logo
First Nation's fight for clean water stalls amid federal-provincial tensions

First Nation's fight for clean water stalls amid federal-provincial tensions

A remote northern Ontario First Nation's daily struggle for safe drinking water is stuck in the middle of a political fight between the federal and provincial governments.
Every morning, families of the Pikangikum First Nation wake up to a water crisis that has become routine. Most homes have no running water. Families start the day not with a shower, but with a trek to the lake — hauling buckets, breaking through ice in the winter and rationing bottled water when it's available. Even the band office relies on a decaying septic tank and water tank with no plumbing.
'Daily life is a very, very long day simply because people don't have a direct water source,' said Carolina Budiman, senior health project manager and spokesperson for the community.
Pikangikum has lived under a boil water advisory for over two decades. Last month, the only working water pump failed again, pushing the community into another state of emergency. Across Canada, 37 long-term boil water advisories remain in effect as of May 30, most of them in Ontario.
The federal government has promised change, preparing to reintroduce a clean water bill for First Nations. This legislation, previously known as Bill C-61, would set national standards for drinking water and wastewater on First Nation lands, clarify which government is responsible, and require Ottawa to provide ongoing, adequate funding. For Pikangikum, this could finally mean moving from temporary fixes to real solutions.
But now Alberta and Ontario are pushing back, asking Ottawa to drop the bill.
In a letter to the federal environment minister, Alberta's Rebecca Schulz and Ontario's Todd McCarthy argued the bill would 'undermine competitiveness, delay project development and disproportionately harm specific provinces and territories without any quantifiable benefits to the natural environment.' They warned the new rules could create more regulatory hurdles and slow economic activity.
'Daily life is a very, very long day simply because people don't have a direct water source,' said Carolina Budiman, senior health project manager and spokesperson for Pikangikum.
Livi McElrea, spokesperson for Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty, reaffirmed the government's intention to go ahead with Bill C-61 in a statement provided to Canada's National Observer.
'Everyone in Canada should have access to safe and clean drinking water. That's why our new government has committed to introduce and pass legislation that affirms First Nations have a human right to clean drinking water. To be clear — we intend to introduce this legislation this fall to advance this important commitment,' McElrea wrote.
She said the legislation was developed through engagement with First Nations from 2018 to 2024 and will continue to be shaped by their feedback.
'We call on all Parliamentarians, Provinces, and Territories to support this critical legislation to ensure that First Nations have access to clean drinking water,' McElrea said.
But the opposition from Ontario and Alberta has added more uncertainty to Pikangikum's situation.
'This kind of political opposition just signals to the communities that even the modest improvements will be met with delay, and that puts people's health and safety at risk every single day,' said Natalie Clyke, a community advocate.
'It signals that First Nation health is still negotiable.'
Paddy Peters, chief of the nation, is frustrated.
'The government is still punishing us, and our children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren are needlessly suffering from the government's lack of response and taking their grand old time in using band-aid solutions to keep our community under submission,' he said in a written response to questions from Canada's National Observer.
Clyke said that delaying the bill undermines the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's calls to action and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People.
Instead of getting the long-term upgrades they need, communities like Pikangikum are stuck with paperwork and temporary repairs.
In May, Pikangikum announced it is taking the federal government to court, seeking $2 billion in damages and $200 million in emergency relief for urgent repairs at its water treatment plant.
Requests for reimbursement and immediate help have gone unanswered, said Budiman.
'Nothing changes,' Peters said. 'Canada makes repeated promises for improvements that never come. Our people live in conditions that would shock most Canadians and we are told to keep studying the problem.'
The failing wastewater system is contaminating both the lake and the treated water reservoir, putting more than 4,000 residents at risk.
Most families in Pikangikum First Nation continue to gather their water daily from the lake. In winter, they cut through the ice and melt the ice blocks over a fire to use at home.
'And it's not like a story that we all have shared growing up, that we went out to the lake ... so that you could bathe yourself,' Clyke said.
Some elders recovering from surgery are staying in hotels just to access showers. Water use also remains heavily restricted.
'They're actually regulating their own water usage. Forget the bath — there's no such thing as a bathtub. They're not taking daily showers, and they're not cooking or cleaning with clean water,' Budiman said.
The community relies on shipped-in products for hygiene, resulting in significant plastic waste.
'We have to ship in Lysol wipes and Pampers wipes. People are using those diaper wipes for their daily hygiene, along with bottled water. So we have a lot of plastic bottles — these are byproducts of having to live with insufficient water supply,' Budiman said.
Pikangikum's challenges echo those in other First Nations communities, where safe water is still not guaranteed despite years of attention and investment.
'There's no reason that in a country as wealthy and strong as this, we cannot provide those services to all communities,' said Ken Coates, professor of Indigenous governance at Yukon University. 'What Canada should do, must do, is commit to every community in the country and legally establish that [Indigenous communities] have access to the same level of services that urban communities take for granted.'
Pikangikum advocates say the commitment to bring C-61 to the House of Commons is a step forward, but they want more than promises. They want a guarantee that their chief and other First Nations will have a seat at the table as the legislation moves ahead.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The controversy over Canada's rules on military exports to Israel, explained
The controversy over Canada's rules on military exports to Israel, explained

