Resignation of Crater Lake head leaves Oregon congressional delegation concerned
While Democratic members of Oregon's congressional delegation expressed alarm at the sudden resignation of the leader of the state's only national park, the Republican who has the park in his district declined to take a position Friday.
Kevin Heatley, the new superintendent of Crater Lake National Park, resigned from his post May 30 over staffing concerns after just five months on the job.
Heatley, who had previously worked at the Bureau of Land Management, told Oregon Public Broadcasting, KGW, The Washington Post and several other news organizations that staffing was already lean at Crater Lake, and layoffs of probationary employees President Donald Trump ordered, followed by hiring freezes, mandates to leave vacant positions unfilled and new federal incentives from the Office of Personnel Management and the office known as the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, to resign or retire were making it worse.
Oregon's congressional delegation met the news with differing levels of concern.
U.S. Rep. Maxine Dexter, representing Oregon's 3rd Congressional District, wrote Wednesday to Doug Burgum, secretary of the Department of the Interior, demanding to know if he or the agency had undertaken any analysis of what staffing levels were like there or how bad it had gotten. Dexter is also a member of the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
On X, formerly known as Twitter, Oregon's U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat, said it is clear to him that Trump is 'hellbent on destroying natural treasures like Crater Lake.'
U.S. Rep. Cliff Bentz, who represents Oregon's 2nd District —his district includes southern Oregon's Crater Lake — said on the phone Friday he'd 'look into it.'
'The person's (Heatley) concern may be well founded. It may not. Until I know the facts better, I'm not going to take a position on it, but now that you've raised an issue, we'll look into it,' he said.
The national park in southern Oregon, famous for its vibrant and translucent volcanic lake that is among the deepest in the world, typically sees about half-a-million visitors each year. But this summer, 60 to 65 seasonal positions will need to be filled, Heatley told journalists in several reports, and just eight ranger positions have so far been filled to keep visitors in the 286-square-mile park safe.
'I mean, the train is still running on the tracks, but it's not heading in the right direction,' Heatley told OPB on June 2. 'I cannot, in good conscience, manage an operation that I know is moving in the wrong direction.'
Spokespeople for Crater Lake did not respond to Capital Chronicle requests for staffing and hiring data.
The federal jobs portal USA Jobs does not list any current vacancies at Crater Lake. The Kansas-based company running Crater Lake's lodging, concessions, retail and boating operations had 18 vacant positions listed on its site as of June 5.
The National Parks Conservation Association, a Washington D.C.-based nonprofit conservation group, called the staffing issues at the 63 National Parks a 'full-blown staffing crisis.'
They report that the Department of the Interior's own workforce database shows that as of May 13, the Park Service had just over 18,000 employees across all parks, a more than 16% drop from 2023, the previous fiscal year — a decrease equal to that of the previous ten years combined. The association said the recent sharp drop was driven by Trump-incentivized buyouts, early retirements, deferred resignations and leaving vacancies unfilled.
Interior Department data also shows 39% of seasonal and temporary staff at the national parks have been hired so far — about 3,300 employees. That's less than half the number of seasonal employees Park Service officials said they'd hire in a February memo.
In her letter to Burgum, Dexter called Heatley's resignation a 'flashing red warning sign that something is very wrong,' in a news release Wednesday.
This article was first published by the Oregon Capital Chronicle, part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Oregon Capital Chronicle maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Julia Shumway for questions: info@oregoncapitalchronicle.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
28 minutes ago
- UPI
IDF says slain reporter was Hamas; journalist groups condemn killing
The Israel Defense Forces said Sunday that it killed an Al Jazeera reporter it accused of being a Hamas militant. File Photo by Jim Hollander/UPI | License Photo Aug. 11 (UPI) -- The Israeli military said it struck and killed Al Jazeera reporter Anas al-Sharif, accusing him of being a Hamas militant, which attracted condemnation from journalist organizations. The Israel Defense Forces made the announcement Sunday on X, saying al-Sharif "was the head of a Hamas terrorist cell and advanced rocket attacks on Israeli civilians and IDF troops." "A press badge isn't a shield for terrorism," the IDF said on X. Al Jazeera reported that al-Sharif was one of four colleagues killed in a targeted Israeli attack on a tent housing journalists in Gaza City, one of the few areas in the Palestinian enclave not under Israeli military control. Seven people were killed in the strike, the Qatar-based news organization said. In a statement, Al Jazeera Media Network condemned what it called the "targeted assassination" of its correspondent, along with photographers Ibrahim Al Thaher and Mohamed Nofal. "As Al Jazeera Media Network bids farewell to yet another group of its finest journalists, who boldly and courageously documented the plight of Gaza and its people since the onset of the war, it holds the Israeli occupation forces and government responsible for deliberately targeting and assassinating its journalists," Al Jazeera Media Network said, adding that al-Sharif's death follows calls from Israeli officials to target him and his colleagues. The IDF has repeatedly criticized Al Jazeera and has accused several of its reporters in Gaza of being Hamas or Islamic Jihad militants. Late last month, IDF spokesman Avichay Adraee accused al-Sharif in a video posted to Facebook of being a member of Hamas' military wing since 2013. Following al-Sharif's death, Adraee continued to post videos and photos to his Facebook account repeating his claims that the journalist was a militant. In its statement Sunday, the IDF cited Israeli intelligence and Gaza documents as proof that al-Sharif "was a Hamas operative integrated into Al Jazeera." Israel has killed at least 178 Palestinian journalists during its nearly two-year-old war in Gaza, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, which said Israel has "a longstanding, documented pattern of accusing journalists of being terrorists without providing any credible proof." "Israel's pattern of labeling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect of press freedom," CPJ Regional Director Sara Qudah said in a statement in response to al-Shari's death. "Journalists are civilians and must never be targeted. Those responsible for these killings must be held accountable."
