How a Bangkok art show was censored after China anger
Most of the censored artworks were by the Tibetan artist Tenzin Mingyur Paldron. Television screens that were supposed to show several films by the artist - one was about the Dalai Lama - had been switched off.Tibetan and Uyghur flags had also been removed, as well as a novel about a Tibetan family in exile and a postcard about China, Israel and Xinjiang.A gallery staff member told the BBC that the exhibition had attracted many visitors in recent days after news of the censorship went viral online.The arts centre's management did not respond to the BBC's questions. But the BBC understands there was an email where the centre said they were "warned that the exhibition may risk creating diplomatic tensions between Thailand and China".The email also stated they made the adjustments "due to pressure from the Chinese embassy" transmitted through the Thai foreign affairs ministry and the Bangkok city government, which is the centre's main supporter.A Chinese embassy statement in response to BBC queries accused the exhibition of openly promoting Tibetan, Uyghur and Hong Kong independence. It added that Thailand's "timely measures" showed that such a "false notion" has "no market internationally and is unpopular".It also said the show "disregards facts... distorts China's policies on Tibet, Xinjiang, and Hong Kong, and harms China's core interests and political dignity"."China opposes any attempt by anyone to use the pretext of cultural and artistic exchanges to engage in political manipulation and interfere in China's internal affairs."The statement did not address allegations that its officials had pressured Thai authorities and the arts centre.
The show's curators and exhibiting artists deny China's accusations.Tenzin Mingyur Paldron said his films "conveyed stories from the heart and sent a message of global solidarity", adding that the censorship was part of a Chinese "campaign of erasure and suppression" of Tibetans around the world."Although I do support the people's will, there is no signage nor advocacy of independence [in the artwork]," said Clara Cheung, one of the artists whose names were blacked out. The Hong Kong artist's installation about China's surveillance in the UK was not affected.Instead of independence from China, "we promote freedom of expression, self-determination, and self-identification... basic human rights", Sai told the BBC."Our exhibition gives space for artists who resist authoritarianism. These are voices often silenced in their own country. The fact that the Chinese Communist Party tries to shut it down proves the very point they are making."
'We realised we had to leave'
Sai and his wife decided to leave Thailand as they were worried of being deported back to Myanmar, also known as Burma, where Sai believes he will be persecuted for his activism against the junta.Two days after the exhibition's opening, the couple was heading to their home in Bangkok when they realised that Thai police were looking for them.The BBC understands the couple received texts from gallery staff alerting them to the police's visit to the exhibition, and that officers had asked for the couple's contact numbers.At that moment, Sai said, "we realised we had to leave the country". The couple immediately purchased the earliest flight to the UK they could find. "We only had a few minutes to pack our belongings. My wife was shaking, she couldn't pack anything," he said. Just hours after they received the call, they left the country.Thailand's national police spokesman Achayon Kraithong told the BBC that he had not received any information that police officers were looking for the artist, and said the accusation was too broad to prove. "Without specific information, we cannot comment on it. If there was enough evidence, we would be able to say if it actually happened or not," he said.The couple had fled their homeland in 2021 following the military coup.Sai's father is Lin Htut, the former chief minister of Myanmar's biggest state, Shan, and a member of Aung San Suu Kyi's ousted National League for Democracy. He was arrested and subsequently jailed on corruption charges. Sai's mother was put under house arrest for several months, and is now still living under heavy surveillance.Sai has long maintained the charges are false and insists that his father is a political prisoner. He has been vigorously campaigning for his release while criticising the junta.The couple had eventually settled in Thailand and decided to put on their art show in Bangkok because of the large Burmese community there, and also because "Thailand plays a critical role to promote peace and stability for Myanmar... it's a secure place", said Sai.But he no longer feels this way. "When a foreign power can dictate what art can be shown, it undermines cultural sovereignty," he said."Because of our activism, the targeting by authoritarian regimes against us has multiplied... my wife and I have no choice but to seek asylum in the UK."
