logo
ITeS not so simple any more

ITeS not so simple any more

The Hindu2 days ago
From being a sure-fire path to upward financial and social mobility, tech graduates are finding that the information technology enabled services industry may no longer be able to offer them what it could, even just a couple of years ago, finds Aroon Deep
In Solapur, Maharashtra, Zuha Jagirdar, 18, has a good feeling about her chances in the job market when she graduates. 'As an electronics and telecommunications student, I was targeting jobs in my core fields: electronics, telecom, and information technology (IT). But my biggest goal, the one I'm still aiming for, was to get into electronics research. I've always been fascinated by how things work at a fundamental level and the idea of being part of that discovery process has always been my main driver,' she says.
Jagirdar is speaking on the sidelines of the Discord group of /r/Btechtards, a meme-filled subreddit's boisterous and noisy discussion board, where IT students and graduates from across the country bond over light-hearted takes on what is shaping up to be a grave situation: the rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and a shrinking job market that threaten to undermine the years of effort they are putting in. On the top of the subreddit is a meme released after ChatGPT's latest model was announced this month. It features a dog on the phone saying, 'Dad, those web development students are really done for', with slightly more unprintable language.
Jagirdar is unfazed. 'The landscape has changed a lot, but the need for skilled people in electronics and telecom hasn't gone away,' she says. 'It's just a matter of standing out. I'm confident that with the right skills and dedication, I can still find my place.' But a generation of young tech graduates is finding that the funnel that once allowed millions like them all over India to enter the middle class is narrowing.
Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), the IT services giant that is somewhat of a bellwether for the industry as a whole, announced in July that it would lay off over 12,000 employees around the world; the majority of the firm's employees are in India. Many of those impacted are entry-level employees or trainees handed a pink slip as the company acted to cull its junior workforce.
Worldwide, newspaper reports say, Microsoft has laid off 15,000 employees so far this year. IBM, Amazon Web Services, and Google have all reportedly asked their staff to leave, though not all roles were part of core IT.
The constricting of job opportunities in IT is worrying students — the biggest firms aim to collectively hire 30% less this year than the last, according to reports based on top executives' statements during quarterly earnings calls.
'Accenture was the first company to visit [my college] for placements and I got selected during their on-campus drive,' says Tejas, 22, a B.Tech graduate from a 'tier-3 engineering college', as he describes it, asking to be identified only by his first name. 'I received the LOI (letter of intent, a precursor to the appointment letter) in September 2024, but now it has been almost a year since I've graduated and there's still no update. No offer letter, no onboarding, nothing,' he says, adding that there are many students facing the same situation.
They are mostly from colleges set up in the past five years or so, which haven't been able to establish an academic and placement reputation yet. 'Most of us don't get the same opportunities as those from tier-1 or tier-2 colleges. Now, even the limited options we had are fading,' he says.
More than AI
At the most reputed colleges though, things aren't as good as he imagines. Ayush Anand, 18, a native of Patna, is a second-year student at the Indian Institute of Technology in his hometown. He is studying computer science and data analytics at the institute, which has immense value in the job market. 'The market is super saturated.'
'It is really difficult to get a job for the average person and it is getting tougher every day. The giants are not hiring as much as they used to because of the AI boom, and of course we can all see the lay-offs. So, now we are left with the choice of joining a smaller company or a start-up,' he says.
Anand confronted this saturation when he started looking for internships during a semester break. While there have been loud warnings on the impact that AI could have on the IT job market (and every other job market), as of mid-2025, the slowdown is not fully a result of automation.
'The seeds were sown some three years ago, even before there was a big thing around AI,' says Vishal Sharma, chief technology officer of CoHyre, a firm that uses AI to help companies sift through job applications.
In the IT industry, he says, 'global economic uncertainties' have led to a slowdown across the board in hiring, with factors like the U.S.-China and U.S.-everyone else trade wars spooking large firms into tightening their spending in the medium-term. This has had consequences for the kind of person that the typical IT company is willing to hire, he says.
'The reality is that not just for entry-level jobs, even for mid-level roles, there has been a change in hiring,' says Sharma. 'The roles are no longer designed for people who need months of hand-holding before they can contribute,' he says.
A few years ago, the learning curve of a new recruit would include interacting professionally with clients, writing production-ready code, and making presentations that may end up being seen by the top-level leadership of a company. Now, these 'usable deliverables', as Sharma calls them, are needed from the get-go.
It is a tall order and those who cannot stand out have few choices. While some freshly minted tech workers hang on to offer letters that see no follow-ups, or finesse their way into roles that may be beyond their training, others are forced to find ways to make money that have nothing to do with their education, he says.
Upskilling and reskilling
