logo
He lives in Thailand but 'supercommutes' to Singapore — living off what he makes from 3 hours a week

He lives in Thailand but 'supercommutes' to Singapore — living off what he makes from 3 hours a week

CNBC15-05-2025
Shao Chun Chen used to work more than 40 hours a week in his corporate career in Singapore. Now, he has a three-hour-a-week job that sustains his and his family's life in Thailand.
The 39-year-old grew up in Singapore and spent most of his life in the city-state before moving to Chiang Mai, Thailand, with his wife in November 2024. Today, he "supercommutes" from Thailand to Singapore, flying over 1,200 miles once a week to work as an adjunct lecturer at the National University of Singapore.
He says he brings in about $2,000 to $4,000 Singapore dollars ($1,540 to $3,070) per month teaching a weekly three-hour digital marketing class, and the amount that he makes teaching the course is enough to cover his travels and all of his and his wife's living expenses in Thailand.
"I'm gaming the system," Chen told CNBC Make It. "Three hours of working in Singapore can sustain my entire expenditure in Thailand."
It took a layoff to make Chen realize he was financially independent in early 2024, giving him the flexibility to change his life.
Over the course of almost a decade working at Google, he lived below his means and consistently set aside up to half of his paycheck for investments. So when he was unexpectedly laid off by the tech company in February 2024, Chen realized that the seven-figure portfolio he had built over the years meant he no longer needed to rely on a paycheck for a long time.
His portfolio was worth about $2 million at the time, according to documents reviewed by CNBC Make It. Using the 4% rule as a guideline meant that he could safely withdraw about $80,000 from his portfolio and that same amount, adjusted for inflation, in each subsequent year.
In theory, that amount would likely be small enough for his portfolio to support him for at least 30 years. Therefore, rather than jumping into another corporate role, Chen decided to give himself the opportunity to lead a different kind of life.
"I've been working for the last 14 years of my life, and because of the layoff, I was forced to take a break," Chen told CNBC Make It. "It was very devastating, it was a huge blow to my ego, my identity, but it turns out, with time ... it sort of mandated me to think [about] what I really wanted in life."
Although Chen found that he could live off of the interest, dividends and capital gains from his investments, he chose to treat them only as a source of passive income, withdrawing money only when necessary to supplement his active income.
In the past year and a half, Chen created multiple new sources of passive and active income.
Along with teaching as an adjunct lecturer for three hours a week in Singapore, Chen also makes money by creating educational content on YouTube and from his coaching business, through which he says he can charge $500 an hour, depending on the client.
He also decided to try geographical arbitrage. By keeping his main source of income teaching at a university in Singapore, where the currency is stronger, Chen doesn't need to work as much to support a comfortable life with his wife in Thailand where cost of living is much lower.
"Find a way to improve your skill sets, or to reach a position where you can charge a high per hourly rate," Chen said. "If you combine a high per hourly rate with a low cost of living, you only need to work very few hours to cover your expenses."
Cities and jobs that can pay a high hourly rate tend to be expensive areas, but that's less of a problem now that digitalization has enabled remote work arrangements, he added.
While his job as an adjunct lecturer is enough to cover his and his wife's living expenses, Chen's other active income sources cover his discretionary spending. He says that in total, he spends between four and eight hours a week working, which includes his teaching, coaching and making YouTube videos.
Since moving to Chiang Mai with his wife in November, Chen says, his lifestyle and quality of life have become "so much better."
"I'm also conscious that not everyone can do it, and the locals are not making as much as we are. [We are] earning in dollars, spending in baht," he says. "I no longer feel the need to ... be on that hamster wheel or to always be producing."
"[Here] I make breakfast for my wife, and in my previous life, I didn't even have that privilege. [I was] just rushing," he added.
Along with not feeling as much financial or time pressure on a daily basis, Chen says, he no longer feels the need to "over-plan" his life. "For the first time in my life, I could just sort of ... enjoy what Thailand has to offer," Chen says.
In Singapore, he says, he was paying about about $2,450 a month for his two-bedroom condominium.
Now, he lives in a brand new one-bedroom condo which costs him $450 a month — and it's much more luxurious. "I'm already overpaying because I'm [paying] on a monthly basis ... If you sign a yearly lease, then it will be closer to $300," Chen says.
"It's a ridiculous condo," Chen says. "It has multiple pools. It has a water slide ... a fully equipped gym, a huge co-working space [and] its own Pilates studio," he added.
As for other living expenses in Thailand, Chen says, he spends between $300 and $500 a month for food and groceries for him and his wife, and about $200 a month for transportation. He also spends about $250 for each round-trip flight to Singapore every Friday.
"The strategy for anyone who wants to live in a country like Thailand is to really embrace the local culture, the local options, the local way of life," rather than try to bring your own lifestyle to the place, Chen says.
"I've actually met a few expats here, and they're really not happy because they were only attracted to Thailand because of the cost of living," he says. "They were complaining: 'Oh, the croissant doesn't taste as good as back home. They don't use real butter here, they use palm oil' ... and then they need to find a specific cafe, and that's actually more expensive."
Instead, expats can save money by buying local products like Thai food, Thai medicine and Thai beer, Chen says. "Everything made in Thailand is cheap, but the moment you want to buy international options, like wine from France ... it's more expensive," he adds.
Although the decision to leave the corporate world to live in Thailand has given him more time and flexibility to enjoy life and build up his different streams of income, Chen says, there are downsides.
For example, he no longer has the structure and predictability that corporate life once afforded him. And when it comes to supercommuting from Thailand to Singapore, traffic is often a big hurdle, as is the amount of energy that it can take to travel so often, he says.
But ultimately, he says, he's happy with his life in Thailand, though he is open to moving back to Singapore if the right opportunity comes along.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

