China says BRICS not seeking ‘confrontation' after Trump's tariff threat
'Regarding the imposition of tariffs, China has repeatedly stated its position that trade and tariff wars have no winners and protectionism offers no way forward,' foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said.
Trump said he would send the first tariff letters to various countries on Monday, days before his deadline for trading partners to reach a deal expires.
He said on Sunday he would send a first batch of up to 15 letters, warning that US levies on imports would snap back to the high levels he set in April if countries failed to make agreements.
And, in a post on his Truth Social network, he threatened a further 10 percent tariff on countries aligning themselves with the emerging BRICS nations, accusing them of 'anti-Americanism' after they slammed his tariffs at a summit in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday.
Conceived two decades ago as a forum for fast-growing economies, BRICS has come to be seen as a Chinese-driven counterbalance to US and western European power.
However, Beijing defended the grouping on Monday as 'an important platform for cooperation between emerging markets and developing countries'.
'It advocates openness, inclusivity and win-win cooperation,' Mao said.
'It does not engage in camp confrontation and is not targeted at any country,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Nvidia CEO Huang says China's military unlikely to use US AI chips to improve capabilities
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said the US government does not need to be concerned that the Chinese military will use his company's products to improve their capabilities. Addressing the largest concern Washington has cited in placing increasing restrictions on US technology exports to the Asian nation, Huang said the Chinese military will avoid using US technology because of the risks associated with doing so. 'We don't have to worry about it,' he said in an interview on CNN's Fareed Zakaria GPS broadcast on Sunday. 'They simply can't rely on it,' he added. 'It could be, of course, limited at any time.' Huang and his peers have lost out on billions of dollars of revenue under increasingly tough rules designed to shut off China from access to the most powerful artificial intelligence capabilities. Successive administrations in Washington have maintained that unfettered use of the most capable components would pose a risk to national security.
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
‘Inexcusable' failures led to Trump assassination attempt: Senate report
A congressional inquiry into the attempt to assassinate US President Donald Trump at a campaign rally a year ago on Sunday lamented 'inexcusable' failures in the Secret Service's operations and response, and called for more serious disciplinary action. Advertisement On July 13, 2024, a gunman shot the then-Republican presidential candidate during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, grazing his ear. One bystander was killed and two other people in addition to Trump were wounded before a government sniper killed the gunman, 20-year-old Thomas Crooks 'What happened was inexcusable and the consequences imposed for the failures so far do not reflect the severity of the situation,' said the report released by the US Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. The dramatic incident energised Trump's bid to return to the White House, with his campaign using a photo of him bloodied and pumping his fist to woo voters. Advertisement The report did not shed new light on the gunman's motive, which still remains a mystery, but accused the Secret Service of 'a cascade of preventable failures that nearly cost President Trump his life'.
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Degraded Nobel Peace Prize standards could mean Trump deserves one
Given the long-degraded state of the Nobel Peace Prize, I say Donald Trump probably does deserve one, or three. It may also be jointly awarded to the US president's Israeli partner-in-crime, the suspected war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu with an outstanding arrest warrant for war crimes and crimes against humanity issued by the International Criminal Court. Eventually, Netanyahu will have to end his war on the Palestinian civilian population, which ought to make him a peacemaker of sorts. Advertisement If Henry Kissinger and Le Duc Tho could win the Nobel, why not Trump and Netanyahu? Incidentally, Trump has sanctioned the court's chief prosecutor for daring to try to arrest his mate, as well as the chief UN monitor on Palestinian rights for issuing a report on the complicity of multinational corporations in Israel's 'genocide' in the Palestinian Terroritories. But never mind; Pakistan, Ukraine, and now Israel and a group of African leaders have taken turns to nominate Trump for the big prize, which the US president has openly admitted he covets. Imagine that: the US has been arming Ukraine and Israel to the teeth, and they in turn nominate its president for the peace prize. That's the kind of world we live in now. Ok, Ukraine has withdrawn the peace nomination after Washington temporarily halted weapon supplies. You can't say Kyiv wasn't being consistent! But now that the weapon pipelines have been restored, perhaps Kyiv should resume the nomination. Advertisement Remember how Barack Obama won the 2009 peace prize just for being elected president? That was what everyone had suspected at the time, and it was subsequently confirmed in the autobiography of a former Nobel Institute director, in his own words, to 'strengthen the president'. Compared with the just-elected Obama, Trump actually did some things, though critics can't agree on what they are or their implications.