Lord Alton of Liverpool, chair of the UK Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights, told the BBC that Sai's case "illustrates the extensive reach of China's campaign of transnational repression", and that he would support Sai's bid for asylum."To pressure an art exhibition to censor exhibits in a cultural centre in another country is an outrageous violation of freedom of expression and should be widely exposed and condemned. The additional fears that this caused for Sai, leading him to flee Thailand for his security, are deeply concerning," he added.The Human Rights Foundation has called the incident "intimidation" that "reflects a coordinated effort to suppress artistic expression", while prominent Thailand-based activist Phil Robertson said it was "outrageous and unacceptable" that Bangkok city officials allowed Chinese censorship.The BBC has asked Thailand's prime minister's office for a response to these views.Fears of China's transnational repression - broadly defined as a government harassing or surveilling individuals in other territories - have risen in recent years. It has raised questions of whether host countries are aware of such actions, or even complicit.The relationship between Thailand and China has also been closely scrutinised.In 2015 Swedish citizen Gui Minhai, one of the founders of a Hong Kong bookshop that sold and published titles critical of Beijing, mysteriously vanished while holidaying in Thailand. He later reappeared in mainland China in police custody. Officials said he had gone to China voluntarily, but rights groups maintain he was abducted by Chinese agents.Earlier this year, at least 40 Uyghurs were deported from Thailand to China despite serious concerns expressed by the United Nations, the US and the UK. Beijing said the repatriation was conducted in accordance with Chinese, Thai and international law. That case had occurred while Sai was still planning his show at the Bangkok Arts and Cultural Centre. Despite concerns, he said, the centre decided to go ahead with the exhibition anyway.Now, Sai is contemplating his next steps while in the UK. He and his wife plan to showcase the uncensored art show in other countries once the exhibition ends its run in Bangkok in October.He believes the censorship has ironically boosted the profile of their art show, with "now many people in the world interested in seeing the exhibition" and discussing it online."We didn't start this movement, the CCP started it. We just laid the foundation [with the exhibition]... the rest has been nurtured organically, and endorsed, by CCP censorship like fertiliser."Additional reporting by Thanyarat Doksone.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
13 minutes ago
- BBC News
CalMac pays out £460,000 to delayed ferry passengers
CalMac has paid out more than £460,000 in compensation to passengers because of delays and cancellations to its services since April last state-owned ferry operator paid £432,735 in compensation to travellers in 2024-25, with a further £33,792 paid out in May and June this marks a 37% rise on compensation payments in 2023-24, but a slight fall from 2022-23, when the operator paid £454,000 to delayed passengers, according to figures obtained by the Scottish Liberal Democrats.A Transport Scotland spokesperson said just over 5% of sailings on the network had been cancelled over the last 10 years. Lib Dem transport spokesman, Jamie Greene, accused the Scottish government of "letting the ferry network deteriorate".He pointed to reliability issues within the CalMac fleet and delays in new vessels going into service. The Glen Sannox ferry, built by Port Glasgow shipyard Ferguson Marine, was delivered years late and over sister ship, the Glen Rosa, will now not be delivered until early next year due to a series of the MV Caledonian Isles, which has not sailed since January last year, could be out of action for a further four months in order to undergo further Lib Dems have launched a consultation on the future of the country's ferry who represents the West Scotland region, said staff and passengers had been "let down" by the SNP's management of the networkHe added: "The SNP government took control of the company and broke their promise to deliver new ferries on time and on budget, which would have reduced the massive bills we are now seeing for compensation and repairs."All of this has created a grim new norm for my constituents along the west coast, from losing business to missing hospital appointments." Data obtained by the Lib Dems via freedom of information request showed more than 7,000 compensation claims had been lodged by passengers over a two-year period between April 2023 and April operator has paid out a total of £1.9m in compensation since the 2017-18 financial said it expected to welcome an additional 13 vessels to its fleet by said, when delays and cancellations did occur, staff worked to find alternative routes or sailings for passengers.A spokesperson added: "We're operating more sailings than ever before, with many of our vessels stretched to their limits."It is no secret that our fleet is ageing and that this can lead to higher levels of technical problems."This is why we are looking forward to welcoming 13 new vessels to the CalMac fleet by 2029, which will lead to less technical problems and cancellations, giving passengers a more reliable service." A Transport Scotland spokesperson said those new vessels would be able to "operate in more challenging sea and weather conditions".They added: "Between January 2015 and June 2025 CalMac have operated over 1.6 million sailings, with just 5.5% of scheduled sailings cancelled. Of those cancelled sailings, 25% were for technical reasons whilst more than double was due to the weather at 60%."In the coming year, the Scottish government intend to invest over £530m maintaining and enhancing our networks and strengthening resilience of services on the west coast and northern isles."This represents a near 23% increase on 24-25 funding levels."
