logo
CNBC Transcript: U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick Speaks with CNBC's 'Power Lunch' Today

CNBC Transcript: U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick Speaks with CNBC's 'Power Lunch' Today

CNBC09-07-2025
WHEN: Today, Tuesday, July 8, 2025
WHERE: CNBC's "Power Lunch"
Following is the unofficial transcript of a CNBC interview with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC's "Power Lunch" (M-F, 2PM-3PM ET) today, Tuesday, July 8. Following are links to video on CNBC.com: https://www.cnbc.com/video/2025/07/08/howard-lutnick-trump-may-cut-tariff-rates-with-a-few-other-countries.html and https://www.cnbc.com/video/2025/07/08/bessent-greer-and-lutnick-may-meet-with-china-on-trade-in-early-august.html.
All references must be sourced to CNBC.
DOMINIC CHU: President Trump's Cabinet meeting just ending moments ago. Tariffs were obviously a very key topic of conversation. So, joining us now is Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who just came from that meeting. Secretary, Mr. Secretary, thank you so much for taking the time to join us. We saw a lot of the conversation that happened within that room, but we want to hear for the record from you, the commerce secretary, about just where you think we are with regard to trade negotiations as a whole as we approach that previously stated July 9 deadline for tariff deals.
U.S. COMMERCE SECRETARY HOWARD LUTNICK: So, you saw 14 letters went out yesterday. You should expect another anywhere from 15 to 20 letters to go out over the next two days, really setting down tariff lines for the key, driving countries. And then we will set out a general letter to the balance, sort of setting out where they're going to be. The president is setting these tariff lines. The president is driving this agenda. This is his agenda. He knows how he wants to play it. And that's what's happening. So we will be setting those tariff rates, and then they go into effect on August 1.
CHU: Secretary, Mr. Secretary, the president may be driving the entire negotiation and conversation, but that doesn't mean that folks like you and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent aren't out there trying to execute the plans, along with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. What do you get as a sense for how these negotiations are going with these multiple parties? Do we feel as though there's going to be a more long, drawn-out, contentious conversation, or do we feel like we're in the seven, eighth, or even ninth inning with many of these major counterparties?
LUTNICK: Oh, we're definitely in the eighth or ninth inning with these counterparties. So what's happened is, many of these countries have made us offers to finally open their markets. You know, they just -- they go slowly, they go with it, and then, finally, they come to the table at the very end, and they start to open their market. And the key is, the president wants to balance our trade deficit with the fact that these countries are finally, finally opening their market. And if you have something like Vietnam where they say, OK, we will really open, open our markets, then the president decides, OK, this is the rate we will do. If you're really going to open your market to our farmers, to our fishermen, to our machines, to our tools, to all of these things going into their country, then, OK, if you're going to give our people that opportunity, I'm willing to cut that rate, which he did with -- obviously, he did it with the U.K. He's done it with Vietnam. My guess is, he will do it with a few other countries. But, basically, if they don't really open their market and they come with these half-baked or a little bit here and a little bit there, the president is saying, look, we have got these huge trade deficits. It's time for you to pay the tariff to trade with the United States of America. Unless you're really going to open, that's how it's going to be.
KELLY EVANS: It's Kelly, Mr. Secretary. And I snapped to attention when I heard the president saying 50 percent tariffs on copper, 200 percent potentially on pharmaceuticals. As we understand it, those -- so, the Commerce Department looks through all those sectors, right, and then make your recommendation. How close to final would you say the recommendations in those two sectors are at this point for 50 percent and potentially 200 percent?
LUTNICK: So, copper is finished. We have done with our study. We have handed the study over to the president. The president knows that he has the ability, since we have studied the market of copper, to set the market tariff for copper. He announced it today at the Cabinet meeting that he intends to go to 50 percent, which will be similar to steel and aluminum, which are both 50 percent, so copper will be 50 percent. And the idea is to bring copper home, bring copper production home, bring the ability to make copper, which is key to the industrial sector, back home to America. We need that kind of production in America. It's important. So that will be out today. You will see the president will TRUTH about it this afternoon, will sign a proclamation, as that goes through the ordinary legal process, within a day or two days. That will come out, but then copper will be set, likely to be put into place the end of July, maybe August 1. So that's copper. With pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, those studies are being completed at the end of the month. And so the president will then set his policies then. And I'm going to let him wait to decide how he's going to do it. He said, if you don't build in America, they're going to be a high rate. But he may consider that if you're building in America to give you the time to build. I think he mentioned that in the Cabinet meeting. Give you time to build, say a year, year-and-a-half, possibly even two years of building, and then the tariff will be much higher. But that – those details will come at the end of the month, and the president will set them.
EVANS: Got it. Thank you. Thank you for the clarity on all of those fronts. Obviously, our audience is closely tuned into what's going to happen there. Also, on the case of China, I remember, when you talked to Brian Sullivan a little while ago, you said, look, like, that's squarely your kind of purview, your remit, figuring out that trade relationship. I'm left a little bit confused as to whether we have reached a trade deal or not. I think the president made some remarks in that direction in the past couple of weeks, but it was unclear what ended up happening. So with rare earths as well, there still seems to be a little bit of confusion on whether those rare earth magnets are coming in, in kind of decent amounts and everything there. Can you just bring us up to speed? What is the trade situation? And is that an open or closed negotiation at this point?
