Administrative deadlock continues at Kerala University
Vice-Chancellor in-charge Mohanan Kunnummal has yet to convene a Syndicate meeting as demanded by Left-backed Syndicate members. Besides, tensions have further escalated following the disciplinary action initiated against Joint Registrar P. Harikumar two days ago, which is feared to derail the ongoing efforts to reach a consensus.
Dr. Kunnummal issued a show-cause notice to Mr. Harikumar for issuing an official order that revoked the suspension of Registrar K.S. Anil Kumar and subsequently circulating the directive across university departments. The Vice-Chancellor has maintained that the Syndicate decision to withdraw the Registrar's suspension lacks legal validity. Mr. Harikumar has been given 15 days to respond to the notice.
A section of Syndicate members has accused the Vice-Chancellor of deliberately stalling the Syndicate meeting to evade scrutiny. University regulations mandate that such meetings must be held at least once every 60 day, they claim. With the last meeting held on May 27, the deadline for the next meeting is July 27. They had submitted a formal request to convene the meeting on July 18.
Meanwhile, the Raj Bhavan has summoned Director (Planning and Development) Mini Dejo Kappen, who has been assigned additional charge of the Registrar, to provide details regarding a controversy over grace mark allocation related to last year's Kerala University Union Youth Festival.
Dr. Kappen has been directed to appear before the Governor on July 26, and present score sheets and other related documents submitted by the festival's judging panel.
The Governor, as the Chancellor of the university, has been named a respondent in a court case filed by a group of students, necessitating the submission of a counter affidavit.
The issue arose after the Vice-Chancellor refused to approve the festival organisers' decision to declare multiple groups as winners in some group events. This approach was allegedly adopted to extend the grace mark benefits to a larger number of students.
Various quarters interpret the Governor's summoning of Dr. Kappen as tacit acknowledgement of the legitimacy of Dr. Kumar's suspension.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
5 hours ago
- Hans India
Mamata Banerjee Questions Health Claims Behind Jagdeep Dhankhar's Abrupt Vice Presidential Exit
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has cast doubt on the official explanation for Jagdeep Dhankhar's unexpected departure from the Vice Presidency, suggesting the former constitutional officer's health claims may not tell the complete story. During a press conference at the state secretariat Nabanna on Tuesday, the Trinamool Congress leader expressed her belief that Dhankhar remains in good health despite his cited medical reasons for resignation. Banerjee deliberately avoided direct commentary on the resignation itself but made pointed observations about Dhankhar's physical condition. She characterized him as "a healthy man" whose health appears "absolutely fine," implying that other factors may have driven his decision to step down from India's second-highest constitutional office. The West Bengal leader's skepticism carries particular weight given her turbulent history with Dhankhar during his previous role as the state's Governor. Their relationship was marked by persistent conflicts, formal correspondence disputes, and mutual accusations, with Banerjee frequently criticizing Dhankhar for allegedly exceeding his constitutional authority while serving in Raj Bhavan. Banerjee's concerns reflect broader opposition skepticism about the circumstances surrounding Dhankhar's departure. Her cryptic suggestion to "watch" developments indicates expectations that more information about the resignation's true motivations may emerge over time. The Chief Minister's position aligns with growing opposition criticism of the resignation's timing and rationale. Several political leaders have questioned whether health concerns alone could justify such an abrupt departure from constitutional office, particularly given Dhankhar's active participation in parliamentary proceedings just hours before his resignation. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh has been particularly vocal in challenging the official narrative, alleging that the resignation was "forced" by government pressure rather than voluntary medical considerations. TMC leaders Kunal Ghosh and Sushmita Dev have similarly expressed surprise at the sudden nature of Dhankhar's decision, questioning whether health issues alone could explain such dramatic action. The resignation makes Dhankhar only the third Vice President in Indian history to leave office mid-term, invoking Article 67(a) of the Constitution in his formal letter to President Droupadi Murmu. His departure has created unprecedented constitutional questions and highlighted tensions between different branches of government. Opposition leaders' collective skepticism suggests broader concerns about institutional independence and the pressures facing constitutional officers in contemporary Indian politics. Their questioning of the health narrative indicates belief that political factors, rather than medical ones, may have ultimately determined Dhankhar's fate as Vice President.
