
Why the MAGA economy is thriving
Imagine the perfect morning. After sleeping between sheets from MyPillow—a company established by Mike Lindell, a conspiracy theorist—you drink some Black Rifle Coffee, which 'serves coffee and culture to people who love America". You shave with Jeremy's Razors ('built for rugged jawlines....not feelings"). Then you eat some bacon from Good Ranchers, which pledges to 'make the American farm strong again", before going for a spin on your Harley-Davidson.
The broader MAGA universe extends beyond goods with over-the-top marketing to products and employers merely favoured by Republicans. And each economic choice adds up to something bigger. According to our analysis, America is splitting into two different economies and markets: one conservative, the other liberal. People on each side think about the economy differently, they buy different things and work in increasingly different industries. Not only that: the MAGA economy is doing surprisingly well.
American liberals tend to look down on companies that market themselves to conservatives. Although this is in part because they do not like the opposing side, some MAGA products look like scams. President Donald Trump's crypto coin soared following its launch, only to crash quickly and leave many supporters holding the bag. His branded watches, including the 'Fight Fight Fight" model, cost up to $100,000 and have received mixed reviews.
Such snobbery also reflects a belief that the conservative economy is backward. Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee in 2016, noted she had 'won the places that represent two-thirds of America's gross domestic product...places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward". Kamala Harris, the nominee in 2024, won a similar share of GDP. Of course, some solidly Republican districts have long been rich. In Jupiter, a town in Florida, local activities include playing golf and wearing white chinos. Yet Yuba City, in northern California, where lots of locals are farmers and people voted strongly for Mr Trump, may be more illustrative of MAGA-land. Incomes are low; shops sell hardware, guns and fast food. There are no chinos in sight.
Despite this, the association of Republicanism with backwardness has run ahead of the data. Even places like Yuba City are doing better than before and together MAga-land is enormously powerful. If Democrats have two-thirds of American GDP, that still leaves Republicans with around $10trn—making them the world's third-largest economy (see chart 1). And as anyone who has watched 'Friday Night Lights" will know, all parts of America have big spenders. Buddy Garrity, a car dealer, is the archetypal MAGA rich guy. He is not wealthy enough to own a private jet or plugged-in enough to attend the Met Gala; still, he has plenty in the bank.
The growing gap between the MAGA and Democratic economies can be seen in both 'soft" and 'hard" data. Surveys suggest that Democrats and Republicans now live in two different realities. Before the presidential election 50% of Democrats believed that the economy was getting better, against just 6% of Republicans. Today 8% of Democrats and 49% of Republicans respond in the same way. Such partisanship has become more pronounced. Look, for instance, at the gap in inflation expectations by party, as in chart 2.
'Hard" data tell a similar story. According to a recent paper by Verena Schoenmueller of Esade University and colleagues, residents of each economy consume in increasingly different ways. After Mr Trump's election victory in 2016, 'liberals faced a threat to their political identity…which they possibly compensated for by stronger support for liberal-oriented brands"—buying more Patagonia fleeces, perhaps. Tesla, a carmaker, demonstrates the power of partisanship better than any other company. TD Cowen, an investment bank, has forecast that Elon Musk's alliance with Mr Trump will reduce sales by over 100,000 vehicles a year in Democratic-leaning counties, while boosting sales by twice as much in Republican ones.
Official data also suggest that consumer tastes are splitting along partisan lines. Compare New York, a blue state, with Wyoming, a red one. Since the 1990s blue people have spent more on stereotypical blue goods and services, and red people more on red. New Yorkers have splurged on dining out. They have also jacked up spending on public transport. People in the Equality State, by contrast, spend more than they did on things you might associate with an older, more conservative population, such as vehicle parts and nursing homes.
It is not just consumption. MAGA and blue economies are behaving increasingly differently, too. They reacted in different ways to the first wave of covid-19. Economic activity in red states, where locals were not so afraid of the virus, fell by half as much as in blue ones. This divergence was the culmination of a long-term trend. The variance in GDP-growth rates, between Democratic and Republican counties, widened sharply around 2008. It has remained about twice as high ever since. In the olden days, when a red place was doing well, you could be pretty sure that a blue place would also be thriving. No longer.
