House subcommittee holding hearing on how regulatory policy impacts natural disasters following LA fires
A subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives will hold a hearing on Thursday on how regulatory policy impacts the prevention of natural disasters, with a focus on the deadly wildfires that ravaged Southern California last month.
The GOP-led House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform and Antitrust will kick off the hearing, titled "California Fires and the Consequences of Overregulation," at 10 a.m. on Thursday.
Not only will the hearing examine how regulatory policy in the Golden State has affected the prevention of natural disasters, specifically wildfires, it will also address how "excessive regulation" on insurance and permitting slows down recovery.
Days after the fires began, California Gov. Gavin Newsom suspended regulations related to rebuilding, waiving permitting requirements based on the California Coastal Act and the California Environmental Quality Act to allow for a quicker rebuilding process.
In the wake of the fires, a March 2024 announcement from California's largest private insurer, State Farm, stating that it was discontinuing coverage for 72,000 home and apartment policies resurfaced, generating backlash and questions surrounding the accessibility of insurance in that area specifically.
The insurer said a letter sent to the California Department of Insurance (CDI) shortly after that announcement was an "alarm signaling the grave need for rapid and transformational action."
Now, State Farm is asking the CDI to "immediately approve" a 22% rate increase for non-tenant homeowners, a 15% increase for renters and condo owners, and 38% for rental dwellings.
The increased rates are to help "avert a dire situation," State Farm said, and would go into effect on May 1, 2025.
"As of February 1st, State Farm General (Fire only) has received more than 8,700 claims and has already paid more than $1 billion to customers," the insurer wrote in a release on its website. "State Farm General will ultimately pay out significantly more, as collectively these fires will be the costliest disasters in the history of State Farm General."
The hearing comes a day after Newsom traveled to Washington, D.C., to meet with President Donald Trump and Congressional members in efforts to secure more federal funding for wildfire recovery.
The Secretary of the California Natural Resources Agency, Wade Crowfoot, who oversees water and fire policy across the state, also attended the meeting.
Witnesses at the hearing include Steve Hilton, founder of Golden Together; Steven Greenhut, R Street Institute resident senior fellow and western region director; and Edward Ring, who oversees Water and Energy Policy at the California Policy Center.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
27 minutes ago
US governors are divided along party lines about military troops deployed to protests
California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is calling President Donald Trump's military intervention at protests over federal immigration policy in Los Angeles an assault on democracy and has sued to try to stop it. Meanwhile, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott is putting the National Guard on standby in areas in his state where demonstrations are planned. The divergent approaches illustrate the ways the two parties are trying to navigate national politics and the role of executive power in enforcing immigration policies. In his live TV address this week, Newsom said that Trump's move escalated the situation — and for political gain. All 22 other Democratic governors signed a statement sent by the Democratic Governors Association on Sunday backing Newsom, calling the Guard deployment and threats to send in Marines 'an alarming abuse of power' that "undermines the mission of our service members, erodes public trust, and shows the Trump administration does not trust local law enforcement.' The protests in Los Angeles have mostly been contained to five blocks in a small section of downtown; nearly 200 people were detained on Tuesday and at least seven police officers have been injured. In Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they're planning to deploy military troops for protests. Since Trump's return to office, Democratic governors have been calculating about when to criticize him, when to emphasize common ground and when to bite their tongues. The governors' responses are guided partly by a series of political considerations, said Kristoffer Shields, director of the Eagleton Center on the American Governor at Rutgers University: How would criticizing Trump play with Democrats, Republicans and independent voters in their states? And for those with presidential ambitions, how does that message resonate nationally? Democratic governors are weighing a number of considerations. 