Epoch Times
29 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Advocacy Group Urges China to Lift Exit Bans on 7-Year-Old and His Mother
A Chinese mother and her U.S.-born young child are being barred from leaving China after a family trip there last year, marking another case where Beijing has stopped foreigners and Chinese nationals from departing the country. On Aug. 7, the Dui Hua Foundation, a San Francisco-based advocacy group for at-risk detainees in China, raised the plight of the Gao family—permanent U.S. residents Gao Zhen and his wife Zhao Yaliang, and their seven-year-old son, Gao Jia, a U.S. citizen from New York. The senior Gao and his younger brother, Gao Qiang, are well-known as the 'Gao Brothers' for their artworks critical of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). One particularly well-known art piece is a bronze statue of former CCP leader Mao Zedong kneeling, his right hand on his chest with a sorrowful expression. In August last year, Gao Zhen was detained on the charge of 'slandering China's heroes and martyrs' during a family trip. The foundation pointed out that the charge was based on the Heroes and Martyrs Protection Law, which went into effect in 2018, even though his artworks mocking the Chinese regime's leadership were created before 2009. Zhao and her son have been barred from leaving China since the senior Gao's arrest. The foundation questioned why Beijing chose to impose the exit ban on them, noting that neither has been accused of a crime nor is required for any criminal investigation by the Chinese authorities. Unable to return to the United States, the seven-year-old Gao 'has been unable to attend school for a full year,' the foundation added. 'It's one thing to slap exit bans on adult Americans like bankers or government employees, it's an entirely different matter to impose an exit ban on a young child,' John Kamm, executive director of the Dui Hua Foundation, said in a statement. Last month, the Chinese regime announced that it had imposed an exit ban on Mao Chenyue, an Atlanta-based managing director at Wells Fargo, accusing the banker of being 'involved in a criminal case.' Also in July, the U.S. State Department confirmed that a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office employee was being prevented from leaving China after traveling there in a personal capacity. In September last year, the foundation estimated that there were 'more than 300 Americans under coercive measures in China,' and 'more than 30 are under exit bans.' The foundation stated that China's treatment of the younger Gao violates the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, which China signed in 1990 and ratified two years later. As for the senior Gao, the foundation stated that he is scheduled to be tried and sentenced 'in the coming weeks,' and warned that he could receive a long sentence, despite his not guilty plea. 'Charging someone with a crime that was not a crime at the time the alleged offense took place,' Kamm said, 'is a violation of a fundamental principle of justice, the principle of non-retroactive application of the law.' 'The Chinese government must stop persecuting the Gao family. It must free Gao Zhen and lift the exit bans on Gao Jia and his mother and allow them to return to the United States.' New York-based nonprofit, the Human Rights Foundation (HRF), sent a letter dated Oct. 31 last year to the consulate general of China in New York, demanding the senior Gao's immediate and unconditional release. The letter, written by HRF Chief Advocacy Officer Roberto González, argued that his artworks 'are incredibly necessary to educating the world on the truth of Mao's dictatorial legacy.' Mao instigated the Red Guards, who were Chinese high school and university students, to persecute those identified as 'class enemies' of the communist regime, amid the Cultural Revolution that lasted 10 years until Mao's death in 1976. González also argued that Beijing should repeal the Heroes and Martyrs Protection Law to 'safeguard artistic freedom in China.' 'His detention is not just a violation of his rights but a blatant abuse of power and an attack on the fundamental human freedoms of all Chinese people who have the right to learn the truth about dictator Mao Zedong,' the letter reads.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kern lawmakers not on board with Newsom's redistricting fight
Kern County's local lawmakers universally condemned proposals from Gov. Gavin Newsom to redraw the state's congressional district, but were mostly quiet about efforts by other states to do the same thing. The offices of each of Kern County's six lawmakers in the state Legislature and U.S. House of Representatives did not respond to The Californian's specific questions on the matter, but did give a statement on the plans in California largely defending the state's independent redistricting committee. "No political party should manipulate redistricting for their own gain. California voters have made it clear: Politicians shouldn't draw their own maps," Assemblyman Stan Ellis, R-Bakersfield, said in an email. "Gov. Newsom's efforts to skew the lines for more seats undermine democracy. We must prioritize the will of the people over partisan politics and uphold fair representation," he said. Yet a defense of democracy is precisely what Newsom and his supporters say California is trying to do. "He knows he's going to lose in the midterms, and we have the opportunity to de-facto end the Trump presidency in less than 18 months," Newsom told reporters on Aug. 4. "That's what's at stake. That's why we're putting a stake in the ground. We're not drawing lines just to draw lines; we're holding the line on democracy." Newsom was referring to efforts by the state of Texas to