An AI data trap catches Perplexity impersonating Google
An AI data trap catches Perplexity impersonating Google

Business Insider

time35 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

An AI data trap catches Perplexity impersonating Google

If you want to succeed in AI, a good hack would be to impersonate Google. You just can't get caught. This is what just happened to Perplexity, a startup that competes with ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and other generative AI services. Quality data is crucial for success in AI, but tech companies don't want to pay for this, so they crawl the web and scrape information for free, often without permission. This has sparked a backlash by some content creators and others interested in preserving the incentives that built the web. Cloudflare and its CEO, Matthew Prince, have stormed into this battle with new features that help websites block unwanted AI bot crawlers. Cloudflare is an infrastructure, security, and software company that helps run about 20% of the internet. It thrives when the web does well, hence its interest in helping sites get paid for content. Some Cloudflare customers recently complained to the company that Perplexity was evading these blocks and continued to scrape and collect data without permission. So, CloudFlare set a digital trap and caught this startup red-handed, according to a Monday blog describing the escapade. "Some supposedly 'reputable' AI companies act more like North Korean hackers," Prince wrote on X on Monday. "Time to name, shame, and hard block them." Perplexity didn't respond to a request for comment. The bait: Honeytrap domains and locked doors Cloudflare created entirely new, unpublished websites and configured them with files that explicitly blocked all crawlers — including Perplexity's declared bots, PerplexityBot and Perplexity-User. These test sites had no public links, search engine entries, or metadata that would normally make them discoverable. Yet, when Cloudflare queried Perplexity's AI with questions about these specific sites, the startup's service responded with detailed information that could only have come from those restricted pages. The conclusion? Perplexity had accessed the content despite being clearly told not to. The cloak: How Perplexity masked its crawl Perplexity initially crawled these sites using its official user-agent string, complying with standard protocols. However, Cloudflare said it discovered that once blocked, Perplexity resorted to stealth tactics. Cloudflare found that Perplexity began deploying undeclared crawlers disguised as normal web browsers and sending requests from unknown or rotated IP addresses and unofficial ASNs, [what is ASN? write out on first ref?] which are crucial identifiers that help route internet traffic efficiently. When its official crawlers were blocked, Perplexity also used a generic web browser designed to impersonate Google's Chrome browser on Apple Mac computers. (Business Insider asked Google whether it has told Perplexity to stop impersonating Chrome. Google did not respond). According to Cloudflare, Perplexity has been making millions of such "stealth" requests daily across tens of thousands of web domains. This behavior not only violated web standards, but also betrays the fundamental trust that underpins the functioning of the open web, Cloudflare explained. The comparison: How OpenAI gets it right To emphasize what good bot behavior looks like, Cloudflare compared Perplexity's conduct to that of OpenAI's crawlers, which scrape data for developing ChatGPT and giant AI models such as the upcoming GPT-5. When OpenAI's bots encountered a file or a similar block, they simply backed off. No circumvention. No masking. No backdoor crawling, according to Cloudflare tests. The Fallout: De-verification and blocking As a result of these findings, Cloudflare has de-listed Perplexity as a verified bot and rolled out new detection and blocking techniques across its network. Cloudflare's takedown serves as a cautionary tale in the AI arms race. While the web shifts toward stronger control over data access and usage, actors who flout these evolving norms may find themselves not just blocked, but publicly called out. In an era where AI systems are hungry for training data, Cloudflare's sting operation is a signal to startups and established players alike: Respect the rules of the web, or risk being exposed.

