logo
Giroud, Delgado each score for LAFC in 2-2 tie with Montreal

Giroud, Delgado each score for LAFC in 2-2 tie with Montreal

CBS News25-05-2025

Olivier Giroud and Mark Delgado each scored a goal for Los Angeles FC on Saturday night in a 2-2 tie with CF Montreal.
Montreal scored multiple goals in the same game for the first time since a 3-2 loss to Atlanta in the season opener on Feb. 22.
Hugo Lloris stopped five shots for LAFC (6-4-5).
Montreal defender Dawid Bugaj redirected a ball-in but it Giroud was there for a one-touch finish from point-blank range to make it 2-2 in the 77th minute.
Prince Owusu had his shot from the top of the area blocked but the loose ball rolled seemingly directly to Giacomo Vrioni, who held a defender on his hip before spinning and rolling a shot inside the right post in the fifth minute and Owusu converted from the penalty spot in the 22nd to give Montreal a 2-0 lead.
Mark Delgado put away a cross played in by Nathan Ordaz, blasting a one-touch shot from near the penalty spot that deflected off goalkeeper Jonathan Sirois into the net in the 38th minute.
Sirois finished with seven saves for Montreal (1-9-5).
Montreal rebounded from a 6-1 loss to Toronto last week.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can the USMNT win the Gold Cup without its top stars?: 'I will let you know after'
Can the USMNT win the Gold Cup without its top stars?: 'I will let you know after'

Fox Sports

time35 minutes ago

  • Fox Sports

Can the USMNT win the Gold Cup without its top stars?: 'I will let you know after'

At this point, it's not as much of a shocking headline anymore. Everybody knows the 26-man roster that U.S. men's national team head coach Mauricio Pochettino called up for the upcoming Gold Cup looks different than initially expected. Christian Pulisic, Jedi Robinson, Yunus Musah, Weston McKennie, Tim Weah and Sergino Dest are among a group of regular stars not participating in this summer's tournament for various reasons. Instead, the USMNT looks more like a greener, motley crew of sorts, mixing guys who have World Cup and European experience with those that play in MLS and have never before been to a major tournament with the senior squad. So, is this group good enough to win the Gold Cup? "I think we need to respect the players that are here. We need to respect every single roster," Pochettino said Friday ahead of two USMNT pre-tournament friendlies. The U.S. faces Turkey on June 7 and then Switzerland on June 10 — two nations that made it to the EURO quarterfinal last year — before opening Gold Cup group stage competition against Trinidad and Tobago on June 15, followed by Saudi Arabia on June 19 and Haiti on June 22. "Good enough? I will let you know after," Pochettino continued. "Good enough to win [Nations League in March]? We were not good enough. We were not good enough to win the World Cup in 2022. We cannot judge or analyze in this way. I think we need to wait, and then if we win, [we'll be] so happy. If we don't win, we'll [be criticized]. "We have to be a team that fights for each other and shows that we have the quality." The U.S. has won seven Gold Cup titles, most recently in 2021. Mexico, a team that's finding its competitive footing and won the Nations League Finals this spring, claimed the confederation championship in 2023. Should the Americans not finish first in their group for whatever reason, they could potentially end up facing their CONCACAF rival earlier than expected. Pochettino cannot change the reality that he's missing some of the USMNT's top players. Their absence will inevitably impact preparation for the World Cup because these are the last competitive matches the team will play before then. There will be friendlies in the fall, but Gold Cup represents the final time Pochettino, who has been the team's manager for less than a year, will get a good grasp of the talent he has to work with aside from watching them play with their respective clubs. "That is the circumstance that we have and we need to adapt to the circumstance," Pochettino said. "And I think it's important to not pay too much attention, only try to believe and provide the players a good environment to perform and fight for a place to be involved in the World Cup in one year." Just how inexperienced is the roster Pochettino has this summer? The group averages 16 caps and just eight in official competition. Seven players are uncapped, and four of those are earning their first senior squad call-ups. "I wouldn't say we're quite in a transition period, but we're probably in a little bit of a learning period," Tyler Adams told reporters on Friday. "We've had to adapt to different things, new principles, new players coming in, getting familiar with each other, finding out each other's tendencies and finding the best way to succeed on the field. And I think that always takes a little bit of time. "But we have a great opportunity in front of us right now. A lot of new faces, new energy, which I think is going to be great for the team." Laken Litman covers college football, college basketball and soccer for FOX Sports. She previously wrote for Sports Illustrated, USA Today and The Indianapolis Star. She is the author of "Strong Like a Woman," published in spring 2022 to mark the 50th anniversary of Title IX. Follow her at @LakenLitman . recommended Get more from United States Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more

