
'Respect never cost anything': PM defends China outcome
The prime minister's itinerary has included retracing the steps of Gough Whitlam on the Great Wall of China and a panda research centre in the southwestern city of Chengdu as his visit nears the end.
Back home, the optics of visiting popular tourist sites attracted sniping from the opposition.
Coalition frontbencher James Paterson suggested the prime minister was enjoying himself too much.
"I do wonder whether a Gough Whitlam history tour on the Great Wall of China, whether a visit to Chengdu to pose with some pandas, and whether a hit of tennis is strictly necessary as part of a six-day visit to China, when there is so much else at stake in our other international relationships around the world," he told Sky News on Thursday.
"And frankly, I have to say that some of this is starting to look a little bit indulgent."
Mr Albanese has himself been eager to draw links between his tour and those of former Labor prime ministers Whitlam and Bob Hawke, who also visited the giant pandas in 1986.
What those and his visits achieved was building respect between Australia and China, which would in turn result in better economic and diplomatic outcomes, he said.
"Those pictures go to 27 million people, potentially, in Australia. They go to over a billion people in China," Mr Albanese told reporters in Chengdu.
"And those billion people represent people who are increasingly rising up the income ladder and are potential tourists and therefore job creators in Australia.
"If James Patterson doesn't understand that, then he doesn't understand much.
"The Great Wall of China symbolises the extraordinary history and culture here in China, and showing a bit of respect to people never cost anything. You know what it does, it gives you a reward."
Mr Albanese's trip has been shorter on concrete outcomes than in previous years, when his resumption of dialogue with China saw $20 billion worth of Chinese trade sanctions lifted from Australian exports.
But the welcome has been warmer and coverage from Chinese state media more effusive than at any time since before the breakdown in Sino-Australian relations in 2020.
A few agreements to boost trade and tourism links have been reached.
But the increased dialogue and co-operation in areas from green steel to medical technology were part of a gradual improvement in relations that would advance Australia's national interests, Mr Albanese said.
"You don't go from a position of where we were into absolute agreement on everything. That's not the goal."
Despite the improving mood, China and Australia still have many issues they disagree on.
In meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, Mr Albanese raised concerns over China not providing advance notice of naval live-fire drills off Australia that forced commercial flights to divert.
Meanwhile, Mr Li has voiced his dismay over Australia's stringent restrictions on foreign investment from China, imploring the Australian government not to treat Chinese firms unfairly.
"We have different political systems, but it has been constructive and has been an important step in the developing of our relationship," Mr Albanese said.
Anthony Albanese has hit back at the coalition over claims of "indulgence" during his China trip, saying his rivals don't understand the importance of respect in diplomacy.
The prime minister's itinerary has included retracing the steps of Gough Whitlam on the Great Wall of China and a panda research centre in the southwestern city of Chengdu as his visit nears the end.
Back home, the optics of visiting popular tourist sites attracted sniping from the opposition.
Coalition frontbencher James Paterson suggested the prime minister was enjoying himself too much.
"I do wonder whether a Gough Whitlam history tour on the Great Wall of China, whether a visit to Chengdu to pose with some pandas, and whether a hit of tennis is strictly necessary as part of a six-day visit to China, when there is so much else at stake in our other international relationships around the world," he told Sky News on Thursday.
"And frankly, I have to say that some of this is starting to look a little bit indulgent."
Mr Albanese has himself been eager to draw links between his tour and those of former Labor prime ministers Whitlam and Bob Hawke, who also visited the giant pandas in 1986.
What those and his visits achieved was building respect between Australia and China, which would in turn result in better economic and diplomatic outcomes, he said.
"Those pictures go to 27 million people, potentially, in Australia. They go to over a billion people in China," Mr Albanese told reporters in Chengdu.
"And those billion people represent people who are increasingly rising up the income ladder and are potential tourists and therefore job creators in Australia.
"If James Patterson doesn't understand that, then he doesn't understand much.