The two economies are behaving differently since their industrial compositions are changing. We have analysed data on employment and pay across counties. Over time, places that voted Democratic in 2024 have taken a greater share of knowledge-intensive forms of economic activity. In 1993 roughly the same share of employee compensation came from the 'information" sector, comprising software and the like, in Republican counties as elsewhere. Now the share is 30% lower than average, while dependence on manufacturing has risen. All told, employment patterns in the Democratic and Republican economies have diverged by 20%, according to difference between 'location quotients", a measure of job dispersion by industry.
Buddy up
There are more Buddy Garritys today, too. In 2024, 47% of Americans reporting annual incomes above $1m lived in Trump-voting states, up from 43% in 2014. The MAGA economy has lots of big businesses that liberals rarely encounter. Yuba City is home to WinCo, which feels like a knock-off Costco; Boot Barn, which sells cowboy boots; and Hobby Lobby, an arts-and-crafts retailer. All seem to be doing well. Fox News's viewers may be on the poorer side, yet over the past year the company's share price has been on a tear.
Olive Garden, an Italian restaurant chain, is another example found in Yuba City. According to a YouGov poll in 2023-24, it is the dining option most favoured by Republicans, relative to Democrats, behind Cracker Barrel, which offers wooden rocking chairs and Southern cuisine. At Olive Garden the pasta may not be fatta in casa, but it is popular. The share price of Darden, which runs the chain, has nearly tripled in the past five years.
These trends play out across America. Along with Kai Wu of Sparkline Capital, a fund manager, we assembled 30 listed firms that are seen favourably by Republicans or Democrats, based on surveys. The process was inevitably arbitrary: there is no single poll that covers all companies. In the end, the Republican basket included firms such as John Deere, Fox and Harley-Davidson, whereas the Democratic one featured Etsy, Lululemon, Lyft and more. The recent market turmoil hit the Republican basket hard. But in the past decade its shareholder returns, including dividends, have thrashed the blue basket (see chart 3).
Why do MAGA companies seem to outperform? Maybe they eschew virtue-signalling. Point Bridge America First, an exchange-traded fund that uses the stock ticker MAGA, only includes firms that support Republicans. The Democratic Large-Cap Core Fund, with the stock ticker DEMZ, invests in companies that make big donations to the Democrats. Since the end of 2020 MAGA's price has easily outperformed DEMZ. Goldman Sachs, a bank, has built a stock index containing firms 'that could benefit from key Republican policies", such as those in oil. In the past decade the share prices of these companies have comfortably beaten the market.
The future for the MAGA economy is uncertain. By raising the cost of imported components, tariffs will hurt manufacturing. Harley-Davidson is a soft target for foreign politicians looking to retaliate. On the flip side, however, Republican states including Florida and Texas are still enticing internal migrants. And with local consumer confidence strong, expect spending in MAGA-land to hold up better than in Democratic-leaning areas. It does not just rely on MyPillow.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
Why more equities won't save you from low withdrawal rates in retirement
Retirees are often drawn to a tempting idea: since equities typically deliver higher returns over the long run, a retirement portfolio with more equities will produce better outcomes. Wouldn't it be nice to escape the meagre 3% withdrawal rate by investing more heavily in equities? Unfortunately, it's not so straightforward. Beyond a point, increasing equity allocation will reduce, not raise, the withdrawal rate. This is due to a crucial but underappreciated concept: sequence of return risk. In portfolios that experience regular withdrawals, not just the returns but the order in which they are earned matter, which can have dramatic consequences. Also Read: Relying on rental income in retirement? Take these steps to protect yourself. The table shows how two retirees (A and B) experience the same average returns but in different sequences. Despite identical withdrawals, A (who faces early losses) ends up with just ₹59, while B (who sees early gains) ends up with ₹71—this is sequence risk at work. In a portfolio with no withdrawals, only returns matter—not the order in which they occur. This is because multiplication is commutative: 1 × 1.1 × 0.9 × 1.2 is the same as 1 × 0.9 × 1.2 × 1.1. But when you introduce regular withdrawals, you are now subtracting from the portfolio every year. In mathematical terms, you are combining subtraction with multiplication, and the commutative property breaks down. The