Is Now the Time to Buy Alphabet?
Is Now the Time to Buy Alphabet?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Is Now the Time to Buy Alphabet?

Key Points Alphabet shares have struggled this year, but they got a boost after strong second-quarter earnings. The company's Q2 revenue, net income, and EPS have all risen year over year, but so have capital expenditures. Management is investing heavily in artificial intelligence, which has been a key factor in its business performance. 10 stocks we like better than Alphabet › Shares of Google parent Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) have delivered lackluster performance this year. The stock is up less than 2% through July 31. Contrast this to digital advertising and AI rival Meta Platforms, which saw shares jump over 30% in that time. However, after its second-quarter earnings report beat Wall Street expectations, Alphabet stock began to climb and is hovering not far from the 52-week high of $207.05 set in February. The recent resurgence could signal a turning point. As a result, now is a good time to evaluate whether an investment in Alphabet makes sense. Doing so requires digging into where the tech giant stands today. Alphabet's recent performance Excellent second-quarter results understandably boosted its stock. Revenue was up a strong 14% year over year to $96.4 billion. Net income rose to $28.2 billion, a 19% increase compared to 2024. Consequently, diluted earnings per share (EPS) soared 22% year over year to $2.31, exceeding Wall Street's consensus estimate of $2.18. While this growth is impressive, a key reason to consider investing in Alphabet is its success in artificial intelligence (AI). According to CEO Sundar Pichai, Google's search traffic is growing year over year, "and our new AI experiences significantly contributed to this increase in usage." AI's boost to Google is noteworthy, since the search engine accounted for $54.2 billion of Alphabet's $96.4 billion in second-quarter sales. AI is also benefiting Alphabet's other businesses, such as Google Cloud. That division saw second-quarter revenue rise an impressive 32% year over year to $13.6 billion as customers were drawn to Google Cloud's AI. Artificial intelligence also plays a crucial role in (literally) driving Alphabet's autonomous car service, Waymo. With that technology behind the wheel, it delivers over a quarter-million passenger trips every week. The company is slowly expanding Waymo to more cities. Atlanta is the latest location, initiated in June, adding to places such as Los Angeles and Austin, Texas. Waymo also signed a multiyear deal with Avis in July, as the rental car company expands into ride-hailing services, providing Waymo with operational support, including vehicle maintenance. Factors to consider with an Alphabet investment The company is determined to be a leader in AI. That's why it has made prodigious capital expenditures (capex) to boost its AI infrastructure. The second quarter's $22.4 billion in capex represented the highest sum yet in any given quarter over the past four, and far above the $13.2 billion spent in the prior year's second quarter. Its huge spending left the company with $5.3 billion in second-quarter free cash flow (FCF). While that amount is down from the previous year's $13.2 billion, a single quarter's dip is not a concern. Alphabet has exceptional ability to generate FCF, producing a princely sum of $66.7 billion over the trailing 12 months. The larger issue is that Alphabet was found guilty of antitrust violations in its digital advertising and Google Search businesses. This has been a factor in the tepid performance of its stock. The courts have yet to announce the company's punishment, but once it's made public, the shares are likely to be affected to some degree, depending on the consequences to its business. Management is appealing the rulings, and this could cause the antitrust cases to drag on for years, according to Pichai. As a result, the threat to Alphabet's business isn't immediate. And ultimately, the legal challenges could be resolved with minimal impact, as was the result in a similar antitrust case against Microsoft in 1998, which concluded in a settlement. To buy or not to buy Alphabet shares In weighing whether to invest in Alphabet, one factor to consider is share price valuation. This can be assessed using its stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, especially in comparison to competitors Microsoft and Meta. Both compete with Alphabet in digital advertising, while Microsoft is also a rival in cloud computing. The chart above shows that Alphabet's P/E multiple is the lowest compared to Meta and Microsoft, suggesting its stock is the best value versus the competition. This is underscored by the fact the company's earnings multiple is lower than it's been over the past year, up until President Donald Trump's announcement of tariff policy changes in April sank the entire stock market. Although the antitrust cases present short-term uncertainty, the company's deep pockets and commitment to battling the court rulings can help it navigate these challenges. With strong financials, successful AI initiatives, and an attractive valuation, now is a good time to consider buying shares in Alphabet. Should you invest $1,000 in Alphabet right now? Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Robert Izquierdo has positions in Alphabet, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Now the Time to Buy Alphabet? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Ex-Google exec's shocking warning: AI will create 15 years of ‘hell' — starting sooner than we think
Ex-Google exec's shocking warning: AI will create 15 years of ‘hell' — starting sooner than we think