"The Great Wall of China symbolises the extraordinary history and culture here in China, and showing a bit of respect to people never cost anything. You know what it does, it gives you a reward."
Mr Albanese's trip has been shorter on concrete outcomes than in previous years, when his resumption of dialogue with China saw $20 billion worth of Chinese trade sanctions lifted from Australian exports.
But the welcome has been warmer and coverage from Chinese state media more effusive than at any time since before the breakdown in Sino-Australian relations in 2020.
A few agreements to boost trade and tourism links have been reached.
But the increased dialogue and co-operation in areas from green steel to medical technology were part of a gradual improvement in relations that would advance Australia's national interests, Mr Albanese said.
"You don't go from a position of where we were into absolute agreement on everything. That's not the goal."
Despite the improving mood, China and Australia still have many issues they disagree on.
In meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, Mr Albanese raised concerns over China not providing advance notice of naval live-fire drills off Australia that forced commercial flights to divert.
Meanwhile, Mr Li has voiced his dismay over Australia's stringent restrictions on foreign investment from China, imploring the Australian government not to treat Chinese firms unfairly.
"We have different political systems, but it has been constructive and has been an important step in the developing of our relationship," Mr Albanese said.
Anthony Albanese has hit back at the coalition over claims of "indulgence" during his China trip, saying his rivals don't understand the importance of respect in diplomacy.
The prime minister's itinerary has included retracing the steps of Gough Whitlam on the Great Wall of China and a panda research centre in the southwestern city of Chengdu as his visit nears the end.
Back home, the optics of visiting popular tourist sites attracted sniping from the opposition.
Coalition frontbencher James Paterson suggested the prime minister was enjoying himself too much.
"I do wonder whether a Gough Whitlam history tour on the Great Wall of China, whether a visit to Chengdu to pose with some pandas, and whether a hit of tennis is strictly necessary as part of a six-day visit to China, when there is so much else at stake in our other international relationships around the world," he told Sky News on Thursday.
"And frankly, I have to say that some of this is starting to look a little bit indulgent."
Mr Albanese has himself been eager to draw links between his tour and those of former Labor prime ministers Whitlam and Bob Hawke, who also visited the giant pandas in 1986.
What those and his visits achieved was building respect between Australia and China, which would in turn result in better economic and diplomatic outcomes, he said.
"Those pictures go to 27 million people, potentially, in Australia. They go to over a billion people in China," Mr Albanese told reporters in Chengdu.
"And those billion people represent people who are increasingly rising up the income ladder and are potential tourists and therefore job creators in Australia.
"If James Patterson doesn't understand that, then he doesn't understand much.
"The Great Wall of China symbolises the extraordinary history and culture here in China, and showing a bit of respect to people never cost anything. You know what it does, it gives you a reward."
Mr Albanese's trip has been shorter on concrete outcomes than in previous years, when his resumption of dialogue with China saw $20 billion worth of Chinese trade sanctions lifted from Australian exports.
But the welcome has been warmer and coverage from Chinese state media more effusive than at any time since before the breakdown in Sino-Australian relations in 2020.
A few agreements to boost trade and tourism links have been reached.
But the increased dialogue and co-operation in areas from green steel to medical technology were part of a gradual improvement in relations that would advance Australia's national interests, Mr Albanese said.
"You don't go from a position of where we were into absolute agreement on everything. That's not the goal."
Despite the improving mood, China and Australia still have many issues they disagree on.
In meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, Mr Albanese raised concerns over China not providing advance notice of naval live-fire drills off Australia that forced commercial flights to divert.
Meanwhile, Mr Li has voiced his dismay over Australia's stringent restrictions on foreign investment from China, imploring the Australian government not to treat Chinese firms unfairly.
"We have different political systems, but it has been constructive and has been an important step in the developing of our relationship," Mr Albanese said.
Anthony Albanese has hit back at the coalition over claims of "indulgence" during his China trip, saying his rivals don't understand the importance of respect in diplomacy.