WNBA refuses to grant OutKick media credentials; What is the league hiding?
WNBA refuses to grant OutKick media credentials; What is the league hiding?

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

WNBA refuses to grant OutKick media credentials; What is the league hiding?

It's been nearly two weeks since Atlanta Dream forward Brittney Griner fouled out of a WNBA game against the Indiana Fever and then was seen on camera shouting something that has been interpreted multiple ways. Some people believe, based on reading her lips, that she said "f---ing white girl," while others believe she said "f---ing whack call." While no one is certain exactly what she said, there's an easy way to find out: ask Griner. However, no one has done that. OutKick has reached out to the WNBA and to Griner's management team several times, but hasn't received a single response. Still, Griner has participated in multiple games since the incident, which means the media has had plenty of access to simply ask the question. Yet, not a single "reporter" has. Would you like to know why? Because there's no such thing as a WNBA "reporter" or "journalist." Sure, there are people who have such titles in their social media bios or on their LinkedIn pages. But they're not telling the truth. The media members who cover the WNBA don't operate with journalistic integrity – instead, they act like PR professionals whose goal is not to report facts, but to simply promote the league. Why is that the case? Because the WNBA wants it that way. OutKick requested a media credential for the Atlanta Dream game in Los Angeles against the Sparks on May 27. The Sparks denied our request. OutKick requested a media credential for the Atlanta Dream game in Connecticut against the Sun on Friday night. The Sun denied our request. Here's the reason provided, via email, by the Sun: "Unfortunately, we cannot accommodate your request for a media credential for Connecticut Sun vs. Atlanta Dream on Friday, June 6. Due to very limited space, priority is given to those that are associated with outlets that have consistently covered the organization for previous seasons." Really? There's not enough space for one more media member for a regular-season game between the 1-6 Connecticut Sun and the Atlanta Dream? Interesting. OutKick asked the team why it refused our request for a credential, if it denied any other credentials and if there is an edict from the WNBA to keep us from covering games. The Sun did not respond to our questions. The Sun granted several media credentials to OutKick last year, including a playoff game that featured the Indiana Fever and Caitlin Clark, so it's unlikely that their excuse is anywhere near the truth. No, the more likely reason is that the WNBA doesn't want OutKick at its games. Why? Because we refuse to act like a PR firm representing the league and want to ask actual questions. You know, reporting. But the WNBA doesn't want that. That's why not one "reporter" or "journalist" has asked Brittney Griner what she said on May 23. They want to continue to get media credentials. The league has sent the message loud-and-clear: cover the WNBA how we want you to cover it, or you're not going to be invited back. Companies, organizations and governments that have nothing to hide welcome reporters. Why wouldn't they? Transparency builds trust. And if there's nothing to hide, there's no reason not to be transparent. Maybe the WNBA isn't hiding anything. But denying media access to a major news organization raises doubts about whether it is being fully transparent. Take a look at an example from last season. Christine Brennan, one of the most progressive liberals in the sports media, came under fire for simply asking DiJonai Carrington about poking Caitlin Clark in the eye. It was a perfectly reasonable question, and one that needed to be asked. Yet, the WNBA Players' Association issued a statement asking the league to revoke Brennan's media credentials. Cover us the way we want, or you're not coming to our birthday party! But just because the WNBA won't let us into its games doesn't mean we're going to stop asking. And we're certainly not going to give up our journalistic duties just because every other "reporter" who covers the league is willing to do it. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

