NY Times editorial board: Mamdani doesn't deserve spot on New York ballot
The New York Times editorial board has weighed in on the city's crowded mayoral race, urging voters not to back state Assembly member Zohran Mamdani in next week's Democratic primary despite not directly endorsing another candidate.
The Times's editorial board, which announced last year that it would no longer endorse in local and state elections, made clear on Monday that despite its lack of formal endorsement voters should not rank Mamdani in any of the spots on their ballot.
New York City employs ranked choice voting, allowing voters to list up to five candidates in order of their preference to support.
'Mr. Mamdani, a charismatic 33-year-old, is running a joyful campaign full of viral videos in which he talks with voters. He offers the kind of fresh political style for which many people are hungry during the angry era of President Trump,' the board said. 'Unfortunately, Mr. Mamdani is running on an agenda uniquely unsuited to the city's challenges.'
The board argued the field, made up of 11 candidates, lacks anyone who seems likely to be the city's 'next great mayor,' but several candidates have 'substantial strengths.' It acknowledged that polls seem to show the race is between former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D), who has been the front-runner since he entered the race, and Mamdani, who has shrunk the gap behind him.
The board criticized Mamdani's lack of experience and policy proposals, saying he 'too often ignores the unavoidable trade-offs of governance.' It argued his calls for rent freezes could restrict the housing supply, rejected his support for government-run grocery stores and accused him of minimizing the importance of police.
It also raised issues with Mamdani having never run a government department or a private organization previously and a lack of execution of his agenda as a state legislator, a role he's held since 2021.
'Mr. Mamdani, who has called [former Mayor Bill] de Blasio the best New York mayor of his lifetime, offers an agenda that remains alluring among elite progressives but has proved damaging to city life,' the editorial states.
The Hill has reached out to Mamdani's campaign for comment.
The board said Cuomo also has 'significant shortcomings,' citing his resignation as governor after multiple women made allegations of sexual harassment or undesired touching against him. Cuomo has consistently denied the accusations.
The board also noted the criticisms of Cuomo's handling of nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic and oversight of public transit. But it acknowledged many seem to intend to vote for him because of his policy record as governor, including raising the minimum wage, implementing paid family leave, legalizing same-sex marriage in 2011 and overseeing renovations of the city's airports and train station.
The editorial states city Comptroller Brad Lander, who has been among the next tier of candidates in polling, is an alternative to Cuomo and Mamdani. It praised Lander for moderating on certain stances, showing a 'welcome ability to learn from experience' and effectively managing his office.
The editorial board said it sees arguments for ranking several candidates, including Lander for progressive voters and a candidate like businessman Whitney Tilson for moderate voters. But given the polls, it noted if and where voters rank Cuomo and Mamdani may be critical.
'We do not believe that Mr. Mamdani deserves a spot on New Yorkers' ballots,' the board said. 'His experience is too thin, and his agenda reads like a turbocharged version of Mr. de Blasio's dismaying mayoralty. As for Mr. Cuomo, we have serious objections to his ethics and conduct, even if he would be better for New York's future than Mr. Mamdani.'
But not ranking either candidate, it said, would be the equivalent of stating no preference.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate takes more flexible approach to green tax credits
The Big Story The Senate's version of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' includes changes to green energy tax credits that are more flexible than those passed by the House — but it would still a significant rollback. © Michael Sohn, Associated Press file This flexibility is likely to please moderates in both chambers who felt that the House version was too stringent. However, it could be teeing up a collision with the conservative House Freedom Caucus, whose board said it will 'not accept' Senate changes that 'water down' its major cutbacks to the climate-friendly credits. The Senate text appears to eliminate the most stringent provision in the House bill, deleting a measure that would have required climate-friendly energy sources to start construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment to qualify for the credits at all. Instead, things such as solar panels and wind farms would need to begin construction this year to receive the full credit amount. Projects that begin construction in 2026 would get 60 percent of the credit, while projects that begin construction in 2027 would receive 20 percent. Projects constructed in 2028 or later would not be eligible for the credit. This, too, appears to be more flexible than the House text, which required projects to not just start construction but actually be producing electricity by the end of 2028 to qualify for the credit. Nevertheless, the Senate provisions are still a major rollback of the tax credits passed by Democrats in their 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Under that law, the credits would have lasted until either 2032 or when U.S. emissions from the electric sector are 25 percent lower than 2022 levels, whichever came later. Read more at Welcome to The Hill's Energy & Environment newsletter, I'm Rachel Frazin — keeping you up to speed on the policies impacting everything from oil and gas to new supply chains. