Why is bitcoin soaring? And is it time to invest?
Investors originally saw bitcoin as a 'safe haven' asset separated from the fluctuation of markets. However, recently, institutional investors have flocked to the asset class, with about 6 per cent of bitcoin being held in exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
Why is it rallying?
Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are notoriously volatile, with their valuation regularly dropping or rising by thousands of dollars in mere minutes. However, the recent rally has been more sustained, thanks largely to the influence of Trump.
During his campaign, Trump made no secret of his support for cryptocurrencies, promising to make the US the 'crypto capital of the world'. Once elected, he then enacted several policies to promote crypto, including establishing a strategic bitcoin reserve within US Treasury, and holding a crypto summit at the White House.
Loading
He also released his own Trump-branded cryptocurrency, which has a market capitalisation of $US1.9 billion.
Republicans are now attempting to pass three more crypto-friendly bills – The GENIUS Act, The Clarity Act and The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act – all of which will create a friendlier regulatory environment for crypto traders and companies, including clarifying when digital assets like crypto tokens are considered securities or commodities.
Crypto advocates view these bills as the US government's effective endorsement of the sector and a further legitimisation of bitcoin, despite widespread crime in the industry and real-world use cases for cryptocurrencies still few and far between.
How much has the price risen?
After bitcoin's creation in 2008, you could buy one for just a few cents, with 10,000 bitcoin famously being used to buy two pizzas in early 2010. As of Wednesday afternoon, one bitcoin was worth about $185,000.
Since Trump's election, the asset's price has risen by almost $80,000, or 76 per cent.
Should you invest?
Obviously, the best time to have bought bitcoin was 2009 – and even then, you would have needed to conveniently forget about it until now. But is it still worth buying even with its heady valuation?
'Yes, we think so,' says Justin Lin, investment strategist at ETF provider Global X. '2025 is shaping up to be a landmark year for bitcoin adoption. This year we've seen some serious signs that investors are starting to value the asset for its fundamental strengths rather simply speculating on its price.
Loading
'We think bitcoin is on its way to becoming a portfolio staple across the world, and as adoption grows, price discovery will follow.'
Global X believes bitcoin will reach a valuation of $US200,000 by midway through next year. Much of this, Lin says, will be driven by traditional investors through bitcoin ETFs, with the current crop of crypto investors mainly consisting of younger, tech-savvy investors.
'By our calculations, only about 20,000 Australians have invested in ASX-listed bitcoin ETFs. That's shockingly low compared to the US. We take it as a sign that our older investment community still has a lot of catching up to do,' he says.
How can you invest?
There are a number of online bitcoin exchanges that operate both internationally and in Australia. You can sign up to one and buy bitcoin or other crypto. Keep in mind you don't have to purchase a whole one – you can just buy a fraction of a coin.
These exchanges allow you to buy, sell, and store your bitcoin, much like an online stockbroker such as CommSec. The bitcoin ETFs are becoming increasingly popular as a way for traditional investors to purchase the digital asset without having to make an exchange account, with the ETFs available to purchase the same way as any other ASX stock.
However, chief executive of investment firm VanEck Asia Pacific Arian Neiron said Australian investors seem to be less willing to invest in crypto than their US counterparts.
'[Australian] investors are more cautious about bitcoin exposure, particularly when there is price momentum based on sentiment,' he says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
12 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Wall St edges up on strong retail sales, economic data
Wall Street's main indexes have inched up, supported by upbeat results from PepsiCo and strong economic data that pointed to a healthy consumer. Retail sales rebounded more than expected in June, rising 0.6 per cent. Meanwhile, initial jobless claims for the last week came in at 221,000, below the anticipated 235,000, pointing to steady job growth in July. "The fact that consumers are still buying is a strong vote of confidence for earnings going forward," said Adam Sarhan, chief executive of 50 Park Investments. "However, things can change if the tariff situation comes in starting August 1. But for now, a stronger consumer is good for the market." Investors already navigated a whirlwind of inflation signals this week - producer prices flatlined in June - but a jump in consumer inflation had already dashed hopes for more aggressive Fed rate cuts. In early trading on Thursday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 149.32 points, or 0.34 per cent, to 44,404.10, the S&P 500 gained 5.90 points, or 0.09 per cent, to 6,269.60 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 22.49 points, or 0.11 per cent, to 20,752.98. PepsiCo jumped 6.6 per cent as upbeat forecasts - fueled by strong demand for energy drinks and healthier sodas - helped offset concerns about a dip in annual core profit. Majority of S&P sectors logged gains. Consumer staples led the pack with a 0.6 per cent rise. US chipmakers edged up after TSMC, the world's main producer of advanced AI chips, posted a record quarterly profit, saying demand for artificial intelligence was getting stronger. US-listed shares of TSMC gained 3.2 per cent, Marvell inched up 0.2 per cent and Nvidia added 0.8 per cent. Wall Street also watched Netflix ahead of its quarterly results after the market's close. Its shares were up 0.4 per cent. United Airlines flagged a hit to its third-quarter earnings from operational snags at Newark airport. However, its shares were up three per cent. Wall Street briefly experienced extreme volatility on Wednesday after reports surfaced that President Donald Trump was considering firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Although Trump swiftly denied the reports, his ongoing criticism of the central bank and hints at possible action kept investors on edge about the Fed's independence. Currently, traders see a 54.3 per cent chance of cutting in September, while a July move is almost completely off the table, according to CME's FedWatch tool. Fed Governor Adriana Kugler signaled that rate cuts are off the table for now, warning that Trump-era tariffs are starting to push up consumer prices - and that tight monetary policy is crucial to keep inflation fears from taking hold. Meanwhile, attention also remained on looming tariffs, with an August 1 deadline threatening higher levies for many US trading partners. Trump told Real America's Voice on Wednesday that the US is closing in on a deal with India and may soon reach an agreement with Europe as well. Advancing issues outnumbered decliners by a 1.49-to-1 ratio on the NYSE and by a 2.03-to-1 ratio on the Nasdaq. The S&P 500 posted 13 new 52-week highs and two new lows, while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 38 new highs and 11 new lows.