Dharamveer, 22, underwent a three-year diploma course at an IT skills programme held by the Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University, where he was in the top decile of the class.
After he graduated, the best job he could find was a data entry position, where the hours were long and the pay was pitiable, at ₹18,000, less than a fifth of what he paid in tuition fees. In two months, he left. Two years on, he is still on the hunt for a job in the IT sector while helping his father out lugging and installing air-conditioning units across the city.
Priyank Kharge, IT Minister of Karnataka, visited Delhi this month to promote an event being held later this year in Bengaluru, the undisputable IT capital of India. After talking about the event, Kharge spoke about the job crisis, which he completely attributed to AI. 'Whenever a new technology comes in, there is going to be a lot of disruption,' he said, echoing the stock tech industry response to AI's impact on jobs. 'It has been happening ever since man learned to light a fire or invented the wheel. It's always been a constant thing. Jobs are taken, new jobs are created.'
But Kharge also had one programme in the works that he said would concretely tackle the challenge. He spoke of 'Nipuna Karnataka' to 'upskill and reskill' members of the State's workforce, hoping to make them more employable. 'No other State is spending ₹300-₹400 crore on such an effort,' the Minister said.
Upskilling and reskilling have been the solutions typically offered by both the government and industry players. It is a simple solution to a job crunch that may yet get more serious: make people more skilled, and companies will want to hire them.
Nagesh Singh, founder of the non-profit EduNet Foundation, which helps enhance employability, insists that when done right, upskilling can be affordable and with transformative results. Singh concedes that while there are real macroeconomic reasons of concern, there are other problems that are within reach of solutions.
'Most colleges and institutions offer curricula that are not entirely in sync with what the market requires,' Singh says, adding that firms want staff who can be ready within a few months to start delivering, while many students are ill-prepared.
The solution, he says, is a bit of pragmatism. 'When we partner with an institute to upskill their students, we look at the gap areas and work on those, while also teaching web development and web marketing.' Online marketing isn't technically an IT job, but 'our focus is on the jobs that are actually there in the market, rather than what the hype is about,' he says. 'We do have a very strong focus on AI, but also focus on the other elements that go into creating careers. So, we end up spending a fair amount of time on softer employability-related skills, like collaboration, communication, and teamwork.'
The company ran a programme last year for students who had completed Class 10 but dropped out of the education system. Since this was a part-time, three-year-long format, some students dropped out due to family or economic pressure to earn. 'But of those who stayed, '90% of them found a job,' Singh says.
Thanks to a sponsor, the non-profit was able to entice most students to see the programme through with a small stipend, he says. The only way to stay relevant now is to be a 'lifelong learner', he says. Even pursuing a specialisation at university or at work may be of limited use.
The need for generalists
Sharma says firms are now looking for 'generalists' who can quickly get up to speed no matter what tech job they are asked to do. 'Specialisation still matters, but it is not good enough,' he says. 'Just being good at one thing' is no longer a guarantee of survival in the job market, he adds.
This is a problem as people age while sharpening skills and growing in their jobs.
Hitesh (name changed on request) has been a software developer in the IT industry for 18 years. The 40-year-old was hired after stints at three different IT majors, moving each time with a pay hike. In July, his firm summoned him to deliver an ultimatum: resign now, and you'll get three months' pay; refuse, and you will be terminated.
The father of a seven-year-old, Hitesh was forced to move back to his hometown, where his wife and child were already living.
'Once you're 40, that's it in IT,' he says, even as he tries to find a job at a new firm. 'At TCS, we would often hear that this is like a government job, and nobody gets fired. All of a sudden, 12,000 people are being told to leave,' he says.
Getting workers ready for this ever-changing world is something that the government is best placed to do, Sharma says. 'In the early 2000s, when computers came in, there were similar worries about job losses, but the government came in and ensured that Indians quickly adopted IT to be on top of the world,' he says. That strategy worked because while computers cost the same everywhere, Indian employees were and remain lower paid than American or European developers.
Aside from upskilling, Sharma suggests incentivising more AI education and non-IT firms to spend more on leveraging AI, hoovering up the IT talent working on this new technology.
In all this though, the promise of IT jobs has strayed far from where it used to be. As an industry that hires only around 1% of India's population but accounts for 7% of its GDP, according to the IT sector industry association Nasscom, it has, since the 1990s, been an attainable and promising way to break into the middle class — or higher. That may no longer be the case.
'One of the bigger myths, and this was true when I was growing up and I'm sure that's true in most households, is the belief that if you can get an engineering degree or a technology degree, any kind of professional degree, your life is made,' Singh says. 'The world has changed.'
aroon.deep@thehindu.co.in
Edited by Sunalini Mathew
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CEOs want their companies to adopt AI. But do they get it themselves?
CEOs want their companies to adopt AI. But do they get it themselves?

