Whoops! White House Rescinds Memo Freezing Federal Financial Assistance
In a brief memorandum issued to executive departments and agencies on Wednesday, the OMB wrote that 'OMB Memorandum M-25-13 is rescinded. If you have questions about implementing the President's Executive Orders, please contact your agency General Counsel.'
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt insisted that the administration is not backing down. 'This is NOT a rescission of the federal funding freeze,' she wrote. 'It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo. Why? To end any confusion created by the court's injunction. The President's EO's on federal funding remain in full force and effect, and will be rigorously implemented.'
The temporary freeze threw scores of government funded agencies into chaos and confusion. Medicaid portals were down, early childhood support organizations found themselves cut off from funding, and even Meals on Wheels was left scrambling — all before the order was officially set to go into effect.
Ahead of the order's implementation, two lawsuits were filed challenging its constitutionality, and President Donald Trump's authority to issue such a widespread seizure of funds approved by Congress. Hours later, U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan partially blocked the order's enforcement pending an emergency hearing for a temporary restraining order.
Throughout the day, the Trump administration attempted to backtrack and clarify large portions of the order's vague instructions, insisting that agencies responsible for providing individual assistance and direct payment to Americans would be exempt, despite the problems being reported by those very same groups.
'FAFO,' wrote Rep, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in response to the order's repeal, which is to say: Fuck around and find out.
More from Rolling Stone
Jimmy Kimmel Douses Trump's Claim Military 'Turned On' California's Water
Trump Hates the Constitution
Selfies and a Standing Ovation: Sermon Taking on Trump Draws Supporters to D.C. Cathedral
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Trump's 50% Brazil coffee tariff expected to rejig trade, send more beans to China
By Marcelo Teixeira NEW YORK (Reuters) -The Trump administration's steep import tariff on Brazilian coffee looks set to reshuffle trade routes for beans from the world's top grower and exporter, benefiting China and incentivizing traders to look for indirect routes into the U.S. A 50% tariff on some Brazilian products, including coffee, will begin on August 6, the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday. The move will challenge commodities traders and Brazilian coffee exporters to find buyers for the roughly 8 million bags sold to U.S. coffee processors every year. At around 25 million bags per year, the U.S. is the world's largest coffee consumer. A third of that comes from Brazil, through bilateral trade that was worth $4.4 billion in the 12 months ended in June. "The global coffee trade flow will be reshuffled. The pain will be felt from Sao Paulo to Seattle - from origin to roaster, to cafe chains, grocers, and morning commuters," said Michael J. Nugent, a senior U.S. coffee broker and owner of MJ Nugent & Co. The possible rerouting of the massive volume Brazil usually sends to the U.S., similar to the entire production of high-quality coffee grower Ethiopia, could benefit a major Trump rival: China. More Brazilian beans may be bound for China because of trade ties between the two nations, both members of the BRICS group, and after the first Trump administration disrupted trade, said Marc Schonland, an independent advisor to the U.S. coffee industry. Coffee consumption is surging in China as young professionals drop tea to seek a higher caffeine boost. Brazil is its main supplier, exporting 538,000 bags to China in the first half of 2025, data from exporters association Cecafe showed. Coffee consumption has grown around 20% per year for the last 10 years in China and per capita coffee consumption doubled in the last 5 years, according to industry data. More Brazilian beans could also head to the European Union, where they face no tariffs, said Logan Allender, head of coffee at U.S. roaster and distributor Atlas Coffee Club. Trade experts see possibilities for exporters to try to dodge the tariffs by exporting Brazilian coffee to other countries, and from there to the U.S. "It will add a bit of logistics costs, but brings down the (tariff) effect to a max 10% to 15%," said Debajyoti Bhattacharyya, commercial vice president at agricultural commodities firm AFEX Ltd., adding that countries such as Mexico or Panama could be used for the stopovers. "Without a strong traceable supply chain, tariffs are meaningless. I mean, we can't stop oil from flowing, why would coffee?" he said. Senior soft commodities analyst and independent consultant Judith Ganes said the fact the U.S. left coffee out of an extensive exemption list of Brazilian products suggests Trump is using the product as a bargaining chip in his political quarrel with Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Trump has said Brazil's Supreme Court is treating his ally, former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, unfairly. The U.S. sanctioned Supreme Court justice Alexandre de Moraes on Wednesday. Traders said coffee that is loaded in Brazil by August 6 can enter the U.S. without paying the tariff up until October 6. William Kapos, CEO at Downeast Coffee Roasters, a large coffee processor in the U.S. East Coast, said he is rushing to ship Brazilian coffee he has already purchased out of South America before that deadline next week. Going forward, Kapos said he will look to buy coffee from Central America and Africa to replace Brazilian beans. "But everybody will do that, so price-wise it is going to be a squeeze on U.S. buyers," he said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Wall Street Journal
28 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Two Books on the Bomb and the Men Who Built It
After three decades of uneasy slumber since the end of the Cold War, atomic weapons are back in the headlines. There were Vladimir Putin's threats to use them in Ukraine or send them up into space. They appeared suddenly on the 'escalation ladder' when tensions flared up between India and Pakistan. And it was the looming threat of a rogue nuclear-weapons program that forced President Trump to use B-2s in Iran to extinguish that threat, at least for now. The time certainly looks ripe for not one but two books on the dropping of the very first atomic bomb, on Aug. 6, 1945, with Garrett Graff's 'The Devil Reached Toward the Sky' and Iain MacGregor's 'The Hiroshima Men.' Eighty years on, after countless books, documentaries and major motion pictures, is there anything more to be said on the subject? Happily for both authors, the answer is yes. By going deeper into the personal details and reminiscences of a generation that is all but lost to us now, Mr. Graff and Mr. MacGregor have made the story more human, especially when the weapon's essential inhumanity threatens to overshadow everything else. The two books complement each other. The bulk of 'The Devil Reached Toward the Sky' focuses on the physical making of the bomb itself, while 'The Hiroshima Men' gives us the context in which it was used: the 3½-year epic fight to the finish between the U.S. and Japan in the Pacific. Familiar names, including Gen. Leslie Groves, J. Robert Oppenheimer and Paul Tibbets—the pilot of the Enola Gay—appear in both accounts almost stereo-optically, allowing readers to get a deeper understanding of each person.
USA Today
29 minutes ago
- USA Today
'DO YOUR JOB': Trump urges senators to skip summer break
Senate Republicans have a major backlog of nominations as Democrats drag their feet, frustrating the president. WASHINGTON − President Donald Trump again called for senators to stay in town and bypass their usual, month-long summer break to push through a backlog of judicial confirmations. "The Senate must stay in Session, taking no recess, until the entire Executive Calendar is CLEAR!!!" Trump wrote in a Truth Social post July 31. "Republicans, for the health and safety of the USA, DO YOUR JOB, and confirm All Nominees," he added. "They should NOT BE FORCED TO WAIT." As August approached, Republicans had a logjam of at least 130 nominees, according to Politico. Normally, the process of confirming most lower-level judicial nominees would move at a faster pace with some bipartisan agreement moving things along. But this year, Democrats are dragging their feet, frustrated by Republicans advancing Trump's agenda items like a sweeping tax bill and $9 billion in spending cuts. The delays have frustrated Trump, who called earlier in July for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, to cancel the chamber's August recess. The president also lashed out on social media against Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, urging the Senate Judiciary Committee chair to ditch a longstanding confirmation practice to expedite the process. "Senator Grassley must step up," Trump wrote in a July 29 post. "He should do this, IMMEDIATELY, and not let the Democrats laugh at him and the Republican Party for being weak and ineffective." Grassley said the next day during a committee hearing he was "offended by what the president said" and "disappointed that it would result in personal insults." To progress through Trump's list of nominees, Thune has left the door open to cutting into senators' break, along with other options such as changing Senate rules. 'I think everything is on the table,' Thune told reporters July 31. Lawmakers often use their beloved summer breaks to return home and reconnect with constituents in person. The prospect of staying extra days or weeks in Washington would likely be met with resistance from members on both sides of the aisle. However, some senators say they would be willing to stick around as needed. 'I'm for staying and doing what we need to do,' Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Alabama, told USA TODAY. 'They pay us to work. They don't pay us to go home and sit for a month.'
