Welfare state is not helping people, says Lord Hain
A former cabinet minister and Welsh MP who carried out reform of disability benefits under the last Labour government has spoken of the need to create an "opportunity" rather than a "punitive" welfare state.Lord Hain was speaking as the UK government prepares to outline a shake-up in the benefits system this week.But there has been speculation that ministers may now row back on plans to freeze a major part of its benefits bill amid strong opposition.On Sunday, UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting said he had not seen the plans but Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said she wanted "to support people who need help the most".
Lord Hain, who was secretary of state for work and pensions under Gordon Brown, said: "We do not want a punitive welfare state, we do not want to punish people who need support, and life in that situation can be pretty tough."We want an opportunity welfare state that helps people to get the opportunities that are out there for them, especially young people."Speaking on BBC Politics Wales, he said people were "much healthier generally speaking in work and that is the objective, not to punish people"."It reminds me of when we came into power in 1997 as a Labour government," he said."It was a complete mess with millions of people on incapacity benefit and other forms of benefit who were never going to stand a chance to work."But we brought in the New Deal which virtually eliminated long-term youth unemployment."He added: "I think we can do it again because we have inherited a similar mess."The welfare state is not helping people and it's not helping people to build a new future."The former Neath MP also said one of the reasons the UK economy had not recovered in the same way others had since the Covid pandemic was because of the number of people on benefits, but he warned it was expensive to get people "job ready".
Luke Young, head of policy at Citizens Advice, has warned about 150,000 people in Wales risked losing up to £400 a month if the eligibility for some benefits were restricted.But he has welcomed reports suggesting a freeze on Personal Independence Payments (PIP) would not go ahead."This is support that is essential for people to get by. "These payments in particular are for the most disabled people to allow them to live their lives every day."Mr Young said he favoured changes such as bringing in more face-to-face regular assessments for those on benefits, as well as changing the relationship between job centre work coaches and claimants."No-one sensible looks at the situation and says it's working in the way it should be," he said."But we have to make sure the jobs are there."When the government talks about getting people back into work, for those who have a disability or a long-term health condition, the reasonable work has to be there."
On the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott accused the UK government of being "all over the place and divided" over welfare reform.The Department for Work and Pensions said: "We have been clear that the current welfare system is broken and needs reform, so that it helps long-term sick and disabled people who can work to find employment, ensuring people receive the support they need, while being fair to the taxpayer."Without reform more people will be locked out of jobs, despite many wanting to work. That is not just bad for the economy, it's bad for people too."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
23 minutes ago
- The National
Tell voters we will hold new indyref no matter what Westminster says
For Labour to win with a candidate they were so embarrassed by that they wouldn't let him speak in public is a low point in recent Scottish politics. But, more importantly, from an SNP perspective, it was another signal that we are not doing enough to enthuse our potential voters. The SNP have a record to be proud of in government. From free tuition to the Scottish Child Payment, we continually show that even with one hand tied behind our back we are the most progressive and efficient government in the UK. However, we have now been in power for 18 years and the public see things such as free prescriptions and the Winter Fuel Allowance as the norm and expect them to be there in perpetuity, not really understanding that if any of the Unionist parties take control of Holyrood these benefits will disappear like snow aff a dyke. READ MORE: Glasgow's new skyscraper guidelines sparks split over city's skyline future Where I believe we have failed as a government is in not making clear to the people of Scotland the real risk they run every time they vote for a Starmer/Sarwar Labour Party of seeing these things go. Have a look at the mess they've made of Wales's NHS or their continual attacks on the poorest, the elderly and the infirm in the UK. We have to get the message out loud and clear about how much money we spend mitigating the right-wing social policies of the previous Conservative government and, shamefully, of this Labour Government. There is no doubt that we are the best party to run Scotland. The alternatives simply do not bear thinking about. But, as I say, familiarity breeds contempt, and I think that's where we are in the minds of the Scottish people. The beauty is, though, that unlike the other political parties, we hold a trump card and that is, of course, the cause of independence. I have written this before and said it a million times: if we don't have independence front and centre then we simply become another party seeking power to do what it can for the people it represents under the constitutional settlement available to us. That in itself is a good thing but after 18 years in government we end up where we are. However, we know – the proof is there in our record in government – only with independence can we ensure we will be able to continue to take a different path from the rest of the UK and start to make things even better. So what now? Well for a start we have to make independence the centrepiece of every leaflet, every piece of campaign material and manifesto we deliver. We have to show the people of Scotland that independence is not just something we want for its own sake but because it's