Flood of complaints over Dutch far-right leader's ‘hateful and racist' campaign image
Netherlands
, far-right leader
Geert Wilders
has sparked a new controversy by using a campaign image that has been described as 'polarising, stigmatising and discriminatory'.
The image has prompted more than 2,500 complaints from members of the public to the anti-discrimination organisation Discriminatie.nl since it was posted on social media earlier this week. It could result in the Freedom Party leader facing legal action.
It shows a split image of a woman, the left side of whose face is light-skinned and pleasant with blonde hair and blue eyes, while the right side is darker skinned, scowling and wearing a hijab, the head covering favoured by Muslim women.
Below the blonde-haired woman are the letters PVV, the initials of Mr Wilders's anti-Islam Freedom Party, while under the woman in the hijab are the letters PvdA, the initials of the Labour Party, led by former EU Commission executive vice-president, Frans Timmermans.
READ MORE
Beneath the split image are the words 'The choice is yours on 29/10'.
Aan U de keuze op 29/10
— Geert Wilders (@geertwilderspvv)
The general election takes place on October 29th. Polls show an alliance between Labour and GreenLeft as presenting the strongest challenge to the Freedom Party, the largest in the outgoing four-party Coalition.
A spokesman for Discriminatie.nl said the large and growing number of complaints was a 'clear signal from society', adding that the bureau was 'preparing to take the next steps'.
The descriptions his organisation was seeing most commonly in complaints were 'hateful', 'tasteless' and 'racist'. However, whether the image 'crosses a legal line' would be a matter for the courts.
He said the last time there was such a flood of anger was during the covid pandemic in 2020 when a satirical song generated about 4,000 complaints of racism after multiple instances of harassment of people of oriental appearance.
[
EU cannot ignore what's happening in Poland and The Netherlands
Opens in new window
]
[
Dutch voters welcome collapse of right-wing coalition, according to poll
Opens in new window
]
The last time Mr Wilders was involved in such a controversy was in March 2014, again in an election setting, when he asked a rally in The Hague whether they wanted 'more or fewer Moroccans' in the Netherlands.
The audience chanted 'fewer, fewer, fewer', to which Mr Wilders replied, 'well, then we will arrange that'.
After a seven-year legal case that went all the way to the Dutch supreme court, Mr Wilders was convicted of 'group defamation' for inciting hatred and violence towards Moroccans.
In its final ruling, the supreme court observed: 'Even a politician must adhere to the basic principles of the rule of law and must not incite intolerance.'
Mr Wilders routinely dismisses such criticism as a 'political witch hunt', a claim courts have repeatedly rejected for lack of evidence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
28 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Irish lawyer quits European rights watchdog after being told Gaza ‘out of our mandate'
The Irish representative to an influential European human rights watchdog resigned his position there over the organisation's failure to address the situation in Gaza . Michael Farrell, who spent 14 years at the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI), said the body would lose respect on other issues if it did not change course. 'You cannot work in an organisation that is concerned with human rights … and ignore what is going on in Gaza ... It certainly is a genocide," Mr Farrell, a veteran lawyer and civil rights activist, said. The ECRI is the independent human rights monitoring body of the Council of Europe, which is distinct from the European Union. READ MORE Farrell submitted his resignation last month after the latest plenary meeting in which he says his proposed motion to draft 'a very, very moderate recommendation' for the commission to publish was not approved. In brief, the draft made the point that 'Israel should stop their attacks, they should allow the food and aid to come in [to Gaza], it should be dealt with by the international bodies, and also that Hamas should hand over the remaining hostages,' according to Mr Farrell. He said the debate on the draft lasted over the course of two days, and the commission 'just wouldn't move'. 'The argument being put up, and there wasn't much discussion from the leadership or from the chair, was just: 'this is out of our mandate',' Mr Farrell said, although he doesn't accept this rationale. 'In presuming that what they meant by that is that they were only able to deal with the things that were going on within the European area, I made the argument that a number of European countries are financing this, providing all the weapons for it. They're playing a major part in this, and, therefore, we are entitled to criticise them for it.' [ Israel's Gaza City plan greeted with widespread international criticism Opens in new window ] A spokesperson for the ECRI secretariat told The Irish Times that the organisation was 'mandated to monitor state action against racism, intolerance and related forms of discrimination in Europe'. The situation in the Middle East has 'not been considered by ECRI members as falling within their mandate'. Meanwhile, Mr Farrell said he received support from a small number of other representatives on the commission after his resignation, and that he did not criticise others for joining him in his stand. 'People are afraid of losing their jobs, there were people who were in bodies which are funded by the state, and they were afraid if they spoke out on this that the state wouldn't draw in the money from the organisations that they work in, which do good work,' he said. Mr Farrell was the first Irish lawyer to advocate on behalf of a client in front of the United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHCR) and the European Courts of Human Rights (ECHR). He was a driving factor behind Dr Lydia Foy's campaign to legally change her sex, and further advocated on issues pertaining to transgender people in Ireland. A native of Magherafelt, Co Derry and a graduate of Queen's University Belfast, he worked as a journalist before his legal career, highlighting the campaign to free the Birmingham Six and Guilford Four . During his time with the ECRI, Farrell acted at times as the commission's vice-chair and also chaired its working group on LGBTI rights. Dr Lydia Foy with solicitor Michael Farrell outside the High Court after it ruled that the State had breached her rights. Photograph: Frank Miller Since Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel, in which 1,200 Israelis were killed and 251 taken hostage, more than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza due to the military conflict in the region. The UN General Assembly has condemned Israeli use of 'starvation as a method of warfare' as the conflict continues, with aid distribution controlled by Israel. Mr Farrell is steadfast in his belief that 'if they don't deal with this, apart from the fact that they should simply because there's so many people being killed, they will lose the level of respect on other human rights issues'.