The Province

time3 hours ago

  • The Province

The controversy over Canada's rules on military exports to Israel, explained

Published Aug 10, 2025 • 7 minute read Sen. Yuen Pau Woo, facilitator of the Independent Senators Group, speaks to reporters after the vote on Bill C-45, the Cannabis Act in the Senate on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, June 19, 2018. Photo by Justin Tang / THE CANADIAN PRESS OTTAWA — A Canadian senator is calling on Ottawa to be more transparent on its policy to restrict arms exports to Israel, following contradictory reports about what manufacturers have been allowed to send to the Middle East. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors 'I'm horrified to hear this news about certain arms exports and parts going to Israel, directly or indirectly,' Sen. Yuen Pau Woo said in an interview with The Canadian Press. 'Civilians are being killed and starved, and the Israeli government has only made things worse.' Ottawa insists it hasn't been allowing exports of lethal weapons to Israel and has been blocking any military goods that could be used in Gaza. Here's a look at what we know — and don't know — about Ottawa's efforts to keep Canadian weapons out of Gaza while allowing Israel to import military goods for other purposes. What is Canada holding back from Israel? In March 2024, Parliament voted in favour of a non-binding motion to halt new arms permits for Israel. The government announced a review of export permits and suspended about 30 of them to determine whether they involved lethal uses. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Ottawa has allowed all other military export permits for Israel to continue. There were 164 such permits used to export military goods to Israel in 2024, and some of them are valid for years. Of the 30 suspended permits, some have expired and the rest remain suspended, says Global Affairs Canada. In March 2024, the office of then-foreign affairs minister Melanie Joly said that none of the valid permits allowed for the export of 'lethal goods' to Israel, such as weapons technology and equipment. Her office also said Canada stopped approving permits for Israel on Jan. 8, 2024, citing human rights concerns. While Israel's foreign minister suggested at the time the decision would undermine Israel's ability to defend itself, Israeli Ambassador Iddo Moed said 'we will be able to continue to defend ourselves.' Essential reading for hockey fans who eat, sleep, Canucks, repeat. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. What is Canada still allowing into Israel? Ottawa has said its restrictions exclude 'non-lethal' equipment. The government provided Parliament with a list of all existing permits in June 2024. The list mentions circuit boards well over a hundred times. In September 2024, after the U.S. State Department approved the purchase of mortar cartridges made in Quebec for Israel, Joly said Canadian-made weapons were prohibited from reaching the Gaza Strip. 'We will not have any form of arms or parts of arms be sent to Gaza, period,' Joly said at the time. 'How they're being sent and where they're being sent is irrelevant.' Anand said in an Aug. 1 statement that this pledge actually goes back to January 2024. Groups like Project Ploughshares argue the term 'non-lethal' is poorly defined and misleading. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Activists say Israel can use Canadian-made components such as lenses and cameras in the Gaza war and in military campaigns in the West Bank, despite Ottawa saying Israel is violating international law in both theatres. What does Israeli customs data say? In late July, pro-Palestinian activists reported that the Israel Tax Authority had listed publicly imports from Canada that were officially recorded in customs data as bullets, guns and other weapons. The data suggested 175,000 bullets were sent from Canada to Israel under the customs code that Israel uses for 'munitions of war and parts thereof,' with three similar shipments in 2024. Israeli customs agents recorded another Canadian shipment in the category of 'tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, motorized, whether or not fitted with weapons, and parts of such vehicles.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. It took the Canadian government three days to respond to the claims. Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand's office said it took the time 'to verify if any of the serious allegations of wrongdoing were true.' In her reply, Anand said the report was flawed and its findings 'are misleading and significantly misrepresent the facts.' The bullets were 'paintball-style projectiles' that cannot be used in combat, Anand's office said. Sen. Woo called that explanation trivializing and suggested Israel is likely using those materials to train its soldiers. Woo was among 32 senators — a third of the Senate — who called for a thorough investigation into what's reaching Israel from Canada. He called Anand's statement 'very limited, slippery and highly defensive.