the route to a healthier, wealthier, happier Scotland – and we have to find a way to do this that bypasses the mainstream media. If last week showed us anything its that our two primary TV channels either don't understand the Scottish political make-up or they understand it only too well. How else can we explain why a Debate Night programme the night before the by-election can have three Labour representatives on it, along with a token Tory and one SNP politician? This is either rank idiocy/ignorance or a blatant attempt to assist one party out of what looked at the time like a political quagmire. You can make up your own minds which you think it is, but either way for us to expect to get a fair hearing on either of these two channels is naïve beyond belief. We must make this forthcoming Holyrood election the Independence Election. We must tell the people of Scotland that if there is an independence-supporting majority government, we will immediately inform the Westminster government that we are taking steps to hold an independence referendum. We should suggest that the best way to do this is with a Section 30 order but either way we will go ahead with one as that is what the people of Scotland have demanded. We should then go back to the Scottish Parliament, ask it to reconfirm the desire to hold the referendum and then set a date. As for the Unionist parties? Democracy is about making available the means for people to participate in the process. If they choose not to do so then they have still used their democratic right. WE then move forward based on the results of the referendum. We cannot continue with the same old, 'give us a mandate, then we'll ask for a Section 30, then we'll voice our disappointment when refused' and then wait for the next election to repeat the process. The last referendum was more than 10 years ago; even in the Unionist calendar that is a political generation. Disagree? Well, they don't. They wrote it into the Good Friday Agreement that seven years was the period between any potential referendums taking place regarding the unification of Ireland. The difference here? Fear of losing Scotland, colonial arrogance and rank hypocrisy. Regarding the indy movement, I think a couple of things have to happen. First of all,please stop pretending that the SNP don't care about independence – you have no idea how ridiculous and insulting that is. Secondly, we all need to put our differences aside and agree that the one thing that matters between now and 2026 is that we get an independence-supporting majority in the Scottish Parliament. The rest can be dealt with after that. Without independence we are not in a position to seriously change the things we want to change. And for SNP members, can we stop begging for a change of leader every time we don't get the result we want. John Swinney has been a member of the SNP and a fighter for independence for well over 30 years. He has constantly shown he knows how to win elections and is someone people tend to trust. Yet every time we lose a by-election or an opinion poll goes against us, we get a clamour for some other politician, usually an MP, who will never have run a department or chaired a parliamentary committee, to become the party leader because they are good in the media or with a witty quip at Prime Minister's Questions. It takes more than that to win a battle of this size. This is not an attack on any of my colleagues at Westminster. There are a number of very talented and able people there, Some of them have put themselves forward to stand in the Holyrood election and that is extremely welcome, but between now and the forthcoming Scottish Parliament election, every member of the SNP should be right behind John. All I ask is that you continue to pressure the leadership to ensure that independence is front and centre of all that we do. It's where it belongs. It's what we are all about.
The National
23 minutes ago
- The National
‘At least we're not those guys' is a strategy lacking in inspiration
Proud socialist and trans ally Christina McKelvie will be succeeded in Holyrood by a member of a right-wing and viciously transphobic Labour Party – and Reform UK came a close third with more than 7000 votes, solidifying proof that Nigel Farage's party will undoubtedly return a number of MSPs at next year's Holyrood election. Ultimately, though, the most depressing element of all was the utter lack of inspired campaigning from the two biggest parties. The SNP's campaign relied entirely on the premise of 'we're not Reform', while Labour's was all about 'we're not the SNP'. Successive front pages of the Daily Record featured messages from John Swinney telling voters that Labour can't win, so vote SNP to stop Reform, and Anas Sarwar telling voters that Reform can't win, so vote Labour to stop the SNP. READ MORE: Glasgow's new skyscraper guidelines sparks split over city's skyline future Swinney's proved to be far more embarrassing, in that it was ultimately exposed as completely untrue – Labour ended up taking the seat and Davy Russell is Holyrood's newest MSP. (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) But the messaging from both the SNP and Labour throughout this campaign was that of two parties devoid of hope or inspiration or any real meaningful ideas to actually improve people's lives. Both relied on telling voters 'at least we're not those guys'. And consequently both parties lost thousands of votes compared to 2021. Many both within and outwith the SNP have remarked in the days since the by-election that it was a mistake for John Swinney and his party to stake their campaign solely on being the anti-Reform party, and I think they're partially right. Regular readers of my column will know that I'm a strong advocate of parties on the left – particularly my own party, the Scottish Greens – tackling Reform UK head-on by offering a genuine alternative to the far-right bile and duplicitous snake oil being put out by Farage and his team. At next year's Scottish Parliament election, it'll be the Greens who are best placed to stop Reform from returning MSPs via the regional lists, and I believe we should be shouting this from the rooftops. Nonetheless, this strategy only works if the alternative on offer is one voters