logo
Blackbeard ‘Cheap' Hypersonic Strike Missile Being Developed For U.S. Army (Updated)

Blackbeard ‘Cheap' Hypersonic Strike Missile Being Developed For U.S. Army (Updated)

Yahoo5 days ago
The U.S. Army wants to see if a startup founded three years ago by former SpaceX employees can deliver a lower-cost ground-launched missile, dubbed Blackbeard, capable of engaging targets hundreds of miles away at hypersonic speeds. The weapon is being developed in parallel with new uncrewed launcher vehicles, but could also be fired from M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) launchers. With a viable Blackbeard design from the Castelion Corporation, the Army says it would gain a valuable new way to quickly strike targets, including time-sensitive ones on the move, and do so relatively cheaply.
In its proposed budget for the 2026 Fiscal Year, the Army is asking for $25 million to support work on the Blackbeard Ground Launch (Blackbeard GL) effort. The funding request is somewhat confusingly contained in a line item that has been used for elements of the Dark Eagle Long Range Hypersonic Weapons (LRHW), as well as HIMARS Extended Range Demostration (HERD) work, in the past.
'As of June 2025, the program office is pursuing a Middle Tier of Acquisition for Rapid Prototyping (MTA-RP) pathway, with the goal of transitioning the system to Program Executive Office Missile and Space if successful and deemed cost-effective,' the Army's Fiscal Year 2026 budget request explains. 'To accelerate development and leverage innovation, the program office is pursuing acquisition under a Fixed-Firm-Price (FFP) sole-source Other Transaction Authority for Prototyping (OTAP) with Castelion Corporation, a non-traditional defense contractor.'
Castelion was founded in 2022 by a trio of individuals who left space launch and services giant SpaceX to form their own company, which is focused on the development of high-speed, but also relatively low-cost and readily producible strike weapons. As of January, the company had raised more than $100 million in funding from private investors and had secured tens of millions more in U.S. military contracts, according to The Wall Street Journal. Those contracts are something we will come back to later on.
Rapid development schedules and affordable, mass-produced defense hardware are the keys to deterring future wars. Castelion is here to build them. pic.twitter.com/DUjoylYvrt
— Castelion (@CastelionCorp) October 5, 2023
'The mission of Blackbeard Ground Launch (GL) is to attack/neutralize/suppress/destroy using hypersonic missile delivered precision fires (seeker based) against time sensitive moving targets and hardened targets at a much-reduced cost per missile than currently exists in the Army inventory,' according to the Army's proposed budget for the 2026 Fiscal Year. 'Blackbeard Ground Launch (GL) is an affordable, mass-produced hypersonic weapon designed for mid-range precision. The Army will leverage advancements in technology, materials, and cost-effective production methods to provide superior capabilities through fast, iterative design cycles, flexible hardware development, and modern manufacturing practices.'
'Blackbeard GL is not a replacement to [sic] the Long Range Hypersonic Weapons (LRHW) as it will not reach similar velocities nor range,' the line item also makes clear. 'The goal of Blackbeard GL is to deliver approximately 80% of the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) Increment 4 capability at a significantly reduced cost.'
PrSM is a short-range ballistic missile. The Army is in the process of fielding the baseline Increment 1 version now, which can be fired from both wheeled M142 HIMARS and tracked M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) launcher vehicles. The Increment 2 missile, which is in development now, features a new dual-mode seeker system that allows for the engagement of moving targets on land or at sea. Increment 3 is focused on new 'enhanced' payloads, which might include small precision-guided glide bombs or kamikaze drones. Increment 4 seeks to increase PrSM's range from 310 miles (500 kilometers) to 620 miles (1,000 kilometers), and could include the addition of a ramjet or some other form of air-breathing propulsion.
At least in terms of range, a Blackbeard missile offering 80% percent of the capability of an Increment 4 PrSM could therefore be able to reach targets out to just under 500 miles (800 kilometers).
Hypersonic speed is also typically defined as anything above Mach 5, which would then be the minimum peak velocity for the Blackbeard missile. It is important to note here that traditional ballistic missiles travel at very high speeds, with many types often exceeding the hypersonic threshold in the terminal phase of flight. However, the term 'hypersonic missile' generally refers to weapons designed for sustained hypersonic speed across a far shallower and even maneuvering trajectory. This can include missiles that release unpowered hypersonic boost-glide vehicles, like the aforementioned Dark Eagle, as well as air-breathing hypersonic cruise missiles. Exactly how Blackbeard is expected to be 'hypersonic' is unclear.
What kind of unit cost the Army is eying for Blackbeard is unknown. PrSM Increment 4 is still very much in the conceptual stage, so there is no price point there to compare against. Per its latest budget request, the Army is now paying around $1.6 million for each Increment 1 PrSM, but is also spending some $5.35 million per Increment 2 missile with the new guidance package.
TWZ has reached out to the Army and Castelion for more information.
Castelion has already conducted numerous launches to date of test articles with different designs, which could reflect multiple concepts under development. They all look, at least in very broad strokes externally, like small ballistic missiles. Some of the company's experimental designs also look to feature tail sections that are at least heavily inspired by, if not lifted directly from Standard-series surface-to-air missiles still in service with the U.S. Navy and other navies globally.
The U.S. Navy and the U.S. Air Force have awarded Castelion contracts for work related to long-range strike weapon concepts in the past. The company has also said previously that it is aiming to have a more finalized design by 2027. The Air Force connection may also help explain the apparent existence of an air-launched design that the Army plans to use as the basis for the first phase of the Blackbeard project.