Irish Times
28 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Diaspora sidelined again in presidential election
Mary Hanafin recently said it would be 'an insult to the office' if her party didn't run a candidate for the presidential election later this year. While her antennae for injustice may be directly proportional to her interest in the job, I agree that 'insult' is a good word to describe the upcoming election – but not because Fianna Fáil might sit it out. Rather, it looks like Irish citizens in Northern Ireland , and Irish citizens living abroad, will yet again be sidelined from electing the next president. As someone from the Border, and resident in Scotland and therefore ineligible to vote, the fact that Ms Hanafin made her comments at the MacGill Summer School in Glenties, Co Donegal, feels significant to me. Imagine three people who heard her statements live driving home after: one to Sligo, another to Strabane, while another visits family before driving to Derry Airport en route back to Glasgow. Three Irish citizens, all invested in Irish society, all driving about the same distance ... and only one of them will get to vote for their next head of state. Talk about insults. Though we abroad and in the North are disenfranchised, it says more about the Republic than it does about us. This whole sorry situation is a greatest hits compilation of Irish politics: myopia and snobbery, inertia and benign neglect Since 1990 we've had a Northern candidate in every presidential election, and a reliable part of campaigning since then has been pulling the big lever marked 'diaspora heart strings'. And yet, we still have no say in choosing the person who comes to visit Irish cultural centres around the world, as eager voters in a candidate's backyard over the Border can do nothing but cross their fingers. What message was the lamp in the window of the Áras trying to convey exactly? 'Don't call us, we'll call you?' READ MORE Though we abroad and in the North are disenfranchised, it says more about the Republic than it does about us. This whole sorry situation is a greatest hits compilation of Irish politics: myopia and snobbery, inertia and benign neglect. It's not that our political parties aren't fussed about the issue, it's that they aren't fussed enough. Sinn Féin and Aontú have brought it up, but they seem resigned to the fact there will be no change this time round: Sinn Féin's idea of a win is a referendum on presidential polling day. Aontú is even less ambitious: the party appears to want to create a hierarchy of disenfranchisement by putting Northern citizens' right to vote to the nation first. Other parties such as Fianna Fáil are happy to perpetuate the Kafkaesque ballet, floating candidates such as Deirdre Heenan who can't vote for herself, while Fine Gael said it wouldn't oppose a referendum, but it was all about timing. Would it help if we all chipped in to buy the Dáil a big clock? This issue first got near the business end of decisiveness in 2013, at the constitutional convention. Despite two seminal referendums where the 'Home to Vote' dimension was massive in the 2010s, it was kicked to touch in 2019 owing to Brexit, then floated off into space just when we should have locked in the expanded franchise to coincide with choosing President Michael D Higgins's successor. But no worries lads, we've got our finest minds on solving this by 2032. Maybe. Our status as non-voters opens up huge logical gaps, let alone political ones. A Polish citizen living in Drogheda can vote for their president. A Brazilian citizen in Dundalk can vote for their president. But Irish citizens over in Newry or New York can't vote for theirs? Nobody is suggesting the infrastructure to make this happen would be a quick build, but we are replete with global examples, and we've had more than a decade to follow them. But Irish politics is like the old excuse for not fixing the roof: it wasn't a problem in sunshine, and it's too wet to sort it now. That Irish legislators have been inert on this for years is not surprising, but the snobbery among some commentators in the Republic is truly shameful. When it looked like a referendum might actually happen, we were subjected to mean-spirited diatribes from commentators who seemed to think Irish people abroad were so doe-eyed or doctrinaire we would vote for a bust of John Wayne from The Quiet Man – and, if they're in the North, a bust with a balaclava over it. The same commentators also regularly invoked an old American revolutionary slogan in opposition, 'no representation without taxation', not appearing to realise they had the slogan the wrong way around. But yeah, we are the ignorant ones. One pundit even had the gall to claim extending the franchise would 'dilute' the electorate. Dilute! This, after the excruciating 2018 'Dragons' Den' election, which we may as well have renamed Áras Got Talent . Given the incoherent sugar-rush campaigning style of a few candidates last time around, maybe the Republic's solution needs to be less concentrated. Wherever we are, whatever our voting status, this presidential election represents a big crossroads for us all: this election is a question of what we want Ireland to be in the next decade and beyond, and the answer affects Irish citizens in Enniskillen just as much as Ennis, Glasgow as much as Galway. To take just one issue, the next president will be supreme commander of a defence force that is contending with unprecedented forks in the road as regards its role in the world, and neutrality will surely be a hot topic in the election. But our voice on vital issues such as these stands to be muted at precisely the time Ireland and Irishness should be at its most pluralistic. Unless the Government somehow speedruns something procrastinated on for a dozen years, the choosing of our most important symbolic dignitary in the world will just be another thing that happens to us. Irish citizens abroad and in the North stand by the Republic – but the Republic is driving right past. Paddy Duffy is originally from Donegal but has been living in the UK since 2012 working as a TV producer.