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect the energy and environment sectors now and in the future: Senate releases Trump tax and Medicaid blueprint Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) on Monday released the Senate's long-awaited version of President Trump's tax agenda, which would make the 2017 corporate tax cuts permanent, cut hundreds of billions of dollars in Medicaid spending and phase out renewable-energy tax cuts enacted under President Biden. Trump fires Democratic member of nuclear energy safety commission President Trump on Friday fired a Democratic member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), which the commissioner says is illegal. When wildfire season coincides with threats to federal emergency support With peak wildfire season just around the corner, residents of California and the broader U.S. West are bracing not just for the blazes, but also for ongoing cuts to the federal programs that have long served as lifelines to a region in flames. What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets touching on energy issues, the environment and other topics: 80°F in Juneau will trigger first-ever National Weather Service heat advisories (Juneau Empire) What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: 5 takeaways from Trump's Army parade The nation's capital on Saturday was overtaken by the sight of tanks rolling down the street and Army helicopters buzzing in the sky for a military parade to mark the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. Read more Klobuchar condemns Mike Lee's posts about Minnesota suspect: 'This isn't funny' Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) on Monday condemned social media posts from her colleague Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) spreading unfounded claims about the man suspected of killing a Minnesota Democratic lawmaker and her husband Saturday morning. Read more You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here
New York Post
40 minutes ago
- New York Post
NYC's failing schools need a mayor who will take on the selfish teachers union
Fixing our public schools is one of the most important jobs facing New York City's next mayor: At $41 billion, education spending is the single largest item in City Hall's gargantuan $115 billion budget. But in both televised debates of the Democratic mayoral primary, my opponents offered only platitudes and teachers-union talking points. Last Thursday, I was the only candidate on stage to argue against the foolish class-size mandate secured by the United Federation of Teachers. Advertisement The policy may sound good, but as I noted it will cost $1.6 billion — and having to suddenly hire thousands of teachers who are less experienced and less qualified than the teachers we have will undercut any possible benefit of smaller classes. When it comes to education, we can't afford to repeat the same tired slogans and tinker around the margins. Advertisement But the UFT's self-interest makes real reform impossible. Fighting for kids — and taking on the adults who run our educational system for their benefit — has been my life's mission. It's why I helped start Teach for America and Democrats for Education Reform, and why I served on the board of NYC KIPP charter schools for more than two decades. Now that I'm running for mayor, I am the only candidate who has made fixing our schools a core part of my pitch to voters. Advertisement I have a simple message to the city's parents: Our Department of Education is ripping you off — and lying about it. The facts are damning: Every year, New York City spends upward of $40,000 per student — more than any other district in the country — but nearly half (46%) of our fourth-graders lack basic reading skills. Shockingly, fourth graders in our nation's poorest state, Mississippi — which spends just $12,000 per student — are now reading at a higher level than their peers in the five boroughs. Advertisement The results for New York City's black and Latino kids are especially alarming. In 2024, 58% of black fourth graders and 62% of Latino fourth graders in New York City public schools lacked basic reading skills, compared with 27% of white students and 25% of Asian students. Fourth grade is a critical time, because that's when the curriculum pivots from learning to read to reading to learn. Most children who struggle to read as fourth-graders fall further and further behind — and end up living lives of poverty and hardship. But to cover up its failure, NYC's public schools lie to parents, telling them their children are doing fine and passing them along year after year. That's why I've pledged to end this 'social promotion' after third grade. If the school system hasn't taught a child to read after five years, it needs to keep trying. The good news is we know what works: Establish high standards and a rigorous curriculum, hold all schools and educators accountable, reward excellence and give parents greater freedom to send their kids to schools of their choosing. Advertisement Against the objections of the UFT, former Mayor Mike Bloomberg expanded high-quality charter schools and other innovative public schools, made all schools take responsibility for their students' performance and greatly expanded parents' choices. The results spoke for themselves: The portion of fourth-graders lacking basic reading skills declined from 53% in 2002, Bloomberg's first year in office, to 38% in 2013. NYC's next mayor should expand on Bloomberg's approach. Charter schools, which educate about 15% of New York City's public-school students, are rigorously evaluated every five years. They must demonstrate that they're delivering for their students — and if they're falling short, they can be put on probation or even closed. Advertisement All public schools should be held to those standards. As mayor, I would establish similar accountability for every school in the system. To make sure we hire and retain the best teachers in the country, we need to pay teachers based on how much they inspire and educate our kids, not on their years in the system or the number of certifications they have. The next contract with the UFT must include differential pay based on merit and other measures that actually benefit our kids. And as mayor, I'd fight to overturn the UFT-engineered class-size mandate. Advertisement Unlike the other candidates, I can make that promise — because I'm not seeking the UFT's endorsement, and therefore I don't owe it anything. It's not too late for my fellow Democrats to join me in standing up to this self-serving special-interest group. Our children's future depends on it. Whitney Tilson, a businessman and education activist, is a candidate in the Democratic mayoral primary.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Early voters ask why Zohran Mamdani listed first on mayoral ballot
