logo
Austerity, current account surplus, & economic resilience

Austerity, current account surplus, & economic resilience

Recently, the Prime Minister reportedly lauded economic performance with regard to country achieving current account surplus. In a developing country, which is facing gross external financing requirements on average of around $20 billion annually over the medium-term, and which is highly debt distressed this may be called a positive consequence for the economy, but only at the surface.
Go any deeper, it spells more problems for the economy than it brings a happy news for, especially in terms of creating economic growth consequences and much-needed greater spending towards meeting sustainable development goals (SDGs), and overall, climate change-, and 'Pandemicene' phenomenon-related economic resilience. Moreover, overall balance of payments (BOP) – which is composed of current account, capital account, and financial account – remained in the negative anyways, with a deficit over FY25 standing at US$3.7 billion while the deficit, in fact, increased by $877 million from FY24.
Hence, while reportedly the PM attributed this surplus to be 'Driven by record remittances, rising exports, and a laser focus on structural reforms…' none of the claims provides the needed stable foundations for this surplus which, during July-June 2024-25, stood at US$2.1 billion. Starting with exports, for June 2025, year-on-year (y-o-y) exports declined by US$81 million while y-o-y there was only a moderate increase in exports during July-June 2024-25, which stood at around US$1.4 billion.
Workers' remittances during FY25 y-o-y while increased considerably by $8.1 billion, yet they nonetheless remain a very unreliable resources, given a world of polycrisis, especially the fast-unfolding climate change crisis creating very unstable consequences for economic growth globally, bringing in its wake a high-level of randomness, not to mention gains from a serious crackdown in recent years on indirect channels on capital flows may have already provided much of the increase, and in that sense future years at most may see only low-level to moderate increase in remittances.
Structural reforms have remained the weakest link of the government's economic reform performance, and it is quite surprising that the PM has cited them as a leading source of improvement of current account surplus. Rather, more damage has been done to both domestic production, and exports through government's over-board austerity policies than any gains from marginal, and narrow-scoped structural reforms, both as outlined in the International Monetary Fund's (IMF's) extended fund facility (EFF) programme that is currently being followed, and beyond as well. Moreover, the procyclical, and neoliberal nature of economic policy – both within and outside of the IMF programme – has limited the scope of overall much-needed economic reforms, which otherwise required much better rationalized role of public sector, and would have meant greater emphasis of reforms on improving (a) economic institutional quality – both in terms of governance and incentive structures (including regulation) – and underlying (b) organizational, and (c) market reforms.
Hence, while the current account surplus remains on very unstable ground – not to mention that surplus anyways is not a favourable outcome for the country in any meaningful way, but more on this later in the article — overall balance of payments situation remains in deficit as indicated earlier, which means greater need for debt for an already highly debt distressed country, given a low level of foreign direct investment (FDI), which remains one of the most reliable sources for the economy in terms of bringing sustainable economic growth, among other positive consequences.
As indicated, over-board austerity policy has meant that cost of capital has been at a high level, which in a developing country like Pakistan, whose exports, and overall economic growth, are significantly import-dependent, has meant that this has taken a heavy toll on both of them — while exports have only increased by around a paltry US$2 billion during the last fiscal year, economic growth has continued to hover over the last few years around the population growth rate of a little more than 2 percent on average. Moreover, lack of economic growth has negatively impacted domestic resource mobilization which, in turn, has negatively impacted domestic debt sustainability, lack of much increase in exports, low level of FDI has not even allowed reduction in overall BOP deficit of FY25 over FY24, which overall has meant a low level of build-up of foreign exchange reserves, when compared with the high external debt distress, and overall gross external financing needs.
Last but not the least, Pakistan remains among the top-ten most climate change challenged countries in the world. In addition to the climate change-related goals in SDGs, it fares very poorly with regard to other goals, including poverty, disease, and education. This, in turn, means that the country needs to spend a lot more than it currently is doing, especially after spending a lot in terms of interest payments on debt, not to mention the fact that the lack of multilateral spirit has resulted in low level of multilateral finances, which puts all the more pressure on government to increase an otherwise low level of expenditure for increasing overall level of economic resilience.
Current account surplus, achieved after a lot of austerity-caused economic growth sacrifice, has neither been able to produce positive consequences for macroeconomic, and economic institutional quality due to poor level of economic reforms, which have also meant that the country still has poor showing for exports, FDI, and overall BOP, nor has it allowed reaching fiscal space for making adequate expenditures towards enhancing otherwise poor level of economic resilience.
(The writer holds PhD in Economics degree from the University of Barcelona, and previously worked at the International Monetary Fund. His contact on 'X' (formerly 'Twitter') is @omerjaved7)
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistan achieves 5.4% budget deficit, 2.4% primary surplus in FY25
Pakistan achieves 5.4% budget deficit, 2.4% primary surplus in FY25

Business Recorder

time10 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Pakistan achieves 5.4% budget deficit, 2.4% primary surplus in FY25

