logo
Upended by Meth, Some Communities Are Paying Users to Quit

Upended by Meth, Some Communities Are Paying Users to Quit

New York Times16-07-2025
Jamie Mains showed up for her checkup so high that there was no point in pretending otherwise. At least she wasn't shooting fentanyl again; medication was suppressing those cravings. Now it was methamphetamine that manacled her, keeping her from eating, sleeping, thinking straight. Still, she could not stop injecting.
'Give me something that's going to help me with this,' she begged her doctor.
'There is nothing,' the doctor replied.
Overcoming meth addiction has become one of the biggest challenges of the national drug crisis. Fentanyl deaths have been dropping, in part because of medications that can reverse overdoses and curb the urge to use opioids. But no such prescriptions exist for meth, which works differently on the brain.
In recent years, meth, a highly addictive stimulant, has been spreading aggressively across the country, rattling communities and increasingly involved in overdoses. Lacking a medical treatment, a growing number of clinics are trying a startlingly different strategy: To induce patients to stop using meth, they pay them.
The approach has been around for decades, but most clinics were uneasy about adopting it because of its bluntly transactional nature. Patients typically come in twice a week for a urine drug screen. If they test negative, they are immediately handed a small reward: a modest store voucher, a prize or debit card cash. The longer they abstain from use, the greater the rewards, with a typical cumulative value of nearly $600. The programs, which usually last three to six months, operate on the principle of positive reinforcement, with incentives intended to encourage repetition of desired behavior — somewhat like a parent who permits a child to stay up late as a reward for good grades.
Research shows that the approach, known in addiction treatment as 'contingency management,' or CM, produces better outcomes for stimulant addiction than counseling or cognitive behavioral therapy. Follow-up studies of patients a year after they successfully completed programs show that about half remained stimulant-free.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Never Has America Been More Vulnerable" — People Are Horrified After RFK Jr. Announced He's Cutting $500 Million In Funding For mRNA Vaccines
"Never Has America Been More Vulnerable" — People Are Horrified After RFK Jr. Announced He's Cutting $500 Million In Funding For mRNA Vaccines

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"Never Has America Been More Vulnerable" — People Are Horrified After RFK Jr. Announced He's Cutting $500 Million In Funding For mRNA Vaccines

I'm not sure if you've heard, but everyone's least favorite Health and Human Services Secretary, RFK Jr., recently announced that he's canceling $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine development. mRNA vaccines, which stand for messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA), are "highly effective" and "safe," according to the National Council on Aging, a nonprofit organization that works to improve the health of older adults in the US. According to the Cleveland Clinic, the mRNA vaccine helps teach your body to fight infectious diseases. More specifically, mRNA technology is utilized in the COVID-19 vaccine, which infectious disease experts say is what helped to slow the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak in the US. In a now-viral X video, RFK Jr. tried to explain the funding cuts saying, "HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses." We reviewed the science, listened to the experts, and acted. BARDA is terminating 22 mRNA vaccine development investments because the data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu. We're shifting that funding toward… — Secretary Kennedy (@SecKennedy) August 5, 2025 Twitter: @SecKennedy According to CBS News, RFK Jr. reiterated that "HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them." Related: In response to the news, Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, recently said it's "one of the worst decisions I've seen in 50 years of public health preparedness work." Following these vaccine funding cuts, millions have expressed deep concern for the future of medicine, as well as the impact of future pandemics in the US. Here's how medical professionals, lawmakers, and citizens are reacting: Commonly, people threw some personal digs at RFK Jr., with one person calling him a "despicable quack." ...and a pediatric MD calling him an "anti-vaxx weirdo." Related: While other medical professionals directly contradicted RFK Jr.'s claims about the mRNA vaccine, calling them "simply false." And called out RFK Jr.'s "fundamental misunderstanding of immunology." Another infectious disease doctor argued that RFK Jr.'s decision came from "ideology" and "online anti vax talking points." Related: And this medical professional and health writer called mRNA vaccines "one of the most important tools we have for preventing future pandemics." Another person expressed their anger about "throwing away" years of research: Even politicians have weighed in, with Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock calling the funding cuts a "tragedy." Related: "Whatever your reason for not voting or voting 3rd party, I promise it wasn't worth destroying our country over," this person wrote. And this person made a scary observation, writing: "A diseased population is easier to control..." And finally, this Reddit user summed up what many are feeling: "Imagine being so privileged to have lived in a tiny slice of human history when MILLIONS of people have been spared from pyrogens at the hands of vaccines……only to be somehow convinced the answer to the threat humanity faces going forward is to stop researching the most proven and effective medicine mankind has ever known." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Camilla Luddington Shares Hashimoto's Thyroiditis Diagnosis
Camilla Luddington Shares Hashimoto's Thyroiditis Diagnosis

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Camilla Luddington Shares Hashimoto's Thyroiditis Diagnosis