LUTNICK: OK, so we are settled with a 30 percent increased tariff. And then, during President Trump's first term, he had a 25 percent tariff. So, on much of China, they're paying 55 percent. And, on the balance, they're paying 30 percent. And that's where we have settled things for the time being. Now, they have agreed to approve our licenses on rare earth magnets. And, to their credit, they have been doing it swiftly and expeditiously. We decided we were satisfied with the movement that they were making. And so we took down our countermeasures. We started shipping ethane and software products to them and airplane parts and things like, that we're sort of balancing our relationship between the two of us. But we're in a pretty good place now. I think we're going to meet in early August and we're going to start kicking off a bigger trade conversation between the two largest economies in the world, China and the United States of America. So that's going to be kicked off in early August with myself, Secretary Bessent and Ambassador Greer. We will all be going together. We will be meeting our counterparts from China. And we will have a bigger -- start the process of a bigger conversation. I think that's going to take some time. But at least we're beginning the process of having a bigger conversation.
CHU: There's also -- there's also, Mr. Secretary, more of a conversation now built around the European Union. Our own Silvia Amaro out in Europe was speaking to some of the top diplomats out there. And she had made at least reference to this idea that they are saying progress is being made, that there is -- there's still a ways to go, but that there might actually be carve-outs or certain concessions there as you work towards an overarching trade deal with the European Union. Can you take us through how you feel those negotiations are going right now? It is a massively significant trade relationship. We're talking not just about beverage, alcohol and airplane and auto parts, but also many different goods that go between our countries and the bloc over there across the Atlantic.
LUTNICK: So, Europe is our biggest trading partner, and we have a $235 billion trade deficit, meaning they sell us more than we sell them. And that's because they block us on cars and they block us -- they don't pay for pharmaceuticals. All those topics, we need to settle. And it wasn't going anywhere for a while. The president then put out a TRUTH that said, look, if you're not going anywhere, you can pay us 50 percent. Their leaders called President Trump and said, no, no, no, no, no, we will get down to brass tacks and do it. And then they started making us real offers. The European Union, to their credit, has now made significant, real offers, meaning we're going to take down our barriers, we're going to open our markets to American farmers, ranchers, fishermen, really open their markets, and let Americans, finally American entrepreneurial spirit finally get to sell to Europe. The president's got those deals on his desk and he's thinking about how he wants to play them. And this is very tricky, because they have a huge trade deficit. So they have got to pay, but they're really going to bat, trying to say, look, we want to open our markets to you. We want to create a more balanced and fair relationship. Please, Mr. President, think about it. And that's what's on his desk right now. And that's really, really tricky, but he's thinking about it.
EVANS: Lastly, we have had a couple of people point out, as we put these tariff levels back on, should the markets be reacting the way they were on April 2? And maybe there will be a delayed reaction or maybe it's -- you know what I'm saying? Can you kind of wear a little bit of both of your hats here both as a market maker and also as somebody working on optimal policy theoretically? Do you expect any more weakness as we churn through the effect of what these higher tariffs now will be? And it's odd that we had a huge panic a couple months ago, and now we seem to be taking this in stride.
LUTNICK: Well, I think the markets should be taking it in stride, because, remember, there was all that fear that, if you set tariffs, there would be inflation, which there obviously is not inflation. There would be -- this would happen. And, obviously, none of those things happened. You have the whole world paying 10 percent now, and China paying 30 percent additional, and what's happened to the world? Stock market reaching new highs, America taking in more than $30 billion a month in revenues. So the world's gotten comfortable with the fact that Donald Trump knows what he's doing and he's out to make a better deal for America than these horrible trade deals of the past. So that's where we are. I think what you will see is these countries come and open their markets to President Trump and say, will you make us a better deal if we open our market? The president's going to go country by country, decide. Even when he sets the letter, you have seen in the letter, he said, if you change the way you treat America, we will listen and we will think about it.
EVANS: Right.
LUTNICK: I think what you're going to see is, rates will be a little lower than they were on April 2 because these countries are opening their markets, and then some countries will come forward with such good deals that they will literally change their rate. But that's what we're doing every day. We're talking about the offers. We had piles of offers in his office on Monday, piles of offers, saying, what do you think of this offer? What do you think of that offer? What do you think of this offer? And the president's deciding what the rate is because he's called it dead right up until now. And I think he's got the bull by the horns. And America's going to be so much better off, hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars better off, per year.
EVANS: Right.
LUTNICK: So, if you wanted to bet on anything, you would bet on President Trump and you would bet on America.
EVANS: And we will see if the market continues to agree with that as we get closer to August 1 and beyond. Secretary Lutnick, thanks for making the time and joining us after that meeting today. We appreciate it.
LUTNICK: My pleasure. Good to see you
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dem senator agrees with GOP that Trump's making progress on trade war
Dem senator agrees with GOP that Trump's making progress on trade war

