EU microchip strategy ‘deeply disconnected from reality' say official auditors
The ECA found the bloc was 'very unlikely' to meet its target of supplying 20% of the world's microchips at a time when global demand for semiconductors is booming to meet the growing needs of defence, green tech and artificial intelligence.
With Donald Trump threatening to impose tariffs on chips imported to the US, there is also potential for 'collapse of supply chains', the ECA said, making the EU more vulnerable, despite tech multinationals such as California's Intel and South Korea's Samsung having bases in Europe.
'The EU urgently needs a reality check in its strategy for the microchips sector,' said Annemie Turtelboom, who was in charge of the ECA audit.
A European Commission paper in 2022 set out the bloc's ambition to take a 20% share of the chip market, a share reflecting the percentage of global end users located in Europe.
However, the ECA's report found that target was 'essentially aspirational' with investment goals hindered by the bloc's 'financial muscle' being too fragmented across different schemes and tax regimes.
'We are making promises that are deeply disconnected from reality,' Turtelboom told reporters at the launch of the report.
'We are competing in a global race, but from the back of the field, and it is unclear whether we have the means to be successful in this race[or the] competencies to support the industry, and the funding we have available is fragmented and scattered.'
Microchip shortages can cause huge problems for industry. The report noted that in the pandemic's wake, a lack of microchips for German carmakers caused production to collapse to 1975 levels.
'They are present in everything, and are becoming only more so with time,' Turtelboom said. 'In a modern car, there are around 1,500 microchips. By 2030, this number is expected to rise to 3,000.'
Brussels announced a Chips Act in 2022 to reduce the EU's reliance on foreign states for supplies of critical components. The resulting regulation came into force in 2023.
'Is it worrying? We know that other continents, China, the US, Taiwan and South Korea, they are not sitting still,' Turtelboom added.
China is expected to overtake Taiwan as the world's biggest manufacturer of chips in 2030 with 22% of the market, according to the ECA. The EU is forecast to to manufacture just 8% on its own soil by then, and would have to quadruple its production capacity to meet a 20% target.
The ECA found that the Chips Act did provide 'new impetus' to manufacturing, and that the funding provided by the European Commission was aligned to the bloc's strategy.
Sign up to This is Europe
The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment
after newsletter promotion
However, it said that the Act was 'prepared in urgency' and the Commission had no mandate to coordinate national investments and all funding streams. It added that tax breaks needed to be closely monitored with a view to increasing investment.
The EU's ambition when the Chips Act came into force was to mobilise €86bn (£73bn) in investment by 2030, but this is eclipsed by the sums being spent by the likes of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), Samsung and Intel.
These top players budgeted $425bn (£361) for investment in just three years between 2020 and 2023 and only one, TSMC, had significant plans to invest in the EU.
Intel, which already has manufacturing facilities in Ireland, had planned to pour €30bn into a mega plant in Magdeburg, Germany, with backing of almost €10bn from the German government, but postponed construction last September.
The postponement was a major blow to the EU that highlighted the effects of the sector being concentrated in so few hands.
'There are a limited amount of players who receive a lot of funding, which means if one project drops, it has a huge impact on the 20% targets,' Turtleboom said.
A European Commission spokesperson said the Chips Act had catalysed funding of €80bn and 'laid a strong foundation in consolidating Europe's position in the global semiconductor market after two decades of decline, and put Europe back on the path of growth'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Largest ICE detention facility at Fort Bliss opens after months of delays, contract squabbles, and a workplace death
A new immigration detention facility, expected to be the largest in the United States, is set to open this week after facing months of delays, including a failed contract and a workplace death. The detention facility, dubbed 'Lonestar Lockup' by Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn, will begin receiving hundreds of people on August 17. The site at Fort Bliss in El Paso, Texas, has an initial capacity of approximately 1,000, but that will expand to 5,000, making it the largest Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in the country. Donald Trump 's administration has rushed to open detention camps including in Florida, dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz', and Indiana's 'Speedway Slammer', to fulfill the president's mass deportation agenda. More than 60,000 people are now being held in immigrant detention centers, according to internal ICE records obtained by The New York Times, breaking the previous record of 55,654 people in August 2019. The process of building the soft-sided tent camp at the Texas military base has been beset by controversies since the beginning. For the past six months, Trump officials have been seeking to build an ICE facility on a military base, eventually settling on Fort Bliss. In April, the administration initially awarded a multi-billion-dollar contract to a company called Deployed Resources to build the Fort Bliss camp but it was quickly canceled. A White House document about the contract claims