Cleanup money for uranium mines and other contaminated sites in budget, for now
New Mexico could soon be cleaning up some of the hundreds of abandoned uranium mines and other contaminated sites around the state and paving the way for continued efforts — if $50 million for that purpose remains in the state budget.
There are at least 302 'orphan sites' in New Mexico, where 'known or suspected contamination is causing a threat to human health or the environment,' according to the New Mexico Environment Department. These sites, in addition to about 50 old uranium mines, aren't eligible for cleanup under any existing programs, and the state can't identify any responsible parties.
The state would use the funding to begin cleaning up those roughly 350 sites.
This story was originally published by New Mexico In Depth
In addition to those orphan sites and the 50 or so old uranium mines the state would be targeting, there are another 200 some odd former uranium mines in New Mexico, some in various stages of cleanup. Many of the old mines in the state are on or near tribal lands, and Indigenous communities have advocated for remediation for decades, citing ongoing health and environmental impacts.
Rep. Joseph Hernandez, D-Shiprock, and his family, along with many others in the state, have 'gone through numerous doctors appointments, numerous times taking care of our elders who either worked in the industry or are family members of someone' who did, he said last month during a committee hearing. Hernandez recounted stories his mother would tell about his grandfather getting home after long shifts in a nearby mill with uranium dust coating his clothes.
'And this dust today continues to get blown through our communities, not just on Navajo,' Hernandez (Diné) told the House Energy, Environment and Natural Resources Committee. 'This is communities throughout New Mexico. Many families feel left behind.'
Hernandez and Sen. Jeff Steinborn, D-Las Cruces, both sponsored bills this year to add in the state budget $50 million for cleaning up contaminated sites, including old uranium mines. That money is now in the $10.8 billion proposed budget the House passed last week.
The funding would be a 'drop in the bucket,' Steinborn said in an interview on Friday. The state environment department already has plans for two sites to be remediated, one of which is a uranium mine estimated to cost between $4 and $8 million. The other is a site with chemically contaminated soil and groundwater estimated to cost $5 million to clean up, the agency reported in a bill analysis.
The money would allow the state to 'begin to characterize more of the sites, do some cleanup work, and then lay the groundwork for a plan to do much broader efforts,' Steinborn said.
He wants more specifically for uranium cleanup. He's sponsoring Senate Bill 276, a proposal to put $75 million in the uranium mine reclamation revolving fund.
Since Steinborn was first elected to the Legislature nearly two decades ago, lawmakers have been talking about the need, he said, but weren't making progress — until 2022. During that session, lawmakers mandated the state develop a strategic plan for cleanup and created the revolving fund.
But the fund has sat empty in the three years since then.
Money deposited in the fund would be used for 'site assessments, safeguarding, closure designs, surface reclamation, groundwater remediation, and monitoring, where appropriate,' reads a November presentation state environment department staff gave lawmakers on the interim Radioactive and Hazardous Materials Committee.
For some of the abandoned mines, there are owners that the state, including the attorney general, could go after legally, Steinborn said. But some of the companies don't exist anymore, and some of the mines aren't eligible for cleanup under any federal programs.
That's where the state should step in, he said.
With just a few weeks left in the session, Steinborn said he continues to advocate for $75 million for the revolving fund, but 'we're going to have to fight to ensure' $50 million for cleanup of contaminated sites more broadly — which would include abandoned uranium mines but wouldn't be exclusive to cleanup of those sites — stays in the budget.
The Senate is 'having to make budget adjustments and fill some budgetary holes, as it's been explained, that weren't addressed in the House,' said Steinborn, who sits on the Senate Finance Committee, tasked with reviewing the budget.