The prime minister's itinerary has included retracing the steps of Gough Whitlam on the Great Wall of China and a panda research centre in the southwestern city of Chengdu as his visit nears the end.
Back home, the optics of visiting popular tourist sites attracted sniping from the opposition.
Coalition frontbencher James Paterson suggested the prime minister was enjoying himself too much.
"I do wonder whether a Gough Whitlam history tour on the Great Wall of China, whether a visit to Chengdu to pose with some pandas, and whether a hit of tennis is strictly necessary as part of a six-day visit to China, when there is so much else at stake in our other international relationships around the world," he told Sky News on Thursday.
"And frankly, I have to say that some of this is starting to look a little bit indulgent."
Mr Albanese has himself been eager to draw links between his tour and those of former Labor prime ministers Whitlam and Bob Hawke, who also visited the giant pandas in 1986.
What those and his visits achieved was building respect between Australia and China, which would in turn result in better economic and diplomatic outcomes, he said.
"Those pictures go to 27 million people, potentially, in Australia. They go to over a billion people in China," Mr Albanese told reporters in Chengdu.
"And those billion people represent people who are increasingly rising up the income ladder and are potential tourists and therefore job creators in Australia.
"If James Patterson doesn't understand that, then he doesn't understand much.
"The Great Wall of China symbolises the extraordinary history and culture here in China, and showing a bit of respect to people never cost anything. You know what it does, it gives you a reward."
Mr Albanese's trip has been shorter on concrete outcomes than in previous years, when his resumption of dialogue with China saw $20 billion worth of Chinese trade sanctions lifted from Australian exports.
But the welcome has been warmer and coverage from Chinese state media more effusive than at any time since before the breakdown in Sino-Australian relations in 2020.
A few agreements to boost trade and tourism links have been reached.
But the increased dialogue and co-operation in areas from green steel to medical technology were part of a gradual improvement in relations that would advance Australia's national interests, Mr Albanese said.
"You don't go from a position of where we were into absolute agreement on everything. That's not the goal."
Despite the improving mood, China and Australia still have many issues they disagree on.
In meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, Mr Albanese raised concerns over China not providing advance notice of naval live-fire drills off Australia that forced commercial flights to divert.
Meanwhile, Mr Li has voiced his dismay over Australia's stringent restrictions on foreign investment from China, imploring the Australian government not to treat Chinese firms unfairly.
"We have different political systems, but it has been constructive and has been an important step in the developing of our relationship," Mr Albanese said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
20 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump's becoming the Basil Fawlty of American tourism
There are those who misguidedly believe that not only should sport and politics never mix, travel and politics shouldn't ever coexist either. Fat chance. As the world's witnessed with international sport over the decades, the notion that it and world events can be separated has proved historically risible, and now we witness overseas travel becoming markedly more politicised. Nowhere is it more starkly illustrated than what appears to be the weaponisation of tourism for political purposes by the US Trump administration and its facilitators, who appear to be Googling overtime in search of any criticism of the president and his policies. This article, and others I've written critical of US treatment of tourists under the Trump administration in my role as travel editor of the Herald and the Age, will likely render any visit by me to the States a risky proposition. I'm not complaining. For me it's no loss, as it's still a wide, wonderful and mostly welcoming world out there, and word has it that our far more rational Canadian friends could do with a little antipodean love in the form of a holiday there. Loading So forget about yours truly and consider the recent case of a reader of the Traveller title of the above publications. Only a few hours before the departure of his flight earlier this month to visit his daughter in the States, Australian Bruce Hyland received notice from US immigration authorities that he would not be permitted to enter the country. This news came after earlier having been approved to visit. 'No reason for a cancellation was provided [for the decision to refuse entry],' Hyland writes in his Traveller letter, 'so one is in the Kafkaesque situation of having breached some official procedure, while having no way to appeal the decision or determine what that procedure could be.'

