logo
Hamas politicians and its military wing are not the same, BBC News chief says

Hamas politicians and its military wing are not the same, BBC News chief says

Glasgow Times16-07-2025
The BBC's Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone documentary was removed from iPlayer in February after it emerged that the child narrator, Abdullah, is the son of Ayman Alyazouri, who has worked as Hamas's deputy minister of agriculture.
It is understood Deborah Turness made the comments when she was asked about the documentary during a routine staff meeting.
A video appears to show Ms Turness saying: 'I think it's really important that we are clear that (the narrator) Abdullah's father was the deputy agricultural minister and therefore, you know, was a member of the Hamas-run government, which is different to being part of the military wing of Hamas.
'And I think externally it's often simplified that he was in Hamas, and I think it's an important point of detail that we need to continually remind people of the difference and of that connection.'
Hamas's military wing was proscribed in 2001 and that was extended in 2021 to include its political wing.
After Ms Turness's comments were reported, a BBC spokesperson said: 'The BBC constantly makes clear on our programmes and platforms that Hamas are a proscribed terrorist organisation by the UK Government and others.
'We are also clear that we need to describe to our audiences the complexities of life in Gaza, including within the structure of Hamas, which has run the civilian functions of Gaza.'
They added: 'Deborah Turness was answering a question about how we described the father of the narrator in our Warzone film.
'She did not imply that Hamas are not a single terrorist organisation.
'As we have said, there was an editorial breach in this film, and we are sorry. We will not show the film again in its current form and we should not have used this child as the narrator.'
Ofcom announced on Monday that it will investigate the documentary after an external review found the programme had breached the corporation's editorial guidelines on accuracy.
The review, conducted by Peter Johnston, the director of editorial complaints and reviews, which is independent of BBC News, said the programme was in breach of accuracy for 'failing to disclose information about the child narrator's father's position within the Hamas-run government'.
It found no other breaches of editorial guidelines, including breaches of impartiality, and also found no evidence that outside interests 'inappropriately impacted on the programme'.
The report said that 'careful consideration of the requirements of due impartiality was undertaken in this project given the highly contested nature of the subject matter'.
Ofcom said it had examined the BBC report and would be investigating under its broadcasting code, which states that factual programmes 'must not materially mislead the audience'.
An Ofcom spokesperson said: 'Having examined the BBC's findings, we are launching an investigation under our rule which states that factual programmes must not materially mislead the audience.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump tariffs: India has 20 days to avoid 50% levies - what are its options?
Trump tariffs: India has 20 days to avoid 50% levies - what are its options?

BBC News

time27 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Trump tariffs: India has 20 days to avoid 50% levies - what are its options?

