‘Flash' James Stunt once blew £100,000 to impress Petra Ecclestone – now his bank accounts are empty
James Stunt was once an unmistakable figure on the London art scene, regularly pulling up at Sotheby's and Christie's in a fleet of personalised black supercars – including a one-of-a-kind carbon fibre Lamborghini, a troop of security guards in tow. But these days, the 43-year-old cuts a rather more subdued figure. His bank accounts are blocked or empty, his fleet of luxury cars now locked away or impounded.
Stunt has been appearing at Leeds Crown Court, one of eight men accused of being involved in a £266 million Bradford money-laundering operation, the biggest money-laundering prosecution brought before a British judge in history. Stunt was accused of allowing his prestigious Mayfair office to be used as 'a trusted hub for money laundering' but denied the offence.
This week, nine years after his office was raided by police, he was cleared of involvement, hugging his father with relief outside the courtroom as they both struggled to contain their emotion. However, four of his co-accused were found guilty and are to be sentenced at a later date.
But this recent incident is just another twist in what has already been quite an eventful life. The former husband of Formula One heiress Petra Ecclestone has been a bullion dealer, an art collector, a lover of fine wine and a self-described 'billionaire'. He's been a cocaine addict, an alleged domestic abuser, and when he was declared bankrupt in 2019, the judge called him 'appalling'. His former father-in-law, Bernie Ecclestone, has called him a 'flash bastard' and an 'idiot'.
He has links to the criminal underworld but also to royalty. He claims to know David Cameron 'intimately', has lent art to King Charles (more on this later), and there are multiple photographs of him cosying up to the monarch. On Stunt's Instagram (now deleted) he called himself 'the most hated man in London'. One former friend of his, who asked not to be named, described him simply as 'Stunt the c--t'.
He grew up in Virginia Water, Surrey, in an affluent family. His father, Geoffrey, was from Brixton and had built a self-made fortune in commercial printing. His godfather is also 'The Godfather' – the alleged Mob boss Terry Adams, a man linked to 25 murders, money laundering, racketeering and extortion.
Stunt went to Bradfield College in Berkshire (annual day pupil fees are currently just shy of £45k), where a contemporary describes him as 'mildly amusing in a petulant way, always rubbing the teachers up'. Stunt himself quipped that students of Bradfield were 'like cream – rich and thick'.
In 2014, he donated money to his former alma mater to restore a dilapidated building, which was renamed Stunt Pavilion in his honour. His former housemaster Stuart Williams said at the time: 'James was a bundle of energy and extremely good fun. Sometimes, I had to persuade him not to be, which led to a few encounters.'
As a young man, Stunt claimed variously to have been an oil tycoon, a shipping magnate and a gold trader. Before meeting Petra in 2006, on a blind date set up by a friend, Stunt says he dated another young heiress, Camilla Fayed, the daughter of Harrods owner Mohamed Fayed.
On his first date with Petra, Stunt says he took her to Crockfords, the private casino, where he blew £100,000. 'I was trying to be Flash Harry,' he recalls. And when he married the 22-year-old heiress in 2011, Stunt was catapulted to a stratospheric level of wealth.
There was the engagement party at Battersea Power Station, a £12 million wedding at Odescalchi Castle near Rome, with Alicia Keys, Eric Clapton, Andrea Bocelli and the Black Eyed Peas chartered in by helicopter to entertain guests. 'A fairy-tale wedding fit for a Formula One princess,' according to Hello! magazine.
The couple had three children (Lavinia, now 12, and twin boys, James and Andrew, now nine) and lived a life of glamour and excess. One of many properties they owned was the 123-room Holmby Hills mansion – the largest house in Los Angeles – built by the television producer Aaron Spelling. Petra bought the mansion, originally dubbed 'Candyland' in honour of the producer's wife, for $85 million and an ever-modest James renamed it 'Stunt Manor'. It had a screening room, bowling alley, beauty salon, billiards room and gift-wrapping room, plus a wine cellar where Stunt stored what is thought to be the world's largest collection of Pétrus.
From his Mayfair office on Curzon Street – in the former HQ of M15 – James ran his numerous business dealings. He would regularly lunch at the members' club 5 Hertford Street, where one former staff member recalls him splashing out on caviar and Château Lafite and tipping generously. During a single evening at the nightclub Tramp, he is said to have spent £200,000 on Cristal champagne alone.
When he wasn't partying, Stunt became interested in art and amassed a collection of portraits by Peter Lely and Van Dyck.