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

CEOs want their companies to adopt AI. But do they get it themselves?

Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In March, Andy Katz-Mayfield, cofounder of the razor brand Harry's, started inviting junior employees to monthly meetings usually reserved for his most senior leaders. The purpose was for lower-level workers to show off how they were using generative artificial intelligence to improve the supply chain, finance and Katz-Mayfield had another purpose, too: getting the top executives comfortable with using AI themselves."Building familiarity with these tools opens people's eyes," said Katz-Mayfield, who is also a CEO of Harry's parent company, Mammoth Brands. "Through demos and stuff, people are like: 'Oh, that's cool. I didn't think about that, but I now realize why this is important for my team.'"Executives refer to the promise of AI with grandiose comparisons: the dawn of the internet, the Industrial Revolution, Carl Friedrich Gauss' discovery of number theory. But while boards and top executives may mandate using AI to make their businesses more efficient and competitive, many of those leaders haven't fully integrated it into their own with most technological advances, younger people have taken to AI more quickly than their elders. And the work that people do earlier in their careers -- inserting data into spreadsheets, creating decks, coming up with designs -- also lends itself to playing around with the technology. Top executives, on the other hand, are often several steps removed from the mechanics. Once they're in the C-suite, days are filled with meetings. Less doing, more to nudge high-level managers, CEOs who have fully embraced AI are trying new tactics. Some have told senior leaders to use Gemini, Google's AI assistant, before defaulting to Google search. Some are carving out time at corporate retreats to play around with generative AI tools like Mayer Brown, a law firm in Chicago, chair Jon Van Gorp has shared with the partners how he uses a generative AI tool built for legal professionals to help draft contracts and distill the most salient points from his own writing. At a fashion startup called Daydream, Friday lunches are devoted to employees' sharing how they're using generative AI tools; the chief technology officer has shared her Gemini prompts from the chief technology officer, Sandeep Chouksey, 41, is well aware of AI and has been playing around with ChatGPT since it came out nearly three years ago. But he found that watching the engineers on his team helped him understand the technology better. He figured his peers needed to get their eyes on it, too, and suggested inviting employees who were working closely with AI to the leadership work of senior executives "doesn't lend itself to actually experimenting with the technology," Chouksey said. "I knew that the other leaders needed to see what I was seeing -- all the bottom-up work that was happening."Chuck Whitten is witnessing how company executives are gradually wrapping their heads around the AI phenomenon. He is the global head of digital practices at Bain & Co., a management consulting firm where his job is to advise CEOs about technology. They understand the importance of integrating AI into their companies, he said, but don't yet have a feel for the technology was in their shoes not too long ago. In 2021, he left Bain after 22 years to become co-chief operating officer at Dell Technologies. He was in that job when ChatGPT rolled out. He describes it as a "lightning bolt" moment. Part of the reason he returned to Bain was realizing that senior leaders needed assistance entering the "golden age of artificial intelligence," he said."I think the majority that I see are just experimenting with the basics, sort of trying Copilot or ChatGPT for the occasional email, draft or quick fact check," Whitten said. "This is not a tool you can delegate down the hall to the chief information officer. They need to be hands-on in both where the technology is going and how they can apply it today."According to a survey of 456 CEOs by Gartner, a research and advisory firm, released in May, 77% of the executives thought AI is transformative for business, but fewer than half thought their technology officers were up to the task of navigating the current digital CEO is trying to "figure out whether they're set up for the future or not and how the world looks on the other side of this technology transformation," said Tom Pickett, CEO of Headspace, a wellness app. "They're facing this constant change, which just leads to stress and everyday anxiety."Pickett, 56, has dealt with his own anxiety by using AI chatbots as much as possible. He joined the company last August and said chatbots had helped him get up to speed in his role. He uses ChatGPT or Gemini to do research and receive advice about business moves, such as potential partnerships with other companies. He said it helped him "learn 10 times as much or test 10 times as many ideas in a very lightweight way."In the past, he said, "I would have had to ask the resident expert or somebody who worked with that company to really give me a debrief," Pickett said. "And instead, in five minutes, I'm like, 'Oh, OK, I get this.'" (He said he had also consulted people in his company, but now "the conversations are more productive.")Sarah Franklin, CEO of Lattice, a human resources software platform, said it can be difficult to get executives to use new tools, and in internal meetings she regularly asks, "Did you test that message with ChatGPT?"Franklin, who previously was chief marketing officer at Salesforce , has been using generative AI tools since they came on the market. But the technology is moving quickly, and everyone is trying to figure it out on the go."Nobody has 10 years of agentic AI experience right now. They at best have six months. So nobody is fully prepared," Franklin, 49, said. "What we have right now in the world is a lot of optimism combined with a lot of FOMO."Fear of missing out can be the mother of innovation, it January, Greg Schwartz , CEO of StockX, was scrolling the social platform X when he saw several users posting projects that they had made with various AI coding apps. He downloaded the hadn't written a line of code in years. But using the apps got his mind a corporate retreat in March, he decided to push 10 senior leaders to play around with these tools, too. He gave everyone in the room, including the heads of supply chain, marketing and customer service, 30 minutes to build a website with the tool Replit and make a marketing video with the app Creatify."I'm just a tinkerer by trait," Schwartz, 44, said. "I thought that was going to be more engaging and more impactful than me standing in front of the room."There was a "little bit of shock" when he presented the exercise, he said. But he tried to remind people it was a fun activity. They weren't being discomfort is normal, said Ethan Mollick, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and author of the newsletter One Useful Thing and the book "Co-Intelligence: Living and Working With AI.""AI is weird and off-putting," Mollick said. "There's a lot of psychological resistance to using the systems even for people who know they should be doing it."Many organizations, he added, have a "real failure of imagination and vision" when it comes to the power of these systems."The main issue is that leaders have to take a leading role," Mollick said. "They all say AI is the future, use AI to do stuff. And then they don't make any decisions or choices."About half of companies do not have road maps for integrating AI, according to a Bain survey. Whitten at Bain said that about only 20% of companies were scaling their AI bets and that most didn't have benchmarks for how workers should use Mammoth Brands, Katz-Mayfield said that he and his team had discussed providing incentives to employees who use AI but that they hadn't needed to. The energy around experimenting is working for the company. In the last meeting it had five demos on the docket but didn't get to all of them because senior leaders were "asking so many questions and wanting to see different things.""If the leadership team is excited and engaged in that stuff," Katz-Mayfield said, "that's probably more than half the battle."

CEOs want their companies to adopt AI. But do they get it themselves?
CEOs want their companies to adopt AI. But do they get it themselves?

Economic Times

time2 hours ago

  • Economic Times

CEOs want their companies to adopt AI. But do they get it themselves?