India has unexpectedly become a key target in Washington's latest push to pressure Russia over the Ukraine Wednesday, Donald Trump doubled US tariffs on India to 50%, up from 25%, penalising Delhi for purchasing Russian oil - a move India called "unfair" and "unjustified". The tariffs aim to cut Russia's oil revenues and force Putin into a ceasefire. The new rate will come into effect in 21 days, so on 27 makes India the most heavily taxed US trading partner in Asia and places it alongside Brazil, another nation facing steep US tariffs amid tense insists its imports are driven by market factors and vital to its energy security, but the tariffs threaten to hit Indian exports and growth all of India's $86.5bn [£64.7bn] in annual goods exports to the US stand to become commercially unviable if these rates sustain. Most Indian exporters have said they can barely absorb a 10-15% rise, so a combined 50% tariff is far beyond their effective, the tariff would be similar to "a trade embargo, and will lead to a sudden stop in affected export products," Japanese brokerage firm Nomura said in a note. The US is India's top export market, making up 18% of exports and 2.2% of GDP. A 25% tariff could cut GDP by 0.2–0.4%, risking growth slipping below 6% this year. India's electronics and pharma exports remain exempt from additional tariffs for now, but the impact would be felt in India domestically "with labour-intensive exports like textiles and gems and jewelry taking the fall", Priyanka Kishore of Asia Decoded, a Singapore-based consultancy told the BBC. Rakesh Mehra of Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (Citi) called the tariffs a "huge setback" for India's textile exporters, saying they will sharply weaken competitiveness in the US tensions now escalating, experts have called Trump's decision a high-stakes gamble. India is not the only buyer of Russian oil - there are China and Turkey as well - yet Washington has chosen to target a country widely regarded as a key what changed and what could be the fallout? India's former central bank governor Urjit Patel said that India's "worst fears" have materialised with the recent announcement. "One hopes that this is short term, and that talks around a trade deal slated to make progress this month will go ahead. Otherwise, a needless trade war, whose contours are difficult to gauge at this early juncture, will likely ensue," Mr Patel wrote in a LinkedIn post. The damaging impact of the tariffs is why few expect them to last. With new rates starting 27 August, the next 20 days are critical - India's moves in this bargaining window will be closely watched by anxious key question is whether Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government will quietly abandon trading ties with Russia to avoid the "Russia penalty" or stand firm against the US."India's efforts to reduce its dependence on Russian military hardware and diversify its oil imports predate pressure from the Trump administration, so Delhi may be able to offer some conciliatory gestures in line with its existing foreign policy behaviour," according to Dr Chietigj Bajpaee of Chatham House. He says the relationship is in a "managed decline", losing Cold War-era strategic importance, but Russia will remain a key partner for India for the foreseeable some experts believe Trump's recent actions give India an opportunity to rethink its strategic ties. If anything the US's actions could "push India to reconsider its strategic alignment, deepening ties with Russia, China, and many other countries", says Ajay Srivastava of the the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), a Delhi-based think will visit China for the regional Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit - his first since the deadly 2020 Galwan border clashes. Some suggest a revival of India-Russia-China trilateral talks may be on the immediate focus is on August trade talks, as a US team visits India. Negotiations stalled earlier over agriculture and dairy - sectors where the US demands greater access, but India holds there be concessions in areas like dairy and farming that India has been staunchly protecting or could the political cost be too high?The other big question: What's next for India's rising appeal as a China-plus-one destination for nations and firms looking to diversify their supply chains and investments?Trump's tariffs risk slowing momentum as countries like Vietnam offer lower tariffs. Experts say the impact on investor sentiment may be limited. India is still courting firms like Apple, which makes a big chunk of its phones locally, and has been largely shielded since semiconductors aren't taxed under the new tariffs. Experts will also be watching what India does to support its exporters."India's government so far has not favoured direct subsidies to exporters, but its current proposed programmes of favourable trade financing and export promotion may not be enough to tackle the impact of such a wide tariff differential," according to stakes high, trade experts say only top-level diplomacy can revive a trade deal that seemed within reach just weeks now the Indian government has put up a strong front, saying it will take "all actions necessary to protect its national interests". The opposition has upped the ante with senior Congress party leader Rahul Gandhi calling Trump's 50% tariffs "economic blackmail" and "an attempt to bully India into an unfair trade deal".Is Modi's touted "mega partnership" with the US now his biggest foreign policy test? And will India hit back?Retaliation by India is unlikely but not impossible, says Barclays Research, because there is precedent."In 2019, India announced tariffs on 28 US products, including US apples and almonds, in response to the US tariffs on steel and aluminium. Some of these tariffs were eventually reversed in 2023, following the resolution of WTO disputes," Barclays Research said in a note. Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.

Israel's Netanyahu to convene security meeting on expanding Gaza war
Israel's Netanyahu to convene security meeting on expanding Gaza war

Reuters

time27 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Israel's Netanyahu to convene security meeting on expanding Gaza war