'I first heard of Stunt when he was still married to Petra, and he was swanning around Sotheby's and bought a Van Dyck portrait in a spectacular frame,' says Georgina Adam, an art journalist and author. 'He did build up an impressive collection, but to say he was seriously dodgy is an understatement. I'm sure he does have some sensitivity to art, but he probably has more sensitivity to money.'
In 2014, he withdrew from buying a portrait of Van Dyck for £12.5 million in order to keep it in the UK, and a year later, he loaned paintings from his collection to the Boston Museum of Fine Arts.
'He wanted to put a collection together for his daughter to inherit, with a view to lending things to museums,' Malcolm Rogers, the former curator of the National Portrait Gallery and retired director of the Boston Museum of Fine Arts, told Vanity Fair in 2020. 'He always presented himself as a very charitable and positive person.'
But in 2017, his marriage to Petra unravelled amid allegations of domestic violence, abuse and drug overdoses (denied by Stunt), and the couple were embroiled in a bitter legal fight over their £5.5 billion fortune. During the hearing, Stunt was said to have rubbed cocaine on his gums in court and made a gun gesture towards his ex-father-in-law, Bernie. He lost custody of his children.
It was around this time that his drug addiction spiralled. Stunt would later tell a court that he took cocaine 'every day for two years'. He took to Instagram and filmed bath-robe-clad rants about 'horrific allegations' against him – 'perpetrated by an evil dwarf named Bernie Ecclestone… a filthy second-hand-car dealer.'
Petra said at the time of their divorce: 'While we were married, he had someone create a Wikipedia page stating he was a billionaire. Later, he had an entire website created, listing himself on a billionaire rich list that he then paid Google Ads to promote if anyone searched his name. I gave him access to money, and the more he had, the worse he became.'
He certainly had delusions of grandeur. A former friend recalls him sending handwritten notes on light blue stationery that Stunt had decorated with a fake family crest, and carrying around a fake chequebook which referred to him as the Duke of Cumbria.
Post-divorce, Stunt was living in a townhouse on Chester Square, Belgravia, paid for by his father. But he needed money to fund his lifestyle, and it was around this time that he lent Prince Charles a magnificent collection of 17 paintings, including pieces by Picasso, Dalí, Monet and Chagall. The only problem was – they were fakes.
'The first time I spoke to Stunt, it was 2017, and he was screaming down the phone at me,' recalls Giampiero Ambrosi, the producer of The Royal Stunt, a documentary about Stunt's plan to pass fake art on to King Charles and make millions. 'I had been meeting with Tony Tetro, the famous art forger, and Stunt was wanting first refusal on a painting Tetro had done. He had commissioned Tetro to make copies of all these famous paintings and it was all very fishy.'
Ambrosi spent months researching Stunt, and even filmed him undercover – supposedly for a documentary about his art collection. He discovered that Stunt had loaned a then-Prince Charles a series of faked paintings to hang in Dumfries House. Stunt then valued the paintings at £217 million and then tried to use them – and the royal seal of approval – to secure loans to pay off his debts. The artwork has since been removed from Dumfries House.
'James could be very funny and charming and self-deprecating,' says Ambrosi. 'He'd go on about his $300,000 watch. He'd say, 'I have the street cred of a gangster with the business sense of a mogul.' But he could also be irate and crazy and paranoid. He was convinced there were all these different conspiracies against him. Sometimes he appeared wired, other times sedated.'
Since then, things have become difficult for Stunt. Because of the investigation into the alleged money laundering, he had his assets and cash frozen at the High Court in 2018 in a 'proceeds of crime' restraint order. He was declared bankrupt in a London court in June 2019, with debts of more than £5 million, including an unpaid sum of £3.9 million to Christie's. Stunt's £11 million luxury cottage in Belgravia was repossessed along with two other flats, each worth £5 million. He tried – unsuccessfully – to claim that a Van Dyck portrait of the Cheeke Sisters, worth £4 million, actually belonged to his father, Geoffrey.
But it seems he has, at least, found love. Stunt has been in a relationship with Helena Robinson, 28, since 2020. She was working in a watch shop when she met him, and she has been by his side as he appeared in court. 'She saved my life,' says Stunt. 'I've never met anyone more beautiful, on the inside and out.'