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Russia threatens 'preemptive strikes' on West days after US President Donald Trump demands Ukraine ceasefire
Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev has claimed the Kremlin could launch "preemptive strikes" on Western nations if they escalate the war in Ukraine just days after United States President Donald Trump demanded a ceasefire. On Tuesday, President Trump threatened to impose "very severe" tariffs on Russia unless the Kremlin negotiated an end to its invasion. The US leader also declared he was "very unhappy" with Russian President Vladimir Putin's reticence to engage in peace talks, in a notable shift away from previous comments praising Russia's leader. The Kremlin subsequently dismissed the threat, with Mr Medvedev, who now acts as the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia, describing it as a "theatrical ultimatum". On Thursday, the senior Russian official went further still, telling state media the Kremlin was ready to "respond in full" to any perceived escalation of the war by Western nations. "The statements of Western politicians on this topic are complete nonsense," he said, adding many were attempting to deliberately rachet up tensions. "We need to act accordingly. To respond in full and, if necessary, launch preemptive strikes." Mr Medvedev did not name President Trump in his remarks, but was likely responding both the the US leader and comments from Ukraine's European and NATO allies following the announcement of further military support. Under a fresh agreement, the US is set to provide NATO with weapons, including advanced Patriot missile systems, which will then be distributed to Ukraine to aid its defence against Russian invaders. Russia has long argued the provision of Western weapons to Ukraine represents direct European and US involvement in the war, a claim Mr Medvedev reiterated on Thursday. "What is happening today is a proxy war, but in essence it is a full-scale war, sanctions packages, loud statements about the militarisation of Europe," he told Russian outlet TASS. "It's another attempt to destroy the 'historical anomaly' hated by the West - Russia, our country." Given Mr Medvedev's remarks, it appears highly unlikely the Kremlin will bow to President Trump's demand for a ceasefire. Russian forces have continued to make gains in Ukraine, with President Putin understood to be keen on continuing to push forward until the West is prepared to meet his terms for peace. Those demands include several stipulations Ukraine deems unacceptable, including the almost complete disbandment of its armed forces and the surrender of huge amounts of land to Russia. The majority of European leaders have backed Ukraine's stance, maintaining any peace agreement should not be negotiated on Russian terms, although it US officials have made no such demands. When asked about the terms of any peace agreement, President Trump has been light on detail, simply insisting the fighting needed to end. The US leader has suggested Ukraine may need to concede territory to Russia in order to secure peace and has also refused to provide guarantees over the nation's future security. With Reuters
The Advertiser
4 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'Respect never cost anything': PM defends China outcome
Anthony Albanese has hit back at the coalition over claims of "indulgence" during his China trip, saying his rivals don't understand the importance of respect in diplomacy. The prime minister's itinerary has included retracing the steps of Gough Whitlam on the Great Wall of China and a panda research centre in the southwestern city of Chengdu as his visit nears the end. Back home, the optics of visiting popular tourist sites attracted sniping from the opposition. Coalition frontbencher James Paterson suggested the prime minister was enjoying himself too much. "I do wonder whether a Gough Whitlam history tour on the Great Wall of China, whether a visit to Chengdu to pose with some pandas, and whether a hit of tennis is strictly necessary as part of a six-day visit to China, when there is so much else at stake in our other international relationships around the world," he told Sky News on Thursday. "And frankly, I have to say that some of this is starting to look a little bit indulgent." Mr Albanese has himself been eager to draw links between his tour and those of former Labor prime ministers Whitlam and Bob Hawke, who also visited the giant pandas in 1986. What those and his visits achieved was building respect between Australia and China, which would in turn result in better economic and diplomatic outcomes, he said. "Those pictures go to 27 million people, potentially, in Australia. They go to over a billion people in China," Mr Albanese told reporters in Chengdu. "And those billion people represent people who are increasingly rising up the income ladder and are potential tourists and therefore job creators in Australia. "If James Patterson doesn't understand that, then he doesn't understand much. "The Great Wall of China symbolises the extraordinary history and culture here in China, and showing a bit of respect to people never cost anything. You know what it does, it gives you a reward." Mr Albanese's trip has been shorter on concrete outcomes than in previous years, when his resumption of dialogue with China saw $20 billion worth of Chinese trade sanctions lifted from Australian exports. But the welcome has been warmer and coverage from Chinese state