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'She missed an opportunity to grasp the gravity of the situation in Gaza,' he said. What about aircraft? Advocates argue Canadian components are being used in Israeli fighter jets and drones, citing exports of items such as circuit boards and scopes or cameras. The July report noted that specific companies in Israel receiving Canadian imports have also been equipping Israel's offensive in Gaza. The report pointed to no direct, explicit evidence that Canadian arms had been used on the ground in Gaza. Ottawa insists it is doing everything it can to ensure Canadian components aren't used in Gaza. What about that parliamentary report? On Aug. 4, the Canadian Muslim Public Affairs Council released a report assembled by the Library of Parliament that it said disproves much of what the government has claimed. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The July 8 report is marked 'not to be published' and the Library of Parliament said in a statement that it 'provides impartial customized research services for individual parliamentarians,' on the basis that the 'client's research request (will) remain confidential.' The government says the report is a rehash of publicly available information that doesn't contradict what the government has said publicly. Advocates seized on the portion of the report showing two arms permits to send goods to Israel were issued in 2024. Anand's office noted the permits were disclosed to Parliament last June and were issued on Jan. 8, 2024, the day Ottawa stopped issuing new permits. The advocates also noted that the report cited $2.3 million in Canadian sales to Israel listed as 'bombs, torpedoes, rockets, missiles, other explosive devices and charges and related accessories, components and equipment.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Anand's spokesman James Fitz-Morris wrote that these were 'electronic components for detection equipment' in Israel's Iron Dome system, which intercepts and destroys incoming rockets. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Did Carney change the Trudeau government's policy? While the government insists it hasn't changed policies, its language has shifted. Joly and her office spoke about non-lethal uses for arms. Anand has avoided that language. 'For a year and a half, we have been clear: if an export permit for an item used to protect civilians is requested, it will be approved,' her office wrote in a statement this week. 'Canada has not approved the export of any lethal weapons or munitions to Israel since January 2024, and any such permit that could have allowed such items were suspended and remains inactive today.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Woo said Anand is 'prevaricating, with the shift in language and … an effort to try to be legalistic about the government's adherence to its own promise.' Fitz-Morris wrote that it would be 'a disingenuous claim, at best' to suggest Ottawa's language has been shifting. 'The government's position has not changed. Minister Anand is not reading from a script. She uses different words sometimes to convey the same message or to add clarity, depending on the circumstances and what she is responding to,' he wrote. 'The only permits that may be granted are for the items used to defend civilians, such as the Iron Dome, and items that are transiting through Israel as part of the global supply chain such as items (whose) end-users include Canada and/or NATO allies.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Why not end all arms exports to Israel? The government says it would compromise the complex supply chains that Canada and its allies rely on if Canada refused to export military goods to Israel, or to import them from that country. 'Any consideration of a two-way arms embargo that would block Israeli-made components from entering Canada would need to take into consideration the impact that would have on Canada, including the (Canadian Armed Forces),' Fitz-Morris wrote. Sen. Woo said Anand should halt all military trade with Israel. 'She's digging a deeper hole for herself and for our government, particularly if there are in fact legal consequences around complicity, aiding and abetting war crimes,' he said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'We are witnessing, in the memorable words of Amnesty International, a live-streamed genocide. It's tearing at our souls.' Israel says it's in an existential war of self-defence and blames Hamas for the high casualty count. What do Canadians want? In an online survey of 1,522 Canadians conducted by the Angus Reid Institute from July 31 to Aug. 5, 54 per cent said they want Ottawa to ensure Canada is not selling lethal military equipment to Israel. One-fifth of respondents said they want the restrictions dropped. Another 27 per cent said they were unsure or opted not to respond. Is the government being transparent? 'The Government of Canada tables regular reports concerning arms exports and has provided thousands of pages of documentation to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs — which the committee then published to its website,' Fitz-Morris wrote. That's not good enough, Woo said. 'To play with words, when a genocide is happening before our very eyes … it's scandalous,' he said. University Local News Local News News Op-Ed

