
China Says Trade Jumped In July, Beating Forecasts
The two economic superpowers agreed in Stockholm last month to hold further talks on extending the tariff truce.
That deal has temporarily set fresh US duties on Chinese goods at 30 percent, while Beijing's levies on US goods stand at 10 percent.
The accord -- initially agreed in Geneva in May -- brought down triple-digit tariffs each side had imposed on the other after Donald Trump launched his "Liberation Day" levies on April 2.
The 90-day truce is set to end on August 12, when the original duties could snap back.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said following the Stockholm talks that Trump would have the "final say" on any extension of a tariffs truce between Washington and Beijing.
Higher tariffs on dozens of trading partners -- including a blistering 35 percent on Canada -- came into force Thursday as Trump seeks to reshape global trade to benefit the US economy.
He has also threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on semiconductor imports.
Thursday's data showing an increase in China's overseas shipments last month outpaced a Bloomberg forecast of 5.6 percent.
But the figures also showed that China's exports to the United States, its largest trading partner, continued to fall, sinking 6.1 percent from the previous month.
And imports -- a key gauge of struggling domestic demand -- jumped 4.1 percent year-on-year in July, compared with a Bloomberg forecast of a one-percent fall.
Zhiwei Zhang, president and chief economist at Pinpoint Asset Management, said the data showed "exports supported the economy strongly so far this year".
"Export growth may slow in coming months, as the front loading of exports due to US tariffs fades away," he said.
"The big question is how much China's exports will slow and how it would spill over to the rest of the economy," he said.
Beijing has said an official goal of around five percent growth this year.
But it has struggled to maintain a strong economic recovery from the pandemic, as it fights a debt crisis in its massive property sector, chronically low consumption and elevated youth unemployment.
Factory output shrank more than expected in July, data showed last week.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
8 hours ago
- DW
Three Thai soldiers injured by landmine on Cambodian border – DW – 08/09/2025
The incident occured only days after an agreement to extend a ceasefire that ended the recent deadly conflict between the Southeast Asian neighbors. Three Thai soldiers have been wounded after one stepped on a landmine in territory along the border with Cambodia, the Thai army announced on Saturday. The incident comes just days after the two countries agreed to extend the ceasefire that ended a brief armed conflict, which were their deadliest clashes in decades. One soldier suffered a severe leg injury, another was wounded in the back and arm, and the third experienced extreme pressure damage to the ear during the incident in northeastern Thailand's Sisaket province. "It clearly demonstrates to both domestic and international society that the use of concealed weapons in border areas continues to exist, constituting a clear violation of the Ottawa Convention by the Cambodian side," the army's statement said. After Saturday's blast, the Thai army statement, citing its spokesperson Maj. Gen. Winthai Suvaree, said that Saturday's mine explosion constituted "a significant obstacle to the implementation of ceasefire measures and peaceful resolution of problems." The Cambodian Mine Action and Victim Assistance Authority, a government body, issued a statement denying that any new mines had been laid. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "We have not, and will not, plant new land mines," said the statement, noting that Cambodia is a party to the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Treaty Convention, "and has an internationally recognized record of removing, not deploying, these indiscriminate weapons." It noted that Cambodia has cleared more than 1 million mines and nearly 3 million other pieces of unexploded ordnance left over from more than three decades of war and civil unrest that began in 1970. A five-day conflict between Thailand and Cambodia killed at least 43 people in a flare-up of a long-running dispute over ancient border temples. The clashes, involving jets, artillery, rockets and infantry battles, ended on July 29 with a ceasefire, after cajoling by US President Donald Trump. A meeting of defense officials in Kuala Lumpur finished on Thursday with a deal to extend the ceasefire. Tensions had simmered since May this year when a Cambodian soldier was shot dead by Thai troops in a brief fracas in another contested border area. The escalating dispute was marked by border crossing restrictions and cross-border boycotts along with bans of goods and services before fighting broke out. The Ottawa Convention, also called the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Treaty, is an international agreement banning the weapons' use, and both Thailand and Cambodia have committed to it. A statement from Thailand's foreign ministry said the incident confirmed the Thai army's findings "that new land mines are being laid in blatant violation of international law." It also noted this was the third such incident in less than a month. Cambodia had suggested that two earlier explosions last month wounding Thai soldiers might be land mines from past conflicts.