Pakistan's budget deficit was recorded at Rs6.17 trillion, i.e. 5.4% of the GDP, during the fiscal year 2024-25, marking a 9-year low, showed data released by the Ministry of Finance. A summary of consolidated federal and provincial fiscal operations for July-June 2024-25, released by the Finance Division showed that total revenue stood at Rs17.997 trillion (15.7% of the GDP) against the total expenditure of Rs24.165 trillion (21.1% of the GDP) during the fiscal year, hence budget deficit has been recorded at Rs6.168 trillion (5.38% of the GDP). 'The deficit of 5.38% is better than the government's revised forecast of 5.6% of GDP (earlier budgeted 5.9%) for FY25,' said Topline Securities. 'Similarly, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) also projected a deficit at 5.6% of GDP.' 2.4% of GDP: Jul-Mar budget deficit stands at Rs2.97trn The primary balance posted a surplus of Rs2.719 trillion, accounting for 2.4% of GDP. 'Pakistan has recorded a primary balance of 2.4% of GDP, the highest surplus % in the recent past (over 2 decades),' said Topline Securities. The brokerage house noted that a higher primary surplus was achieved as revenue growth surpassed expenditure growth. 'This surplus of 2.4% of GDP is better than the government's revised projection of 2.2% of GDP and the IMF forecast of 2.1%,' it noted. As per figures provided by the Finance Division, the total revenue of Rs17.997 trillion included Rs12.722 trillion in tax and Rs5.274 trillion in non-tax revenue. Of the tax revenue, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR)'s tax collection remained Rs11.744 trillion during FY25. 'FBR tax (with petroleum development levy [PDL]) to GDP ratio has increased to 11.3% in FY25, a 7-year high compared to 9.7% in FY24 and an average of 9.9% in the last five years (FY20 to FY24,' said Topline. Provincial governments' tax collection was recorded at Rs978 billion in FY25. During FY25, Pakistan's total GDP stood at Rs114.692 trillion. 'Pakistan is expected to post its third consecutive year of primary surplus in FY26 after 2 decades. While overall fiscal deficit is expected to clock in at 4-4.1% of GDP in FY26, the lowest in 2 decades,' said Topline Securities.

Pakistan's budget deficit at 5.4% of GDP; primary surplus climbs to 2.4% in FY25
Pakistan's budget deficit at 5.4% of GDP; primary surplus climbs to 2.4% in FY25

Business Recorder

time10 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Pakistan's budget deficit at 5.4% of GDP; primary surplus climbs to 2.4% in FY25

Pakistan's budget deficit was recorded at Rs6.17 trillion, i.e. 5.4% of the GDP, during the fiscal year 2024-25, marking a 9-year low, showed data released by the Ministry of Finance. A summary of consolidated federal and provincial fiscal operations for July-June 2024-25, released by the Finance Division showed that total revenue stood at Rs17.997 trillion (15.7% of the GDP) against the total expenditure of Rs24.165 trillion (21.1% of the GDP) during the fiscal year, hence budget deficit has been recorded at Rs6.168 trillion (5.38% of the GDP). 'The deficit of 5.38% is better than the government's revised forecast of 5.6% of GDP (earlier budgeted 5.9%) for FY25,' said Topline Securities. 'Similarly, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) also projected a deficit at 5.6% of GDP.' 2.4% of GDP: Jul-Mar budget deficit stands at Rs2.97trn The primary balance posted a surplus of Rs2.719 trillion, accounting for 2.4% of GDP. 'Pakistan has recorded a primary balance of 2.4% of GDP, the highest surplus % in the recent past (over 2 decades),' said Topline Securities. The brokerage house noted that a higher primary surplus was achieved as revenue growth surpassed expenditure growth. 'This surplus of 2.4% of GDP is better than the government's revised projection of 2.2% of GDP and the IMF forecast of 2.1%,' it noted. As per figures provided by the Finance Division, the total revenue of Rs17.997 trillion included Rs12.722 trillion in tax and Rs5.274 trillion in non-tax revenue. Of the tax revenue, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR)'s tax collection remained Rs11.744 trillion during FY25. 'FBR tax (with petroleum development levy [PDL]) to GDP ratio has increased to 11.3% in FY25, a 7-year high compared to 9.7% in FY24 and an average of 9.9% in the last five years (FY20 to FY24,' said Topline. Provincial governments' tax collection was recorded at Rs978 billion in FY25. During FY25, Pakistan's total GDP stood at Rs114.692 trillion. 'Pakistan is expected to post its third consecutive year of primary surplus in FY26 after 2 decades. While overall fiscal deficit is expected to clock in at 4-4.1% of GDP in FY26, the lowest in 2 decades,' said Topline Securities.

