_2021_09_26_15_09_28.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Dolomite Beach inquiry eyed amid Manila flooding
Bicol Saro party-list Rep. Terry Ridon made the call under his House Resolution 56, saying the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA), through its Chairman Don Artes, identified the Manila Bay Dolomite Beach Project as a direct contributor to the persistent flooding in the City of Manila.
'Specifically, it (Manila Bay Dolomite Beach Project) caused the blockage of three major drainage outfalls—Faura, Remedios, and Estero de San Antonio Abad—forcing rainwater to be rerouted through a sewage treatment plant incapable of handling flood volumes during heavy rains,' Ridon said.
In addition, Ridon cited that the Manila Bay Dolomite Beach Project was never part of the then National Economic Development Authority (NEDA) -approved Manila Bay Rehabilitation Master Plan.
The artificial beach was built during the administration of former president Rodrigo Duterte in 2020, The 900-meter long and 60-meter wide beach was later closed for expansion which was completed in 2022.
'As such, it was never envisioned to protect Manila Bay's coastal resources nor to prevent coastal flooding, erosion, or pollution. It is a cosmetic project masquerading as rehabilitation, and has now proven harmful to flood mitigation efforts in Manila,' Ridon said.
The lawmaker said the inquiry will shed light on the following issues:
Whether the project was a necessary government expense to fulfill the Supreme Court's Writ of Continuing Mandamus on Manila Bay rehabilitation;
Whether it was subjected to a proper environmental impact study, especially with respect to flooding in the City of Manila;
Whether its implementation aggravated flooding in adjacent areas due to the obstruction of drainage outfalls;
Whether the ?389 million project cost was within standard pricing for comparable beach nourishment works;
Whether criminal and administrative liability attaches to government officials involved if the project is deemed unnecessary or irrelevant to the mandamus, implemented without a proper Environment Impact Assessment, grossly overpriced, or directly responsible for worsening Manila flooding.
'It is nothing but a criminal wastage of public funds—?389 million that could have been far better spent on sewage treatment plants and other engineering interventions grounded in science and sustainability. We will undertake a full congressional inquiry, determine criminal and administrative liability, and hold every government official directly involved in the origination, planning, and implementation of this project accountable,' Ridon said.
Back in June 2021, then President Duterte said the white sand in the Dolomite Beach Project needs to be replenished since the waves have wiped them out. — RF, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


GMA Network
12 hours ago
- GMA Network
SONA should not be red carpet affair amid flood devastation — solon
The fourth State of the Nation Address (SONA) of President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr. should do away with lavish preparations amid the devastation caused by heavy floods due to multiple tropical storms and the enhanced Southwest Monsoon (Habagat), according to Akbayan party-list Representative Perci Cendaña. 'Lavish preparations for the yearly address would be tone deaf to affected communities. This is not the time for pomp. This is the time for empathy, humility, and decisive action. Ang panawagan ko sa mga kapwa ko mambabatas na kusa na nating gawing payak ang pagdaos ng SONA,' Cendaña said. (I appeal to my fellow lawmakers to make the SONA simple.) 'It is the height of insensitivity if we will roll out the red carpet for SONA when our constituents and their families don't even have roofs over their heads,' Cendaña maintained. Instead of colorful displays, Cendaña said the SONA is intended by the Constitution for the President to report to the people on the current status of the country. 'Malaki ang inaasahan ng mamamayan sa SONA ng Pangulo. Marami silang tanong na nangangailangan ng agarang sagot sa Pangulo. Isa na diyan kung nasaan ang agarang tulong sa mga nasalanta at kung bakit tila lumalala ang problema ng pagbaha sa kabila ng bilyun-bilyong piso na ginugugol natin taon-taon sa mga flood control projects,' Cendaña said. (The public expects so much from the President's SONA. They want immediate answers from the President. Among these is where is the much needed help to those who were affected by the floods and why is the situation worsening despite the billions of pesos being spent annually for flood control projects.) The President is scheduled to deliver his SONA on Monday, July 28, 2025, after the opening of the First Regular Session of the 20th Congress. House spokesperson Princess Abante earlier said that the physical gathering for the President's fourth SONA will proceed amid the inclement weather. — RF, GMA Integrated News


GMA Network
15 hours ago
- GMA Network
House to SC: Queries on impeach rap vs VP Sara best settled before Senate court