'There probably is some concern about retributions — what the reaction of the administration could be for a governor who takes a strong stance," Shields said. And in this case, polling indicates about half of U.S. adults approve of how Trump is handling immigration, though that polling was conducted before the recent military deployment. On other issues, Democratic governors have taken a variety of approaches with Trump. At a White House meeting in February, Maine Democratic Gov. Janet Mills told Trump, ' we'll see you in court ' over his push to cut off funding to the state because it allowed transgender athletes in girls' school sports. Michigan's Gretchen Whitmer, a possible 2028 presidential candidate, publicly sparred with Trump during his first term but this time around, has met with him privately to find common ground. Initially, Hawaii Gov. Josh Green referred to Trump as a 'straight-up dictator," but the next month he told a local outlet that he was treading carefully, saying: 'I'm not going to criticize him directly much at all." Apart from their joint statement, some of the highest-profile Democratic governors have not talked publicly about the situation in California. When asked, on Wednesday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul's office pointed to a Sunday social media post about the joint statement. Whitmer didn't respond. The office of Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who is set to testify before Congress on Thursday about his state laws protecting people who are in the country without legal status, reiterated in a statement that he stands with Newsom. The office said 'local authorities should be able to do their jobs without the chaos of this federal interference and intimidation.' Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, in an interview Wednesday in The Washington Post, said Trump should not send troops to a weekend protest scheduled in Philadelphia. 'He's injected chaos into the world order, he's injected it into our economy, he is trying to inject chaos into our streets by doing what he did with the Guard in California," Shapiro said. As state attorney general during Trump's first term, Shapiro routinely boasted that he sued Trump over 40 times and won each time. As governor he has often treaded more carefully, by bashing Trump's tariffs, but not necessarily targeting Trump himself. Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis has often clashed with Newsom, a fellow term-limited governor with national ambitions. Newsom's office said DeSantis offered to send Florida State Guard troops to California. 'Given the guard were not needed in the first place, we declined Governor DeSantis attempt to inflame an already chaotic situation made worse by his Party's leader,' Newsom spokesperson Diana Crofts-Pelayo said in an email to The Associated Press. Speaking on Fox News on Tuesday, DeSantis said the gesture was a typical offer of mutual aid during a crisis — and was dismissive of the reasons it was turned down. 'The way to put the fire out is to make sure you have law and order,' he said. Protests against immigration enforcement raids have sprung up in other cities — and a series of 'No Kings' demonstrations are planned for the weekend — with governors preparing to respond. In Connecticut, Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont said he has spoken with his public safety commissioner to make sure state and local police work together. 'I don't want to give the president any pretext to think he can come into Connecticut and militarize the situation. That just makes the situation worse,' said Lamont, who called Trump "a little eager to send federal troops and militarize the situation in Los Angeles.' It is unclear how many Texas National Guard members will be deployed or how many cities asked for assistance. In Austin, where police used chemical irritants to disperse several hundred protesters on Monday, the mayor's office said the National Guard was not requested. San Antonio officials also said they didn't request the Guard. Florida's DeSantis said law enforcement in his state is preparing 'The minute you cross into attacking law enforcement, any type of rioting, any type of vandalism, looting, just be prepared to have the law come down on you,' DeSantis said Tuesday. 'And we will make an example of you, you can guarantee it.' ___ Associated Press reporters Nadia Lathan and Jim Vertuno in Austin, Texas; Sophie Austin in Sacramento, California; Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan; Andrew DeMillo in Little Rock, Arkansas; Susan Haigh in Hartford, Connecticut; Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, New York; Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida; and Sophia Tareen in Chicago; contributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Left With No Choice': Churchill Downs Inc. Moves To Relinquish Fair Grounds License In Louisiana