Phase 1 'will deliver a prototype proof-of-concept, including a fixed-fin flight demonstration of the existing air-launched, extended-range Blackbeard design from a modified Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Multiple Launch Rocket System Family of Munitions (MFOM) pod,' according to the Army's latest budget proposal. 'Following the demonstration, Blackbeard-GL Minimum Viable Product (MVP) prototypes will be fabricated alongside a custom Blackbeard-GL launcher pod, culminating in an MVP flight test launched from the M142 HIMARS Fire Control system.'
All current munitions for the M142 HIMARS and M270 MLRS come in standardized MFOM pods. The pods can each hold six 227mm guided artillery rockets, a single Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) short-range ballistic missile, or two PrSMs. It's unclear how many Blackbeards the Army expects to fit inside the standard pod architecture.
'If Phase 1 is successful, this option will be exercised to develop and demonstrate the full capability of a production-representative weapon,' according to the Army's budget documents. 'This includes delivering 10 missiles integrated into the M142 HIMARS launcher platform and fire control system, as well as integrating a Flight Termination System (FTS).'
A munition that would allow a HIMARS launcher to precisely engage stationary or moving targets 800 miles in any direction from where it is located, and do so very quickly and at relatively low cost, would be a major boost in capability. Even just with a hypersonic peak speed, Blackbeard would offer additional flexibility against pop-up threats and otherwise present additional challenges for enemy forces.
As mentioned at the start of this story, the Army says that Blackbeard is also a direct companion to work on new uncrewed launcher vehicles capable of firing munitions from MFOM pods, as well as bespoke canisters. The service is currently looking toward a future that could include a potential family of so-called Common Autonomous Multi-Domain Launchers (CAML) of various sizes. It has already tested an uncrewed derivative of the HIMARS, as well as a separate design from Raytheon.
Castelion has been using launchers loaded on 10×10 Oshkosh MKR18 Logistics Vehicle System Replacement (LVSR) trucks, as well as static launchers on the ground, during its testing.
Another flight test in the books – this time @Spaceport_NM. Our second flight in the past 30 days.The best way to stay ahead of your adversary in a prolonged competition is to have faster learning cycles than they do. pic.twitter.com/9n776j8XWr
— Castelion (@CastelionCorp) February 19, 2025
Welcoming our new LSVR MKR18 to El Segundo this week. We'll be making upgrades to convert this vehicle into a launcher system for our upcoming flight tests – and it's a fun ride. pic.twitter.com/xNfktSAc7i
— Castelion (@CastelionCorp) April 10, 2024
In general, uncrewed launchers would help the service expand its overall rocket artillery and ballistic missile launch capacity without the need for significantly larger numbers of personnel. The launchers could also be employed with less risk to human operators, even when pushed further forward. This could be a particularly potent combination when paired with Blackbeard's range and other capabilities.
Beyond the operational capabilities it might offer, Blackbeard represents a steadily growing U.S. military-wide interest in lower-cost precision munitions that are also relatively easy to produce, as well as leveraging non-traditional defense contractors to develop and build them. This is widely seen as vital for bolstering stockpiles in an economically viable way ahead of a major contingency, such as a large-scale conflict in the Pacific against China, and keeping adequate supplies of those weapons flowing in the event of a drawn-out fight.
On top of all this, hypersonic weapons have historically been notoriously complex and expensive, which in turn limits their potential impact in future operations. At the same time, the U.S. military has consistently touted the importance of hypersonic capabilities to success in future conflicts, especially against global competitors like China.
'I think the types of sensing capability that quantum sensing is going to deliver, the cross domain sensing opportunities from space to air, for example,' and 'the sophistication of sensor fusion and track using AI [artificial intelligence] and other techniques – I don't think we're going to be able to hide in any operational sense, in a realistic way,' Rob McHenry, deputy director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), warned during an online talk hosted by the Air and Space Forces Association's (AFA) Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies last week. McHenry had also explicitly posited whether the 'stealth era' might be coming to an end.
'And so what are the implications of that? You know, if you look historically, there are things like using speed and maneuverability,' he added.
The U.S. military is also trying to improve its contracting processes to manage risks differently to encourage innovation while avoiding sinking significant resources into efforts that ultimately don't provide useful results. The 'phased approach provides the Army with a clear 'off-ramp' should the technology prove immature, ensuring responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars,' the line item for Blackbeard in the service's latest budget request makes clear.
Whether the Blackbeard missile project delivers on its promise or not, it could serve as a model for future Army munition development efforts.
Update: 7/1/2025 –
In response to our queries, Castelion has now told TWZ that the designs seen in the imagery it has released to date show 'arerepresentative of the low-cost internally developed test vehicles we use to enable rapid subsystem design iteration and to ground our performance models in real-world test data.'
'Castelion's approach to development focuses on getting into hardware-in-the-loop and flight testing early in development to support learning cycles across design, production, and test,' the company added. 'As such, flight vehicles shown on social media are not representative nor intended to be representative of our final weapon systems.'
Contact the author: joe@twz.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's Tesla Is Braced For A Surprise Bitcoin Price Shock After SpaceX Set Alarm Bells Ringing
Elon Musk's Tesla Is Braced For A Surprise Bitcoin Price Shock After SpaceX Set Alarm Bells Ringing