New Yorkers voting in the Democratic Primary are questioning why Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani is listed first, at the very top of the ballot sheet. Mamdani — an assemblyman who has gained momentum in recent polling to catch up with favorite Andrew Cuomo — has copped backlash for his refusal to acknowledge Israel having a right to exist as a Jewish state and his involvement in the 'BDS' movement, which seeks to divert US funding to the country. The 33-year-old candidate, who is a Muslim, has also raised eyebrows with his pie in the sky policy proposals, such as city-owned grocery stores and free bus service — that would cost taxpayers at least $10 billion. 6 Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, is now in second place in the mayoral race, according to polls. Kyle Stevens/Shutterstock 6 Provided to NY Post The Board of Elections (BoE) have explained the ballot order is randomly selected and bound by strict regulations, but some people are demanding more transparency. New York resident Simone Weichselbaum, 43, cast her vote as early voting began on Saturday — less than two weeks ahead of the June 24 primary election — but walked away from the booths frustrated and concerned. 'As a pro-Israel Midtown East Jewish voter, I voted yesterday and was shocked to see Mamdani listed first on the long list of names of mayoral candidates — we have a very crowded field this year,' she told The Post.' 'It took me a lot longer to vote because you have to go down the list and rank them.' The 2025 race is the second time ranked choice voting has been used. New Yorkers can choose up to five candidates in order of preference. When all first choice votes are counted, if one candidate has more than 50% of votes, they win. If not, the candidate in last place is eliminated and the second choice of the people who voted for the eliminated candidate is counted. This process continues until there are only two candidates left, upon which the candidate with the most votes wins. 6 A voter at a New York voting booth on Saturday as early voting in the mayoral election opened. Michael Nagle 6 Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo is the favourite to become mayor of New York City. Getty Images 'Voters who are less enthusiastic might not take the time to consider their options. A lazy voter might just go 'f—k this', and go down the line, selecting Mamdani first,' Weichselbaum said. 'I want to know how the random selection process works. Who is in the room? Is it AI creating the list? Are they putting names in a hat? We need more transparency around this selection process.' A crowded field of candidates, including former governor Cuomo, current Comptroller Brad Lander and current Speaker of the New York City Council Adrienne Adams are all running in the city's mayoral race. New York law requires the Board of Elections in the City of New York to determine the order in which names are printed on the official Primary Election Day ballot in a random drawing. State law requires a board of elections or other elections officer to prepare a primary ballot with 'numbered spheres and an automatic selection machine similar to those used for bingo games or for drawing state lottery numbers'. A number is then pulled for each of the candidates and whatever comes out is where they end up on the list. 6 sysadmin This year's drawing for the June 24, 2025 Primary Election ballot positions was livestreamed on the Board's website on April 30, however an archive of the draw did not seem to be available Monday. 'Prior to the date of the drawing, the commissioners shall designate at least two persons who will conduct the drawing for all offices,' the state election law citation reads. 'Candidates or their designees may inspect the device or devices to be used for the drawings, at the date and time established by the board, and in the presence of the two commissioners or their designees.' However, many voters are unaware of that process and therein lies the problem, according to Weichselbaum. 6 Mamdani has been on the campaign trail. He appears first on the ballot for voters in New York, after his name was publicly drawn. / MEGA 'The BOE should actively publicize it and run public service announcements so the public goes into the voting booth knowing what to expect,' she said. 'I give the BOE a fat letter F — for failing voters during such an important mayoral election that's flooded with so many candidates.' Another New Yorker, Darren Glick, 54, told The Post he had been 'receiving a lot of questions' from people in the Jewish community who were already 'confused about the ranking system'. 'This is such a large group of mayoral candidates, it would be easier for people to scroll through the list alphabetically,' he said. '[Making the process difficult] could lead to people not finding their candidate… especially for people who want to vote Cuomo and don't realize he's at the bottom of the list.' The New York State Board of Elections did not return a request for comment. Cuomo is widely considered the frontrunner in the race, with many local Democrats fearing the consequences of one of the fields' more progressive politicians winning. Incumbent Eric Adams, a Democrat, is running as an independent, so is not included in the primary for the Democrat party, but will be on the November general election ballot. Early voting is open through until Sunday, June 22 and election day is June 24 when polls will be open across the five boroughs from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m.