it was terminated 'for convenience', citing Trump's executive order on wasteful spending and transparency. Weeks later, the government offered two contracts to build and maintain the facility, but both offers were pulled before they could be awarded to a new company. It is unclear why. Finally, in July, the Department of Defense announced it had secured a $231.9 million contract, under a Navy program, with Acquisition Logistics LLC to construct and operate the ICE detention facility in El Paso. Another company that did not win the bid, Gemini Tech Services LLC., filed a bid protest in July. While it is sealed, a source told NBC News the company was seeking to stop construction of the facility. The Fort Bliss project is also subject of two investigations by the Government Accountability Office, an independent nonpartisan agency that audits, investigates, and evaluates government services, according to NBC News. Those investigations are for improper bidding. Last month, the project faced tragedy after Hector Gonzalez, a 38-year-old employee with a subcontracted company, died in a workplace accident. The death is being investigated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration as well as the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division. 'Hector was a beloved husband, father, son, brother and co-worker and he will be greatly missed. Our support and prayers are with his entire family,' a spokesperson for his company, Disaster Management Group, told NBC News. In response to questions about the bid protest and workplace accident death, an Army spokesperson told NBC News that they are 'aware of the GAO protest for the Acquisition Logistics contract,' but could not discuss the issue due to ongoing litigation. 'However, we can confirm that this protest is unrelated to the recent death, which is under investigation,' the Army spokesperson added. In a statement, ICE said that the Fort Bliss facility will adhere to the agency's detention standards and will include access to legal representation, visitation, recreation space, and medical treatment space. The immigration detention center will also provide balanced meals and necessary accommodations, ICE stated. The facility with serve as a detention center and processing center, streamlining the removal process, ICE noted. "Upon completion, this will be the largest federal detention center in history for this critical mission - the deportation of illegal aliens," Pentagon spokesperson Kingsley Wilson said. So far, several states have assisted the federal government by building detention facilities including Florida, which erected Alligator Alcatraz, a tent camp and temporary holding center in the Everglades. It's been subject to scrutiny by lawmakers and detainees for its poor conditions. Similarly, the Speedway Slammer, an extension of the Miami Correctional Facility in Indiana, has also been subject to criticism from local people who believe the facility is an inhumane way of housing immigrants. Both facilities were built quickly to assist in the administration's mass deportation agenda which has compounded worries from Democratic lawmakers and immigration advocates that the locations are unable to meet the stringent requirements of an ICE facility.
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
Deere warns of bigger tariff hit after quarterly profit declines
Aug 14 (Reuters) - Deere & Co (DE.N), opens new tab reported a drop in third-quarter profit on Thursday and warned of a bigger tariff hit than previously expected, sending shares of the farm-equipment maker down 7% in morning trade. U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs have impacted companies across sectors, especially the manufacturing and industrial firms that rely significantly on imported raw materials. This has added to the woes of farm-equipment makers who were already grappling with slow demand due to a slump in crop prices for wheat, corn and soybeans in North America and farmers opting to rent machinery instead of buying. The company now expects a pre-tax tariff impact of nearly $600 million for the year, compared with $500 million projected last quarter. "Tariff uncertainty and deflated commodity prices have made farmers increasingly cautious in spending decisions and more hesitant to accept higher machinery prices," said CFRA Research analyst Jonathan Sakraida. In the third quarter, the levies cost the company nearly $200 million, as tariff policies shifted quickly. Despite the gloomy demand environment, Deere CEO John May said the company was able to manage its inventory levels to help production match retail demand. The company's cost-saving measures also helped it top analyst estimates for third-quarter profit and revenue. Third-quarter operating profit from two of Deere's largest units, which produce tractors, combines and construction equipment, roughly halved from a year earlier. The company cut the higher end of its annual profit forecast to $5.25 billion from $5.50 billion, but kept the lower end intact at $4.75 billion. Global companies that reported between July 16 and August 8 projected a combined financial hit of $13.6 billion to $15.2 billion for the full year, a Reuters' tariff tracker shows. Trump has said the tariffs are a response to persistent U.S. trade imbalances and declining manufacturing power, and that the moves will bring jobs and investment to the nation. Deere's net income in the third quarter came in at $1.29 billion, or $4.75 per share, compared with $1.73 billion, or $6.29 per share, a year earlier. Analysts on average had expected the company to report a quarterly profit of $4.63 per share, according to data compiled by LSEG. The company's net sales fell about 9% to $10.36 billion from a year ago, more than analysts' estimates of $10.31 billion.