potentially redraw four of its Congressional districts. Current plans from Republican lawmakers in that state could potentially add five Republicans to the already narrowly divided U.S. House. Texas Democrats have fled the state in an effort to stall the process. Several governors — Democrats in Illinois and New York, Republicans in Ohio and Missouri — have indicated their willingness to enlist their state in a gerrymandering arms race if other states do the same. Newsom has met with state legislative leaders and suggested holding a special session on the matter. But Kern County's state lawmakers from both parties said they're not interested. "The governor's efforts to gerrymander Congressional districts is pure politics and voters will see it for what it is — an end run around the state's voter approved redistricting commission," state Sen. Shannon Grove, R-Bakersfield, said in a statement. "I support Congressman Kevin Kiley's efforts to pass a federal law prohibiting changes to congressional district lines as the best solution to this partisan mess being created," she said. Kiley, a Placer County Republican, has proposed legislation that would prevent any new state maps from taking effect before 2030. Kern County's Democratic state Sen. Melissa Hurtado, did not respond to request for comment. Delano Assembly member Dr. Jasmeet Bains called efforts in Texas "an affront to democracy" and said she opposed any effort to circumvent independent redistricting. "(Texas') gerrymandered maps are an electoral fraud. I will not sit by and watch two political parties destroy the concept of fair elections," Bains said in an email. "This has become a race to the bottom where an eye for an eye will make the whole world blind. We don't need more ways for politicians to rig the system." Bains also called for courts to intervene. But that's not likely to happen, according to UCLA law professor Richard Hansen. "In 2019 the (U.S.) Supreme Court in the Rucho case held that federal courts would not intervene against partisan gerrymandering," Hansen said in an email. That decision — decided in a 5-4 split between the courts conservative and liberal justices — found the court had no 'judicially manageable standard' for determining at what point a partisan gerrymander becomes unconstitutional. The issue is particularly complex for Bains, who recently announced she was running for California's 22nd Congressional District, meaning she would be voting to redraw the very districts she's looking to win. The Associated Press reported Monday one of the proposals currently being considered in California includes the 22nd as one of the districts that would see right-leaning voters shaved and Democratic voters boosted, a shift that would make it likely a left-leaning candidate would prevail in each race. The district is currently held by U.S. Rep. David Valadao, one of California's nine Congressional Republicans. Even before the redistricting issue, the 22nd was seen as one of the most competitive in the nation with candidates able to pull in millions of dollars from outside donors. In an email, Valadao's campaign strategist Robert Jones defended the state's independent redistricting commission. "California voters made it clear in 2008 that they wanted an independent commission, not partisan politicians like Jasmeet Bains, drawing their own districts for their own personal gain," Jones said. "That's corruption of the highest order." Bains' role in the potential redistricting quickly became fodder for Republican campaigners. In a statement Wednesday morning, regional spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee Christian Martinez accused Bains of supporting Newsom's redistricting plans. Martinez acknowledged in a text to The Californian he had not seen a statement from Bains regarding the issue. On Thursday, after Bains made statement condemning the governor's plan, Martinez released a new statement calling on Bains to recuse herself from the process. Kern County's other congressional Republican, Vince Fong, said partisan gerrymandering was precisely what Californians voted against when they overwhelmingly supported the creation of the independent redistricting commission. "Newsom, flanked by Texas Democrats, announced that he stands ready to take power away from the Citizens Commission and place it back into the hands of Sacramento politicians to further his left-wing political agenda," Fong said in an email. "As a delegation we will fight any attempt to disenfranchise California voters by whatever means necessary to ensure the will of the people continues to be reflected in redistricting and in our elections." Any new electoral maps drafted by the state Legislature would have to be approved by voters in California. It's not clear whether the public would approve of the measures. Several groups have come forward calling on the state not to abandon its independent redistricting process even as other states move to boost the number of seats for a specific party. "Our feeling is that once you break that safeguard, you don't just risk the one election. You set a precedent that future politicians could use," said Helen Hutchinson, interim executive director for the League of Women Voters of California. Hutchinson said Californians worked hard to take redistricting out of the hands of politicians and completely circumvent the process was "a race to the bottom." "We really understand that urgency and we think that authoritarianism is not an abstract. It's here and it's really dangerous," Hutchinson said. "But we think the way to fight it is not to abandon one of our greatest democratic reforms here in California, the idea is to lead with ideas and policies that inspire voters, not with shortcuts that further erode public trust in the government."