Int'l Business Times
10 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Russia Cautious On Armenia-Azerbaijan Deal, Iran Reject Border Corridor
Russia cautiously welcomed a US-brokered draft deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan on Saturday, but Moscow's regional ally Iran rejected the idea of a new border corridor backed by President Donald Trump. The two former Soviet republics signed a peace deal in Washington on Friday to end a decades-long conflict, though the fine print and binding nature of the deal remained unclear. The US-brokered agreement includes establishing a transit corridor through Armenia to connect Azerbaijan to its exclave of Nakhchivan, a longstanding demand of Baku. The United States would have development rights for the corridor -- dubbed the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity" -- in the strategic and resource-rich region. But Russia's ally and the warring parties' southern neighbour Tehran said it would not allow the creation of a such a corridor running along the Iranian border. "With the implementation of this plot, the security of the South Caucasus will be endangered," Akbar Velayati, an advisor to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told the Tasnim news agency. The planned corridor was "an impossible notion and will not happen", while the area would become "a graveyard for Trump's mercenaries", he added. In a similar tone, Moscow said it would "further analyze" the corridor clause, noting there were trilateral agreements in place between Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, from which no one had yet withdrawn. "It should not be ignored that Armenia's border with Iran is guarded by Russian border guards," said Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova. Moscow, previously a key backer of Armenia, still has a military base there. Embroiled in its Ukraine operation, launched in 2022, it did not intervene in the latest conflict. This has strained the historically warm ties between Yerevan and Moscow, home to a large and influential Armenian diaspora, triggering Armenia's drift towards the West. Christian-majority Armenia and Muslim-majority Azerbaijan went to war twice over their border and the status of ethnic enclaves within each other's territories. Moscow, once the main power broker in the Caucasus, is now bogged down in its more than three-year offensive in Ukraine, diverting political and military resources into the grinding conflict of attrition. Both Armenia and Azerbaijan praised the US efforts in settling the conflict. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev even said he would back President Donald Trump's nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize. The US-led NATO alliance welcomed the deal as a "significant step forward". But in Moscow, Zakharova refrained from even calling it a deal, referring to it merely as "the meeting of the leaders of the South Caucasus republics in Washington" -- adding, however, that it still deserved "a positive assessment". Analysts also sounded a note of caution, with the International Crisis Group pointing out that the deal left "a lot of questions unanswered". The two countries went to war twice over the disputed Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan recaptured from Armenian forces in a lightning 2023 offensive, sparking the exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. Azerbaijan and Armenia agreed on the text of a comprehensive peace deal in March. Much of the White House agreement was a "repackaging" of that, which helped both countries get on Trump's good side "by giving him a role," the Crisis Group's senior South Caucasus analyst Joshua Kucera said. Azerbaijan later added a host of demands to that March deal, including amendments to Armenia's constitution to drop territorial claims for Karabakh, before signing the document. Pashinyan has announced plans for a constitutional referendum in 2027, but the issue remains deeply divisive among Armenians, with Kucera warning that this could yet derail the process. Kucera called the corridor "one potentially significant development" from the White House meeting, but added that missing key details could prove "serious stumbling blocks". Nevertheless, she added, even if many details were still missing and nothing was guaranteed, the deal still gave Armenians "a promise of a better life and then maybe even more peace in the region". 'It should not be ignored that Armenia's border with Iran is guarded by Russian border guards,' said Russia's Zakharova AFP


DW
11 hours ago
- DW
As Putin and Trump talk Ukraine, what will be on the agenda? – DW – 08/09/2025
The presidents of Russia and the US plan to meet next Friday in Alaska to discuss a possible end to the war in Ukraine. What do they want to achieve, and what are the most contentious issues? Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump are scheduled to meet in person for bilateral talks on August 15 to discuss how to end the war in Ukraine. Before his election victory in November 2024, Trump announced he would end the war within the first 24 hours of his term. He is now about 200 days past his own deadline. Trump said the meeting with Putin will help accelerate the peace process. Here's an overview of what's known so far. The two leaders will meet next Friday in Alaska, a state in the northwest of the United States. The Kremlin has confirmed the meeting and has also invited Trump to Russia after the talks in Alaska. Kremlin foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov described the choice of location for the meeting as "logical." "Russia and the United States are close neighbors, bordering each other," Ushakov said. "It seems quite logical that our delegation should simply fly across the Bering Strait and that such an important and eagerly awaited summit between the leaders of the two countries should be held in Alaska." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video For the US president, who portrays himself as an accomplished dealmaker, taking a significant step toward peace would be of personal and reputational importance. His political ally, Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu, recently nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. As for the actual conflict, Trump wants a ceasefire at the very least, and a long-term solution, at best. Trump has said he also wants to arrange a three-way meeting with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. But neither the Russian nor the Ukrainian leader has agreed to this yet. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Russian president wants to prevent the NATO military alliance from expanding further eastward. It's likely he will try to convince Trump to vote against Ukraine's NATO membership . Another important point for Putin is preventing any possible NATO military presence on Ukrainian territory. He also wants a new, Russia-friendly government in Kyiv. In addition, Putin has repeatedly demanded that certain territories captured by Russian troops during the Ukraine war be permanently transferred to Russia. Putin likely expects Trump to provide assurances on this as well. The biggest point of contention is military action. Russian attacks on military and civilian targets in Ukraine have resulted in many deaths and the destruction of Ukrainian infrastructure. Ukraine is also striking back inside Russia and doing damage there. However, there's an imbalance in terms of population and Ukraine is keen to end the war and, with it, the rising death toll among its own people. But at what cost? According to experts, Russia probably won't be willing to end the war without some concessions, a pivotal factor being Ukraine's potential NATO membership. According to Kyiv, NATO membership would significantly reduce the likelihood of another Russian attack in the future because when one NATO member is attacked, the others are required to come to its aid. The security alliance includes the US and other nuclear-armed powers, the United Kingdom and France. Another negotiating point will be Ukraine's borders. Kyiv has demanded full sovereignty for Ukraine and wants the borders to go back to the way they were before the war. But experts have said it's unlikely Russia would agree, as Putin wants territories currently held by the Russian army to be transferred to Russia. Russian troops currently occupy a large part of the four eastern Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, territories which Russia claims as its own. In addition, there are areas elsewhere in Ukraine currently held by the Russian army, as well as the Crimean Peninsula, which Russia annexed in 2014.