media more effusive than at any time since before the breakdown in Sino-Australian relations in 2020. A few agreements to boost trade and tourism links have been reached. But the increased dialogue and co-operation in areas from green steel to medical technology were part of a gradual improvement in relations that would advance Australia's national interests, Mr Albanese said. "You don't go from a position of where we were into absolute agreement on everything. That's not the goal." Despite the improving mood, China and Australia still have many issues they disagree on. In meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, Mr Albanese raised concerns over China not providing advance notice of naval live-fire drills off Australia that forced commercial flights to divert. Meanwhile, Mr Li has voiced his dismay over Australia's stringent restrictions on foreign investment from China, imploring the Australian government not to treat Chinese firms unfairly. "We have different political systems, but it has been constructive and has been an important step in the developing of our relationship," Mr Albanese said. Anthony Albanese has hit back at the coalition over claims of "indulgence" during his China trip, saying his rivals don't understand the importance of respect in diplomacy. The prime minister's itinerary has included retracing the steps of Gough Whitlam on the Great Wall of China and a panda research centre in the southwestern city of Chengdu as his visit nears the end. Back home, the optics of visiting popular tourist sites attracted sniping from the opposition. Coalition frontbencher James Paterson suggested the prime minister was enjoying himself too much. "I do wonder whether a Gough Whitlam history tour on the Great Wall of China, whether a visit to Chengdu to pose with some pandas, and whether a hit of tennis is strictly necessary as part of a six-day visit to China, when there is so much else at stake in our other international relationships around the world," he told Sky News on Thursday. "And frankly, I have to say that some of this is starting to look a little bit indulgent." Mr Albanese has himself been eager to draw links between his tour and those of former Labor prime ministers Whitlam and Bob Hawke, who also visited the giant pandas in 1986. What those and his visits achieved was building respect between Australia and China, which would in turn result in better economic and diplomatic outcomes, he said. "Those pictures go to 27 million people, potentially, in Australia. They go to over a billion people in China," Mr Albanese told reporters in Chengdu. "And those billion people represent people who are increasingly rising up the income ladder and are potential tourists and therefore job creators in Australia. "If James Patterson doesn't understand that, then he doesn't understand much. "The Great Wall of China symbolises the extraordinary history and culture here in China, and showing a bit of respect to people never cost anything. You know what it does, it gives you a reward." Mr Albanese's trip has been shorter on concrete outcomes than in previous years, when his resumption of dialogue with China saw $20 billion worth of Chinese trade sanctions lifted from Australian exports. But the welcome has been warmer and coverage from Chinese state media more effusive than at any time since before the breakdown in Sino-Australian relations in 2020. A few agreements to boost trade and tourism links have been reached. But the increased dialogue and co-operation in areas from green steel to medical technology were part of a gradual improvement in relations that would advance Australia's national interests, Mr Albanese said. "You don't go from a position of where we were into absolute agreement on everything. That's not the goal." Despite the improving mood, China and Australia still have many issues they disagree on. In meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, Mr Albanese raised concerns over China not providing advance notice of naval live-fire drills off Australia that forced commercial flights to divert. Meanwhile, Mr Li has voiced his dismay over Australia's stringent restrictions on foreign investment from China, imploring the Australian government not to treat Chinese firms unfairly. "We have different political systems, but it has been constructive and has been an important step in the developing of our relationship," Mr Albanese said. Anthony Albanese has hit back at the coalition over claims of "indulgence" during his China trip, saying his rivals don't understand the importance of respect in diplomacy. The prime minister's itinerary has included retracing the steps of Gough Whitlam on the Great Wall of China and a panda research centre in the southwestern city of Chengdu as his visit nears the end. Back home, the optics of visiting popular tourist sites attracted sniping from the opposition. Coalition frontbencher James Paterson suggested the prime minister was enjoying himself too much. "I do wonder whether a Gough Whitlam history tour on the Great Wall of China, whether a visit to Chengdu to pose with some pandas, and whether a hit of tennis is strictly necessary as part of a six-day visit to China, when there is so much else at stake in our other international relationships around the world," he told Sky News on Thursday. "And frankly, I have to say that some of this is starting to look a little bit indulgent." Mr Albanese has himself been eager to draw links between his tour and those of former Labor prime