The Hindu
19 hours ago
- The Hindu
Administrative deadlock continues at Kerala University
The administrative stalemate at Kerala University shows no signs of resolution, despite mediation attempts by various quarters including Higher Education Minister R. Bindu. Vice-Chancellor in-charge Mohanan Kunnummal has yet to convene a Syndicate meeting as demanded by Left-backed Syndicate members. Besides, tensions have further escalated following the disciplinary action initiated against Joint Registrar P. Harikumar two days ago, which is feared to derail the ongoing efforts to reach a consensus. Dr. Kunnummal issued a show-cause notice to Mr. Harikumar for issuing an official order that revoked the suspension of Registrar K.S. Anil Kumar and subsequently circulating the directive across university departments. The Vice-Chancellor has maintained that the Syndicate decision to withdraw the Registrar's suspension lacks legal validity. Mr. Harikumar has been given 15 days to respond to the notice. A section of Syndicate members has accused the Vice-Chancellor of deliberately stalling the Syndicate meeting to evade scrutiny. University regulations mandate that such meetings must be held at least once every 60 day, they claim. With the last meeting held on May 27, the deadline for the next meeting is July 27. They had submitted a formal request to convene the meeting on July 18. Meanwhile, the Raj Bhavan has summoned Director (Planning and Development) Mini Dejo Kappen, who has been assigned additional charge of the Registrar, to provide details regarding a controversy over grace mark allocation related to last year's Kerala University Union Youth Festival. Dr. Kappen has been directed to appear before the Governor on July 26, and present score sheets and other related documents submitted by the festival's judging panel. The Governor, as the Chancellor of the university, has been named a respondent in a court case filed by a group of students, necessitating the submission of a counter affidavit. The issue arose after the Vice-Chancellor refused to approve the festival organisers' decision to declare multiple groups as winners in some group events. This approach was allegedly adopted to extend the grace mark benefits to a larger number of students. Various quarters interpret the Governor's summoning of Dr. Kappen as tacit acknowledgement of the legitimacy of Dr. Kumar's suspension.
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
Jagdeep Dhankhar's tenure as West Bengal Governor was a constitutional flashpoint
The office of the Governor in India's constitutional architecture occupies a unique and often delicate space. The tenure of Jagdeep Dhankhar, who resigned as Vice President of India last night, as Governor of West Bengal is a classic example of how that delicate space can cause conflict between two offices. As the nominal head of a state, the Governor is expected to function as a vital link to the Union, a custodian of the Constitution, and a guide to the elected government. This role has an inherent tension: How to perform these duties, particularly on constitutional oversight, without being perceived as encroaching upon the democratic mandate of the state legislature and executive. Dhankhar's role as Governor of WB brought this tension into sharp public focus. A defining feature was his prolific use of public platforms, most notably Twitter, to communicate his views and question the state government's actions. This marked a departure from constitutional tradition and practice, that gubernatorial advice and concerns are best offered in private consultation with the Chief Minister. By taking his critiques of administrative and policy matters directly to the public sphere, Jagdeep Dhankhar created a dynamic of constant, open friction with the Mamata Banerjee government, fundamentally altering the nature of their constitutional engagement. On the issue of law and order, Dhankhar was a persistent critic, frequently summoning senior police officials and issuing statements that questioned the state's administrative capacity. Following the 2021 Assembly elections, his visits to areas affected by post-poll violence were presented as a response to a constitutional crisis. However, these actions were met with accusations from the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) that the Raj Bhavan was acting in a partisan manner, with his pronouncements often aligning closely with the narrative of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the opposition in the state. This friction extended deep into the legislative domain. The Governor's power to grant or withhold assent to bills passed by the legislature is a constitutional check, but it is meant to be exercised with utmost restraint. During his tenure, several bills, including the crucial Howrah Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Bill, remained pending at the Raj Bhavan for extended state government argued that such delays amounted to an obstruction of the legislative will of the people. To appreciate the distinctiveness of this approach, it is instructive to contrast it with the gubernatorial style of Gopal Krishna Gandhi, who served in West Bengal from 2004 to 2009. Gandhi, a seasoned diplomat and scholar, presided during an equally, if not more, volatile period. His interventions, however, were rooted in what could be described as constitutional quietude and moral suasion. He engaged in firm, but discreet, dialogue with the then Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharya. He sought to be a mediator, a calming influence who could facilitate talks between the government and the Opposition, then led by Mamata Banerjee. The contrast is one of method: One chose public scrutiny as the primary tool of accountability, the other chose private counsel and moral authority. While one contextualises Jagdeep Dhankhar's tenure, it cannot be divorced from the prevailing national political climate, characterised by intense competition between the BJP-led central government and powerful regional parties such as the TMC. His actions in West Bengal were seen by many observers as part of a pattern in Opposition-ruled states where the Raj Bhavan became a key site of political contestation. This aligns with the long-standing debate over the role of the Governor, with bodies like the Sarkaria Commission having cautioned decades ago against appointing active politicians to the post to prevent the office from being used for partisan ends. The governorship of Dhankhar in West Bengal was a tenure that consistently tested the established conventions of India's federal democracy. By adopting a posture of public and persistent opposition to the elected state government, his term forced a debate on the very nature of the Governor's role. It highlighted a fundamental divergence in approach from predecessors like Gopal Krishna Gandhi, who operated on the principle of dignified detachment and mediation. The legacy of Jagdeep Dhankhar's term in West Bengal is, therefore, one that brought critical questions to the fore, one that continues to play out in other states: Where does a Governor's duty to uphold the Constitution end and political interference begin? And what are the long-term institutional consequences when the Raj Bhavan is perceived not as a neutral umpire, but as a player in the political arena? The author is a political anthropologist and teaches in Dr APJ Abdul Kalam Government College, Kolkata
