
Election to 135-year-old Vidyavardhak Sangha gains political colour
The election is being held for the posts of president, vice-president, chairman, general secretary, treasurer, and joint secretary, and nine seats in the executive committee on Sunday, May 25.
After the demise of veteran journalist Patil Puttappa (March 2020), who held the president's post for a record 48 years, former MLA and BJP leader Chandrakanth Bellad had occupied the post and now he is contesting again with his team.
Three factions
When Patil Puttappa (Papu) was the president, there used to be two factions during the election, one 'with Papu' and the one 'against Papu'. After his demise, when the elections were held in 2021, a third faction emerged, and this time again, there is a loose third faction comprising of individuals who are opposed to the two groups.
Although Papu was nominated to the Rajya Sabha and Mr. Bellad was a former MLA of the BJP, the elections so far had not gained a distinctly political colour. However, the entry of former MLC Mohan Limbikai and JD(S) leader Gururaj Hunasimarad has given a political colour to the election. BJP MLA Arvind Bellad's followers, too, are likely to be involved in the polls as his father is seeking a re-election.
Some existing office-bearers have identified themselves with the presidential post aspirant Mr. Limbikai, who is now with the Congress and heads the 'Patil Puttappa Gumpu'. Sharanappa Kotagi, another Congress leader and younger brother of former Chairman of Karnataka Legislative Council Viranna Mattiakatti, is with him and is in the poll fray. Mr. Limbikai at one point asked what was wrong with politicians contesting the election, as 'Papu' was also a former Rajya Sabha member, but sought to argue later that there was 'nothing political' about their contest.
Mr. Hunasimarad, who had filed nomination papers for the president's post, subsequently withdrew from the contest, reportedly in favour of writers and artists who are not contesting as a group. Mr. Hunasimarad, who had said earlier that he intended to merely oppose politicians entering the fray, has now become neutral.
It seems to be a close contest between the incumbent president and Mr. Limbikai, and historian Hanumakshi Gogi is contesting as independent.
Incumbent general secretary Shankar Halgatthi is being challenged by advocate Prakash Udakeri, a member of the Patil Puttappa faction, and the post of working president will see a direct contest between advocate Basavaprabhu Hosakeri and journalist Manojkumar Gouda Patil. There is a triangular contest for the vice-president's post, for which Sanjeev Kulkarni, Sharanappa Kotagi, and D.M. Hiremath are in the fray. Twenty-eight candidates are in the fray for the seven-member executive committee.
Critical voices
These developments have led to criticism from different quarters. Already, the likes of former Mayor Iresh Anchatageri, advocate K.S. Korishettar, and others have objected to 'politicisation' of the sangha's election. Many feel that the sangha, which always stood for linguistic and regional identity, has been slowly losing its relevance in recent years as its activities are now mostly limited organising endowment lectures and cultural events.
'Under Puttappa, the sangha used to take a bold stand against any 'anti-Kannada' policy of the ruling disposition, but it is not the case now,' said a senior member. Despite claims by politicians that their contest in the sangha's election has nothing to do with politics, the development has certainly made several men of letters, artists of repute, and Kannada activists shy away from the contest.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
29 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Rajya Sabha passes Mines and Minerals Bill amid Opposition protests
The Rajya Sabha passed key amendments to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Bill on Tuesday amid Opposition protests and repeated adjournments. During the discussion, Union Mines Minister G Kishan Reddy said that coal production had increased due to the central government's efforts, and the country has now become the second-largest coal consumer globally. He added that the Gevra coal mine in Chhattisgarh is the world's second-largest mine. He also stated that under PM Modi's leadership, India's coal production had crossed one billion tonnes for the first time. 'Today, no state can report a power shortage. However much coal shortage there may be for states to generate power, the ministry is ready to provide that coal,' he said. The Bill allows leaseholders to apply to the state government for adding other minerals to an existing lease. For the inclusion of critical and strategic minerals and other specified minerals, no additional amount needs to be paid. These minerals include lithium, graphite, nickel, cobalt, gold, and silver. National Mineral Exploration Trust The Bill establishes the National Mineral Exploration Trust to fund mineral exploration in the country. It also widens the scope of the Trust to fund the development of mines and minerals. Removing the limit on sale The Bill allows captive mines to sell up to 50% of minerals produced in a year, after meeting end-use requirements. It removes the previous limit on the sale of minerals. Deep-seated minerals The Bill permits a one-time extension of the area under a mining or composite lease for deep-seated minerals. Mineral exchanges The Bill provides for the establishment of an authority to register and regulate mineral exchanges. It defines a mineral exchange as a registered electronic trading platform or marketplace for trading minerals and metals.


