Rachel Reeves says £20,000 annual Isa limit will stay
In an interview broadcast on BBC Newscast, Ms Reeves was asked whether if, in a few years' time, someone would be able to put a whole £20,000 per year into an Isa, as they are able to do now.
Ms Reeves told the BBC: 'First of all, very few people are able to save £20,000 a year… we still want people to be able to save and I'm certainly not going to reduce that limit.'
Several different types of account come under the umbrella of Isas, including those where people's money is held in cash, as well as stocks and shares Isas.
Earlier this year, there was speculation that the idea of lowering the annual cash Isa allowance to £4,000, from £20,000, was being mooted, to encourage more people to put their money into investments.
Several organisations, including building societies, pushed back against the idea.
Treasury costings documents that were released with the spring statement assume the overall Isa limit of £20,000 remains in place up to and including 2029/30.
Ms Reeves told the BBC: 'I'm not going to reduce the limit of what people can put into an Isa but I do want people to get better returns on their savings, whether that's in a pension or in their day-to-day savings.
'And at the moment, a lot of money is put into cash or bonds when it could be invested in equities, in stock markets and earn a better return for people.
'And so, one of the reasons why we're looking at advice and guidance that financial firms can give to their customers is to make sure that people are making informed decisions about how to invest their money, whether that's their pension savings, or their Isa savings.
'So those are things that we're looking at, but I absolutely want to preserve that £20,000 tax-free investment that people can make every year.'
Commenting on the interview, Jason Hollands, managing director of online investment platform Bestinvest said: 'To get more people investing in equities requires a combination of better education, an appropriate regulatory environment so they can get the help they need in choosing a suitable investment, and the potential carrot of additional incentives.'
He added that 'parts of the City' are 'pushing for an overhaul of stocks and shares Isas, urging the Chancellor to refocus these on UK equities to help revitalise the UK market'.
He continued: 'Such arguments might appeal to a Chancellor keen to see increased investment in UK domestic assets, but if she is minded to do this then we would urge a carrot rather than a stick-based approach.
'A mandated limit on overseas investment within Isas would reduce flexibility and returns for savers, and it would be unlikely to drive more people to invest.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Stocks are celebrating inflation's demise prematurely and the big money isn't buying, says Larry McDonald
(PRO Views are exclusive to PRO subscribers, giving them insight on the news of the day direct from a real investing pro.) The stock market and retail investors are celebrating an end to inflation worries prematurely on Tuesday, and the big money is not playing along, according to Larry McDonald of "The Bear Traps Report" — whose clients are some of the biggest hedge funds on the planet. There already was something off with the way financial markets were reacting to the July CPI report with the 10-year Treasury yield going higher after the numbers, while the Dow Jones Industrial average is rallying . Big institutional money on Wall Street is siding with the bond market and believes that inside of the CPI report were the signs of a growing comeback in inflation. They are looking at what's called "supercore" inflation, which removes food and energy, but also shelter and rent costs from the headline number. When that's taken out, inflation was running at a 3.21% rate last month, much higher than the 2.7% headline annual rate that was slightly less that economists expected and sparked the equity rally. "This could be like a nice relief rally today, but under the surface, inflation is just not coming down fast enough and that's not great for bonds," said McDonald, author of " How To Listen When Markets Speak. " Supercore "is one of the most important number's the Fed looks at. ... The bond market is really focused on supercore and you can't fake that," he said. This hidden inflation that's about to rear its head is "good for hard assets, good for gold, silver, platinum, palladium, copper," said McDonald. Big hedge funds are buying anything that comes out of the ground Tuesday, along with natural gas, he said. "The cheapest part of the market right now is natural gas," McDonald added, noting its key part in powering AI data centers. The investor and strategist pointed to the First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) along with Antero Resources as ways to play along with the big money. (Watch the video above for the full conversation.)
