
3 women from Ganjam among Mumbai building collapse victims
Berhampur: Three women of a family from Ganjam district were among six killed after the portion of a slab in a four-storey building collapsed in Kalyan East, Mumbai on Tuesday.
The deceased from Ganjam were identified as Pramila Sahu (56) of Jaugada-Nuagaon in Purushottampur block, and her two daughters, Sunita Sahu (38) and Sujata Padhy (32).
Sujata's 4-year-old son and Sunita's 12-year-old daughter, who were in the building, sustained injuries and are undergoing treatment in a nearby hospital.
Their condition was stated to be serious, sources said.
Sunita's 14-year-old son escaped as he had gone for tuition, while her husband Neelanchal and brother-in-law were at their workplaces. Sunita owned a flat on the second floor of the
Saptashrungi building
located in Karpewadi area in Kalyan East, where the victims were resting when a part of the inside of the building collapsed from the second floor to the ground floor, sources said.
Pramila reached Kalyan on Konark Express early Tuesday and stayed at her elder daughter's house in the building. Some hours before the collapse, she visited Sujata's house, a short distance away. Sujata, along with her mother and four-year-old son, came to Sunita's house to have lunch. Pramila planned to go to her son's house, about 10 km from there, in the evening.
The collapse might have occurred just after lunch, said Neelanchal.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
No dark spots, 10 years younger! Just take this from Guardian
URUHIME MOMOKO
Learn More
Undo
"I asked my mother to wait until I returned from work," said Jagannath (30), Pramila's son. "Before I arrived, the bodies of my mother and two sisters had been recovered from the debris," said Jagannath, who works in a shop.
Janardan Tiwadi, a resident of Jaugada-Nuagaon who settled in Kalyan area to carry out business, said they rushed to the site at 5 pm after they came to know about the building collapse. "With the help of police, we shifted the injured persons to nearby hospitals," he said.
"After the death of her husband Kalu Charan Sahu, Pramila frequently went to her village and returned alone by train. Her family had settled in Kalyan about 20 years. She had returned to Kalyan ahead of Sabitri Brata on May 26 to give gifts to her daughters, as per tradition in Odia families," he said.
Maharashtra govt has declared Rs 5 lakh compensation to family members of the deceased.
Berhampur: Three women of a family from Ganjam district were among six killed after the portion of a slab in a four-storey building collapsed in Kalyan East, Mumbai on Tuesday.
The deceased from Ganjam were identified as Pramila Sahu (56) of Jaugada-Nuagaon in Purushottampur block, and her two daughters, Sunita Sahu (38) and Sujata Padhy (32). Sujata's 4-year-old son and Sunita's 12-year-old daughter, who were in the building, sustained injuries and are undergoing treatment in a nearby hospital. Their condition was stated to be serious, sources said.
Sunita's 14-year-old son escaped as he had gone for tuition, while her husband Neelanchal and brother-in-law were at their workplaces.
Sunita owned a flat on the second floor of the Saptashrungi building located in Karpewadi area in Kalyan East, where the victims were resting when a part of the inside of the building collapsed from the second floor to the ground floor, sources said.
Pramila reached Kalyan on Konark Express early Tuesday and stayed at her elder daughter's house in the building. Some hours before the collapse, she visited Sujata's house, a short distance away.
Sujata, along with her mother and four-year-old son, came to Sunita's house to have lunch. Pramila planned to go to her son's house, about 10 km from there, in the evening.
The collapse might have occurred just after lunch, said Neelanchal. "I asked my mother to wait until I returned from work," said Jagannath (30), Pramila's son. "Before I arrived, the bodies of my mother and two sisters had been recovered from the debris," said Jagannath, who works in a shop.
Janardan Tiwadi, a resident of Jaugada-Nuagaon who settled in Kalyan area to carry out business, said they rushed to the site at 5 pm after they came to know about the building collapse. "With the help of police, we shifted the injured persons to nearby hospitals," he said.
"After the death of her husband Kalu Charan Sahu, Pramila frequently went to her village and returned alone by train. Her family had settled in Kalyan about 20 years. She had returned to Kalyan ahead of Sabitri Brata on May 26 to give gifts to her daughters, as per tradition in Odia families," he said.