A new contract: how Pakistan can end politics of poverty
A new contract: how Pakistan can end politics of poverty

Business Recorder

time13 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

A new contract: how Pakistan can end politics of poverty

'There is always more misery among the lower classes than there is humanity in the upper.' Victor Hugo, Les Misérables. Let's be honest: we don't need another diagnostic. We already know the patient is bleeding. What Pakistan needs now is a surgical plan—practical, bold, and morally sound. For too long, we've accepted poverty as collateral damage in the pursuit of elite consensus and IMF appeasement. But poverty is not an economic inevitability. It's a political choice; we have the tools. The question is: do we dare use them? It begins at the source: revenue. Not just collecting more—but collecting fairly and intelligently. Three big fissures need closing. First, agricultural income: time to stop pretending. We must tax progressively above subsistence thresholds, synchronized across provinces. Digitize land records, use satellite imagery to estimate yields, and enforce returns based on real output. Second, the retail-wholesale sector — our country's backbone — remains untaxed. Use utility, mobile, and point-of-sale data for automatic registration, offer simplified compliance pathways, and blacklist evaders. Third, exemptions: eliminate the alphabet soup of favours. Every tax break must have a limited time-frame or a sunset clause. Any system people don't understand breeds mistrust. The tax code should not be a maze for the honest and a playground for the connected. But it's not just about how much we collect—it's about how we spend. We must flip the budget. Instead of rewarding glossy overpasses, we reward outcomes. Tie provincial transfers to performance on health, literacy, nutrition. Double down on girl-focused primary education—stipends, not just schoolbags. Fund preventive healthcare—immunisation, clean water, maternal support. And if we must borrow, let it be for people, not concrete. That debt pays dividends for decades. The deeper issue is how we define development. We remain stuck in an outdated metric. GDP was never designed to measure human welfare. Nobel laureates like Joseph Stiglitz and Amartya Sen have long argued that a country's economic output is not the same as its people's well-being. Pakistan needs to budget with a dashboard: track HDI by district, inequality via the Gini index, and deprivation through the Multidimensional Poverty Index. Real reform starts when budgets ask, 'How many children ate today?' instead of 'How many bridges did we build?' There's no way forward without confronting what we're doing to our youth. We call it a 'youth bulge,' but without investment, it's more like a ticking bomb. What we need is a national skills guarantee—every Pakistani under 30 should have access to one of three paths: vocational training, digital certification, or an apprenticeship. No excuses. Every district should have youth entrepreneurship hubs—public-private incubators to build solutions in climate tech, fintech, creative services. We should have a Youth Civic Corps that mobilises thousands for literacy drives, urban greening, disaster response. This isn't idealism—it's strategic insurance. If we don't create opportunity, we'll be dealing with unrest. Meanwhile, we must build on what works. The Benazir Income Support Programme remains the country's most robust safety net. But it's frozen in its original form. We need to evolve it. Link payments to real outcomes: school attendance, vaccination, skills completion. Digitally integrate it with NADRA, Sehat Sahulat, Ehsaas, and microcredit channels to build a universal social registry. Add tiers: long-term unconditional support for widows, persons with disabilities, and the elderly. Conditional, time-bound transfers for those who can and want to move up. The goal is not permanent welfare—it's dignity with an off-ramp. But even as we talk reform, let's address the elephant in the drawing room—protocol. We're trying to build a welfare state while financing a spectacle of privilege. Convoys, VIP perks, public security as personal entitlement. Every rupee spent on ceremonial power is one less rupee for public good. Strip it back. Limit police convoys to verified high-risk individuals. Publish the protocol budget of every ministry. Cap perks. All the big-wigs in the state apparatus can fly economy—if they want comfort, they can top up from their own pockets. This isn't about symbolism. It's about credibility. Yet all this will still fall flat without trust. No reform survives without it. The state must show it sees its citizens. Start small but start strong. If you paid for a government service like passport or ID card, and it doesn't arrive within time, it's free. If the passport office has no power, escalate, the portal allows you to complain to next HQ. Create real-time redressal. Provide free legal aid to women, bonded labourers, minorities. A welfare state does not begin with charity—it begins with predictability. With justice. Everything we're proposing here isn't just economic. It's deeply moral. Thomas Piketty, in his work on capital and inequality, showed how unregulated wealth accumulation creates systemic instability. The longer you let inequality fester, the more corrosive it becomes—to social cohesion, to democracy, to the very idea of merit. It's not about punishing the rich—it's about protecting the country, the republic. Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett's landmark work 'The Spirit Level' makes a shocking case: unequal societies are not just unfair—they are dysfunctional. They do worse across everything that matters: crime, education, trust, health, productivity. Pakistan must understand that inequality is not just a side effect. It is the engine of dysfunction. When one class is hoarding plots in gated suburbs while another queues up for food rations, it's not just a fiscal problem—it's a fracture in the national soul. We can either have elite consensus or we can have inclusive development. But we can't have both. What we need is a new contract. A contract that says: if you work hard, you can feed your family. If you pay your taxes, your kids go to school. If you obey the law, the law protects you. That's not utopia. That's Republic 101. The elite will not sign that contract willingly. But history shows that when the middle class and the marginalised demand it together — it becomes inevitable. Pakistan does not lack resources. It lacks resolve. It does not lack intelligence. It lacks intent. Let this be the decade we chose differently. Let this be the decade we turned the page. Let this be the decade we ended the politics of poverty—and began the practice of justice. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store