Urban League declares a ‘state of emergency' for civil rights in the U.S. in response to Trump
The National Urban League's annual State of Black America report accuses the federal government of being 'increasingly determined to sacrifice its founding principles' and 'threatening to impose a uniform education system and a homogenous workforce that sidelines anyone who doesn't fit a narrow, exclusionary mold,' according to a copy obtained by the Associated Press.
'If left unchecked,' the authors write, 'they risk reversing decades of progress that have made America more dynamic, competitive, and just.'
The report, to be released Thursday at the group's conference in Cleveland, Ohio, criticizes the administration for downsizing federal agencies and programs that enforce civil rights policies. The authors aimed to highlight what they saw as a multiyear, coordinated effort by conservative legal activists, lawmakers and media personalities to undermine civil rights policy and create a political landscape that would enable a hard-right agenda on a range of social and economic policy.
'It is not random. It is a well-funded, well-organized, well-orchestrated movement of many, many years,' said Marc Morial, president of the Urban League. 'For a long time, people saw white supremacist politics and white nationalism as on the fringe of American politics. It has now become the mainstream of the American right, whose central foundation is within the Republican Party.'
The report directly critiques Project 2025, a sweeping blueprint for conservative governance coordinated by The Heritage Foundation think tank. Project 2025 advised approaches to federal worker layoffs, immigration enforcement and the congressional and legislative branches similar to the Trump administration's current strategy.
The Urban League report condemns major corporations, universities and top law firms for reversing diversity, equity and inclusion policies. It also criticizes social media companies like Meta and X for purported 'censorship' of Black activists and creatives and content moderation policies that allegedly enabled 'extremists' to spread 'radicalizing' views.
The Trump administration has said many policies implemented by both Democratic and Republican administrations are discriminatory and unconstitutional, arguing that acknowledgments of race and federal and corporate policies that seek to address disparities between different demographics are themselves discriminatory. Trump has signed executive orders banning 'illegal discrimination' and promoting 'merit based opportunity.'
Harrison Fields, a White House spokesman, said civil rights groups that oppose the administration 'aren't advancing anything but hate and division, while the president is focused on uniting our country.'
The report, meanwhile, calls for the creation of a 'new resistance' to counter the administration's agenda. Morial urged other organizations to rally to that cause.
The Urban League and other civil rights groups have repeatedly sued the Trump administration since January. Liberal legal groups and Democratic lawmakers similarly sued over parts of the administration's agenda.
Veteran civil rights activists, Black civic leaders, former federal officials, Illinois Atty. Gen. Kwame Raoul and seven members of Congress, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, contributed to the text.
Raoul said that civil rights allies have felt 'on the defense' in recent years but that now 'it's time to act affirmatively.' For instance, if rollbacks of DEI policies result in discrimination against women or people of color legal action could follow, he warned.
'It all depends on how they do it. We're going to be watching,' he said. 'And just because the Trump administration doesn't believe in disparate impact anymore doesn't mean the rest of the universe must believe that.'
The report criticizes the Trump administration's efforts to shutter the Education Department, and denounces changes to programs meant to support communities of color at the departments of Commerce, Health and Human Services and Housing and Urban Development, among others. The transformation of the Justice Department's civil rights division was singled out as 'an existential threat to civil rights enforcement.'
The Justice Department pointed to its published civil rights policy and a social media post from its civil rights arm that reads the division 'has returned to enforcing the law as written: fairly, equally, and without political agenda.'
Nevada Rep. Steve Horsford, a contributor to the report, said Trump 'betrayed the American people' in enacting plans he said were similar to Project 2025.
Another contributor, Rep. Yvette Clarke, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, said civil rights advocates and their Democratic allies must do more to communicate with and educate people.
'When you have an administration that's willing to take civil rights gains and call it reverse racism, then there's a lot of work to be done to unpack that for folks,' the New York Democrat said. 'I think once people understand their connection to civil rights gains, then we will be in a position to build that momentum.'