'Left With No Choice': Churchill Downs Inc. Moves To Relinquish Fair Grounds License In Louisiana originally appeared on Paulick Report. Doubling down on statements made last month about not opening Fair Grounds Race & Slots in New Orleans for a live horse racing meet this fall, Churchill Downs Inc.'s chief executive officer informed the Louisiana State Racing Commission the company plans to 'begin the next steps' to relinquish its live racing and OTB license, along with its slots and video poker licenses, at the racing commission's next meeting. In a June 9 letter to racing commission officials – obtained by the Paulick Report – Bill Carstanjen, the chief executive officer of CDI, said the loss of historical horse racing (HHR) revenue, following an adverse state Supreme Court ruling, and newly enacted legislation has forced the company's hand. Advertisement Related: Situation 'Dire': Fair Grounds May Not Run 2025-'26 Race Meet Without Legislative Help 'Given the legislature's ease with which it approved legislation that is directly adverse and harmful to the economic interests of Fair Grounds, the opposition by elected officials to engage in meaningful solutions in collaboration with the Fair Grounds, and the forthcoming adjournment of the legislative session,' Carstanjen wrote, 'CDI is left with no choice but to request an appearance before the LSRC to begin the next steps for voluntarily surrendering the racing license held by the Fair Grounds.' Carstanjen added: "This is not the path CDI wishes to proceed down, but the inaction from elected officials to offer any sort of compromise has made this the only possible outcome. ... Closing one of the nation's oldest racetracks, and the most important track in Louisiana, will be a devastating blow to Louisiana's equine industry and the New Orleans economy. It will also have an immediate detrimental impact on the livelihoods of the hundreds of employees, local vendors, and community surrounding the Fair Grounds." At an emergency meeting of the Louisiana commission on May 13, Ozair Shariff, an attorney for CDI, warned commissioners that without some form of legislative assistance to make up for the loss of HHR revenue, Fair Grounds would not apply for racing dates in the fall, calling the situation 'dire.' Reading from a statement at the May meeting, Shariff said: 'Fair Grounds' overall profitability is dependent on revenue generated from its OTB network, specifically video poker and historical racing – until last week (when the Supreme Court decision on HHR took effect). The elimination of 46 percent of the OTB revenue and an even more significant 74 percent of OTB EBITDA does not allow Fair Grounds to cover its required $9 million average annual maintenance operating capital. Faced with this reality, operating under the current status quo is no longer an option.' Shariff said efforts to engage members of the Louisiana legislature, whose session ends on June 12, was a priority, in hopes of getting some type of relief. Shariff was rebuked at the meeting by Louie Roussel III, a prominent New Orleans businessman who formerly owned Fair Grounds and is a longtime Thoroughbred owner and trainer. Roussel, who said he was speaking on behalf of Gov. Jeff Landry, addressed the commission, telling them, 'Do not allow these people to do this. … If they tell you they don't want to race, fine them $50,000 or $100,000 a day for every day they don't race. 'There will be no state subsidy for this racetrack,' Roussel added. 