ministers Whitlam and Bob Hawke, who also visited the giant pandas in 1986. What those and his visits achieved was building respect between Australia and China, which would in turn result in better economic and diplomatic outcomes, he said. "Those pictures go to 27 million people, potentially, in Australia. They go to over a billion people in China," Mr Albanese told reporters in Chengdu. "And those billion people represent people who are increasingly rising up the income ladder and are potential tourists and therefore job creators in Australia. "If James Patterson doesn't understand that, then he doesn't understand much. "The Great Wall of China symbolises the extraordinary history and culture here in China, and showing a bit of respect to people never cost anything. You know what it does, it gives you a reward." Mr Albanese's trip has been shorter on concrete outcomes than in previous years, when his resumption of dialogue with China saw $20 billion worth of Chinese trade sanctions lifted from Australian exports. But the welcome has been warmer and coverage from Chinese state media more effusive than at any time since before the breakdown in Sino-Australian relations in 2020. A few agreements to boost trade and tourism links have been reached. But the increased dialogue and co-operation in areas from green steel to medical technology were part of a gradual improvement in relations that would advance Australia's national interests, Mr Albanese said. "You don't go from a position of where we were into absolute agreement on everything. That's not the goal." Despite the improving mood, China and Australia still have many issues they disagree on. In meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, Mr Albanese raised concerns over China not providing advance notice of naval live-fire drills off Australia that forced commercial flights to divert. Meanwhile, Mr Li has voiced his dismay over Australia's stringent restrictions on foreign investment from China, imploring the Australian government not to treat Chinese firms unfairly. "We have different political systems, but it has been constructive and has been an important step in the developing of our relationship," Mr Albanese said. Anthony Albanese has hit back at the coalition over claims of "indulgence" during his China trip, saying his rivals don't understand the importance of respect in diplomacy. The prime minister's itinerary has included retracing the steps of Gough Whitlam on the Great Wall of China and a panda research centre in the southwestern city of Chengdu as his visit nears the end. Back home, the optics of visiting popular tourist sites attracted sniping from the opposition. Coalition frontbencher James Paterson suggested the prime minister was enjoying himself too much. "I do wonder whether a Gough Whitlam history tour on the Great Wall of China, whether a visit to Chengdu to pose with some pandas, and whether a hit of tennis is strictly necessary as part of a six-day visit to China, when there is so much else at stake in our other international relationships around the world," he told Sky News on Thursday. "And frankly, I have to say that some of this is starting to look a little bit indulgent." Mr Albanese has himself been eager to draw links between his tour and those of former Labor prime ministers Whitlam and Bob Hawke, who also visited the giant pandas in 1986. What those and his visits achieved was building respect between Australia and China, which would in turn result in better economic and diplomatic outcomes, he said. "Those pictures go to 27 million people, potentially, in Australia. They go to over a billion people in China," Mr Albanese told reporters in Chengdu. "And those billion people represent people who are increasingly rising up the income ladder and are potential tourists and therefore job creators in Australia. "If James Patterson doesn't understand that, then he doesn't understand much. "The Great Wall of China symbolises the extraordinary history and culture here in China, and showing a bit of respect to people never cost anything. You know what it does, it gives you a reward." Mr Albanese's trip has been shorter on concrete outcomes than in previous years, when his resumption of dialogue with China saw $20 billion worth of Chinese trade sanctions lifted from Australian exports. But the welcome has been warmer and coverage from Chinese state media more effusive than at any time since before the breakdown in Sino-Australian relations in 2020. A few agreements to boost trade and tourism links have been reached. But the increased dialogue and co-operation in areas from green steel to medical technology were part of a gradual improvement in relations that would advance Australia's national interests, Mr Albanese said. "You don't go from a position of where we were into absolute agreement on everything. That's not the goal." Despite the improving mood, China and Australia still have many issues they disagree on. In meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, Mr Albanese raised concerns over China not providing advance notice of naval live-fire drills off Australia that forced commercial flights to divert. Meanwhile, Mr Li has voiced his dismay over Australia's stringent restrictions on foreign investment from China, imploring the Australian government not to treat Chinese firms unfairly. "We have different political systems, but it has been constructive and has been an important step in the developing of our relationship," Mr Albanese said.