The money-laundering charge which Stunt has been facing alleges that his business Stunt & Co took in tens of millions of pounds between 2014 and 2016 from Bradford gold dealer Fowler Oldfield. The money probably originated from 'large-scale drug dealing' but could also have been generated by fraud, tax evasion or human trafficking. Stunt denies knowing or suspecting the cash was criminal property and has described the case as a 'fit-up'.
In 2022, forgery charges against him were dropped, after he claimed he 'didn't know it was an offence' to ask his personal assistant to 'forge' his signature so he could buy an Andy Warhol painting, while he was high on morphine.
As for the psychology of what makes Stunt act the way he has, those who know him have some theories. 'He always had a chip on his shoulder that he wasn't as rich or as knowledgeable about art as the people around him,' said one former friend. 'When you add drugs and unlimited wealth to the mix, that insecurity can turn toxic.'
'I think he genuinely had a desire to be knowledgeable about art and develop a real collection,' says Ambrosi. 'But he wanted to take short cuts and all he's left with is a bunch of lies and grandstanding. Everything about him is fake. He is so guilty of so many louche and shifty things.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Damson Idris addresses Black Panther 3 casting rumours
Damson Idris has addressed speculation that he could become the next Black Panther. During an appearance on the Today show on Wednesday, the F1 actor was asked if he had had any conversations with Marvel Studios about becoming the next iteration of the superhero in the third Black Panther movie. When presenter Craig Melvin encouraged him to give a "yes or no" answer, Idris playfully replied, "Yes-no." Melvin asserted his response meant a "yes," and the British actor responded, "It could mean no." When asked if he'd accept the role if it was offered to him, Idris confirmed that he would. T'Challa/Black Panther was played by Chadwick Boseman in 2016's Captain America: Civil War, followed by 2018's Black Panther and Avengers: Infinity War and 2019's Avengers: Endgame. After Boseman died in August 2020, aged 43, director and co-writer Ryan Coogler decided not to recast the character for the planned sequel, Black Panther: Wakanda Forever. In the 2022 film, T'Challa dies, and his sister Shuri, played by Letitia Wright, takes over the Black Panther mantle. During a radio interview on Sway in the Morning, Idris opened up about what the Black Panther role would mean to him. "It would mean everything, of course. Again, it's all about responsibility. But either way, whoever plays that part, if that part even happens, I'm going to be in the theatres supporting it," he shared. "I knew Chad(wick) well. He was an icon to us. Someone like Chad and what he represented, I think it's important that that essence carries on. I think that's what he would want." However, Black Panther producer Nate Moore previously insisted in February that there was "no truth" to the T'Challa recasting rumours. "We'll get into it later this year, but everything you read online is not true, if for no other reason than we just haven't started (working on it yet)," he told


Newsweek
36 minutes ago
- Newsweek
America Faces Billion-Dollar Threat From New Cyberattack
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The group behind the cyberattacks that rattled American and British retail companies earlier this year has turned its attention toward the insurance sector, and experts warn that the financial fallout could be in the billions. On Monday, John Hultquist, the chief analyst of the Google Threat Intelligence Group, warned that "multiple intrusions" had been observed, including those targeting insurance companies, and issued a "high alert" warning for the sector. He added that these attacks "bear the hallmarks" of Scattered Spider. This prolific hacker collective has gained notoriety in recent years for its impersonation tactics and the use of "ransomware," a type of software that compromises victims' computer systems until an extortion payment is made. The group, also known as UNC3944, is believed to be behind the attacks earlier this year, which targeted U.K. chains Marks & Spencer and Co-Op, as well as U.S. retailers. Hultquist said in a post on X, formerly Twitter, that Scattered Spider has "a habit of working their way through a sector," and that insurance firms should now "be on the lookout for social engineering schemes targeting their call centers." The warning coincided with reports from two American insurance firms, Erie Insurance and Philadelphia Insurance Companies, of anomalies in their systems; however, neither has confirmed a suspect or motive. The latter's website is still down as its team works "around the clock to fully resume business operations," while Erie on Tuesday said there was no longer any indication "of ongoing threat actor activity." Charles Carmakal, chief technology officer of Google Cloud's Mandiant Cybersecurity Consulting, confirmed to Newsweek that there were already more than one U.S.