The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Parliament passes Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill
Parliament on Tuesday (August 19, 2025) passed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025 that aims to further liberalise, modernise and make India's mineral sector more dynamic, especially with a focus on critical and strategic minerals. The Bill, which seeks to amend the original Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, was passed in Lok Sabha on August 12. Rajya Sabha passed it with a voice vote. About 19 members participated in the debate and shared some constructive suggestions. Replying to the debate on the Bill, Union Minister of Coal and Mines G Kishan Reddy said the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government has taken revolutionary reforms in the coal and mine sector in the last ten years. In critical minerals, the country is dependent on imports due to less reserves in India. With demand for critical minerals expected to rise further, the government is focusing on enhancing domestic production and exploring overseas market to secure the supplies, he added. One of the key amendments in the Bill is renaming of the National Mineral Exploration Trust as the National Mineral Exploration and Development Trust, and its scope has been expanded to fund exploration and development both domestically and internationally. "A forward looking reform, which has been hanging fire for very long time. This Bill is not just about minerals, it is about securing India's economic security, future and ensuring development in more transparent and sustainable way," BJP leader Kiran Choudhary said during the debate on the Bill. India is the world's third largest in the mineral wealth. Yet the mining sector is constrained by outdated laws, fragmented leases, lack of accountability. The Bill is important as it addresses all these gaps, she said. The Bill balances development with sustainability and provides for community participation and welfare of people in the mining areas, she added.


News18
43 minutes ago
- News18
'Should I Bring Truckful Of Papers To Parliament?': How Nehru Dismissed MPs' Concerns Over Indus Treaty
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday quoted from a News18 report on the Parliament archives to slam Nehru's approach in signing the IWT Should I bring a truckful of papers to the Parliament? This is how then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru dismissed the demands of parliamentarians, including senior members from his own party, who questioned him in 1960 on why he did not consult Parliament before signing the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) with Pakistan. Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday quoted from a News18 report on the Parliament archives to slam Nehru's approach in signing the IWT. A perusal of the archives shows Nehru was completely dismissive of the idea of consulting Parliament on it. 'All those numerous papers will probably fill a cart. You can imagine ten years' papers and if you have to bring them and present them to Parliament you require a truck-huge number of correspondences, this debate, that engineer's estimate, etc, running to hundreds of pages. It is a mountain of papers; it is not a few letters exchanged, for a period of twelve years," Nehru told Parliament. In this debate on November 30, 1960, Nehru went on to say that such 'complicated agreements" cannot be brought to Parliament. 'I do not think it is possible for any kind of these complicated agreements to be dealt with, when we have to refer to Parliament. There must have been, I suppose, in this particular matter, dozens of approaches, dozens of plans, discussed, ultimately rejected and something happened. Are we to come at every step and ask Parliament?" Nehru told the MPs. Parliamentarians, including those from the Congress, were aghast that while the Parliament was in session till September 9, 1960, the treaty was signed on September 19 in Karachi without Parliament being aware. 'You cannot carry on any kind of negotiation, even relatively simple ones and certainly not this very difficult one (with Parliament being consulted). Therefore, very wisely, the Constitution and convention lay down that in such agreements, Government has to stake its own judgment, its future, on it. There is no other way. One takes a risk; maybe that Government may go wrong. But there is no other way to deal with it," Nehru insisted. In the end, as per the BJP now and the general wisdom of the parliamentarians then, the Nehru government did go wrong on the Indus Waters Treaty. Nehru had then accused his fellow MPs of acting in 'narrow-minded spirit" while opposing the treaty and requesting 'a little more friendly treatment by this House". He said Congress MPs using words like a 'second partition" for IWT was loose language and a 'perversion of the facts". 'Partition of what? Of an inch of territory? Partition of a pailful of water? What have we partitioned? Is that the way to approach an international question? I was depressed that when we are dealing with mighty things like relationship of nations, the future of India spreading out, the future of Pakistan spreading out, we should talk in this way, which has no relation to fact," Nehru said. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...