Irish Times
28 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Gareth Sheridan's presidential nomination is by no means certain
With three months to go before the next presidency is inaugurated , the rustling in the political undergrowth is becoming louder. On Sunday, businessman Gareth Sheridan , chief executive of a US-based pharma company, broke cover to tell the Sunday Independent that he would run as an independent candidate, seeking a nomination from local authorities to get on the ballot paper. His spokesman told The Irish Times that the candidate was confident that he would get the endorsement of at least four councils, after months lobbying councillors. But Sheridan's path to the nomination will require the co-operation of opponents and potential opponents – and that is by no means certain. READ MORE Crash: Brian Cowen and the unravelling of Ireland - part one Listen | 52:35 Fine Gael has its own candidate in Mairead McGuinness and it is questionable that the party's councillors would be permitted to facilitate the entry of a challenger to the race. The party may decide that it should open up the nominations process to outsiders. But it may also take the view: why on earth would we do that? It's not how elections work. You vote for your side. We'll vote for our side. The picture with Fianna Fáil is less clear, as that party has yet to decide whether it will run a candidate – that depends on discussions within the party, and especially with its leader Micheál Martin , in the coming weeks. If Fianna Fáil does not run a candidate, that may free up its councillors to facilitate the nomination of other candidates, including Sheridan. A party source said that there had not any substantive discussions on the issue within the party but added that councillors could not facilitate anyone who was hostile to the party. Sheridan's campaign has at least identified its path to a nomination and his spokesman insists he has been working quietly in the background for months. Other potential candidates featured in the Sunday newspapers today appear less advanced in their preparations. [ How much does it cost to run for the Áras? Opens in new window ] 'If I can help the people of Ireland in an ambassadorial role as president, then I would be honoured to.' Photograph: Brian Lawless/ PA The former Riverdance star Michael Flatley continues to tease about his ambitions. He told the Sunday Independent magazine that he and his 'team of inside advisers' were considering his options. 'I have spent the last 30 years promoting Ireland globally. After my last cancer journey, I realised that life is short and I need to do more – more with my family and more for the country that I love. If I can help the people of Ireland in an ambassadorial role as president, then I would be honoured to,' he said. However, the newspaper was also told not to take this as confirmation that Flatley is running. The Sunday Times reported variously on the ambitions of RTÉ daytime television presenter Dáithí Ó Sé – he will not be contesting on this occasion, alas, but maybe in the future – and the MMA fighter Conor McGregor . [ The Irish presidency is a moral role much more than a political one Opens in new window ] Conor McGregor in the White House in Washington, DC, on St Patrick's Day this year. Photograph: Jim Lo Scalzo/ EPA/ Bloomberg via Getty McGregor, the paper reports, is seriously considering a legal challenge to the eligibility requirements for entry to the presidential campaign. It is not clear how serious this is. The eligibility requirements for the presidency are stated explicitly in the Constitution, not in statute law. The paper also reports that the entrepreneur and erstwhile scourge of EU treaties Declan Ganley is manoeuvring for a nomination. Ganley has been talking to Oireachtas members about nominating him but there is no sign – yet, anyway – that he has the 20 supporters he needs. As with others, going the local authority route would require the tacit co-operation of Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil. And anyway, as the Sunday Times wonders, what about Ganley's day job? His company is planning to launch hundreds of satellites next year. Satellites, of course, are hard to get off the ground. Ditto presidential campaigns.