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Ukraine war: US and Russian delegations head to Alaska for crunch talks
US and Russian officials will converge on the state of Alaska ahead of a highly anticipated Friday meeting between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir pair will meet for the first time in six years, as Trump tries to enact a key campaign pledge to end Russia's war in Ukraine. The US president, who has portrayed himself as a global peacemaker, hopes to leverage his personal relationship with Putin to achieve a ceasefire breakthrough where others have Thursday he assessed there was a "25% chance" the meeting would not be leader Volodymyr Zelensky has been excluded from the talks, and warned that any resolutions made in his absence will be meaningless. The summit comes exactly one week after Trump's deadline for Russia to reach a ceasefire or face tough new was always highly unlikely that Kyiv and Moscow – who have been locked in a bloody war since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 – would reach an agreement to end hostilities before that was scepticism about whether Trump would stand by his threat of imposing sanctions on countries that do business with Russia, which would have resulted in a blistering trade war with China. He has, however, gone as far as to say he will impose secondary tariffs on India later this month over its purchases of Russian week's announcement that Trump and Putin would meet had the effect of tacitly pausing the sanctions countdown - and awarding both sides more time to think about their next move. ANALYSIS: What do Putin and Trump each want from summit in Alaska?Putin must 'prove he is serious about peace,' says StarmerWhy did Putin's Russia invade Ukraine? Throughout the week, the American approach to the aims and hopes for the summit has been varied – shifting from the positive, to the cautious, to the the latter extreme, Trump has threatened "very severe consequences" if his Russian counterpart does not agree to end the war. What seemed to harden his approach was a group call on Wednesday with European leaders including the other hand, Kyiv will have been alarmed when Trump mooted the "swapping of territories" and the White House indicated that the president would take a passive approach by treating the meeting as a "listening exercise". All the while, the Russians have remained mostly silent – refusing to engage with speculation and rumours of frozen frontlines, territorial exchanges or minerals deals between Moscow and is consistency in that silence. Whenever Kremlin officials have spoken this week, it has been to reiterate Putin's seemingly intractable position on the conflict. They have restated that the war will only end once Russia gains full sovereignty over the Ukrainian regions it partially occupies – Donetsk and Luhansk, known as the Donbas, as well as Kherson and Zaporizhzhia – and a pledge that Kyiv will demilitarise and not join Nato, the military alliance of Western Trump seems convinced that the usually convivial relationship he has cultivated with Putin could help him unlock a deal to end the conflict and further his image as a global peacemaker. The issue has become central to the question of what Trump has delivered on the world stage since returning to the US presidency. He has a domestic audience to keep happy, and many of his supporters backed him for his pledge to swiftly end the war and disentangle America from expensive foreign conflicts more of the summit - his first meeting with Putin for six years - the American hopes that his negotiating style will pay dividends where other efforts to end the war have failed. His top officials have stressed the importance of him meeting Putin in person, and Trump himself has talked up his business-like instincts, saying he may know "in the first two minutes... exactly whether or not a deal can be made". Europe finds itself in the unenviable position of being caught between the two sides and excluded from Friday's their last-minute call with Trump on Wednesday, European leaders emerged tentatively optimistic that once in Alaska the US president would fight their Ukraine itself, they have endured several turbulent months, during which Trump had a memorable White House bust-up with Zelensky and later temporarily paused military supplies for Kyiv - a markedly different stance to his predecessor Joe Biden. Ukraine has been sidelined ahead of Friday, protests by the Ukrainian leader that any agreement struck by Trump and Putin without input from Kyiv would amount to "dead decisions", it became increasingly clear as the week progressed that the US-Russia meeting would remain a bilateral only. While he remained careful to keep Trump onside, Zelensky felt he had to intervene after the US president's throwaway comments about the need to see "some swapping, changes in land" between Russia and Ukraine."We will not withdraw from the Donbas. We cannot do that," the Ukrainian president said, with a hint of exasperation, as speculation over potential territorial concessions reached a height on Tuesday."Everyone forgets the first part: our territories are illegally occupied. For the Russians, the Donbas is a bridgehead for a future new offensive," he said, arguing that he would "pave the way" for further conflict on its soil if it gave up the many of his compatriots, Zelensky is convinced that Putin wants to destroy Ukraine's sovereignty and people, and believes any concession to Russia would result in renewed and perhaps fatal aggression in the near is why he has consistently pushed to be invited into the room with Trump and Putin. While this will not be the case during Friday's summit, the US president has pledged to update Zelensky soon afterwards - and has indicated he is angling for a "quick" three-way meeting in the near future. What Putin would have to gain from such a meeting is unclear. The Kremlin has always said Putin and Zelensky have no reason to meet until much further down the negotiating that could still be far off. Ultimately, Putin's "central objective lies in obtaining... the geopolitical 'neutralisation' of Ukraine," according to analyst Tatyana Stanovaya."It is extremely difficult to convey what is truly at stake... as people often simply cannot accept that Putin might want so much - and be serious about it. Unfortunately, he can."The frenzied lead-up to the Alaska summit has revealed that if Trump's position on a potential resolution of the conflict is still subject to change, Putin's is will offer them a meeting place; common ground at the negotiating table may be harder to find. Follow the BBC's coverage of the war in Ukraine EXPLAINER: Where in Alaska is Trump meeting Putin and why?VISUALS: The war-ravaged Ukrainian territories in mapsVERIFY: Russian attacks on Ukraine double since Trump inaugurationGROUND REPORT: On Ukraine's front line, twisted wreckage shows sanctions haven't yet stopped Russia