NBA Finals 2025: The Indiana Pacers Are Comfortable In Chaos
NBA Finals 2025: The Indiana Pacers Are Comfortable In Chaos

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

NBA Finals 2025: The Indiana Pacers Are Comfortable In Chaos

Any time there's a miraculous comeback or NBA playoff moment that leaves a national audience stunned, it's never just one play. It's never just one guy, and never just one bucket that matters. The Indiana Pacers, arguably more than any team this century, have proven that it takes an army to pull off the unthinkable. Above all else, that's what makes Indy special – Tyrese Haliburton may wear the cape on most nights. But when the game tightens, Indiana becomes the Avengers – everybody's got a superpower, and nobody is afraid to save the day. Digging deep as a collective unit is the only way a team overcomes the sloppiest offensive game of their season. Indy committed a turnover on 24.8% of their possessions, the team's highest rate of the entire season (99 games). It was the biggest reason they found themselves trailing by 15 in the fourth quarter. From there, the Pacers demonstrated why they thrive in these environments – playing from behind, in a building so loud they can't hear coaches on the sideline or their own teammates on the floor. The Thunder led Game 1 for 47 minutes and 59 seconds. To be more precise, Indy's first lead came with 0.3 seconds remaining. It was another instance of the Pacers being thieves in the night, leaving a road audience aghast: The anatomy of such a robbery is never as simple as Haliburton drilling a game-winner, which he did once again, for the third time this postseason. Almost everything had to go right for the Pacers to have a chance in that moment. That shouldn't get lost in the mix. What I'm coining as the 'Indiana Second' doesn't come to fruition without everyone on the floor stacking positive plays down the stretch, staying calm and collected the entire time. It doesn't happen without Myles Turner delivering three jumpers midway through the fourth quarter to keep Indy within striking distance. It doesn't happen without Aaron Nesmith hitting a corner three with 2:38 left, on a possession that was seemingly dead. And it doesn't happen without Andrew Nembhard relieving Haliburton of the ball-handling and shot creation duties – even for just a couple possessions. Nembhard sizing up the league MVP and creating just a sliver of space for this step-back triple is what fueled the belief. With OKC's defensive pressure taking Haliburton out of certain actions, Indy had make something out of nothing. But that's why the Pacers are playing June basketball in the first place. Every player in their rotation is comfortable making something out of nothing. And thriving in chaos: It was the perfect example of why postseason basketball is so glorious. Late in a game, you can essentially scrap all of the fancy play designs or X's and O's. Moments like Thursday are often decided in isolation, or old fashioned one-on-one scenarios. In many ways, it was the Pacers learning from their rough lessons in the first half – sometimes it's better to get off a clean shot instead of driving into traffic and risking a turnover. Road playoff wins also require flawless help defense and execution down the stretch, especially against an historically great team that entered the Finals 80-18. There is no margin for error. Every five-man unit must be on a string, communicating switches and reading when to rotate on time. Pascal Siakam's critical stop at the rim, with only 1:07 left, illustrated how much trust this group has in each other. With Gilgeous-Alexander trying to hunt Haliburton on a switch, the MVP gained a slight advantage and found a pathway to the rim. He was funneled directly into Siakam, who protected his yard with ferocity: The comeback victory also doesn't happen without Siakam's opportunistic mindset on this possession below. Capitalizing on the slight moment Gilgeous-Alexander turns his head, Siakam crashes the glass after realizing Nembhard didn't have the greatest shot selection. Having played in nearly 100 playoff games and surviving a long championship run with Toronto, Siakam is aware of the moment. He was fully aware OKC didn't have a center on the floor. And he knew how to exploit that weakness: Eight times out of 10, the Thunder grab that rebound, set up their offense while burning the clock, and put the opponent away. But not this opponent. Not in the year 2025. Equally as important was Nembhard's textbook defensive stop on Gilgeous-Alexander with 12 seconds left. As the Thunder were gearing