ETtech In March, Andy Katz-Mayfield, cofounder of the razor brand Harry's, started inviting junior employees to monthly meetings usually reserved for his most senior leaders. The purpose was for lower-level workers to show off how they were using generative artificial intelligence to improve the supply chain, finance and marketing. But Katz-Mayfield had another purpose, too: getting the top executives comfortable with using AI themselves. "Building familiarity with these tools opens people's eyes," said Katz-Mayfield, who is also a CEO of Harry's parent company, Mammoth Brands. "Through demos and stuff, people are like: 'Oh, that's cool. I didn't think about that, but I now realize why this is important for my team.'" Executives refer to the promise of AI with grandiose comparisons: the dawn of the internet, the Industrial Revolution, Carl Friedrich Gauss' discovery of number theory. But while boards and top executives may mandate using AI to make their businesses more efficient and competitive, many of those leaders haven't fully integrated it into their own workdays. As with most technological advances, younger people have taken to AI more quickly than their elders. And the work that people do earlier in their careers -- inserting data into spreadsheets, creating decks, coming up with designs -- also lends itself to playing around with the technology. Top executives, on the other hand, are often several steps removed from the mechanics. Once they're in the C-suite, days are filled with meetings. Less doing, more approving. So to nudge high-level managers, CEOs who have fully embraced AI are trying new tactics. Some have told senior leaders to use Gemini, Google's AI assistant, before defaulting to Google search. Some are carving out time at corporate retreats to play around with generative AI tools like Creatify. At Mayer Brown, a law firm in Chicago, chair Jon Van Gorp has shared with the partners how he uses a generative AI tool built for legal professionals to help draft contracts and distill the most salient points from his own writing. At a fashion startup called Daydream, Friday lunches are devoted to employees' sharing how they're using generative AI tools; the chief technology officer has shared her Gemini prompts from the week. Mammoth's chief technology officer, Sandeep Chouksey, 41, is well aware of AI and has been playing around with ChatGPT since it came out nearly three years ago. But he found that watching the engineers on his team helped him understand the technology better. He figured his peers needed to get their eyes on it, too, and suggested inviting employees who were working closely with AI to the leadership meetings. The work of senior executives "doesn't lend itself to actually experimenting with the technology," Chouksey said. "I knew that the other leaders needed to see what I was seeing -- all the bottom-up work that was happening." Did you test that with ChatGPT? Chuck Whitten is witnessing how company executives are gradually wrapping their heads around the AI phenomenon. He is the global head of digital practices at Bain & Co., a management consulting firm where his job is to advise CEOs about technology. They understand the importance of integrating AI into their companies, he said, but don't yet have a feel for the technology itself. He was in their shoes not too long ago. In 2021, he left Bain after 22 years to become co-chief operating officer at Dell Technologies. He was in that job when ChatGPT rolled out. He describes it as a "lightning bolt" moment. Part of the reason he returned to Bain was realizing that senior leaders needed assistance entering the "golden age of artificial intelligence," he said. "I think the majority that I see are just experimenting with the basics, sort of trying Copilot or ChatGPT for the occasional email, draft or quick fact check," Whitten said. "This is not a tool you can delegate down the hall to the chief information officer. They need to be hands-on in both where the technology is going and how they can apply it today." According to a survey of 456 CEOs by Gartner, a research and advisory firm, released in May, 77% of the executives thought AI is transformative for business, but fewer than half thought their technology officers were up to the task of navigating the current digital landscape. Every CEO is trying to "figure out whether they're set up for the future or not and how the world looks on the other side of this technology transformation , " said Tom Pickett, CEO of Headspace, a wellness app. "They're facing this constant change, which