Indigenous groups question government funding for Métis Nation of Ontario
Indigenous groups question government funding for Métis Nation of Ontario

Global News

time13 hours ago

  • Global News

Indigenous groups question government funding for Métis Nation of Ontario

First Nations in Ontario and the Manitoba Métis Federation say nearly $1 billion in federal funding went to a group they allege is fraudulently claiming Métis identity. The Chiefs of Ontario, which represents 133 First Nations in the province, shared with The Canadian Press data on more than 20 years worth of federal funding provided to the Métis Nation of Ontario. It suggests that $819,836,061 went from Ottawa to the MNO — an organization First Nations leaders say has no legitimacy and threatens their rights. 'This data shows just how badly First Nations in Ontario are being harmed by the diversion of government funding to the MNO and away from the needs of First Nations and other legitimate groups,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. 'The question is, why is the Crown sending hundreds of millions of dollars to the MNO when there is overwhelming evidence contradicting their claims?' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "The question is, why is the Crown sending hundreds of millions of dollars to the MNO when there is overwhelming evidence contradicting their claims?" Story continues below advertisement The data indicates the money came from several federal departments, including Indigenous Services Canada, Crown-Indigenous Relations, Parks Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada. The MNO also received funds from the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and the Impact Assessment Agency related to the potential impacts of projects in their communities. The conflict between First Nations, some Métis groups and the MNO stems from a 2017 decision by the government of Ontario to recognize six 'new, historic' Métis communities in the province — and a 2023 federal government bill, which never passed, that would have affirmed the MNO's right to self-government. First Nations and other Métis groups say the communities represented by the MNO have no claim to Métis heritage and Ottawa and Ontario have no right to recognize them. 3:31 Métis Nation of Ontario accused of recasting ancestors as Métis Last month, history professor Leila Inksetter of the University of Quebec in Montreal released a report drafted on behalf of the Wabun Tribal Council that concluded there is no evidence of a mixed-ancestry community in the Wabun Tribal Council's territory in northeastern Ontario. Story continues below advertisement The MNO rejected that report, saying that despite years of outside attempts 'to discredit' it, 'nothing has changed.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'The facts of history will not change because a new 'expert' has been paid to peddle the same Métis denialism,' the group said in a media statement. The MNO has cited a 2003 decision by the Supreme Court of Canada to recognize a Métis community in and around Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. The case did not consider the six new communities recognized in 2017, but rather what may constitute a Métis right. Another report, published last month and commissioned by Saugeen Ojibway Nation, also concluded there is no evidence of a distinct Métis community in their territory in southwestern Ontario. 'The historical evidence simply does not support this claim,' says the nearly 200-page report, written by two historians at the University of Toronto. While the report says there were 'certainly individuals and families of mixed ancestry' in the region, that can't form the basis of a claim to a distinct community within Saugeen Ojibway Nation territory. 