arithmetic changes and the sequence begin to matter. High sequence risk A retirement portfolio with heavy equity exposure is likely to face substantial volatility and heightened sequence risk. In the accumulation phase, volatility can be a friend—it brings down average cost through disciplined investing. But in the decumulation phase, volatility becomes a foe. A 20% drawdown early in retirement can cause lasting damage, especially if the retiree is simultaneously withdrawing funds to meet expenses. Unlike a young investor, the retiree cannot 'wait it out". Also Read: How to prepare for retirement in a world of increasing life expectancy This can be illustrated by conducting simulations on retirement portfolios with varying equity allocation. We conducted multiple such simulations to check how the optimal withdrawal rates vary for different asset allocations. The findings are unambiguous. Withdrawal rates initially rise with greater equity exposure, peaking at 20–40%, but then begin to fall. Portfolios with higher equity allocation produced meaningfully lower safe withdrawal rates. This is not a quirk of Indian market data or a one-off observation. William Bengen, the American financial planner who introduced the '4% rule" in 1994, found the same. In his landmark study of historical US data, Bengen was surprised to find that safe withdrawal rates declined when equity allocations increased. He even noted that the worst outcomes were not produced by conservative portfolios with low equity exposure but by aggressive portfolios with too much equity. This insight wasn't isolated. The Trinity Study, an influential academic analysis, came to similar conclusions when it tested various asset allocations and their impact on withdrawal rates using US market history. Closer to home, my 2024 co-authored study with Rajan Raju had a similar conclusion. Using Indian data, we found that withdrawal rates initially rise with equity allocation but then begin to decline beyond a certain point. Also Read: How to build a ₹5 crore retirement corpus with ₹1.5 lakh monthly salary Though equities offer higher long-term returns, more equity does not always mean more retirement income. This is a paradox we need to wrap our heads around. Retirees should construct a portfolio with a balanced allocation that reduces volatility. If you have been smirking at retirees with good fixed-income allocations in their retirement portfolio, well, the joke may be on you. Ravi Saraogi, CFA, Sebi-registered investment adviser. and co-founder, Samasthiti Advisors.


Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
Wall Street, Main Street push for foreign tax rethink in US budget bill
Concerns over potential negative impact on U.S. investments and jobs Senate Republicans may clarify impact on Treasuries to mitigate risks Multinationals may shut U.S. operations, risking 8.4 million jobs, says association By Carolina Mandl, Bo Erickson NEW YORK/WASHINGTON, - Industry groups representing sectors including real estate, finance and multinational companies are pushing for the reduction or exclusion of a retaliatory tax targeting foreign investors in the U.S. in the Republican tax bill, as they see it as a threat to their businesses and to the broader markets and economy. The proposed tax, known as Section 899, applies a progressive tax burden of up to 20% on foreign investors' U.S. income as pushback against countries that impose taxes the U.S. considers unfair, such as digital service taxes. It could raise $116 billion in taxes over 10 years. Some individual companies are also pushing for action, according to two lawyers familiar with their clients' plans, who did not name specific companies due to client confidentiality. 'Lobbying surrounding Section 899 is at peak levels,' said Jeff Paravano, a former Treasury Department official who is now chair of law firm BakerHostetler's tax group. The move comes as Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, the Republican in charge of the chamber's tax writing provisions, and other Republicans are in close coordination with President Donald Trump on the tax bill, having met on Wednesday. The White House declined to comment. Crapo said he would not comment on ongoing discussions about the bill. Global investors hold almost $40 trillion in U.S. assets, such as securities, loans and deposits, according to the U.S. Treasury International Capital Reporting System. This raises concerns about the ripple impact of the bill. "It has the potential to be a very negative impact on the free flow of capital from the U.S. and through businesses that are multinational," said Gabriel Grossman, a U.S. tax partner at Linklaters, adding he has seen some clients put planned investments in the U.S. on pause until they have more clarity on the new levies. The broader bill itself is also creating much debate as it is forecast to add about $2.4 trillion to the U.S. debt and has sparked an