'None.' Apparently, Roussel was correct. Advertisement Legislators did pass two bills that Carstanjen said would be damaging to CDI's bottom line: the first expands the permitted number of video poker machines at truck stops (from 50 to 60) and bars (from three to four). The second bill would permit fixed odds wagering on horse racing. The legislation created a fund for Louisiana purses, but nothing for track operators. Following is Carstanjen's letter to the Louisiana State Racing Commission, in full: June 9, 2025 Mr. Edward J. Koehl, Jr., Chairman Louisiana State Racing Commission Mr. Stephen Landry, Executive Director Louisiana State Racing Commission 320 N Carrollton Avenue Suite 2-B New Orleans, Louisiana 70119-5100 RE: LSRC Meeting and Fair Grounds' Racing License Dear Chairman Koehl and Executive Director Landry: It is my understanding that soon after the Louisiana Legislature adjourns on June 12, 2025, an emergency meeting of the Louisiana State Racing Commission ("LSRC") will be conducted. This correspondence is Churchill Downs Incorporated's ("CDI") formal request to appear at the meeting to discuss the timeline and next steps concerning the license held by Churchill Downs Louisiana Horseracing Company, L.L.C. d/b/a Fair Grounds Racecourse & Slots ("Fair Grounds"). For the last few months, CDI has attempted to engage in good faith discussions with elected officials and various other industry stakeholders to find a path toward long term economic viability for the Fair Grounds after the recent decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court that resulted in the elimination of historical horse racing ("HHR"), and nearly half of the Fair Grounds' off-track betting ("OTB") revenues. To date, our efforts to engage elected officials have not led to meaningful discussions and, confoundingly, CDI's efforts have been met with a combination of reluctance, indifference, apathy, and even opposition. To make matters worse, the passing of HB 540 and 547 further negatively impacts the Fair Grounds' ability to remain competitive. House Bill 540 will lead to significant cannibalization of revenue from our OTB network in and around greater New Orleans, a network in which the Fair Grounds has heavily invested since 2005 - the only racetrack operator in the state to do so. House Bill 547 will shift wagering handle from current brick and mortar racetracks, OTBs, and advanced deposit wagering platforms, all of which provide revenues to track operators and local horsemen groups, to out-of-state bookmaking operators. Given the legislature's ease with which it approved legislation that is directly adverse and harmful to the economic interests of Fair Grounds, the opposition by elected officials to engage in meaningful solutions in collaboration with the Fair Grounds, and the forthcoming adjournment of the legislative session, CDI is left with no choice but to request an appearance before the LSRC to begin the next steps for voluntarily surrendering the racing license held by the Fair Grounds. The timing of the LSRC's meeting, and the date on which the Fair Grounds ceases its operations for not committing to run a 2025-2026 race meet, necessarily implicates the Louisiana Gaming Control Board ("LGCB") and the Fair Grounds' slot license, the surrender of which may not occur without the prior approval of the LGCB. To be clear, we expect to surrender our slot and video poker licenses. This is not the path CDI wishes to proceed down, but the inaction from elected officials to offer any sort of compromise has made this the only possible outcome. Fair Grounds provides nearly $30 million in taxes to local municipalities and the State of Louisiana, in addition to well over $34 million in purse money for its racing product. Closing one of the nation's oldest racetracks, and the most important track in Louisiana, will be a devasting blow to Louisiana's equine industry and the New Orleans economy. It will also have an immediate detrimental impact on the livelihoods of the hundreds of employees, local vendors, and community surrounding the Fair Grounds. However, the inaction of the legislature and others in a position to save this racetrack have forced us into the current situation. Please provide the details of the meeting at your earliest convenience. William C. Carstanjen Churchill Downs Incorporated, CEO cc: Mr. Jeff Landry, Governor Mr. Cameron Henry, Senate President Mr. Phillip DeVillier, Speaker of the House Mr. Jimmy Harris, Senator Mr. Bernard Chatters, President of the Louisiana HBPA Mr. Patrick Bernard, LSRC Commissioner Mr. Rock Bordelon, LSRC Commissioner Mrs. Leslie Bouie, LSRC Commissioner Mr. Larry Findley, LSRC Commissioner Mr. K.R. Finkelstein, LSRC Commissioner Mr. Nathan Granger, LSRC Commissioner Mr. Earl Landry, LSRC Commissioner Mr. Travis Miller, LSRC Commissioner Mr. Deano Thornton, LSRC Commissioner Mr. Vincent Tuminello, LSRC Commissioner Mrs. Katherine Winters, LSRC Commissioner This story was originally reported by Paulick Report on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: Police Clear Protesters in Seattle, Las Vegas and L.A.