just leads to stress and everyday anxiety." Pickett, 56, has dealt with his own anxiety by using AI chatbots as much as possible. He joined the company last August and said chatbots had helped him get up to speed in his role. He uses ChatGPT or Gemini to do research and receive advice about business moves, such as potential partnerships with other companies. He said it helped him "learn 10 times as much or test 10 times as many ideas in a very lightweight way." In the past, he said, "I would have had to ask the resident expert or somebody who worked with that company to really give me a debrief," Pickett said. "And instead, in five minutes, I'm like, 'Oh, OK, I get this.'" (He said he had also consulted people in his company, but now "the conversations are more productive.") Sarah Franklin, CEO of Lattice, a human resources software platform, said it can be difficult to get executives to use new tools, and in internal meetings she regularly asks, "Did you test that message with ChatGPT?" Franklin, who previously was chief marketing officer at Salesforce, has been using generative AI tools since they came on the market. But the technology is moving quickly, and everyone is trying to figure it out on the go. "Nobody has 10 years of agentic AI experience right now. They at best have six months. So nobody is fully prepared," Franklin, 49, said. "What we have right now in the world is a lot of optimism combined with a lot of FOMO." Tinkerers in the C-suite Fear of missing out can be the mother of innovation, it seems. In January, Greg Schwartz, CEO of StockX, was scrolling the social platform X when he saw several users posting projects that they had made with various AI coding apps. He downloaded the apps. He hadn't written a line of code in years. But using the apps got his mind racing. During a corporate retreat in March, he decided to push 10 senior leaders to play around with these tools, too. He gave everyone in the room, including the heads of supply chain, marketing and customer service, 30 minutes to build a website with the tool Replit and make a marketing video with the app Creatify. "I'm just a tinkerer by trait," Schwartz, 44, said. "I thought that was going to be more engaging and more impactful than me standing in front of the room." There was a "little bit of shock" when he presented the exercise, he said. But he tried to remind people it was a fun activity. They weren't being graded. Their discomfort is normal, said Ethan Mollick, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and author of the newsletter One Useful Thing and the book "Co-Intelligence: Living and Working With AI." "AI is weird and off-putting," Mollick said. "There's a lot of psychological resistance to using the systems even for people who know they should be doing it." Many organizations, he added, have a "real failure of imagination and vision" when it comes to the power of these systems. "The main issue is that leaders have to take a leading role," Mollick said. "They all say AI is the future, use AI to do stuff. And then they don't make any decisions or choices." About half of companies do not have road maps for integrating AI, according to a Bain survey. Whitten at Bain said that about only 20% of companies were scaling their AI bets and that most didn't have benchmarks for how workers should use AI. At Mammoth Brands, Katz-Mayfield said that he and his team had discussed providing incentives to employees who use AI but that they hadn't needed to. The energy around experimenting is working for the company. In the last meeting it had five demos on the docket but didn't get to all of them because senior leaders were "asking so many questions and wanting to see different things." "If the leadership team is excited and engaged in that stuff," Katz-Mayfield said, "that's probably more than half the battle." Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. 3 years on, Akasa's next challenge: Staying in the air against IndiGo's dominance Jane Street blow pushes Indian quants to ancient Greek idea to thrive Why are mid-cap stocks fizzling out? It's not just about Trump tariffs. As 50% US tariff looms, 6 key steps that can safeguard Indian economy End of an era: The Maggi Man who rebuilt Nestlé India bows out Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and return potential of more than 25% in 1 year Logistics sector: Be tactical in the face of head & tailwinds; 6 logistics stocks with an upside potential of over 30% These large- and mid-cap stocks can give more than 20% return in 1 year, according to analysts