-based victim in the insurance sector, and that the latest wave of attacks started "approximately 1.5 weeks ago." Illustrative image. Illustrative image. GDA illustration via AP Images However, should the attacks spread to the broader insurance sector, valued in the trillions and considered a cornerstone of the entire U.S. economy, experts believe the reputational and financial toll could far exceed that of the earlier attacks. "When insurers bleed, the economy feels the pain," said cybersecurity expert and former White House Chief Information Officer Theresa Payton. "Scattered Spider could turn a sector safeguard into a financial sinkhole." Payton told Newsweek that a Scattered Spider attack could disrupt insurers' ability to access accounts, process claims, or make payments, and that a sector-wide attack could "cost hundreds of millions, possibly billions," given the "vast troves" of sensitive data that insurance companies hold, which could be exploited. James E. Lee, president of the Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC), similarly estimated the potential impact of "a large-scale series of attacks" in the billions of dollars, given the costs associated with the small number of successful attacks on the retail sector. Marks & Spencer, the primary target of these attacks, estimated that these would result in a £300 million ($403 million) hit to this year's profits. This is in addition to the harm caused to those who rely on uninterrupted insurance payouts, and the "widespread erosion" of customer trust, with resulting "regulatory scrutiny," Payton said, would befall the industry. Both experts also noted that the insurance industry's vast size and complexity make it an ideal target for Scattered Spider's signature playbook, particularly the use of employee impersonation to gain access to computer systems. "Everyone is a target," said Payton, "however, the insurance sector is a prime candidate for Scattered Spider due to its data-rich environment, decentralized IT systems, and reliance on third-party vendors." She added that the use of "social engineering tactics" could exploit human vulnerabilities in call centers, and that insurers hoards of data from personal and information to health records "are lucrative for extortion or dark web sales." However, beyond the outsize risks posed to the insurance industry, Payton told Newsweek that another "hidden threat" was emerging, which could "supercharge" the social engineering tactics of groups such as Scattered Spider. "With generative AI, attackers no longer need fluent English or clunky translations; they can craft bespoke phishing emails or impersonate a high-ranking U.S. official from D.C., mimicking their voice or likeness in real-time interactive calls or video chats," she said. "This technology, widely accessible, amplifies their ability to deceive employees and bypass digital defenses." A countermeasure to this, Payton argues, is for companies to "go analogue." "Use in-person verification or a deepfake-combating passphrase—unique, unguessable, and not derived from social media, public records, or breached data—to thwart these hyper-realistic scams."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Love Island USA Season 7 Is Being Ruined by ‘Sisterhood'
Peacock In this op-ed, associate editor Aiyana Ishmael argues that the efforts of the Love Island season 7 cast to recreate the commercial success of the PPG trio from season 6 is negatively impacting the natural chemistry of the Islanders and detracting from the experiences of those in and outside of the villa. During Love Island USA season 6, audiences were sold a unicorn: stars Serena Page, Leah Kateb, and JaNa Craig forged a genuine friendship while out in Fiji searching for love, a bond not often seen during the epic throes of reality dating television. Gone were the days of women cattily fighting over men for six weeks. We welcomed in a new era of sisterhood, one slightly more bonded than anyone had ever seen on the reality franchise's seasons past. That undeniable love and support for each other — and their instantly iconic moniker, PPG — made fans of the series invest in anything these three girls were hypothetically selling. Serena had roughly 2,000 followers on Instagram when the show first premiered last June, and she left the villa with over half a million, which has now turned into over 4 million followers across Instagram and TikTok, a spinoff series on Peacock, and representation from one of the largest media agencies in the country. To say that the power of sisterhood transformed the personal lives of PPG is a gross understatement. So it was only a matter of time that Love Island USA season 7 producers, contestants, and fans alike would be searching for a way to catch lightning in a bottle once more. Only it seems that we've all quickly forgotten that a successful friendship takes time and work — not just twelve episodes. Likely due to PPG's success, it feels as though each of season 7's female contestants are overly conscious of the fact that they're being perceived by millions of at-home viewers, and desperately aware that the reality show — and 'sisterhood' — could be an avenue out of corporate purgatory and into influencer freedom, similar to what we saw with Serena, Leah, and JaNa. We saw these forced attempts straight out of the gate: during episode 2 of the newest season, Huda Mustafa referred to Olandria Carthen and Chelley Bissainthe as her 'sisters,' noting that she was so excited for this 'sisterhood' to grow over the next few weeks. Her sentiments held the same weight as teary-eyed Alabama freshmen 'running home' to their new sorority houses, claiming they've felt the sisterhood from the moment they stepped into their first day