1:06 Manitoba Métis Federation president blasts Ontario group during identity summit Jennifer St. Germain, MNO chief strategy officer, said Métis and First Nations 'should not be working at odds as we are not enemies.' Story continues below advertisement 'We have worked together throughout our shared history to push colonial governments to respect the rights of Métis and First Nations peoples, to properly invest in the programs that matter to our families and communities, and to uphold the honour of the Crown,' she said. 'When the MNO and Ontario First Nations work together, we make real change for the better for our children, families, and communities, as well as our lands and waters. 'It's time to get back to the table rooted in our shared values of honesty, truth, and respect.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "It's time to get back to the table rooted in our shared values of honesty, truth, and respect." The Chiefs of Ontario says that the academic research 'merely reaffirms reality.' 'Not only are Ontario and Canada refusing to consult First Nations, they refuse to share the research they relied on or acknowledge the growing body of research and take steps to fix their mistakes,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. 'It is extremely disappointing that Canada and Ontario … failed to do any adequate research before recognizing the MNO.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "It is extremely disappointing that Canada and Ontario … failed to do any adequate research before recognizing the MNO." Open disputes over claims to Métis heritage came close last year to ripping apart the Métis National Council, which once acted as a national voice for Métis but now has just two provincial members. The Métis Nation-Saskatchewan withdrew from the Métis National Council last September, citing concerns about the MNO and claiming the council had failed to ensure the integrity of its citizenship registry. Story continues below advertisement 5:23 Ottawa signs self-government agreements with Metis Nation in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario The Métis Nation British Columbia withdrew from the council shortly after, saying it had lost confidence in the council's ability to serve as a national advocacy organization. Their departure came years after the Manitoba Métis Federation withdrew from the council, citing similar concerns. Will Goodon, the Manitoba Métis Federation's minister of identity protection and inter-Indigenous affairs, said the amount of public money available to Métis communities is limited and should not be shared with bodies that are not connected to what he calls the historic Métis Nation — largely recognized as descendants of the Red River communities in Manitoba. One Parks Canada grant received by the MNO was meant to allow the organization to secure land and 'support creation of an ecological corridor in the region along the north shore of Lake Superior,' says a federal document. Story continues below advertisement Goodon said that type of funding raises red flags for both Red River Métis and First Nations concerned about the prospect of the MNO seeking land in their territories. 3:01 Federal contracts given to Indigenous companies without proof The Manitoba Métis Federation said it's also troubled by the fact that the federal government last week invited MNO leaders to a meeting to discuss its controversial major projects legislation. The federation, which boycotted that meeting, said the MNO's invitation undermined the integrity of the gathering and put the government's major projects agenda at risk. 'Canada and Ontario are pushing pro-development agendas. They say they will consult with 'Indigenous communities' but, in Ontario, the only consultations that should occur are with the rights holders — First Nations,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. 'Pan-Indigenous approaches do not work and only devalue the true rights holders.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "Pan-Indigenous approaches do not work and only devalue the true rights holders."