Originally appeared on E! Online Camilla Luddington is opening up about her medical journey. The Grey's Anatomy star shared that she was diagnosed with Hashimoto's thyroiditis, explaining that the autoimmune disease—which causes low levels of thyroid hormone in your body, per the Cleveland Clinic—is in part responsible for how tired she felt all the time. 'As long as you've been listening to us, you've known that I joke about being slothy,' Camilla explained on her iHeartRadio Call It What It Is podcast Aug. 6. 'Slower, tired. Wanna be in bed. Love a nap.' And while the 41-year-old plays a doctor on TV alongside her podcast cohost Jessica Capshaw, it never occurred that there could be a medical reason for her constant exhaustion. But when she went in for her yearly bloodwork to 'make sure everything is good,' the doctors gave her the diagnosis. 'My doctor was like, 'Everything looks great except this one little thing,' Camilla recalled. 'And I remember hearing the words 'autoimmune disease' and thinking, 'What the f—k.' And then being told that I had something called Hashimoto's hypothyroidism and that it was very common.' More from E! Online Jessa Duggar Shares Special Role Her Sister Jordyn Duggar Played in Birth of Baby No. 6 Kris Jenner's Feet in New Photo Have Raised a Big Question From Fans Chris Appleton Details Coming Out to His Former Partner and Kids And while she admits she 'was a little freaked out' by the diagnosis, ultimately she felt relieved. 'I felt like I had the answer for something that I've been knowing is going on,' the podcaster continued. 'And I have health anxiety, so there was a part of me that was like, 'Am I gaslighting myself?'' For now, Camilla is taking the necessary medication and hopes to start feeling normal again soon. 'I'm on the road to recovery,' she shared. 'It's going to be a journey.' Jessica took a page from Finding Nemo, joking that Camilla was going to 'just keep swimming, just keep swimming, just keep swimming.' As for why Camilla wanted to share her diagnosis? She explained the goal of their podcast was always to be as open and honest as they could be with their listeners. 'We set out to share all the things in the hopes that sharing our stories might resonate with somebody else,' she added, 'or make somebody feel a little less alone in their experience.' For more celebrity health scares, keep reading. Nikki Garcia's Breast Implant InjuryLupita Nyong'o's Uterine FibroidsSuki Waterhouse's HerniaBrian Austin Green's Perforated AppendixAdam Devine's Long-Term Injury From Childhood AccidentJason Tartick's Back InjuryMatt Kirschenheiter's Heart AttackTracy Morgan's Medical EmergencyChristy Carlson Romano's Eye InjuryAmy Schumer's Cushing SyndromeCasey Fitzgerald's Neck Injury From Hockey Skate BladeHailey Bieber's Blood ClotJustin Bieber's Ramsay Hunt SyndromeJamie Foxx's Brain Bleed & StrokeEmilia Clarke's Brain AneurysmCori Broadus's StrokeShailene Woodley's Health Battle For the latest breaking news updates, click here to download the E! News App Solve the daily Crossword

NFL smelling salts ban: NFLPA provides key updates on policy
NFL smelling salts ban: NFLPA provides key updates on policy

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NFL smelling salts ban: NFLPA provides key updates on policy

The NFL announced Tuesday its teams would be prohibited from distributing smelling salts to its players during the league's 2025 season. However, the league did not actually ban the products from being used, as the NFLPA clarified Wednesday. "We were not notified of this club policy change before the memo was sent out," the NFLPA wrote in a message to its players, per ESPN. "To clarify, this policy does not prohibit player use of these substances, but rather it restricts clubs from providing or supplying them in any form. The NFL has confirmed this to us." The confusion stemmed from the NFL's initial memo to players, which explained why NFL clubs would no longer be permitted to distribute smelling salts to its players. "In 2024, the FDA issued a warning to companies that produce commercially available ammonia inhalants (AIs), as well as to consumers about the purchase and use of AIs, regarding the lack of evidence supporting the safety or efficacy of AIs marketed for improving mental alertness or boosting energy. The FDA noted potential negative effects from AI use. AIs also have the potential to mask certain neurologic signs and symptoms, including some potential signs of concussion. As a result, the NFL Head, Neck, and Spine Committee recommended prohibiting the use of AIs for any purpose during play in the NFL. "In light of this information, effective for the 2025 NFL season, clubs are prohibited from providing or supplying ammonia in any form at NFL games. For clarity, 'ammonia' refers to ammonia capsules, inhalers, ammonia in a cup, and any form of 'smelling salts.' This prohibition applies to all club personnel (including but not limited to team physicians, athletic trainers, strength and conditioning coaches and coaches or other personnel). The prohibition applies through the entirety of all NFL games, including during all pregame activities, and halftime, and applies on the sideline and in stadium locker rooms." Several NFL players took the memo to mean the use of smelling salts had been banned outright. That upset many, including San Francisco 49ers tight end George Kittle, who said he was "distraught all day" after reading the memo. "I'm an every drive guy," Kittle said of his use of smelling salts in an appearance on NFL Network. "I considered retirement. We got to figure out a middle ground here guys. Somebody help me out, somebody come up with a good idea… I miss those already." After the NFLPA's clarification, Kittle no longer has to worry about negotiating a middle ground. He will, however, have to provide his own stash of smelling salts if he wants to continue using them in 2025. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: NFL players not banned from using smelling salts, NFLPA says

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store