Aragon and Catalonia battle over the 'Sistine Chapel of Romanesque art'
After 11 years of complaints, appeals and back-and-forth between various courts, on May 28, Spain's Supreme Court finally ruled in the case of the mural paintings from the Romanesque Monastery of Santa María de Sijena. The dispute has pitted the regions of Aragon and Catalonia against each other since 2015. Unsurprisingly, but not without controversy, the court upheld, as a final ruling, the sentence imposed on the Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya (MNAC) in Barcelona: It must return the monastery's frescoes, located in the town of Villanueva de Sijena in the province of Huesca, within 20 days. Dating from 1196 to 1208, the works were removed in 1936 to protect them from the Spanish Civil War, before being purchased by the MNAC from nuns who were not the rightful owners.
For the Catalan museum officials who have displayed the works since 1961, and who in recent years have called on numerous experts to bolster their case against the transfer, the decision puts extremely fragile works at risk. For the Aragonese government, which invested nearly €1.2 million in restoration work at the monastery, including the installation of a sophisticated climate control system to accommodate the paintings, it is time for the "Sistine Chapel of Romanesque art" to return to its original home. "The monastery is now able to store these works in perfect safety and, very soon, to exhibit them," said Jorge Azcon, president of the government of Aragon and of the right-wing People's Party of Aragon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Brazil court to rule from Sept 2 in Bolsonaro coup trial
Bolsonaro is accused of attempting to hold power despite his 2022 electoral defeat by Brazil's current leftist leader, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. He faces up to 40 years in prison if found guilty. The Supreme Court statement said the ruling would be considered "during extraordinary sessions on September 2, 3, 9, 10 and 12." Thousands of Bolsonaro supporters stormed government buildings in Brasilia on January 8, 2023, a week after Lula's inauguration, alleging election fraud and calling on the military to intervene. Bolsonaro, who led the Latin American country from 2019 to 2022, has maintained his innocence, calling any coup "abhorrent." The prosecutor's office maintains that Bolsonaro led an "armed criminal organization" that orchestrated the coup attempt and was to be its main beneficiary. The case file also focuses on meetings where draft decrees were allegedly presented, including those involving the possible imprisonment of officials such as Supreme Court judges. However, the defense has stressed that "there is no way to convict" Bolsonaro based on the evidence presented in the case file, which they argued adequately demonstrated that he ordered the transition of power to Lula. His lawyers have questioned the validity of the plea bargain handed to Lieutenant Colonel Mauro Cid, Bolsonaro's former aide, on whose testimony many of the accusations are based. Bolsonaro's legal wranglings are at the center of fizzing diplomatic tensions between Brazil and the United States. President Donald Trump has called the trial a "witch hunt" and the US Treasury Department has sanctioned Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing Bolsonaro's trial, in response. Trump has also signed an executive order slapping 50 percent tariffs on many Brazilian imports, citing Bolsonaro's "politically motivated persecution."
LeMonde
3 days ago
- LeMonde
Brazilian ex-president Bolsonaro's lawyers call for an acquittal in alleged coup trial
Defense lawyers for former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro asked the country's Supreme Court for an acquittal during closing arguments on Wednesday, August 14, in a trial where he's accused of attempting a coup. In a 197-page document submitted to the court, Bolsonaro's lawyers argued the far-right former head of state is "innocent of all charges" and that an "absolute lack" of evidence was presented during the trial, which began in May. He faces up to 40 years in prison if found guilty. Bolsonaro and seven collaborators are accused of attempting to hold power despite his 2022 electoral defeat to Brazil's current leftist leader, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Bolsonaro, who led the Latin American country from 2019 to 2022, has maintained his innocence for months, calling any coup "abhorrent." On January 8, 2023, a week after Lula's inauguration, thousands of Bolsonaro supporters stormed government buildings in Brasilia, alleging election fraud and calling on the military to intervene. Earlier this month, Bolsonaro was placed under house arrest in Brasilia for violating a ban on using social media to plead his case to the public.
Euronews
08-08-2025
- Euronews
US federal judge blocks Trump's birthright order nationwide
A federal judge in Maryland ruled that US President Donald Trump cannot withhold citizenship from people born to people in the United States illegally or temporarily, issuing the fourth court decision blocking Trump's birthright citizenship order since a key Supreme Court ruling in June. US District Judge Deborah Boardman's preliminary injunction was expected after she said last month that she would issue such an order if an appeals court returned the case to her. The 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals sent the case back to her late in July. Since June, two other district courts, in addition to an appellate panel of judges, have also blocked Trump's birthright ban nationwide, which he passed on his first day in office through an executive order. Trump's executive order signed on Inauguration Day on 20 January would deny citizenship to children born to parents living in the United States illegally or temporarily. Boardman issued a preliminary injunction blocking the executive order nationwide, but a ruling by the Supreme Court offered the Trump administration some hope of upholding the policy many criticise as a violation of the US Constitution. The 14th Amendment of the Constitution stipulates that all persons born or naturalised in the United States are US citizens. The top US court upended Boardman's decision and other court rulings blocking Trump's order across the nation, saying that federal judges and courts lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions. The justices ruled did not however rule out other court orders which could have nationwide effects, including class-action lawsuits and those brought forward by states. Boardman on her Thursday ruling certified a class of children who have been born or will be born in the United States after 19 February, who would be affected by Trump's order. She argued that the plaintiffs in the lawsuit before her were 'extremely likely' to win their argument that the US president's order is a constitutional violation and are also likely to suffer 'irreparable harm' if the order went into effect.