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Home secretary defends Palestine Action arrests: ‘More than a regular protest group'
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has defended the proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, stating it is more than a regular protest group. Ms Cooper argued that Palestine Action has engaged in an escalating campaign of violent criminality, distinct from lawful protest. She cited counterterrorism intelligence indicating the group met the criteria for proscription under the 2000 Terrorism Act, with disturbing information about future attacks. The Metropolitan Police reported over 700 arrests since Palestine Action was banned on 5 July, with 60 more people to be prosecuted for supporting the group. The first three charges in England and Wales under the Terrorism Act relating to Palestine Action have been confirmed, with more prosecutions anticipated.
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Boris Johnson's ‘jet zero' dreams have failed to take off
For those flying south this summer, the prospect of 'green fuel' one day powering their planes down to the south of France or the Med may mean a little less guilt over their climate-destroying air travel. British factories pumping out climate-friendly aviation fuel have long been a pipe-dream for the aviation industry and some holidaymakers, and it seemed one step closer six years ago when British Airways announced plans for the UK's first factory to convert waste into jet fuel. The futuristic plant, to be built by fuels firm Velocys on a field near the Humber estuary, in north Lincolnshire, would see household rubbish destined for landfills turned into thousands of tonnes of green plane fuel, powering the airline into a sustainable future. Alex Cruz, then-chief executive of BA, said the fuel – known as sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) – would be a 'game-changer for aviation'. But six years after British Airways' Velocys announcement – and a year after the SAF plant should have gone into production – that dream seems as far away as ever. Velocys' Humber estuary site remains as an empty field – a recent image shows that the only structure on it is a portaloo. The failure of the plan highlights the difficulty green aviation has faced getting off the ground, made worse by a government push to force airlines to use more green fuels. On the back of promises for airlines to use SAF, in 2022, then-prime minister Boris Johnson announced a new policy – known as 'jet zero' – to enforce a minimum threshold of green fuel use. By 2050, he claimed, flying would be zero-carbon, adding: 'Sustainable fuels and fully electric planes will achieve guilt-free flying for years to come.' Under the policy, still in force, British airlines must this year fuel their planes with a minimum of 2pc SAF, ratcheting up to 10pc by 2030 and 22pc by 2040. That fuel should also be pumping out from a minimum of five new SAF plants, which, Johnson's policy promised, would be operating by now, creating jobs and helping make the UK 'a clean energy superpower'. Barely any of that has come to pass. For BA's partner Velocys – which is yet to sell any green jet fuel to any airline – it ran out of money last year and was taken over by a private consortium. Its leadership team says its plans are only delayed, but similar promises by other UK would-be SAF producers have also so far come to nothing. It means the only company making SAF in the UK is the Phillips66 refinery on Humberside – and its output is just 20,000 tonnes a year. That's about 0.2pc of the 11 million tonnes of aviation fuel Britain consumes annually. So how are UK airlines meeting their obligation to add 2pc SAF to their fuel tanks? Most of it is being imported, generating jobs not in the UK but mostly in Finland, the Netherlands, the US and Holland. That gap is set to worsen, says the Aviation Environment Federation. It points out that by 2030, the UK's SAF obligation will have soared to 10pc, or 1.2 million tonnes, of green fuel – all or most of which will be imported. 'While a number of plants are making progress, the expected amounts they will produce are insufficient to meet the mandate', it says. Those imports will not just dash the opportunity for more UK jobs, but also mean flight costs will take off, say experts. Simone Burgin, a biofuels analyst with Argus Media, said SAF is already far more expensive than conventional jet fuel. 