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Dem senator agrees with GOP that Trump's making progress on trade war

Pennsylvania Democratic Sen. John Fetterman admitted that his party had gotten it wrong about President Donald Trump's tariffs, saying that, so far, the U.S. trade war is 'going well.' Asked by Fox News Digital whether he thought the Trump administration was winning the trade war, Fetterman responded, 'Absolutely.' Advertisement 'I'm a huge fan of Bill Maher, and I mean, I think he's really one of the oracles for my party, and he acknowledged it, it's like, hey, he thought that the tariffs were going to tank the economy, and then he acknowledged that it didn't,' said Fetterman. 'So, for me,' he went on, 'it seems like the E.U. thing has been going well, and I guess we'll see how it happens with China.' This comes as Trump is increasing the tariff on Canada from 25% to 35% beginning on Friday, after the U.S. neighbor to the north failed to help curb the imports of fentanyl and other illicit drugs. The White House noted that Trump signed an executive order on Thursday to increase the tariff in an effort to hold Canada accountable for its role in the flow of illicit drugs into the U.S. Advertisement 3 Sen. John Fetterman admitted Democrats are wrong about President Trump's tariffs, claiming that the trade war is 'going well.' AP Additionally, Trump signed another executive order on Thursday to modify the reciprocal tariff rates for some countries to further address the United States' trade deficits. The action reflects Trump's efforts to protect the U.S. from foreign threats to national security and the economy by securing 'fair, balanced and reciprocal trade relationships,' the White House said. Earlier this year, Trump announced an additional 10% tariff on all countries as well as higher tariffs for countries the U.S. has large trade deficits with. Advertisement The tariffs became effective on April 9. Since then, Trump and his team have since made several trade deals with several countries. The U.S. struck a deal with the European Union in which the EU agreed to purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy and make new investments of $600 billion by 2028. The EU also agreed to accept a 15% tariff rate. Advertisement The U.S. also made a deal with Japan, which agreed to invest $550 billion in the U.S. to rebuild and expand core American industries. 3 President Trump has raised the tariff rate on Canada from 25% to 25%. / MEGA Japan also agreed to further its own market to U.S. exports, and like the EU, Japan agreed to a baseline 15% tariff rate. However, many Democrats are digging in their heels against Trump's tariffs strategy, saying the negative effects are still on the horizon. Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., forecast that, despite the increased revenue, 'within a few weeks or months, you'll start seeing significant increases in most things you buy. And also, you will see disruption in terms of a lot of our industries, because they're not able to access product or supply.' 'When you have across-the-board tariffs, it does operate like a national sales tax, and I think people are going to be more and more hurt,' predicted Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md. 'This is the president who said he was going to come in and reduce prices. Prices are going to rise, and they're going to rise more over time,' said Van Hollen. Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren said that 'Donald Trump may beat his chest and say, 'Man, I made him take a 15% tariff or 25% tariff,' but also understand that every one of those trading partners is now looking hard all around the rest of the world to find other customers, because Donald Trump is signaling loud and clear that the United States under Donald Trump is not a reliable trading partner. And that's not good for any of us.' Advertisement Warren also claimed that Trump's tariffs are the reason the Federal Reserve has not lowered U.S. interest rates. 