Federal Court sets Nov 6 to hear Malaysian Armed Forces retirees' leave to appeal on pension case
Lawyer Mohamed Hanif Khatri Abdulla, representing the retirees, said the date was fixed by Federal Court deputy registrar Husna Dzulkifly during a case management session that began on Aug 4 and concluded today via e-Review.
'The hearing will be conducted virtually via Zoom,' he said, adding that a final case management is scheduled for Oct 25 to update the court on the status of cause papers and written submissions.
On June 4 this year, a three-judge Court of Appeal panel overturned the High Court's ruling that entitled MAF retirees who left service before Jan 1, 2013, to pension adjustments matching those granted to retirees after that date.
The appellate bench had allowed the appeal filed by the respondents, namely, the government, Prime Minister, Senior Defence Minister and MAF Council.
The Court of Appeal ruled that the MAF retirees failed to prove that the respondents had breached the Federal Constitution.
Subsequently, the retirees filed an application on July 3 seeking leave to appeal to the Federal Court.
In their application, they sought the determination of two questions of law related to the pension adjustment issue.
Fifty army personnel of various ranks, including majors, lieutenants, staff sergeants, and privates, filed an originating summons in the High Court on Nov 17, 2022.
They sought a declaration that the government violated the Federal Constitution and Section 187 of the Malaysian Armed Forces Act 1972 by failing to implement new pension adjustments for retirees who left service before Jan 1, 2013.
The retirees contended that the government's failure created a significant pension gap between those who retired before and after that date. — Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
33 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
‘Mission impossible' for B40 East Malaysian students to enter top varsities, says MP
Bayan Baru MP Sim Tze Tzin said the government should treat STPM students more fairly in university admissions. KUALA LUMPUR : East Malaysian students from B40 families face an uphill battle to get into top university courses, a government MP said today. Sim Tze Tzin (PH-Bayan Baru) highlighted the big gap between the two main pre-university paths in Malaysia – Sijil Tinggi Persekolahan Malaysia (STPM) and the matriculation programme. 'If the students choose STPM, it is 'mission impossible' to get into a good university. 'This is because they basically have less than 3% chance to get into medicine, pharmacy or dentistry,' he said when debating the 13th Malaysia Plan in the Dewan Rakyat. Sim cited data showing very few STPM students from Sabah and Sarawak being admitted into medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, and law courses. In 2023, only 2.39% of medical students admitted came from STPM, with most coming from matriculation. He said nearly 72% of STPM students were from B40 families. 'We want social mobility. But they are stuck in STPM. They can't move. This is an issue of justice because B40 students from Sabah and Sarawak are dependent on STPM to achieve social mobilisation and higher education,' he said. Sim also pointed out that matriculation took nine months to complete while STPM required 18 months, giving matriculation students a quicker path to university. He urged the government to treat STPM students more fairly in university admissions. 'STPM is now the second or last choice for our children. It should be given a higher weightage for entrance into university,' he said. He also called for the creation of a task force to 'save STPM' and ensure a fairer system for all students. Last month, education minister Fadhlina Sidek dismissed calls to abolish the matriculation programme. She denied claims that it was inferior to the STPM examination and said matriculation remained a recognised pre-university pathway accepted by both local and international universities.
Free Malaysia Today
33 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Public feedback still required for key projects, says DBKL
DBKL said it is committed to public engagement, transparency, and inclusive decision-making in urban planning. PETALING JAYA : New planning regulations for Kuala Lumpur will continue to require stakeholder consultation, Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) said today. DBKL said although formal objections to the Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2040 (PTKL 2040) no longer apply following its gazettement on June 11, it remains committed to best planning practices through the implementation of Rule 3 of the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur Planning Rules 2025, which mandates stakeholder consultations. It explained that such consultation is required for specific types of proposed developments, such as high-density projects or temporary developments, which require public feedback before approval is granted. 'Additionally, every approved development project in Kuala Lumpur is required to implement a communication strategy covering the pre-construction, construction, and post-construction phases,' it said in a statement. 'This ensures that developers engage with nearby residents to clearly explain the planned development and the benefits it will bring to the local community.' DBKL said these measures reflect its ongoing commitment to public engagement, transparency, and inclusive decision-making in urban planning. It was responding to criticism by Seputeh MP Teresa Kok over the 'secret' gazettement of the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur Planning Rules 2025, which took place on June 13 and became effective three days later. Kok said the rules, which replace decades-old planning laws, weaken transparency and limit public objections to development projects. In its statement, DBKL said it remains dedicated to ensuring that the city is developed in an organised, inclusive, and liveable manner, with public input serving as a key foundation of its planning process. It also stressed that PTKL 2040's preparation was carried out transparently and in full compliance with legal provisions, with all stakeholders given the opportunity to provide input. It said it implemented a variety of publicity and public engagement methods to ensure broad community participation in line with Sections 14 and 15 of the Federal Territory (Planning) Act 1982. The public participation period began on Jan 31, 2024, was extended twice, and ended on April 15, 2024, it said. During this time, DBKL said it hosted permanent and mobile exhibitions across Kuala Lumpur and conducted 13 public briefing sessions, including ones involving Kuala Lumpur MPs. It also said it went beyond the legal requirements by conducting more engagement sessions than required under the Federal Territory (Planning) Act. Fifty-one engagement sessions involving more than 1,500 individuals and groups were organised. The participants included academics, MPs, professionals, residents' associations, government bodies, and local authorities. These engagement efforts spanned several years and formats, and included early pre-consultation sessions in 2019, informal meetings with MPs in 2020, and technical meetings with 32 government bodies. DBKL also said it gathered feedback through online surveys from 300 residents' associations, hosted focus group discussions with 521 participants, held consultation sessions with MPs in 2023, and organised an open day for the draft amendment in May.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Speaker scolds MPs for rowdy show before schoolchildren
Dewan Rakyat Speaker Johari Abdul said he would review the Hansard and surveillance cameras near the exit before making a ruling on the ruckus tomorrow. (Bernama pic) KUALA LUMPUR : Dewan Rakyat Speaker Johari Abdul chastised MPs after a shouting match during the debate today, reminding them that schoolchildren in the gallery were watching their bad behaviour. The ruckus began when Chong Zhemin (PH-Kampar) criticised a speech by Abdul Hadi Awang (PN-Marang) on the 13th Malaysia Plan, saying that it lacked policy points. He singled out a remark in which Hadi had blamed Pakatan Harapan, DAP and other parties for Kuala Lumpur's problems, calling it irrelevant to the document. Several PAS MPs, including Shahidan Kassim (PN-Arau) and Awang Hashim (PN-Pendang), jeered in response. RSN Rayer (PH-Jelutong) tried to raise a point of order but was drowned out by shouts and insults aimed at his party, DAP. One of the opposition MPs was heard saying 'Wherever DAP is in administration, there are problems.' Rayer subsequently asked if they would accept him calling PAS 'Parti Ajaran Sesat', prompting further uproar. Suhaizan Kayat (PH-Pulai), who was standing in to chair proceedings, struggled to restore order before Johari rushed in from his chambers and issued the MPs a sharp rebuke. 'There are schoolchildren here before us. From my chamber, I could hear insults and foul words. If we want this nation to progress, leaders must progress. Not like this,' Johari said. As Johari spoke, some opposition MPs staged a walkout, further drawing his ire. He reminded both sides, each with experience in government, to respect senior leaders and maintain civility during debates. Rayer later said that two PAS MPs had asked him to 'come out for a fight' before exiting the Dewan Rakyat. Johari said he would review the Hansard and surveillance cameras near the exit before making a ruling on the ruckus tomorrow.