Questions on the validity and other matters about the impeachment complaint filed against Vice President Sara Duterte are best settled first before the Senate impeachment court, the House of Representatives prosecution panel said Wednesday. The House made this assertion in its answer to the Supreme Court (SC) which required the Lower Chamber to give details about the impeachment complaint it filed against Duterte and transmitted to the Senate. The same SC order also asked the House how it resolved the three prior impeachment complaints which were archived by the House after the fourth impeachment complaint was signed by over 215 House members, a figure that is way over the constitutionally-required one-third of the House members for the Senate to immediately start the impeachment trial. 'The clarifications sought by this Honorable Court through the above inquiries emphasize one thing: that the issues in this case involve questions which necessitate that this Honorable Court act as a trier of facts. Respectfully, this cannot be done, especially as the Constitution vests jurisdiction of the impeachment trial with the Senate,' the House prosecution panel said. Likewise, the House prosecutors cited that the Senate had already convened itself into the Senate impeachment court last June 10. 'As provided by Article XI, Section 3 (6) of the Constitution, 'the Senate shall have the sole power to try and decide all cases of impeachment. Respondents [House] thus submit that matters regarding the validity of the transmitted Articles of Impeachment, along with the factual inquiries in this Honorable Court's July 8, 2025 Resolution, should, if at all, fall in the first instance to the jurisdiction of the Senate impeachment court,' the House said. 'These matters are necessarily entwined with the case of impeachment now pending before them, and may be settled once the trial proper begins,' it added. Further, the House said that the High Court's questions on which office prepared the Articles of Impeachment, when it was circulated among members of the House, and if the evidence for each Article were attached in the Articles of Impeachment circulated among the House members are internal House proceedings which are beyond the SC's jurisdiction. The House cited the SC decision on the Santiago v. Guingona case which states that 'the principle of separation of powers ordains that each of the three great branches of government has exclusive cognizance of and is supreme in matters falling within its own constitutionally allocated sphere. Constitutional respect and a becoming regard for the sovereign acts of a coequal branch prevents this Court from prying into the internal workings of the Senate.' 'It is the position of the House that these matters pertain to its internal proceedings, which have always been regarded as beyond the jurisdiction and scrutiny of this Honorable Court. This is especially because the matters referred to — the preparation, circulation, and perusal of the impeachment complaint, as well as its attachments — are not governed by any specific constitutional provision or House rule,' the House said. 'This [position] is grounded on no less than the separation of powers enshrined in our Constitution. Being a co-equal branch, the Congress is entitled to respect with regard to those matters which are within its exclusive jurisdiction,' it added. Still, the House maintained that the fourth impeachment complaint consisting of seven Articles of Impeachment that the House filed against Duterte and transmitted to the Senate are in accordance with the Constitution and the House Rules as stated in House Resolution 328 submitted to the Senate impeachment court last June 25. 'On the status of the first three complaints filed by private citizens, the House directed these to be transmitted to the archives of the House on February 5, 2025 after they were mooted by the fourth impeachment complaint, which had already been acted upon by the plenary [with over 215 lawmakers signing off on the fourth impeachment complaint]. The House Resolution attests that the fourth impeachment complaint fully complied with Article XI, Section 3, Paragraph 5 of the 1987 Constitution,' the House said. 'It is submitted that this is sufficient to affirm the regularity and validity of the fourth impeachment complaint, insofar as the House is concerned. Any further inquiry into the House's internal proceedings, absent a constitutional basis, is unwarranted,' it added. The seven Articles of Impeachment vs. Duterte include: conspiracy to assassinate President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Marcos, and Speaker Martin Romualdez; malversation of P612.5 million in confidential funds with questionable liquidation documents; bribery and corruption in the Department of Education during Duterte's tenure by handing out cash to former DepEd Undersecretary Gloria Jumamil-Mercado (Procurement Head), Bids and Awards Committee Member Resty Osias, DepEd Chief Accountant Rhunna Catalan