logo
Much-loved Aussie footy broadcaster admitted to hospital after suffering a heart attack

Much-loved Aussie footy broadcaster admitted to hospital after suffering a heart attack

Daily Mail​14 hours ago
Rugby league commentator Andrew Moore was admitted to hospital after he suffered a heart attack on Wednesday.
He underwent successful surgery and is understood to be recovering in a hospital in Sydney.
Moore, who also commentates on cricket, explained to ABC that he was grateful to the 'amazing doctors and nurses' who have looked after him in hospital.
His colleague Brett Sprigg revealed the news that Moore had been admitted to hospital prior to Penrith's crunch match against Melbourne.
'He actually sent us a message, his ABC rugby league colleagues, just this afternoon and he's a bit knocked around, but in good spirits,' Sprigg said.
'I know, trust me, how much he hates missing the footy.'
The ABC issued an update on their colleague's well-being on Thursday.
'We are saddened to share that our colleague and friend Andrew Moore has recently suffered a heart attack,' ABC content director Tim Verrall explained.
'He has undergone surgery and is now recovering with his family.
'Andrew has asked us to pass on his gratitude to the doctors, nurses, and hospital staff who have cared for him.
'All of us at ABC Sport are sending our love and best wishes to Andrew, and we can't wait to hear his voice back in the commentary box when the time is right.
'Until then, mate — we've got things covered. Rest up and focus on getting well.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

4th person dies after a Legionnaires' disease outbreak sickens dozens in New York City
4th person dies after a Legionnaires' disease outbreak sickens dozens in New York City

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

4th person dies after a Legionnaires' disease outbreak sickens dozens in New York City

A fourth person has died in connection with a Legionnaires' disease outbreak in New York City, health officials disclosed Thursday as they revealed that some cooling towers that tested positive for the bacteria are in city-run buildings. The outbreak in Central Harlem has sickened dozens since it began in late July. Seventeen people were hospitalized as of Thursday, according to the health department. The bacteria that causes Legionnaires' disease had been discovered in 12 cooling towers on 10 buildings, including a city-run hospital and sexual health clinic, health officials said. Remediation efforts have been completed on 11 of the cooling towers, with the final tower's remediation required to be completed Friday. Legionnaires' disease is a type of pneumonia that is caused by Legionella bacteria, which grow in warm water and spread through building water systems. The city's outbreak has been linked to cooling towers, which use water and a fan to cool buildings. People usually develop symptoms — a cough, fever, headaches, muscle aches and shortness of breath — between two days to two weeks after exposure to the bacteria, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Michelle Morse, the city's acting health commissioner, said new cases in the Central Harlem outbreak have begun to decline 'which indicates that the sources of the bacteria have been contained.' She urged people who live or work in the area to contact a health care provider if they develop flu-like symptoms.

The common deadly fan mistake experts say people do at home that could trigger heart attacks
The common deadly fan mistake experts say people do at home that could trigger heart attacks

The Sun

time9 hours ago

  • The Sun

The common deadly fan mistake experts say people do at home that could trigger heart attacks

WITH August's scorching weather showing no signs of letting up, staying cool at home has become more essential than ever. This is why an electric fan is likely to become your new best friend for the coming weeks, while you try to take the edge off and feel cooler. 2 2 But a new study from Australia suggests using the humble device could do more harm than good by increasing your risk of a heart attack. Scientists from the University of Sydney recruited 20 people to test how fans affect body temperature, heart rate, sweating and comfort when used in a hot and humid environment. They also wanted to find out whether hydration levels made any difference, since it's already known that fans can sometimes make heat stress worse. The participants completed the experiment in a climate-controlled chamber set to 39.2C with 49 per cent humidity. In two of the sessions, they were well hydrated, having consumed the recommended amount of fluids for 24 hours beforehand, and were also allowed to drink during the trial. In the other two sessions, they were deliberately dehydrated by avoiding fluids and foods with high water content for 24 hours and were not permitted to drink during the trial. Each hydration state was tested both with and without the use of a fan. A series of temperatures were measured, including their heart rate, rectal temperature, whole body sweat rate, thermal discomfort, and thirst level. The results revealed that fan use while dehydrated can worsen heart strain, which can eventually lead to heart attacks. The experts concluded that using a fan increased sweat losses by about 60 per cent, which could mean using a fan is more harmful if you are dehydrated. How to stay cool during hot weather The study lead, Connor Graham PhD said: "Most extreme heat decedents do not have air conditioning but often own electric fans. "Fan use can reduce heat-related elevations in thermal and cardiovascular strain at temperatures up to approximately 39 to 40C. "In hotter conditions, fans should be turned off, as they can worsen heat stress.' This, Connor said, is because the high temperature of the air causes the body to heat up faster than it can cool itself by sweating. This isn't the first time fans have been linked to an increased risk of heart issues. Previous research has found that fan use can reduce heat and heart strain in temperatures up to around 39C, but once the mercury edges past 40C it's better to turn them off. Researchers have previously also recommended only using fans when it's below 39C for healthy adults below 40 years old and 38C for older adults 65 or older. They also warned fans should only be used in temperatures above 37C in older adults on anticholinergic medications like oxybutynin for bladder control.