The Age
20 minutes ago
- The Age
Trump's becoming the Basil Fawlty of American tourism
There are those who misguidedly believe that not only should sport and politics never mix, travel and politics shouldn't ever coexist either. Fat chance. As the world's witnessed with international sport over the decades, the notion that it and world events can be separated has proved historically risible, and now we witness overseas travel becoming markedly more politicised. Nowhere is it more starkly illustrated than what appears to be the weaponisation of tourism for political purposes by the US Trump administration and its facilitators, who appear to be Googling overtime in search of any criticism of the president and his policies. This article, and others I've written critical of US treatment of tourists under the Trump administration in my role as travel editor of the Herald and the Age, will likely render any visit by me to the States a risky proposition. I'm not complaining. For me it's no loss, as it's still a wide, wonderful and mostly welcoming world out there, and word has it that our far more rational Canadian friends could do with a little antipodean love in the form of a holiday there. Loading So forget about yours truly and consider the recent case of a reader of the Traveller title of the above publications. Only a few hours before the departure of his flight earlier this month to visit his daughter in the States, Australian Bruce Hyland received notice from US immigration authorities that he would not be permitted to enter the country. This news came after earlier having been approved to visit. 'No reason for a cancellation was provided [for the decision to refuse entry],' Hyland writes in his Traveller letter, 'so one is in the Kafkaesque situation of having breached some official procedure, while having no way to appeal the decision or determine what that procedure could be.'


West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Angus Taylor suggests Labor ‘fickle' on AUKUS
Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor says it is wrong to call the Coalition 'fickle' on AUKUS, but that he cannot say the same about Labor. Mr Taylor was asked on Wednesday to respond to comments made by Jerry Hendrix – the man heading a US ship building blitz in line with Donald Trump's mission to 'restore America's maritime dominance'. Mr Hendrix, a retired US Navy captain, has been vocal in his concerns about Australia's commitment to AUKUS, saying last year 'the Australians have been noticeably fickle', as reported overnight by the Sydney Morning Herald. In a separate criticism, he said the 'challenge for AUKUS' is two-fold. 'First there will be a question of whether the Australian government will sustain their commitment across the coming years and change of (governments),' Mr Hendrix posted on social media. 'Second will be whether the US will actually be willing to give up Virginia class boats.' Speaking to Sky News, Mr Taylor said the 'opposition's position on AUKUS is not fickle at all'. 'It is complete and utter commitment to what is an incredibly important initiative, both tranche one and tranche two – the nuclear submarines as well as the associated technology,' he said. Pressed on the criticism, he repeated his defence but suggested it was a fair shot at the Albanese government. 'The opposition's not fickle, that's for sure,' he said. 'I worry that the government – I think it's not just me worried, I think every expert looking at this is making these comments – they're deeply worried that we're not on our way to having the defence force we need in such an uncertain time. 'We've got authoritarian regimes around the world flexing their muscles.' Mr Taylor was also asked about the Netherlands' defence chief warning Australia should lift its military spending in response to the build up in China. General Onno Eichelsheim was in Australia for Talisman Sabre – annual war games hosted by the Australian Defence Force. He said the country should 'get ready for something that you hope will never happen', drawing parallels between Russia's invasion of Ukraine and China's aggression in the Indo-Pacific. 'You should look at the facts that are around you … if Russia tells us that they want to have more, more influence, then take that seriously,' General Eichelsheim told the ABC. 'And if you see in this case in this region, China building up, take it seriously and get ready for something that you hope will never happen. 'If you prepare for war, you can avoid war. And that's how we look at it.' However, he said percentage of GDP was not the most important measure. Responding to the remarks, Mr Taylor said Australia 'definitely' needed to boost defence spending. 'We need to spend that money better,' he said. 'And (the Coalition has) made a commitment already to get to 3 per cent at least and that is exactly what the government should be doing.' Labor has committed billions in extra defence funding over the next decade, which will push it to about 2.3 per cent of GDP by 2034. But Anthony Albanese and his government have firmly rejected the US' call to boost it to 3.5 per cent, adding to friction with Washington.