The Urban League originally planned to focus its report on the legacy of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 for the law's 60th anniversary but pivoted after Trump returned to office to focus on 'unpacking the threats to our democracy' and steps civil rights advocates are taking to pull the country back from 'the brink of a dangerous tilt towards authoritarianism.'
For many veteran civil rights activists, the administration's changes are condemnable but not surprising. Some lawmakers see it as a duty to continue the long struggle for civil rights.
'I think it's all part of the same struggle,' said Rep. Shomari Figures, an Alabama Democrat who contributed to the report and whose father was successfully brought a wrongful-death suit against a branch of the Ku Klux Klan. 'At the end of the day, that struggle boils down to: Can I be treated like everybody else in this country?'
Brown writes for the Associated Press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
12 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Laws of Economics Apply to the Late Show
Ben Sasse is right that the cancellation of 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' illustrates the decline of a common American culture ('Colbert and the End of Late-Night TV,' op-ed, July 21). That's not something to celebrate. But the failure of the show illustrates another point that is exciting: Leftist cultural icons aren't immune to the laws of economics. Mr. Colbert put leftist political comedy first, effectively alienating at least half the country. He seems to have assumed that, given his lofty cultural perch and the elite deference shown to people like him, he was insulated from any potential decline in viewership. But losing your audience means losing revenue, and while studio executives tolerated him for a time, the losses became too steep to ignore.
Buzz Feed
13 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Gavin Newsom Just Shut JD Vance Down With One Simple Map
In case you didn't know, Texas Republicans are redrawing the state's congressional districts in an attempt to gain five more seats to strengthen their narrow House majority in the 2026 midterm elections. A few weeks ago, Trump said he was encouraging them to do this. When asked if he wanted a complete redraw of the Texas map, Trump said, "No, just a simple redraw. We pick up five seats." Well, that potential new map was released today and it looks like this: Needless to say, Dems aren't happy about it, with some people calling on California and Gavin Newsom to do something: "Gavin Newsom if you can hear me save me Gavin Newsom. Save me Gavin Newsom." JD Vance must have been seeing these tweets because he sent out this one accusing California of gerrymandering, "The gerrymander in California is outrageous. Of their 52 congressional districts, 9 of them are Republican. That means 17 percent of their delegation is Republican when Republicans regularly win 40 percent of the vote in that state. How can this possibly be allowed?" That's when Gavin Newsom jumped in and responded with this: "Try again, dumb dumb." The map Newsom used appears to be from a 2024 map made by the World Population Review. Out of those 11 states, World Population Review says 10 favor Republicans. The 10 states that favor Republicans are Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. The one that favors Democrats is Maryland. Soooo, what happens next? The new Texas map will go to the Texas legislature for approval. Gavin Newsom has said he would try to redistrict in California, but that's not allowed under California law. Redistricting in California is carried out by an independent commission. One way new maps could be adopted in California is if the legislature drafts new maps and holds a special election for voters to approve them. I guess we'll see what happens next...