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
US July Tariff Revenue Jump Fails to Halt Wider Budget Deficit
US tariff revenue reached a fresh monthly record in July, though the increase wasn't enough to prevent a widening in the monthly budget deficit — pointing to the federal government's continuing fiscal challenges. Customs duties climbed to $28 billion last month, marking a 273% surge over July last year, a Treasury Department release showed on Tuesday. At the same time, the monthly budget deficit came in at $291 billion, or 10% more than the same month a year before, after accounting for calendar differences.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Tariff ‘Mission Accomplished' hype is just that
On May 1, 2003, George W. Bush announced, 'Major combat operations in Iraq have ended.' He was standing below a giant banner that read, 'Mission Accomplished.' At the risk of inviting charges of understatement, subsequent events didn't cooperate. But it took a while for that to be widely accepted. We're in a similar place when it comes to President Trump's experiment with a new global trading order. 'Tariffs are making our country Strong and Rich!!!' proclaims Trump, making him not only the first Republican president in living memory to brag about raising taxes on Americans, but also the first to insist that raising taxes on Americans makes us richer. MAGA's mission-accomplished groupthink relies primarily on three arguments. The first is that Trump has successfully concluded a slew of beneficial trade deals. The truth is that some of those deals are simply 'frameworks' that will take a long time to be ironed out. But Trump got the headlines he wanted. The second argument is a kind of populism-infused sleight of hand. The 'experts' — their scare quotes, not mine — are wrong once again. The White House social media account crows, 'In April, 'experts' called tariffs 'the biggest policy mistake in 95 years.' By July, they generated OVER $100 BILLION in revenue. Facts expose the haters: tariffs WORK. Trust in Trump.' But the high-fivers are leaving things out. The most-dire predictions of economic catastrophe were based on the scheme Trump announced on April 2, a.k.a. 'Liberation Day.' Trump quickly backed off that plan ('chickened out' in Wall Street parlance) in response to a bond and stock market implosion. Saying the experts were wrong under those circumstances is like saying experts opposed to defenestration were wrong when they successfully convinced a man not to jump out a window. The third argument, made by the White House and many others — that tariffs are working because they're raising money — is a response to a claim no one made. To my knowledge, no expert claimed tariffs wouldn't raise money. The estimates of these revenues from Trump world are stratospheric. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick expects somewhere between $700 billion and $1 trillion per year. Last month, the government collected $29 billion. It's likely this number will significantly increase as more tariffs come online and businesses run down the inventory they stockpiled earlier this year in anticipation of more tariffs to come. Normally, Republicans don't exult over massive revenues from tax hikes. But Trump's defenders get around this problem by insisting that money is 'pouring' and 'flowing' into America from someplace else. It's true that tariff revenue is pouring into the Treasury, but that money is coming out of American bank accounts, because American importers pay the tariff. Even Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cannot deny this when pressed. So yes, tariffs are 'working' the way they're supposed to; the problem is Trump thinks tariffs work differently than they do. It's possible some foreign exporters might lower prices to maintain market share, and some American businesses might absorb the costs — for now — to avoid sticker shock for inflation-beleaguered consumers, but what revenue is generated still comes from Americans. Ultimately it means higher prices paid here, reduced profits for businesses here or reduced U.S. trade overall. Sometimes, when pressed, defenders of the administration will concede the true source of the revenues, but then they say the pain is necessary to force manufacturers and other businesses to build and produce in the United States. It's backdoor industrial policy masquerading as trade policy. That, too, might 'work.' But all of this will take time, no matter what. And, if it works, that will have costs, too. Manufacturing in America is more expensive — that's why we manufacture so much stuff abroad in the first place. If this 'reshoring' happens, our goods will be more expensive, and less money will 'pour in' from tariffs. It's difficult to exaggerate how well-understood all of this was on the American right until very recently. But the need to grab any argument available to declare Trump's experiment a success has a lot of people not only abandoning their previous dogma but leaping to the conclusion that the dogma was wrong all along. Maybe it was, though I don't think so. The evidence so far suggests that problems are looming. The dollar is weakening. Prices continue to rise. The job market is reeling. The stock market (an unreliable metric, according to MAGA, when it plummeted after Liberation Day) is holding on, thanks to tech stocks. The truth is we won't have real evidence for a while. It's worth remembering that Americans don't live by headlines and press releases and they don't live in the macro economy either. Declaring 'Mission Accomplished' for the macro economy won't convince people they're better off in their own micro-economies when they're not. @JonahDispatch