Maharashtra govt has declared Rs 5 lakh compensation to family members of the deceased.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Drugs not recovered, man walks free after 12 years in NDPS case in Noida
Noida: Twelve years after being jailed for allegedly possessing contraband, a man was acquitted, with the prosecution having failed to convince the court about any sort of recovery. A court of additional district and sessions judge on Tuesday said the prosecution did not follow the procedures mandated under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. Judge Abhishek Pandey ordered the acquittal of Dilip Kumar, a resident of Sunpura in Mainpuri district, who was already out on bail in a case pertaining to the alleged recovery of diazepam powder by Sector 24 police in 2013. The court observed "grave lapses" in the prosecution case as the recovered substance was not produced before the court, the accused was not searched in front of any neutral witness or magistrate as mandated under Section 50 of the NDPS Act and after sending 24 grams of the recovered powder to the forensic lab, there was no mention of how the remaining one gram of powder was handled. Declaring that the prosecution failed to prove that the accused was arrested with any contraband substance, the court exonerated him from charges under Section 18/20 of the NDPS Act and said that since Kumar was already out on bail, his bailers should be recused. He was, however, directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs 30,000 and two sureties of equal value in the court. "Under established norms, the recovered powder should have been placed in two packets with proper marking and sent for forensic testing and the other kept under seal in the police station, but this has neither been detailed in the case details nor admitted by prosecution witnesses in their deposition," the court observed. The defence counsel objected to the accusations and said that the accused was falsely implicated in the case and that nothing was ever recovered from him. "It was a false story and the procedures under the NDPS Act were not followed by the prosecution," the defence counsel said, seeking exoneration from all charges. It also expressed surprise over the missing one gram of powder and the statement of prosecution witness 3, who said that he received three sealed packets from SI Yadav on the night of the arrest. "If there were three sealed packets, what was in them and where it was kept is not clear," the court observed. According to the prosecution, a police team under sub-inspector Srinivas Yadav was on regular vehicle checking duty near Videocon Square on the evening of Sept 26, 2013, when they received a tip-off about a person coming in that direction with diazepam tablets and a knife. Yadav, who registered an FIR the same day, informed the court that he, along with the police team, intercepted the accused and overpowered him when he was trying to escape. "On asking the reason for escape, he confessed to having diazepam powder and a knife. We informed him about his right to be searched before a magistrate or gazetted officer, but the accused expressed his eagerness to be searched by police and we recovered a white powder, which weighed 25grams of diazepam powder, and a knife," Yadav informed the court. Prosecution witness Yadav, who was referring to the case file during deposition, told the court that he retired in 2016 and was undergoing treatment for depression.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cyberfrauds digitally arrest retired doctor & wife, extort Rs 1.95 crore
Patna: A retired doctor and his wife in the city were kept under digital arrest for 12 days by cyberfrauds, who impersonated as top law enforcement officials and extorted Rs 1.95 crore from them. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The couple, terrorised by continuous threats and fake courtroom visuals on video calls, transferred the money in multiple instalments over two weeks. The case came to light when the elderly couple grew suspicious and lodged a complaint with the Cyber police station in Patna on Wednesday. Confirming this, DSP Raghwendra Mani Tripathi, in charge of the cyber police station, said on Thursday, "The couple—Dr Radhe Mohan Prasad, a retired physician from the PMCH, and his wife Chhabi Prasad, who live in Hanuman Nagar—were under digital arrest since May 23. The cybercriminals posed as CBI officials, lawyers, and judges, and threatened them with violence. Out of fear, the couple visited their bank multiple times and made six RTGS transfers amounting to Rs 1.95 crore." Their ordeal began on May 21 when they received a phone call from an unknown number based in Mumbai. The caller claimed to be a CBI officer and informed them of a money laundering case registered against them at the Colaba police station in Mumbai. Saurabh Mohan, the couple's son, who also is a doctor, recounted, "My parents were at home when the call came. The man said he was from the CBI and claimed a money laundering case had been filed against both of them. Soon after, they started receiving video calls in which people dressed as police officers were visible." The fraudsters told Dr Prasad that a SIM card, issued in his name using his Aadhaar card, was linked to multiple money laundering cases. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Within an hour of the first call, they began bombarding the couple with long video calls—some lasting up to 15 hours—where fake setups resembling police stations, CBI offices, and courtrooms were shown to create an atmosphere of intimidation, said the police. "The criminals maintained round-the-clock surveillance through video calls, cutting off their communication with the outside world," the DSP said. The elderly couple, overwhelmed by fear and unable to verify the claims, complied with the criminals' instructions without informing anyone else. The police have begun a probe into the case and have received three phone numbers used for the WhatsApp video calls. "We are analysing the call details and tracing the origin of the video setups," he said.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Two schools get DEO notice for selling books, stationery on premises
Ahmedabad: The Ahmedabad City District Education Officer (DEO) served notices to Swaminarayan Techno School in Maninagar and Jay Somnath School in Khokhra for allegedly selling books and stationery within their premises. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Both schools were directed to provide written clarification within two days, explaining why they should not face a Rs 10,000 penalty for breaching govt guidelines. Educational institutions are prohibited from selling books or stationery on school premises. Although a directive exists, numerous schools persisted with these activities. The DEO initiated strict implementation of the rule and issued notifications accordingly. So far, five schools in Ahmedabad received notices for violating this rule in the past three days. Nelson School in Maninagar and United Valley International School in Vastral were the first to get DEO notices for compelling parents to purchase school books, stationery, and uniforms from their premises. This was followed by Suffah School in Kalupur. Subsequently, Swaminarayan Techno and Jay Somnath Schools were also issued notices. DEO Rohit Chaudhary confirmed that institutions failing to comply with guidelines regarding book sales, uniforms, and fee collection would face appropriate consequences.