explosive feud between Trump and his erstwhile key ally Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla. Industries across different sectors are on high alert. The new levy could increase taxes from rents and real estate investment trusts, gains from property sales and securitized products. "There is a legitimate fear among investors that, if this goes through, it could impact investments, and that it would create higher costs for real estate in terms of getting financing," said David McCarthy, managing director at the CRE Finance Council, a nonpartisan trade group. "It could depress the value of real estate if you don't have as much money to finance property purchases." The asset management industry is concerned about outflows. "We encourage the Senate to make this provision more targeted to respond to unfair foreign taxes and other concerning measures rather than disincentivizing beneficial foreign investment in the U.S.," a spokesperson for the Investment Company Institute said. The investment community is also working to clarify whether Treasuries and corporate bonds will remain exempt as they are currently subject to a portfolio interest exception that applies no taxation, lawyers and industry sources said. "There's reason to believe that fixed-income assets wouldn't be in scope, but there's still considerable uncertainty about this point," Morgan Stanley strategist Michael Zezas said in a note to clients. A footnote part of the Budget Committee report, which provides direction to taxpayers, courts and the Treasury in interpreting the statute, says that Section 899 "does not apply to portfolio interest." Foreigners' equity investments, however, do not count with the portfolio interest protection and could be taxed, lawyers and banks said. Multinational companies could face a new tax burden on dividends and inter-company loans, potentially reducing profit, according to Section 899. Jonathan Samford, president of the Global Business Alliance, a lobbying group for international companies in the U.S., said many multinationals could decide to shut down operations in the U.S., risking 8.4 million jobs in the country. "Those companies will not be paying U.S. tax whatsoever because they will not be able to operate in that punitive, high-tax environment," he said. Morgan Stanley said in a note to clients a repatriation of profits out of the U.S. and pressure on the U.S. dollar. Corporate loans could also become more expensive, as loans extended by foreign banks might be subject to the new tax burden if section 899 overrides current treaties, lawyers said, adding that companies could end up paying more for the debt to make up for the tax increase. Investors are hoping for some changes in the Senate. Senator Steve Daines, a Montana Republican on the Finance Committee, said it may be necessary to clarify the language in Section 899. 'We want to make sure we don't have tax policies that in some way would diminish the fact that we are the gold standard in the world,' Daines said. Morgan Stanley said in a note that it expects "sufficient Senate Republicans to take notice and clarify the policy to mitigate this risk" of increasing the cost of capital for the U.S. "It actually is pretty much of a nuclear bomb," said Pascal Saint-Amans, partner at Brunswick Group, who is also the former tax chief of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, who led the 2021 global tax treaty. "The coverage seems extremely broad and the terms are not extremely well-defined." This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Whole World Now Knows The Truth': Tharoor Wraps Up US Visit, Quips on Pakistan's Terror Links
/ Jun 09, 2025, 03:31PM IST Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, leading a multi-party Indian parliamentary delegation, declared "The world knows the truth now" after concluding a high-level visit to the US to brief global powers on Operation Sindoor—India's response to the Pahalgam terror attack. Tharoor said the international community now understands the scale of Pakistan-backed terrorism and India's measured but firm retaliation. The delegation met US Vice President JD Vance and Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau, who expressed outrage at the Pahalgam killings and praised India's restraint. Tharoor emphasized that India's moral clarity and strategic intent were acknowledged by key US stakeholders. Meetings with top US lawmakers, think tanks, media, and Indian-American leaders capped the visit. Tharoor paid tribute to Mahatma Gandhi in Washington, reiterating India's commitment to peace—but not without strength.#shashitharoor #operationsindoor #pahalgamattack #worldknowsthetruth #indiausrelations #jdvance #christopherlandau #usbacksindia #indianusvisit #terrorfrompakistan #indiandiplomacy #mahatmagandhiwashington #globalsupportindia #strategicretaliation #indiafightsterror #toi #toibharat #bharat #breakingnews #indianews