and Special Disbursing Officer Edward Fajarda; unexplained wealth and failure to disclose assets in the Vice President's Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth where her wealth increased by four times from 2007 from 2017; involvement in extrajudicial killings in Davao City; destabilization, insurrection, and public disorder efforts, which include: boycotting the State of the Nation Address (SONA) while declaring herself "designated survivor," leading rallies calling for Marcos' resignation, obstructing congressional investigations by ordering subordinates not to comply with subpoenas, threatening bodily harm against the First Couple and Romualdez, among others; the totality of the Vice President's conduct as the second highest official of the land. —KG, GMA Integrated News

GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
VP Sara says dad Rodrigo likens fate to Quiboloy amid detention
Vice President Sara Duterte said her father, former President Rodrigo Duterte, thinks he and his ally, Pastor Apollo Quiboloy, share the same fate as both are in detention. The vice president is currently in The Hague, Netherlands to visit her father in detention after he was arrested for alleged crimes against humanity during his administration's war on drugs. 'Sabi niya na pareho daw sila ng palad ni Pastor Quiboloy, pareho daw sila ng kapalaran. Tapos sabi niya, 'Sana pala hindi na lang kami naging magkaibigan, baka pa hindi kami napunta sa detention,'' Sara said, recalling her conversation with Rodrigo about Quiboloy. (He said he shares the same fate as Pastor Quiboloy. He told me he wished he hadn't become friends with Quiboloy, so that they wouldn't be placed in detention.) 'Nagtawanan kami, tapos sabi ko, 'Wala namang kinalaman 'yung mga guhit niyo sa palad sa inyong ano…sa mga pangyayari ngayon.' Sabi ko sa kanya, 'Politika lahat 'yan,'' she added. (We laughed about it. I told him that their palm lines/fate have nothing to do with what is happening now. I told him that it's all because of politics.) Duterte was arrested in the Philippines by local authorities on March 11, 2025 based on a warrant of arrest issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC). He is currently detained in the Scheveningen Prison in The Hague. Quiboloy, meanwhile, was arrested by local authorities six months earlier or on September 8, 2024, inside the Kingdom of Jesus Christ (KOJC) compound in Davao City, where the police had been searching for him for weeks. He is currently detained at Pasig City Jail. The religious leader is facing a non-bailable qualified human trafficking charge under Section 4(a) of Republic Act No. 9208, as amended. He is also facing charges under Section 5(b) and Section 10(a) of Republic Act 7610 or the Special Protection of Children Against Abuse, Exploitation, and Discrimination Act. Recently, a Pasig court has denied the petitions for bail filed by Quiboloy and his co-accused for his qualified trafficking for sexual abuse and labor exploitation case. The Vice President said she has not yet informed her father regarding this development, as she has not read the order of the Pasig Regional Trial Court (RTC), as well as the evidence presented by the prosecution that led to the denial of the bail petition. Call for Abante Sara also urged House of Representatives spokesperson Princess Abante to stop commenting on the ICC case of her father, stressing that she should only speak on behalf of the lower chamber. 'Siguro dapat huwag magsalita si Ms. Abante patungkol sa ICC case dahil spokesperson naman siya ng House of Representatives at wala namang kinalaman ang House of Representatives sa ongoing na kaso ngayon,' the Vice President said. (Maybe Ms. Abante should not comment about the ICC case because she is the spokesperson of the House of Representatives and the House of Representatives has nothing to do with this case.) She said that she went to The Hague as a Filipino and as a Vice President fighting for the rights of someone who was brought to and detained in another country. 'So ako, meron akong right. I have all the right to express my anger against what the administration of BBM did. Pero si Princess Abante, siya ay isang spokesperson ng House of Representatives so ang dapat niyang tina-topic o ibinabahagi sa taumbayan ay kung ano 'yung nangyayari sa House of Representatives. Huwag na siyang sumawsaw. It's out of her league,' VP Sara added. (I have the right to express my anger against what the administration of BBM did. But as for Princess Abante, she is a spokesperson of the House of Representatives so she should be only talking about what is happening at the House of Representatives. Do not meddle in this. It's out of her league.) Abante said Monday that the detention of Rodrigo Duterte by the ICC over alleged drug war deaths is based on evidence. The House spokesperson said this in response to Sara Duterte's assertion that her father's detention in The Hague is based on gossip and collusion between the ICC and the Marcos administration.—LDF, GMA Integrated News