genuinely believe in. It only works if voters who are scunnered with mainstream parties selling them false promises election after election believe that the party they're voting for will materially improve their lives. It's not good enough to just say 'it's between us and Reform' – especially if that turns out to not even be true – you have to build an alternative to Reform that voters can be excited to get behind. It's also not good enough to just talk the talk – you have to walk the walk as well. That means being able to enact meaningful change in the Scottish Parliament (which, for smaller parties like the Greens, means co-operating with other parties and striking deals to implement our policies). But it also means living by your principles and refusing to vote for budgets and other motions which will hurt the people you're supposed to represent. It's a fine line to balance, but a crucially important one to ensure voters trust you to get things done, and that you'll also stand up for them when the going gets tough. Beyond just 'we're not Reform', the SNP had very little substance to offer in this by-election campaign. The party's billboards in the constituency celebrated the return of Winter Fuel Payments – a worthy and important policy after the payments were cut by the Labour Westminster government, but that's merely a return to what last year was just the status quo, it's not a way the Scottish Government is actually making things better for people. The SNP can't keep pointing to free prescriptions and tuition forever – voters in Scotland don't want to know how their lives are better than those of their neighbours south of the Border, they want to know how they are better today than they were five years ago. It's a genuine struggle to think of any policies the SNP has implemented in the current parliamentary term that have genuinely improved the lives of people across Scotland which didn't come from the Scottish Greens. So it's little wonder that, in a constituency crying out for change, the message of 'it's us versus Reform' failed to resonate. The fact is, Reform are on the rise whether we like it or not. We'll have Reform MSPs elected across Scotland this time next year, and the way things are going Farage will be prime minister come 2029. It's not good enough for us to just sit back and let that happen just so we can say 'we told you so' – we have to do everything we can to stop the rise of the far-right because it's no exaggeration to say that people's lives will depend on it. But the way we do that has to be by offering a genuine alternative. We need to use the full powers of Holyrood to tax the rich and redistribute wealth to fund our public services. We need to return our NHS – one of the greatest successes of socialism in the history of the UK – to its original purpose of free, publicly funded, accessible healthcare for all. We need to desperately reform the regressive council tax system to radically reduce the amount paid by ordinary people and increase that paid by land barons and millionaires. All of these are policies well within the competence of the Scottish Parliament, if only our politicians had the ambition to get on with it. Not only would they genuinely improve people's lives across Scotland, but by demonstrating competent government and a real alternative we could build a far more sturdy case for independence – the real key to unlocking the even more radical changes needed to transform our society.
Scotsman
43 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Hamilton by-election prompts rethink of assumptions about 2026 Holyrood elections
John Swinney said it was a two-horse race between the SNP and Reform UK; some commentators claimed Reform might just sneak it; and Labour was tipped to finish third. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... But when the votes were counted in last week's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, it was Labour who emerged as the winners with a majority of 602, overturning the SNP's majority of more than 4,500 in 2021 - a swing of 7.42 per cent from the SNP to Labour. Amid poor poll ratings,and after the party's humiliation in last month's Runcorn and Helsby by-election, where it lost the seat to Reform, this was a major boost for Labour. Labour's Davy Russell celebrates with Anas Sarwar, Jackie Ballie and Monica Lennon after winning the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. Picture: Jeff| Getty Images Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And with the Scottish Parliament elections less than a year away, it prompts a rethink of the assumption that the SNP is on course for a fifth term in power at Holyrood. Labour's landslide general election victory last July encouraged hopes that Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar could oust John Swinney as First Minister and end nearly two decades of SNP rule next May. But a series of unpopular decisions by the new Labour government at Westminster, including means-testing winter fuel payments, led to plummeting poll figures and seemed to put paid to the party's chances in Scotland. Reacting to the Hamitlon result, Mr Sarwar claimed it showed a rejection of the SNP because of its record in Government, as well as a rejection of Nigel Farage and Reform. But he also acknowledged people wanted the UK Labour government to 'go further and faster in making a difference to people's lives'. The SNP's continuing poll lead after18 years in government cannot be easily dismissed and Reform's 26 per cent of the vote shows it is a serious threat, but Labour nevertheless has good reason to be heartened by the Hamilton victory. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Commentators have warned against reading too much into the win and rightly point out the parties' performances in Hamilton were roughly in line with Scotland-wide polling which shows SNP support 15 points down on the 2021 Holyrood election and Labour support two points down. But the fact remains that Labour has won a fiercely-fought by-election which they were widely expected to lose badly and have taken a seat from the SNP who were seen as more or less certain victors next year. And that gives Labour a new momentum in their drive to win power at Holyrood.