of rush. There's a power dynamic they're refusing to address — and a (obviously lacking) suspension of disbelief required of the viewers. Forming friendships quickly through shared trauma and confined spaces is very common; this concept of deep, profound friendship found amongst a television cast wouldn't be so jarring if we weren't being force-fed the word every few minutes by cast members who only met a few days prior. Bombshell Amaya Espinal arrived at the villa ready to try her luck at the abysmal group of Love Island men. She decided to kiss Jeremiah Brown — who was coupled up with Huda in the first few episodes — which led to Huda calling Amaya a b*tch, claiming that she could not trust the newcomer because 'she should know' what she and Jeremiah had going on. (Amaya had arrived on the island roughly an hour before Huda's claims and had no prior knowledge of their relationship.) In an attempt to build allegiance with the original group of girls, (Chelley, Olandria, Belle-a Walker, and Cierra Ortega) Huda 'welcomed' Cierra into the sisterhood, sharing that she was a mother — a personal fact she'd just told Jeremiah, which is why she was feeling frustrated with Amaya's choices. Weaponizing sisterhood to separate the girls from Amaya is not friendship. It's as if this season's cast read the SparkNotes of last season's success without really contextualizing what it means to uphold friendship against the real enemy — the men in the house constantly gaslighting them. A week later, during episode 12, we see Charlie Georgiou pull Amaya for a chat to explore a potential connection — after his partner Hannah Fields was making out with bombshell Pepe Garcia. Amaya claimed that Charlie was moving off of impulse, but more importantly that Hannah is one of her 'closest sisters' and that would be her 'biggest betrayal right now' — the 'right now" being the end of week two in the villa. Charlie earnestly shares that while he may be moving off of emotion in response to Hannah, he deserves to explore multiple connections. Amaya tearfully reiterates that she's 'too close to Hannah' to do that to her. Moments later, in a confessional, Amaya shares that she could potentially be sent home because she hasn't formed any other connections. She adds that maybe 'if the story was different,' she'd consider Charlie, but she didn't want to change her 'moral compass.' Based on the too-quick formation of this 'girl squad,' it's evident that the contestants are trying to take a shortcut to loyalty island when nothing's been earned yet. It's almost as if they've all forgotten the primary reason why they're on Love Island — and it has everything to do with PPG. PPG's success last year was a gradual climb. As each new week passed we saw through subtle and grand gestures how their sisterhood became infallible. It wasn't on day one and it surely wasn't finalized by day twelve. Lest we forget the small fights between JaNa and Leah over the indiscernible Connor Newsum, something fans still bring up in shock when they see that the two are still friends after the villa? JaNa and Leah made mistakes when it came to how they handled exploring a connection with the same man, but they resolved their issues through honest communication. Small tiffs are bound to happen throughout the six-week social experiment that is Love Island, but acting as if women you've just met owe you more than the men you're actively pursuing isn't how you form a sisterhood. After season 7 episode 12's fallout, it is painstakingly clear that forming a 'sisterhood,' especially one that operates with dogmatic loyalty, has actually become more harmful than helpful for all the girls in the house. As the women carefully walk on eggshells to soothe Huda's deteriorating emotional state, we're watching in real time how poorly-built, forced closeness is disrupting everyone's villa experience. The friendships they're forcing onto each other — that are rightfully valued in the outside world — are magnified to an uncomfortable dimension in season 7. The contestants are taking the best parts of PPG, Liv and Kaylor, and even the Casa Amor girls, and perverting it into something else. I'd much rather watch a show filled with morally gray, self-aware women open to the idea of building real connections with the other women on the show, all while following the main mission of Love Island: pilfering romance and affection from a large assortment of people at the same time. Further, on a show where there are only five to six women in play at a time, trying to form an overarching group sisterhood isn't realistic. PPG was a trio and Liv and Kaylor were a duo — this idea that all the season 7 women should have undying allegiance to each other defeats the purpose of dating multiple people. Toes are bound to get stepped on, and not everyone can be in your corner all summer long. More times than not, a friend to all is a friend to none. Sisterhood comes with time and real bonding, not forced cliques. Just because you repeatedly say it, doesn't always make it true. No one wants to be the girl who cried sisterhood. Originally Appeared on Teen Vogue Want more great Culture stories from Teen Vogue? Check these out: Underneath Chappell Roan's Hannah Montana Wig? A Pop Star for the Ages Is Your New Favorite Song Real or AI? Bridgerton Showrunner Clarifies Benedict's Sexuality & Talks Francesca's Queer Plot Twist The Borders of Country Music Are Finally Crumbling