up for the killshot, Nembhard stayed in front, got physical, and showed his hands. He wasn't allowing SGA to get any closer. He forced SGA to pull-up from 10 feet, which was still a terrific look for the NBA's scoring champion. But it was Nembhard stopping the drive short – along with Nesmith's gritty rebound to finish the possession – that gave Indy a chance to attack and steal the game: The only thing Haliburton needed was a chance. He knows the Pacers aren't perfect. He knows they don't fit the traditional or statistical profile of a Finals team. But he also doesn't care. Because he knows, with the game on the line, he's their unflappable leader with ice in his veins. It doesn't matter who is defending him – he's getting off a quality look and leaving fans breathless while the ball rotates in the air: The only thing the 2025 Pacers enjoy is cheating death. Each time they walk into enemy territory, they become the living embodiment of the 'Call an ambulance … but not for me!' advertisement. Indiana has now survived four separate games in which they appeared dead in the water. At least once in every playoff series, they've had a 5% win probability or lower in the final three minutes. Yet, it's the opposing team sulking and fuming in the locker room: All of those ended in Pacer wins. Three of them resulted in silent road crowds, walking to the exits questioning the meaning of life. At this point, you're more surprised when the Pacers don't pull off a miracle. They have made the extraordinary feel expected. And it appears this should no longer be considered luck. It's simply their identity – and they love it. Thursday was the fifth time Indiana has overcome a 15+ point deficit in this postseason, which is the most since 1997 when the play-by-play era began. Additionally, Indiana is now the fourth team in the play-by-play era to win a postseason game despite leading for 30 or fewer seconds. They joined the 1999 Spurs, 2001 Mavericks, and 2002 Lakers. Two of those three teams won the championship. Before last night, the record was 13 seconds. Indiana simply said, 'hold my beer.' While the Pacers are no stranger to these impressive feats, it elevates to a new level when the opponent is factored in. Oklahoma City, officially stamped as a juggernaut with the highest point differential in NBA history, was supposed to shut off Indiana's water. These fourth quarter comebacks were supposed to be halted. Before Thursday's Game 1, the Thunder hadn't lost a home game to an Eastern Conference team since March 12, 2024. Over 450 days ago. That loss, hilariously, was to the Pacers. With Haliburton leading the way, nothing is out of reach for this team. No deficit is too large, and no opponent is too intimidating. Per Inpredictable, this playoff run for Haliburton is practically off the charts in terms of clutch heroics. He's breaking statistical models and surpassing all-time playoff legends in Clutch Win Probability Added: Haliburton might just be the NBA's clutch king Inpredictable If you didn't believe in the phrase Team of Destiny before this year, it's time to start buying in. This might just be the season Indiana breaks through and claims its first championship. There's no other logical explanation to their shooting surges, particularly from Nembhard, who has lifted his 3-point efficiency by nearly 18 percentage points compared to the regular season. All of their role players have taken leaps forward during the playoffs and contributed star-level moments, which is all a team needs in order to make a run. At the same time, labeling the Pacers as the Team of Destiny actually does them a disservice. Because this is not a new trend. This isn't a random eight-week hot streak. In reality, this is who Indiana has been since the calendar flipped. The Pacers are 47-18 over the last six months, which translates to a 59-win team over the course of a full season. So not only does Indiana belong on this stage – they are showing why any discussion of this being a lackluster NBA Finals matchup was disrespectful. All it did was shine a light on who hasn't paid attention to the progress Indiana has made on both sides of the ball. For all 48 minutes, the Pacers and Thunder proved (market) size doesn't matter, and neither do regions. Small markets, large markets, coastal city or Midwestern communities, the basketball will always be thrilling in June. Especially when it includes a group like the Pacers, who fully lean into the underdog story and experience a frightening level of comfort while on the doorsteps of defeat.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store