'The European price for SAF stood at $2,280 (£1,681) per metric tonne on Aug 13 – more than three times the price of conventional jet fuel.' Those high costs are inherent to the way SAF is made – using vast amounts of heat at high pressure to break down waste cooking oil, animal fats, wood, plastics or other organic materials into the smaller molecules needed for jet fuel. But inflated pricing is adding to that, says the International Air Transport Association (IATA), which represents 340 global airlines. It says fuel suppliers are stoking their profit margins with 'compliance fees'. 'The fees being imposed on airlines are over twice the prevailing market price premium of SAF. In the EU, airlines face an additional $1.3bn in excess surcharges in 2025. The impact of the compliance fees in the UK is even higher.' It all suggests Britain's demand that airlines add SAF to their fuel is doing little to save the planet and nothing for UK jobs, while making aviation increasingly expensive. Greenhouse gas emissions from UK-based international aviation are surging – equating to 37 million tonnes in 2024 – more than double the 16 million tonnes seen in 1990, and set to grow even faster in the next two decades. The 300 million passengers who pass through UK airports annually is expected to hit up to 500 million by 2050, with 10 airports planning major expansions. And globally, aviation emits around a billion tonnes of CO2 and rising – so what difference can SAF really make? Airlines and aircraft manufacturers point out that it's still early days for SAF – and as manufacturing steps up, so prices and emissions may decline. But they too are worried by the lack of realism from a Government that is telling them to use ever more SAF, but doing little to help ensure homegrown supplies. Jonathon Counsell, sustainability director at IAG, which owns British Airways, said the current plans for boosting SAF output were too weak to meet UK and EU decarbonisation targets. Airlines want some of the taxes they pay to be deployed to support SAF production. 'SAF is a critical lever to get to net-zero, and to achieve this, the industry needs increased Government support, as mandates alone are not enough,' he said. 'Greater support is essential to bridge the cost gap between SAF and traditional jet fuel, alongside stronger incentives to accelerate production at the scale required to ensure a long-term, affordable supply.' The Department for Transport, which is steering the policy, points out that next year will see the introduction of its 'revenue certainty mechanism' under which companies that build SAF plants will get a guaranteed minimum price, funded by a levy on airlines. But that levy would add to costs in an industry with a slim profit margin of 3pc to 4pc – and so would go straight on to ticket prices. Tim Alderslade, the chief executive of Airlines UK, said global SAF supply had doubled last year to one million tonnes and was expected to double again this year. 'Like any brand-new industry, progress will be uneven, and there will be failures. There also remains much to do to ensure UK airlines have access to the growing volumes of 'advanced' SAF needed to meet the UK mandate.' Ryanair, Europe's largest airline, puts it more bluntly: 'SAF production needs to be incentivised by governments.' It said the environmental taxes it pays annually need to be reinvested to 'accelerate the decarbonisation of the sector'. A Department for Transport spokesman said: 'Not backing SAF is not an option – it is a core part of the global drive to decarbonise aviation. 'There are encouraging signs that the SAF mandate will be met, and we will continue to support the production and use of SAF as the technology matures.' A Velocys spokesman said the company was seeking to licence its technology to SAF producers worldwide to help them produce more fuel. He said the amount of money required for the Humber estuary plant was 'beyond investment appetite' and investors 'remained concerned about the pace of regulatory change' but that it hoped to bring the site to fruition in the 'near term'. For sunseekers hoping to cleanse their conscience with green fuel, a guilt-free future still seems some way off.