California liberals welcomed Gov. Gavin Newsom's speech condemning President Trump, but some remained skeptical of the governor. Republicans, meanwhile, saw his address as opportunistic and blamed him for the state's turmoil. For months, Californians weren't sure what to make of Gov. Gavin Newsom. There was the new podcast on which he interviewed right-wing influencers and said he felt trans athletes shouldn't participate in women's sports. There was the meeting in February with President Trump in the White House. And there were occasional snipes at Republicans, but nothing like those Mr. Newsom had dished out in years past. Then came a blistering nine-minute speech on Tuesday in which Mr. Newsom warned Americans that Mr. Trump was destroying democracy and acting as an authoritarian who would eventually send the military to states across the country. Many liberals in California cheered Mr. Newsom, finally seeing in him the leader of the resistance that they had been missing. Those feeling confused and fearful since Mr. Trump started his second term were looking for someone to stick up for them and said they appreciated Mr. Newsom's forcefulness. 'In a time of rising fear and growing threats to democracy, he spoke not just as a governor, but as a moral leader,' said Representative Lateefah Simon, Democrat of California. 'He named the danger plainly.' But others, while supportive of his message, were not entirely convinced. They said testing the political climate ahead of a potential run for president. 'Even if you're late to the party, you know, welcome to the fight,' said Hugo Soto-Martinez, a progressive City Council member in Los Angeles, who appreciated what Mr. Newsom said but wished the governor had stood up to the president sooner. Adrian Tirtanadi, executive director of Open Door Legal, a nonprofit which provides free legal representation for immigrants and others, said he liked all of the words in Mr. Newsom's speech. But, he said, he wondered why the governor was not backing up the rhetoric with more financial support for immigration lawyers who could fight deportation. Big talk without much action, Mr. Tirtanadi said, is often the California way. Still, others appreciated that Mr. Newsom had demanded that Mr. Trump stop workplace raids and filed lawsuits seeking to block the deployment of National Guard troops and Marines in Southern California. That has given some hope to immigrants who have felt powerless. When David Campos was 14, he and his family traveled by foot and by bus, across deserts and over mountains, to California from their home in Guatemala. They scurried under a border fence and settled in South Central Los Angeles without legal papers. The family eventually obtained citizenship through his father's carpentry job. Mr. Campos went on to Stanford University and Harvard Law School, served on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and is now the vice chairman of the California Democratic Party. Mr. Campos said he was glad that Mr. Newsom, the former San Francisco mayor with whom he sometimes clashed, took a defiant stance toward Mr. Trump. 'I'm glad he's rising to this moment,' Mr. Campos, 54, said in an interview. 'The governor reminded us that if the president can do this in California, he can do it anywhere in this country. That's how a democracy can die.' Republicans in California, many of whom have aligned with President Trump, said they were decidedly unimpressed with the governor's speech. Senator Brian Jones, the State Senate minority leader, said that the governor seemed to have been filming an early campaign commercial with his speech, from the way the flags were set in his backdrop to the suit he was wearing. 'It doesn't do anything to lower tensions in L.A.,' Mr. Jones said. 'When he says we all need to stand up, is he encouraging more people to show up to the riots and participate?' James Gallagher, the Republican leader of the California State Assembly, called the governor's address 'self-righteous political posturing.' Mr. Gallagher said California's policy of preventing local law enforcement from working with federal immigration officials created the current tension. He said he found it funny that Mr. Newsom was accusing Mr. Trump of being authoritarian when the governor ordered Californians to close their businesses, stay home from church, attend school on Zoom, wear masks and get vaccinated during the Covid-19 pandemic. 'He was a total tyrant, and he has no business talking about authoritarianism because he is exhibit A,' Mr. Gallagher said. Mr. Newsom's speech, as well as his sharp-tongued retorts to Republicans on social media this week, won some plaudits from younger influencers. Dwayne Murphy, Jr., a 34-year-old content creator who lives in Downey, Calif., and said he votes Democrat, said he appreciated that the governor 'seems to be hyper-focused on standing up for this state at a time like this, and I feel like that's what people are very encouraged by.' Inkiad Kabir, 20, a pop culture content creator who lives in the Inland Empire region of California, said that Mr. Newsom was the rare Democrat willing to go on the attack, calling him 'basically liberal Trump, in a way.' Mr. Kabir created a popular TikTok video this week in which he called the governor 'Daddy Newsom' and likened the governor to a 'toxic ex that you promise you're not going to go back to, but you always go back to.' For now, it seems, Mr. Kabir has gone back.