77% Of Gen Z Bring Parents To Job Interviews, Even For Salary Talks And Hiring Tests
77% Of Gen Z Bring Parents To Job Interviews, Even For Salary Talks And Hiring Tests

NDTV

time3 hours ago

  • NDTV

77% Of Gen Z Bring Parents To Job Interviews, Even For Salary Talks And Hiring Tests

A recent survey by Resume Templates reveals that 77% of Gen Z job seekers have involved their parents in the hiring process, with many bringing them along to interviews, salary negotiations, and even test assessments, reported the Fortune Magazine. Among those whose parents attended interviews, 40% reported they sat in during the discussion, while one-third said their parents asked or answered questions. Around 27% noted that parents negotiated compensation or benefits, and some even introduced themselves directly to hiring managers, according to the study by Resume Templates. Beyond interviews, parental involvement extends to nearly all stages of the job search. Over 75% of Gen Z candidates used a parent as a reference, 63% had them apply for jobs on their behalf, and more than half allowed their parents to email or call hiring managers. Notably, 48% had parents complete test assignments, and 41% let them handle initial HR interactions, according to Fortune. Experts attribute this trend to Gen Z's lack of professional experience and limited networks, worsened by the pandemic's impact on social development. The tight entry-level job market has also added pressure, pushing young applicants to seek support from trusted sources-primarily their parents. While some view this involvement as overstepping, others see it as a reflection of the changing dynamics in today's workforce. Experts suggest using AI tools like ChatGPT to better prepare for job applications and interviews. What Gen Z asked their parents to do while job hunting? An overwhelming 90% of Gen Z job seekers asked their parents to help find jobs to apply to, while 75% listed them as references. Around 70% had parents submit applications on their behalf, and 60% sought their help in emailing or speaking with hiring managers directly. Over half asked parents to complete test assignments (55%) and handle HR screener calls (45%). Additionally, 35% relied on their parents to write resumes, and 30% for cover letters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store