Forbes

time4 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Elon Musk's Tesla Is Braced For A Surprise Bitcoin Price Shock After SpaceX Set Alarm Bells Ringing

Bitcoin, fresh from hitting an all-time high earlier this month, is swinging wildly even as U.S. president Donald Trump issues a huge crypto prediction. Sign up now for CryptoCodex—A free newsletter for the crypto-curious The bitcoin price has doubled from this time last year, soaring as a $37 trillion nightmare engulfs the Federal Reserve. Now, after Tesla and SpaceX billionaire Elon Musk confirmed a wild bitcoin rumor, Wall Street is bracing for Tesla's worst quarter in years that could be saved by the bitcoin price rally—just as SpaceX begins moving its bitcoin for the first time in years. Sign up now for the free CryptoCodex—A daily five-minute newsletter for traders, investors and the crypto-curious that will get you up to date and keep you ahead of the bitcoin and crypto market bull run Elon Musk, Tesla and SpaceX chief executive, is one of the most important influencers of the bitcoin ... More price. 'We see [Tesla] results coming in largely in line due to bitcoin gain,' GLJ Research analyst Gordon Johnson wrote in a note to clients seen by Barron's. Tesla, which is believed to hold just over 10,000 bitcoin worth $1.3 billion on its balance sheet, is expected to report a 10% decline in revenue from the same period last year to $22.7 billion, with adjusted earnings per share forecast to drop almost 20% year-over-year to $0.42, according to estimates compiled by Visible Alpha. In January, Tesla's profit for its fourth quarter of last year was given a boost due to changes in how companies account for their bitcoin and crypto holdings, with the bitcoin price then falling through the first few months of 2025 before sharply rebounding from April, climbing to a peak of $123,000 per bitcoin. The bitcoin price has soared 50% since its April lows, when it crashed alongside stock markets that were roiled by U.S. president Donald Trump's global tariff trade war. Earlier this month, Musk, who set up and led the Trump administration's department of government efficiency (Doge) and was jokingly called Trump's 'first buddy" until their fallout over out-of-control government spending, announced he's starting his own political party called the 'America Party" that will support bitcoin. 'Fiat is hopeless, so yes,' Musk posted to X, replying to a user who had asked if "the America Party embrace bitcoin," sending the bitcoin price sharply higher, and referring to government-backed currencies known as fiat, rather than asset-backed currencies. Sign up now for CryptoCodex—A free, daily newsletter for the crypto-curious The bitcoin price has rocketed higher since Elon Musk bought bitcoin for his companies Tesla and ... More SpaceX. Musk's hot-and-cold relationship with bitcoin has meant that even small references or mentions of bitcoin and crypto can cause prices to ricochet wildly. Meanwhile, Musk's rocket company SpaceX has set alarm bells ringing that either Tesla or SpaceX could be preparing to sell their bitcoin by moving $153 million worth, with analysts at blockchain data company Arkham Intelligence spotting the move earlier this week. The 1,300 bitcoin moved by SpaceX is just a fraction of the near 8,200 bitcoin SpaceX is believed to hold, according to data from In 2022, Musk sold most of the bitcoin Tesla had bought just over a year earlier, causing the bitcoin price to briefly plummet and sending shockwaves through the crypto market that Musk had been a vocal supporter of.