Los Angeles Times
13 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Texas Republicans propose new U.S. House map with more winnable GOP seats
AUSTIN, Texas — Texas Republicans on Wednesday unveiled plans for a new U.S. House map that would deliver on President Trump's goal of creating more winnable GOP seats before the 2026 elections, pushing ahead with a fast and unusual summer redrawing that Democrats have few options to blunt. The new map would create five new Republican-leaning seats that Trump is seeking as his party looks to bolster its chances of maintaining its slim House majority. Republicans hope to pass it during a special 30-day session of the GOP-dominated Legislature called by GOP Gov. Greg Abbott. Most of the changes target Texas' big cities, which are the few strongholds for Democrats in the booming state of more than 30 million residents. Trump had urged Texas to help the GOP, and his team has signaled that efforts could expand to other states, with a similar push underway in Missouri. 'My understanding is that there is a path forward for a Republican to win five more of those seats,' said Republican state Rep. Cody Vasut, chair of the Texas House's redistricting committee, on the new maps. But the effort has spurred a push by Democrats in California and New York to consider redrawing their districts as well to counter the GOP efforts. Democrats in Texas also are considering walking out to prevent the GOP from passing new maps before the special session ends Aug. 19, though Abbott could simply call another one. Republicans hold 25 of the state's 38 seats, and the new map ups the total they could win to 30. Had the same lines been in place in 2024, Trump would have carried each of the 30 districts by at least 10 percentage points, leading to conservative optimism despite what's likely to be a tough midterm environment for the party. Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom said on social media that 'The 2026 election is being rigged.' 'California won't sit back and watch that happen,' he posted on X. Legislators in Texas and and other states have walked out of legislative sessions before, hoping to thwart the other party, with mixed results. In 1979, a dozen liberal Democratic state senators in Texas who became known as the 'Killer Bees' bunked down in a staffer's garage and evaded Texas Rangers for four days, killing a plan to change the date of the state's GOP presidential primary to favor former Gov. John Connally. In 2003, when Texas Republicans also sought to redraw district lines in place for only one congressional election, Democrats fled to Oklahoma and New Mexico but failed to overturn the GOP plan. Republicans had taken full control of the Legislature in the 2002 elections for the first time since the 1870s, and their new congressional map allowed the GOP to pick up six seats in 2004, meaning they held 21 to the Democrats' 11. U.S. Rep. Greg Casar, whose seat would be drawn into a liberal district for Austin and San Antonio with fellow Democratic incumbent Lloyd Doggett, called the proposed changes 'illegal voter suppression,' because his district would be merged with another Democratic-held seat. 'Everyone who cares about our democracy must mobilize against this illegal map,' Casar said in a statement. The new seats come from making two Rio Grande Valley seats that have been narrowly won by Democrats recently slightly more Republican, collapsing the seats held by Casar and Doggett and turning two Democratic-held seats in the Dallas-Ft. Worth area into GOP-majority ones. Adam Kincaid, executive director of the National Republican Redistricting Trust overseeing GOP mapmaking, defended the proposal as beneficial for minority communities in Texas' two largest cities. He said the new map would create two new Black-majority seats, one in Dallas and the other in the Houston area, and one new majority Hispanic one. 'If you go through it, you're going to see that a lot of the communities that were broken up in the previous map were put together in this one,' he said. Trump has been pushing for redistricting in Texas with the explicit goal of making it easier for Republicans to defend their U.S. House majority. And Democrats are limited in their options for countering the GOP's efforts. In California, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has talked about redistricting, but an independent commission draws political boundaries. In New York, Democrats introduced a proposal this week that would allow a new map ahead of schedule, but it would require amending the state constitution, a change that must pass the Legislature twice and be approved by voters. The soonest new lines could be in place would be 2028. New York also has a nonpartisan commission that is supposed to come up with the state's congressional lines, though Democrats have in the past overridden the commission's map to draw districts that would be more favorable for their party. Democratic state Sen. Michael Gianaris, who is sponsoring the proposal, acknowledged the 2026 shortcomings of his legislation but said 'we can't just sit there and watch' as Texas redraw its maps. 'There may be opportunities elsewhere but this is not a battle that's going to be over in a year,' he said in a phone interview after Texas proposed its new map. 'Unfortunately this is just a new front in the manipulation in our democracy to gain political advantage.' During the first few days of Texas' special session, Republicans faced scathing criticism from Democrats, who questioned the timing of redistricting efforts when lawmakers are supposed to be focused on providing relief following deadly Hill Country floods. In GOP-led hearings, hundreds of residents testified and expressed their concerns about not yet being able to see the maps and what new districts could mean for Democratic voters. Vasut repeatedly denied the maps would harm voters. Cappelletti, Hanna and Lathan write for the Associated Press. Cappelletti reported from Washington and Hanna, from Topeka, Kan. AP writers Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, N.Y., and Nicholas Riccardi in Denver contributed to this report.
