Emilia Prez', leading the Oscars race with 13 nominations, used AI to enhance Karla Sofa Gascón's singing voice. 'The Brutalist', starring Adrien Brody and Felicity Jones, saw its Hungarian dialogue refined through AI tools. Studios are leaning in as well. Warner Bros. uses AI-driven casting analytics; Lionsgate has tapped Runway AI to speed up storyboarding; and James Cameron is a part of Stability AI's is no denying AI. It is the present, and if used transparently, these tools can be a boon that helps in streamlining pre-production, improving accessibility, and even pushing artistic boundaries. But the recent 'Raanjhanaa' controversy has exposed the flipside to AI, where it is being used to rewrite a vision, rather than enhancing Raanjhanaa Flashpoint Earlier this month, Eros International re-released the Tamil version of 'Raanjhanaa' (Ambikapathy) with an AI-generated alternate ending in which Kundan [Dhanush] survives, leading to a sentimental reunion rather than the film's original tragic Aanand L Rai and lead actor Dhanush, neither consulted nor informed, called it a betrayal. Rai branded the move 'a dangerous precedent' and is looking at pursuing legal action to protect the work's artistic began as a 'tech experiment' became a national flashpoint. Critics argue that the power of 'Raanjhanaa' rests in its heartbreak; change the ending and you change the soul of the film. Rai compared it to 'hijacking' the story's Akhtar backed the director publicly. 'If the creator of the film was unhappy about their work being changed, I will always support the creator,' he said during an event. Ritesh Sidhwani echoed the sentiment, stressing AI should only be used 'smartly' and 'to the film's advantage,' not to override the filmmaker's defended the update, describing the new finale as a 'creative reimagining' and asserting their legal right as the film's copyright isn't the first time Indian filmmakers have expressed unease over AI's creative creep. Karan Johar has previously said that while one cannot ignore the existence of AI, natural intelligence is irreplaceable. He mentioned, 'If you have pure orange juice and you have canned orange juice, there is a difference. And yes, canned orange juice can take you to higher sales, and you can do much more economically. But there is a purity to fresh orange juice.'Anurag Kashyap, never shy about industry shifts, said that while AI could help with improving the quality of remakes in cinema, it 'might not encourage more original filmmaking.'When AI Works: The Case of MaaYet, it's not all bad news. Ajay Devgn's 'Maa', produced by Prismix Studios, released a statement today explaining the use of AI in its latest production. A pivotal three-minute sequence in the film features 90 seconds of AI-generated visuals, created via an in-house generative Studios calls it 'a fusion of art and innovation', a glimpse into how AI can inspire risk-taking while respecting cinematic vision. 'We're setting the foundation for how AI can responsibly and meaningfully contribute to the art of cinema,' their statement with the help of AI, fans of deceased pop stars/celebrities, can continue experiencing their legacy. Case in point, late Punjabi rapper Sidhu Moose Wala will soon be 'performing' in an AI-driven hologram concert, allowing fans to witness an immersive, larger-than-life stage This Matters for AudiencesMovies live in our collective memory because of how they make us feel. Imagine 'Kal Ho Naa Ho' without Aman's death, or 'Titanic' with Jack clambering onto the raft. Tempting? Maybe. But would they still be the same films? Absolutely 'Raanjhanaa' incident raises urgent questions: If studios can unilaterally alter endings, what stops them from modifying performances, rewriting dialogue, or sanitising plots to suit trends? What happens when your favourite film is 'updated' every few years to fit new market tastes?advertisementFor filmmakers, this is about creative ownership. For audiences, it's about trust. If you can't be sure you're watching the director's vision, are you watching the movie at all, or an algorithmic remix?AI is neither hero nor villain—it's a tool. De-aging technology gave us 'The Irishman's decades-spanning drama. AI-assisted VFX are making mid-budget films look like blockbusters. Accessibility tools are making films more inclusive for audiences with real issue is governance. At present, the rules are struggling to keep pace with technology. The Academy is reportedly considering requiring filmmakers to disclose AI use in submissions, a step many see as the bare entertainment industry globally is calling for stronger safeguards. Be it mandatory creator consent for alterations post-release or a declaration when AI-generated elements form part of the final film. Also, archival protection for original versions of films, among these guardrails, AI risks being a matrix of metrics be real. AI is here to stay. It has the potential to become the most transformative filmmaking tool, when done right. But cinema is more than just content, it's art, shaped by the intent and imagination of the people behind it. The moment that intent becomes optional, we risk losing what makes the medium worth protecting.- Ends
NDTV
4 days ago
- NDTV
Shwetha Menon Obscene Films Case: Kerala High Court Orders Interim Stay On Proceedings In FIR Against The Actor
Kochi: Kerala High Court on Thursday stayed the proceedings in connection with the FIR lodged against Malayalam film actor Shwetha Menon for allegedly publishing or transmitting obscene scenes of some of her past movies and advertisements. The interim order was passed by Justice V G Arun on a plea made by the actor to quash the FIR against her. The High Court said there was prima facie substance in the contention of the actor's counsel. Before referring the complaint for investigation, the requirements of calling for a report from the police and of making an enquiry ought to have been complied. "Considering the short duration within which the complaint was filed and forwarded to the police, it appears that no such procedure was followed. Registry shall call for a report from the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam regarding the procedure followed before forwarding the complaint to the police for investigation". "There shall be an interim stay on further proceedings in crime number 1075/2025 (the FIR) of Ernakulam central police station," the High Court said. It also issued notice to the state and the complainant on whose complaint the magisterial court had ordered after the FIR was lodged. An FIR, under the section 67 (publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form) of the Information Technology (IT) Act and provisions of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act was lodged against the actor. Menon, known for films like Salt N Pepper, Rathinirvedam and Kalimannu, is in the fray for the president's post in the Association of Malayalam Movie Artistes (AMMA). The election to the executive committee is scheduled for August 15. In her plea, seeking quashing of the FIR, the actor has claimed that the allegations are "mala fide" in nature and the offences she has been booked for are not made out. The complainant -- Martin Menachery -- has alleged that Menon appeared in several films -- Paleri Manikkyam, Rathinirvedham, Kalimann and a condom advertisement containing her obscene visuals with the intention of securing monetary gain. Rejecting the allegations, the actor has contended that the films referred to in the complaint were duly censored and certified and have been available in the public domain for several years now. She also said that the character portrayed by her in the movie Paleri Manikyam, bagged her a Kerala State Award for best actress. Even the advertisement, in which she appeared years ago, was duly censored and certified, the plea said. "The allegation of the petitioner (Menon) being privy to running porn sites is absurd and per se defamatory. It is submitted that such allegations are raised in a callous and irresponsible manner without any supporting material," it contended. The actor also said that the complaint was filed in the wake of her filing nomination for the post of AMMA president.