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Ex-Google exec's shocking warning: AI will create 15 years of ‘hell' — starting sooner than we think

A former Google executive warned that artificial intelligence will plunge society into more than a decade of severe disruption and hardship as it eliminates many white-collar jobs — and the 'hell' will begin as early as 2027. Mo Gawdat, who left Google X as its chief business officer in 2018 and has become a popular author and public speaker, painted a grim picture of widespread job losses, economic inequality and social chaos from the AI revolution. 'The next 15 years will be hell before we get to heaven,' Gawdat told British entrepreneur Steven Bartlett on his 'Diary of a CEO' podcast on Monday. Gawdat, 58, pointed to his own startup, which builds emotional and relationship-focused artificial intelligence. It is run by three people. 'That startup would have been 350 developers in the past,' he told Bartlett in the interview, first reported by Business Insider. 'As a matter of fact, podcaster is going to be replaced.' Gawdat specifically warned that 'the end of white-collar work' will begin by the late 2020s, representing a fundamental shift in how society operates. Unlike previous technological revolutions that primarily affected manual labor, he argues this wave of automation will target educated professionals and middle-class workers who form the backbone of modern economies. The Egyptian-born tech whiz, who was a millionaire by age 29, believes this massive displacement will create dangerous levels of economic inequality. Without proper government oversight, AI technology will channel unprecedented wealth and influence to those who own or control these systems, while leaving millions of workers struggling to find their place in the new economy, according to Gawdat. Beyond economic concerns, Gawdat anticipates serious social consequences from this rapid transformation. Gawdat said AI will trigger significant 'social unrest' as people grapple with losing their livelihoods and sense of purpose — resulting in rising rates of mental health problems, increased loneliness and deepening social divisions. 'Unless you're in the top 0.1%, you're a peasant,' Gawdat said. 'There is no middle class.' Despite his gloomy predictions, Gawdat said that the period of 'hell' will be followed by a 'utopian' era that would begin after 2040, when workers will be free from doing repetitive and mundane tasks. Instead of being 'focused on consumerism and greed,' humanity could instead be guided by 'love, community, and spiritual development,' according to Gawdat. Gawdat said that it is incumbent on governments, individuals and businesses to take proactive measures such as the adoption of universal basic income to help people navigate the transition. 'We are headed into a short-term dystopia, but we can still decide what comes after that,' Gawdat told the podcast, emphasizing that the future remains malleable based on choices society makes today. He argued that outcomes will depend heavily on decisions regarding regulation, equitable access to technology, and what he calls the 'moral programming' of AI algorithms. 'Our last hurrah as a species could be how we adapt, re-imagine, and humanize this new world,' Gawdat said. Gawdat's predictions about mass AI-driven disruption are increasingly backed by mainstream economic data and analysis. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has warned of a 'white-collar bloodbath,' predicting that up to half of all entry-level office jobs could vanish within five years. The World Economic Forum says 40% of global employers expect to reduce staff due to AI, and Harvard researchers estimate that 35% of white-collar tasks are now automatable. Meanwhile, Challenger, Gray & Christmas reports that over 27,000 job cuts since 2023 have been directly attributed to AI, with tens of thousands more expected. Goldman Sachs and McKinsey project a multi-trillion-dollar boost to global GDP from AI, but the IMF cautions that these gains may worsen inequality without targeted policy responses. Analysts from MIT and PwC echo Gawdat's fears of wage collapse, wealth concentration, and social unrest — unless governments act swiftly to manage the transition. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store