The hospitals with the LONGEST waiting lists revealed: As 7.37million people wait for routine treatment, the Government is slammed for 'misleading' public on NHS figures
The hospitals with the LONGEST waiting lists revealed: As 7.37million people wait for routine treatment, the Government is slammed for 'misleading' public on NHS figures

Daily Mail​

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

The hospitals with the LONGEST waiting lists revealed: As 7.37million people wait for routine treatment, the Government is slammed for 'misleading' public on NHS figures

The number of people in England waiting for routine hospital treatment has surged for the first time since March. More than 7.37million treatments—relating to 6.23million patients— are now in the queue for ops like hip replacements, official data revealed today. This includes over 190,000 people stuck in limbo for at least a year, often in pain. While the figure for June marks a drop on the record 7.77million treatments logged in September 2023, it is up almost 10,000 on May. Separate NHS monthly performance data today also revealed around 1,000 patients faced waits of at least 12 hours in A&E every day in June. Experts slammed the 'unacceptable' toll being heaped on patients, warning that A&E clinicians are 'reporting this week as one of the worst they have experienced'. It comes just hours after a leading think tank warned the NHS and the Government had 'misled' the public about the reasons why the waiting list has fallen. Health Secretary Wes Streeting has repeatedly claimed the 260,000 drop in the NHS backlog since the general election 'was not a coincidence', adding that it was because of 'record investment and fundamental NHS reform'. But a new Quality Watch report by the Nuffield Trust think tank found 245,000 appointments were being removed every month because patients died, had treatment elsewhere or moved abroad, rather than because treatment had finished. According to the monthly NHS figures, the number of hospital treatments on the waiting list jumped by 9,712 to 7.37million. Some 191,814—2.6 per cent of those in the backlog — had been waiting at least 12 months. And 1,103 had been waiting for at least 18 months. Although that figure is down from the 1,237 in May. Waiting lists last increased in March before falling for two consecutive months. Responding to the latest figures, Dr Becks Fisher, Nuffield Trust director of research and policy, said the waiting list 'remains stubbornly high'. She added: 'Our new analysis shows that waiting list reductions in previous months are not wholly due to increases in appointments being delivered. In fact, the NHS is still treating fewer patients than are being referred. 'But, an average of about 245,000 cases have been coming off the list each month due to reasons other than patients being recorded as getting their treatment. 'Doing this work to improve the accuracy of the waiting list is important, but we should be under no illusions that despite delivering more appointments, the NHS is still not meeting patient demand.' Elsewhere, new analysis from NHS England found more care was delivered during the most recent doctors' strike compared to a year ago. Resident doctors—formerly known as junior doctors—in England took to the picket lines for five days in July 25 in a dispute with the Government over pay. But, according to the health service, 11,071 more appointments and procedures went ahead during this strike compared to the five-day walkout before the general election in 2024. Staff absences were also lower, it said, with around 1,243 fewer staff absent each day on average compared to last June. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the figures show the NHS 'was more resilient against last month's strike action than ever before'. 'We are getting on with the job of delivering progress in the face of strike action, and we will continue to put patients first,' he said. Latest A&E figures, however, show 35,467 patients had to wait more than 12 hours last month before being admitted, transferred or discharged. Some 76.4 per cent of patients were seen within four hours in A&Es in July, up from 75.5 per cent in June. The health service's target is 78 per cent. But these figures only look at trolley waits — the time between doctors deciding a patient needs to be admitted and them getting a bed. Figures capturing exact arrival times at A&E paint a much bleaker picture, with 122,852 patients (8.3 per cent) forced to wait at least 12 hours. Dr Nick Murch, president of the Society for Acute Medicine, said: 'These figures again highlight the extent of the crisis across urgent and emergency care, with an unacceptable amount of people waiting over 12 hours in emergency departments, often suffering avoidable harm. 'Clinicians across the UK are reporting this week as one of the worst they have experienced, with no sign of the brief respite seen in the immediate aftermath of recent strike action. 'Yet there remains no tangible and immediate action to address urgent workforce and capacity issues. 'Sadly, instead, recent commentary and reporting suggests a growing reliance on selective or misleading interpretations of NHS data, as highlighted this week in analysis by the Nuffield Trust which calls into question claims the NHS is being turned around. 'This is similar to what is being seen in many urgent and emergency care settings where some areas are being rebranded to 'off the clock' areas improving performance data but not changing the patient journey or experience. Cancer patients also faced longer waits in June—separate NHS figures released today show just one of the three national cancer targets were met. Just 67.1 per cent of newly-diagnosed cancer patients referred for urgent treatment were seen within two months—the target is 85 per cent. Meanwhile, only 91.7 per cent of patients started treatment within 31 days of being booked in June, below the goal of 96 per cent. The health service target of telling at least 75 per cent of patients with suspected cancer they do or don't have the disease was, however, met at 76.8 per cent. But separate ambulance figures for July released by the health service today, found response times had improved. Heart attack and stroke patients in England, known as category two callers, had to wait an average of 28 minutes and 40 seconds for paramedics to arrive on the scene. This is almost a minute quicker than June but ten minutes longer than the 18 minute target. The average category one response time—calls from people with life-threatening illnesses or injuries—was 7 minutes and 56 seconds. This is just 1 second longer than the previous month. The target time is seven minutes. Ambulance teams handled more than 843,535 incidents in July.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store