PeakDo makes the ultra-portable Starlink Mini ultra convenient
PeakDo makes the ultra-portable Starlink Mini ultra convenient

The Verge

time3 hours ago

  • The Verge

PeakDo makes the ultra-portable Starlink Mini ultra convenient

The Starlink Mini satellite dish is now even better thanks to the $119 LinkPower 1 power bank from PeakDo. The battery locks securely to the back of SpaceX's smallest terminal and provides over 4.5 hours of uninterrupted Internet connectivity. The LinkPower's battery can also charge simultaneously over USB-C from your car, solar generator, or solar panel for indefinite Internet use. Then the tidy little package can be slipped into a backpack or tote for your next adventure. Starlink is a life-changing Internet service that connects people and villages too remote for towers and cables to reach. My own Starlink Mini has been critical in helping me pursue life as a digital nomad from almost anywhere in Europe. And right now, Starlink's the only game in town for relatively cheap and fast consumer internet that can be quickly deployed into data dead spots. My overriding thought after using the PeakDo LinkPower for the last few weeks is this: why doesn't SpaceX make one of these? 9 Verge Score The LinkPower power bank bungs 99Wh right into the slot on the back of the Starlink Mini just like one of SpaceX's official mounts. It powers the little dish via a short DC-to-DC barrel connector. It makes the Starlink Mini a self-contained unit that can be placed anywhere within Wi-Fi range. That includes on top of your vehicle or shack, or in a distant clearing where it has a clear line-of-sight to satellites overhead — no long power cables required. The PeakDo unit has a bi-directional USB-C PD port to charge devices like your phone at up to 65W, or to share 100W of input to simultaneously power the Starlink and charge the LinkPower's battery. An integrated display lets you monitor the power on both ports. The single button on the LinkPower acts like an on/off switch for the Starlink Mini. Press it once to turn on the integrated display or hold it down to turn on the DC output that powers the Starlink Mini. The USB-C port is always on standby to deliver power, but I didn't notice any vampire drain as a result. For example, I put it away with a 98 percent charge, and five days later it still said 98 percent. Remote monitoring and control are possible over Bluetooth with a web app. This works on Android, Mac (with Chrome), and PC desktops, but iPhones require a special browser that supports Web Bluetooth APIs. It was a little janky regardless of platform, but also useful when the dish was sitting on the roof of my van, for example. It's the only way to access advanced features such as creating on/off schedules for the Starlink Mini. I averaged a whopping 4 hours and 35 minutes of battery life over repeated tests, with seven devices active on the Starlink Mini. When I reviewed the Mini back in October, I was only getting about 3 hours from my own 99Wh power bank – a good indication that the continuous stream of firmware updates delivered to my Starlink Mini terminal have improved power efficiency. That runtime can be extended by plugging a USB-C cable between the LinkPower and your car, power station, portable solar panel, or even a standard power bank you might use for your phone. Not having to worry about carrying special equipment just for the Starlink Mini has been incredibly liberating. Normally, the Starlink Mini requires an AC wall jack or battery with 100W (20V/5A) USB-C PD port to operate, along with specialized cables fitted with weather-resistant 5221 barrel jacks. But with the PeakDo LinkPower plugged in, you can easily keep it charged with the same gear that charges your laptops, phones, and other USB-C gadgets. My Sprinter van's USB-C jacks only provide about 19W of power, but a USB-C adapter plugged into its 12V socket produces over 30W of the 120W available, easily covering the 22W average power draw of the Starlink Mini. Not having to worry about carrying special equipment – those SpaceX cables are long! – just for the Starlink Mini has been incredibly liberating. It took 2 hours and 30 minutes to fully recharge the PeakDo LinkPower over USB-C from a 100W source, while simultaneously keeping the StarLink Mini running. The LinkPower's display was showing 55W – 60W coming in over USB-C to charge the battery, and another 18W – 26W over DC to power the Starlink Mini. I found the USB-C charging rate maxed out at about 60W, whether the Starlink was being powered or not. And pulling the USB-C charger never interfered with the operation of the Starlink Mini when starting or stopping the van. One knock against the PeakDo LinkPower's battery is its resistance to dust and water. It has an IPX4 rating, significantly worse than the Starlink Mini's IP67 rating. That means the LinkPower is not certified against dust — though PeakDo calls it 'dustproof' — and it's only tested to resist splashing water. So, it's probably not a good idea to mount it on the roof when driving in rain or on dusty roads. Regardless, the Starlink Mini works well from inside moving vehicles when mounted against a glass sunroof or sitting on the dashboard of a van. PeakDo claims an operating range of 60 degrees Celsius (140 degrees Fahrenheit) to -20 C (-4F). That means the battery should be fine on top of your vehicle's extra hot roof during sunny summer days, but could struggle in very cold winters. The Starlink Mini's operating temperature range is 50C (122F) to -30C (-22F). Using the LinkPower means you can't use the kickstand or other SpaceX mount with the Starlink Mini. The power bank does have three ¼-inch holes for a tripod or other aftermarket mounts if you're really bent on locking in a perfect orientation to the sky. I don't bother with this: it's never made much difference in my months of regular use. I don't have any real gripes with PeakDo's LinkPower power bank. The battery adds an additional 645g (1.42lb) to the 1.1kg (2.43lb) Starlink Mini, making it feel solid, not heavy. It was previously at risk of blowing away in strong winds. At $119, it costs about twice as much as other 99Wh power banks with 100W USB-C PD outputs, but it's worth it. By untethering the Starlink Mini, the PeakDo LinkPower 1 power bank opens up a world of new placement possibilities. Everything you need is in a self-contained kit that can be fired up with the press of a button for over four hours of operation — or longer with a simple USB-C power source. I already gave the ultra-portable Starlink Mini a 9/10 when I reviewed it last year. Making it ultra-convenient with some help from PeakDo edges it even closer to perfection for people with a desire to get up and go. Photography by Thomas Ricker / The VergePosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Thomas Ricker Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Accessory Reviews Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Reviews Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech

South Korea Plans to Build a Base on the Moon
South Korea Plans to Build a Base on the Moon

WIRED

time3 hours ago

  • WIRED

South Korea Plans to Build a Base on the Moon

Jul 23, 2025 5:00 AM The country's newly formed space agency wants to establish a lunar base by 2045. An artist's illustration of a lunar base. Illustration:China, India, and Japan are not the only countries on the Asian continent looking to establish themselves in the fledgling space economy. South Korea also wants to be in the space race, and even plans for a presence beyond Earth's orbit, with ambitions to create its own lunar base within 20 years. At a public meeting held at the National Research Foundation of Korea on July 17, the South Korean AeroSpace Administration (KASA) released a roadmap proposing 'five core missions, including low-Earth orbit and microgravity exploration, lunar exploration, and solar and space science missions,' The Korean Times has reported. KASA had already proposed placing a robotic lander on the lunar surface by 2032, but the new master plan is much more ambitious, including the development of a new lunar lander by 2040, as well as the construction of a lunar economic base by 2045. The Republic of Korea is not starting from scratch in the field of lunar exploration. In mid-2022, the country launched Danuri, its first lunar probe, aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket. Danuri reached lunar orbit later that year and is still in operation, studying the moon's natural resources with its suite of instruments. It is also intended to test space technology that will be used by KASA on future missions. This mission was part of the first phase of the Korean Lunar Exploration Program. Phase two includes the launch in 2032 of the aforementioned robotic module, as well as another lunar orbiter and a rover weighing 20 kilograms. This second phase will no longer rely on a SpaceX rocket or even a pad on US soil; rather, the mission will be launched using the country's KSLV-III rocket, which is still under development, from the Naro Space Center, located on the Republic of Korea's southern coast. The Korea Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Resources is assisting with preparations by deploying prototype lunar rovers in abandoned coal mines to evaluate technologies that could be used in upcoming space mining tasks. My KASA Is Your NASA KASA was created only recently, in May 2024, by the South Korean government, as a domestic version of NASA. It now oversees the Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI), which has handled development of the country's aerospace technologies since its establishment in 1989. Both KARI and the republic's national space research organization, the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, are now sub-agencies of KASA. With its new special agency and the backing of the private sector, South Korea is seeking to position itself among the top five countries in the field of space exploration. KASA also envisions landing a module on Mars in 2045, as well as the development of probes to monitor solar activity and improve space security, including, by 2035, the deployment of a solar observation satellite at the L4 Lagrange point (a stable position in space where small objects are held in place by the gravitational forces of the sun and Earth). South Korea, of course, is not the only country looking to build a lunar base by the middle of this century or to develop space economy infrastructure. Through the Artemis program, NASA intends to establish a lunar base within the next decade—if political conflicts do not derail that project. China, in collaboration with Russia and other countries, has also set a goal of building a lunar base by 2045. India also has its sights set on the moon, with plans for its own base on the surface by 2047. This story originally appeared on WIRED en Español and has been translated from Spanish.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store