'If they're having to come up with money to fill some holes, a $50 million pot of money sitting there, it could be attractive to some to say, 'Hey, let's make that number a little smaller and help fill a hole somewhere else.' So it's going to require continued advocacy and education to preserve that, which I will be doing and others should as well,' he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Obama: Newsom redistricting approach ‘responsible'
Former President Obama backs California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D)'s plan to redraw California's congressional districts if it helps offset new maps in Texas that are more favorable to Republicans. 'I believe that Gov. Newsom's approach is a responsible approach,' Obama told a Martha's Vineyard, Mass., fundraiser crowd Tuesday, according to excerpts shared with reporters. 'We're only going to do it if and when Texas and/or other Republican states begin to pull these maneuvers. Otherwise, this doesn't go into effect.' Newsom, who is considered a contender for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028, has been leading Democrats as they battle against the GOP's efforts to maintain control of the House in the 2026 midterms. President Trump set off a political arms race for more right-tilted and left-tilted House districts in states where one party holds control. Trump pushed Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) to call state lawmakers into a special session to approve new maps to boost the number of reliably Republican seats, setting off a fight with Democrats in Texas and elsewhere. Newsom responded by calling on California lawmakers to come up with ways to skirt the state's redistricting regulations and produce maps more favorable to Democrats to even the score. Obama said he personally believes that redistricting should be strictly nonpartisan, but he doesn't fault Democrats for engaging in the tit-for-tat. 'I've had to wrestle with my preference, which would be that we don't have political gerrymandering, but what I also know is that if we don't respond effectively, then this White House and Republican-controlled state governments all across the country, they will not stop, because they do not appear to believe in this idea of an inclusive, expansive democracy,' he told the crowd. 'They want to restrict it, and they're not that shy about saying so.' 'That is not my preference, but we cannot unilaterally allow one of the two major parties to rig the game, and California is one of the states that has the capacity to offset a large state like Texas,' he added. Obama was speaking at an event for the National Democratic Redistricting Committee and its affiliates that raised $2 million. Former Attorney General Eric Holder and Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) also attended.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
House Republican calls for ‘action' from Johnson to end redistricting
Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) called for 'action' from House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) amid a redistricting battle in the Golden State. Johnson on Monday had gone after California Democrats' proposed House map and said he was taking measures to halt the new congressional lines. 'Democrats across the nation have played politics with redistricting for decades, and this is just the latest example. Republicans who are following state and federal laws will not be lectured by people who abused the system,' Johnson wrote on the social platform X. 'I have instructed the NRCC [National Republican Congressional Committee] to use every measure and resource possible to fight the California Democrats' illegal power grab,' he continued. 'I will continue to lead efforts to defend our House Republican incumbents and grow our majority so that we can continue to deliver on our commonsense, America First agenda.' In response to Johnson's post, Kiley said, 'these are nice words but we need action.' 'You can stop [California Gov. Gavin] Newsom's Redistricting Sham and save our taxpayers $250 million by bringing my mid-decade redistricting bill to the Floor,' he added in his Tuesday post on X. On Monday, California Democrats unveiled legislation to go ahead with their plan to combat a Republican redistricting proposal in Texas with new congressional maps in of their own. 'We decided as a delegation that we could not just stand there and allow [President] Trump to distort the next election and continue to harm the people who we represent. And so we have worked to try and identify a map that is consistent with the goals that we believe in,' Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) said during a press conference. When reached for comment, Johnson's office directed The Hill back to Johnson's post and recent comments from the Louisiana Republican on CNN. The Hill was directed by Newsom's office to remarks from the governor last week in which he said 'the state of California's going to fund' a special election in November for voters to approve a ballot measure that, in the end, would let Democrats push through a new House map ahead of the 2026 midterms. Newsom's office also highlighted a post on X in which his press office said, 'California's action this week is a DIRECT response to Trump and his lapdogs in Texas.' Updated at 8:40 p.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Xavier Hernandez death: El Paso DA gets investigation, likely to go to grand jury
An investigation into the death of Xavier Guadalupe Hernandez during an arrest on the side of a freeway is now in the hands of the El Paso District Attorney's Office. It will likely go to a grand jury to determine if criminal charges will be filed against police officers. Hernandez, 30, died in a controversial case recorded on an El Paso Police Department body camera video that raised criticism over how police handled what started as a call about a pedestrian on Interstate 10 and ended with Hernandez's death on July 13. More: El Paso medical examiner rules man who died in police struggle as a homicide El Paso District Attorney James Montoya, in an emailed statement on Wednesday, Aug. 20, said his office has now received the investigation conducted by El Paso police. "While the case is pending, we cannot offer any other comment about it specifically," Montoya stated. "However, it is the policy of the DA's Office to present all in-custody deaths and officer-involved shootings to a grand jury of El Pasoans for their review and determination of potential criminal liability." EPPD body camera video released this week showed Hernandez in an agitated state on the shoulder of the busy freeway in a situation that quickly escalated into a struggle as an officer repeatedly shocked him with a Taser. "Officer, what's your badge number?" Hernandez repeatedly yells in the video, which shows Hernandez stop breathing while handcuffed behind his back and held facedown on the asphalt by officers. An autopsy by the county medical examiner's office deemed Hernandez's death a homicide caused by "asphyxia due to chest compression during law enforcement subdual and restrain" with cocaine toxicity as a "significant" factor. DA: Grand jury to look at police deadly force cases Montoya, a Democrat, took office in January after defeating former Republican DA Bill Hicks in the November 2024 election. Montoya previously had an unsuccessful run for DA, losing to Yvonne Rosales in the 2020 Democratic primary. Rosales later ended up resigning from office amid accusations of incompetence and Hicks was appointed by Gov. Greg Abbott to fill in the remainder of her term. During the 2020 campaign, police brutality was a hot topic amid the George Floyd protests, Black Lives Matter movement and the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020, Montoya said in an El Paso Times interview that incidents in which police use deadly force should be automatically investigated. "Whether that is a discharge of a firearm, some kind of chokehold, any type of deadly force, including a Taser, which I believe is deadly force, will be presented to an El Paso grand jury for their review for potential criminal charges," Montoya said in 2020. Daniel Borunda may be reached at dborunda@ and @BorundaDaniel on X. This article originally appeared on El Paso Times: El Paso police bodycam video death case likely to go to grand jury