Indigenous groups question government funding for Metis Nation of Ontario
Indigenous groups question government funding for Metis Nation of Ontario

Toronto Sun

time13 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

Indigenous groups question government funding for Metis Nation of Ontario

Published Aug 10, 2025 • Last updated 6 minutes ago • 5 minute read Manitoba Metis Federation president David Chartrand speaks during a press conference ahead of the planned Bill C-5 Summit in Ottawa, on Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2025. Photo by Spencer Colby / THE CANADIAN PRESS OTTAWA — First Nations in Ontario and the Manitoba Metis Federation say nearly $1 billion in federal funding went to a group they allege is fraudulently claiming Metis identity. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The Chiefs of Ontario, which represents 133 First Nations in the province, shared with The Canadian Press data on more than 20 years worth of federal funding provided to the Metis Nation of Ontario. It suggests that $819,836,061 went from Ottawa to the MNO – an organization First Nations leaders say has no legitimacy and threatens their rights. 'This data shows just how badly First Nations in Ontario are being harmed by the diversion of government funding to the MNO and away from the needs of First Nations and other legitimate groups,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. 'The question is, why is the Crown sending hundreds of millions of dollars to the MNO when there is overwhelming evidence contradicting their claims?' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The data indicates the money came from several federal departments, including Indigenous Services Canada, Crown-Indigenous Relations, Parks Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada. The MNO also received funds from the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and the Impact Assessment Agency related to the potential impacts of projects in their communities. The conflict between First Nations, some Metis groups and the MNO stems from a 2017 decision by the government of Ontario to recognize six 'new, historic' Metis communities in the province _ and a 2023 federal government bill, which never passed, that would have affirmed the MNO's right to self-government. First Nations and other Metis groups say the communities represented by the MNO have no claim to Metis heritage and Ottawa and Ontario have no right to recognize them. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Last month, history professor Leila Inksetter of the University of Quebec in Montreal released a report drafted on behalf of the Wabun Tribal Council that concluded there is no evidence of a mixed-ancestry community in the Wabun Tribal Council's territory in northeastern Ontario. The MNO rejected that report, saying that despite years of outside attempts 'to discredit' it, 'nothing has changed.' 'The facts of history will not change because a new 'expert' has been paid to peddle the same Metis denialism,' the group said in a media statement. The MNO has cited a 2003 decision by the Supreme Court of Canada to recognize a Metis community in and around Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. The case did not consider the six new communities recognized in 2017, but rather what may constitute a Metis right. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Another report, published last month and commissioned by Saugeen Ojibway Nation, also concluded there is no evidence of a distinct Metis community in their territory in southwestern Ontario. 'The historical evidence simply does not support this claim,' says the nearly 200-page report, written by two historians at the University of Toronto. While the report says there were 'certainly individuals and families of mixed ancestry' in the region, that can't form the basis of a claim to a distinct community within Saugeen Ojibway Nation territory. Jennifer St. Germain, MNO chief strategy officer, said Metis and First Nations 'should not be working at odds as we are not enemies.' 'We have worked together throughout our shared history to push colonial governments to respect the rights of Metis and First Nations peoples, to properly invest in the programs that matter to our families and communities, and to uphold the honour of the Crown,' she said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'When the MNO and Ontario First Nations work together, we make real change for the better for our children, families, and communities, as well as our lands and waters. It's time to get back to the table rooted in our shared values of honesty, truth, and respect.' The Chiefs of Ontario says that the academic research 'merely reaffirms reality.' RECOMMENDED VIDEO 'It is extremely disappointing that Canada and Ontario … failed to do any adequate research before recognizing the MNO. Not only are Ontario and Canada refusing to consult First Nations, they refuse to share the research they relied on or acknowledge the growing body of research and take steps to fix their mistakes,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Open disputes over claims to Metis heritage came close last year to ripping apart the Metis National Council, which once acted as a national voice for Metis but now has just two provincial members. The Metis Nation-Saskatchewan withdrew from the Metis National Council last September, citing concerns about the MNO and claiming the council had failed to ensure the integrity of its citizenship registry. The Metis Nation British Columbia withdrew from the council shortly after, saying it had lost confidence in the council's ability to serve as a national advocacy organization. Their departure came years after the Manitoba Metis Federation withdrew from the council, citing similar concerns. Will Goodon, the Manitoba Metis Federation's minister of identity protection and inter-Indigenous affairs, said the amount of public money available to Metis communities is limited and should not be shared with bodies that are not connected to what he calls the historic Metis Nation — largely recognized as descendants of the Red River communities in Manitoba. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. One Parks Canada grant received by the MNO was meant to allow the organization to secure land and 'support creation of an ecological corridor in the region along the north shore of Lake Superior,' says a federal document. Goodon said that type of funding raises red flags for both Red River Metis and First Nations concerned about the prospect of the MNO seeking land in their territories. The Manitoba Metis Federation said it's also troubled by the fact that the federal government last week invited MNO leaders to a meeting to discuss its controversial major projects legislation. The federation, which boycotted that meeting, said the MNO's invitation undermined the integrity of the gathering and put the government's major projects agenda at risk. 'Canada and Ontario are pushing pro-development agendas. They say they will consult with 'Indigenous communities' but, in Ontario, the only consultations that should occur are with the rights holders — First Nations,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. 'Pan-Indigenous approaches do not work and only devalue the true rights holders.' Columnists Columnists Canada Sports Toronto & GTA

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store