TEL AVIV/CAIRO, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was due to meet with a small group of senior ministers on Thursday to discuss plans for the military to take control of more territory in Gaza, despite mounting criticism at home and abroad over the nearly two-year-old war there. Netanyahu will convene the security cabinet following a three-hour meeting this week with the head of the military, which Israeli officials described as tense, saying the military chief had pushed back on expanding the campaign. Opinion polls show that most Israelis want the war to end in a deal that would see the release of the remaining hostages. Netanyahu's government has insisted on total victory over the Palestinian militant group Hamas, which ignited the war with its deadly October 2023 attack on Israel. The idea of Israeli forces pushing into areas it does not already control in the shattered Palestinian enclave has generated alarm in Israel. The mother of one hostage on Thursday urged people to take to the streets to voice their opposition to expanding the campaign. "Someone who talks about a comprehensive deal doesn't go and conquer the Strip and put hostages and soldiers in danger," Einav Zangauker wrote on X in comments directed at Netanyahu. The Hostages Families Forum, which represents captives held in Gaza, urged military Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir to oppose expanding the war and called on the government to accept a deal that would end bring the war to an end and free the remaining hostages. Defence Minister Israel Katz said on Wednesday that the military would carry out the government's decisions until all war objectives were achieved. Israeli leaders have long insisted that Hamas be disarmed and have no future role in a demilitarised Gaza and that the hostages be freed. The U.N. has called reports about a possible expansion of Israel's military operations in Gaza "deeply alarming" if true. There are 50 hostages still held in Gaza, of whom Israeli officials believe 20 are alive. Most of those freed so far came about as a result of diplomatic negotiations. Talks toward a ceasefire that could have seen some hostages released collapsed in July. Videos released last week of two living hostages showed them as emaciated and frail, triggering international condemnation. Hamas, which has ruled Gaza for nearly two decades but now controls only parts of the territory, insists any deal must lead to a permanent end to the war, while Israel accuses the group of lacking sincerity about giving up power afterward. The Israeli military says it controls about 75% of Gaza. Most of Gaza's population of about 2 million has been displaced multiple times over the past 22 months and aid groups are warning that the enclave's residents are on the verge of famine. "Where should we go? We have been displaced and humiliated enough," said Aya Mohammad, 30, who, after repeated displacement, has returned with her family to their community in Gaza City. "You know what displacement is? Does the world know? It means your dignity is wiped out, you become a homeless beggar, searching for food, water and medicine," she told Reuters. Close to 200 Palestinians have died of starvation in Gaza since the war began, nearly half of them have been children, according to Gaza's health ministry. Rabeeha Jamal, 65, a mother of six, has remained in her house in Gaza despite warnings in the past from the Israeli military to leave. For now, she said she intends to stay. "Not until they force us if the tanks roll in, otherwise, I will not go running in the street to be killed later," she said, calling for an end to the war. "We don't have anywhere to go." Netanyahu is under intense international pressure to reach a ceasefire agreement, but he also faces internal pressure from within his coalition to continue the war. Some far-right allies in his government have pushed for a full occupation of Gaza and for Israel to reestablish settlements there, two decades after it withdrew. Far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich told reporters Wednesday that he hoped the government would approve the military taking control over the rest of Gaza. About 1,200 people were killed and 251 hostages taken to Gaza in the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on southern Israeli communities. More than 61,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israel's assault on Gaza, according to the Gaza health officials, who said that at least 20 people had been killed in air strikes across the territory on Thursday.

Labour's minister for homelessness Rushanara Ali ejects her tenants and hikes rent
Labour's minister for homelessness Rushanara Ali ejects her tenants and hikes rent

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Labour's minister for homelessness Rushanara Ali ejects her tenants and hikes rent

Rushanara Ali, who has previously criticised "unreasonable rent increases", has been criticised amid reports rent on an East London home was ramped up after four tenants moved out Labour's homelessness minister is under fire over reports she threw out four tenants before ramping up the rent on a house she owns by £700 a month. ‌ Rushanara Ali, who has previously criticised "unreasonable rent increases" reportedly gave the renters four months notice that their lease would not be renewed. The East London home was subsequently re-listed for rent within weeks of them moving out at a massively increased price, it is claimed. ‌ The four were sent an email saying they would have to leave in November last year, the i newspaper reports. But it is understood they were offered the opportunity to stay on a rolling basis while the house was on the market. When it failed to sell, it was re-listed for rent, it is believed. Ms Ali, MP for Bethnal Green and Stepney, faces calls to step down. ‌ READ MORE: Lisa Nandy gives cutting verdict on MasterChef as new series drops on BBC iPlayer One of the tenants, Laura Jackson, told the newspaper that she saw the four-bedroom townhouse had been put up for rent at nearly £4,000 a month shortly after moving out. Previously Ms Ali charged £3,300 a month for the home close to London's Olympic Park, it is claimed. Ms Jackson said: 'It's an absolute joke. Trying to get that much money from renters is extortion'. Shadow Housing Secretary James Cleverly said the allegations "would be an example of the most extreme hypocrisy and she should not have the job as homelessness minister'. ‌ However sources close to the minister say it was a fixed-term contract, and the house was put on the market for sale while the tenants were there. The people living there were told they could stay on a rolling basis, but opted to leave, the BBC reports. It was only re-listed for rent because it did not sell, according to the i. A spokesperson for Ms Ali said: 'Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.' The house, one of two rental properties Ms Ali has declared in her register of interests, is currently listed for sale at £894,995. It had originally gone up for £914,995 last November - but the price was reduced in Februrary. ‌ Under the Renters Rights Bill, which is making its way through Parliament, landlords who end a tenancy to sell a home will be banned from re-listing it for six months. The Bill will also end fixed-term tenancies. Landlords will also be required to give four months' notice if they plan to move tenants out in order to sell it. In September last year Ms Ali said renters would be given more powers to challenge "unreasonable" increases. In a written answer she said: "More widely, we are taking action to tackle the root causes of homelessness. "This includes delivering the biggest increase in social and affordable housebuilding in a generation, building 1.5 million new homes over the next parliament, and abolishing Section 21 'no fault' evictions which will prevent private renters being exploited and discriminated against and empower people to challenge unreasonable rent increases."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store