3 Fetterman still remains isolated from his party, taking Trump's side in the trade war, as many Democrats argue that negative effects are still on the horizon. AP 'Jerome Powell said last month that he would have lowered interest rates back in February if it hadn't been for the chaos that Donald Trump was creating over trade. And the consequence has been that American families have, for six months now, been paying more on credit cards, more on car loans, more home mortgages, all because Donald Trump has created chaos,' she said. Meanwhile, Republicans whom Fox News Digital spoke with urged the president to double down on his tariff strategy. Advertisement 'I think it's exactly the right approach. It's what I have been urging the president to do, and I think the successes he's winning are big wins for America,' said Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas. In response to Democrats still predicting economic fallout because of the tariffs, Cruz sarcastically remarked, 'I'm shocked, shocked that Democrats are rooting for the economy to do badly under President Trump.' 'It'd be nice if some Democrats would put their partisan hatred for Trump aside and actually start working together for American workers and American jobs. Unfortunately, I don't see a whole lot of Democrats interested in doing that right now,' said Cruz. Advertisement Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., while agreeing that the tariffs have been successful, voiced that he hopes the goal is to ultimately achieve reciprocal zero percent tariffs between the U.S. and its trade partners. 'Clearly, the president got a good deal from one perspective. The Europeans just caved, they did. Fifteen percent tariffs on them, zero on us, commitment to invest in our country. But the part of the deal I like the most, the E.U. and the president agreed that a whole bunch of goods would be tariff-free. That is, no American tariffs and no E.U. tariffs. It's called reciprocity, and ideal reciprocity is zero on both sides,' he explained. 'That's what I would like us to achieve in all the trade deals,' Kennedy explained. 'Let the free enterprise system work. May the best product at the best price win. That, to me, would be the perfect situation.' Fox News Digital's Greg Wehner contributed to this report.

Stephen A. Smith hits back at Michelle Obama, ‘still … salty' at her Trump vote comments
Stephen A. Smith hits back at Michelle Obama, ‘still … salty' at her Trump vote comments

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Stephen A. Smith hits back at Michelle Obama, ‘still … salty' at her Trump vote comments

Stephen A. Smith has hit back at Michelle Obama. The former First Lady took a jab at Smith's employer, ESPN, name-dropping the longtime host and saying the network's shows were like watching reality television, namely 'The Real Housewives of Atlanta.' Advertisement 'It's all a sociological study. They think that sports is better reality TV, I'm like, 'It's the same thing.' If I listen to ESPN for an hour, it's like watching the 'Real Housewives of Atlanta,' you know?' Obama said on her brother Craig's 'IMO' podcast. 'It's the same drama, and they're yelling at each other, and they don't get along, you know? I mean, Stephen A. Smith, he's just like every other. . . . 'So, that's why I'm like, 'what's the difference?' It's just, you know, it's just sociological drama,' added Obama. 'I mean, the fact that people over seasons of working still can't get along. They still have the same arguments, you know, and it's not just women. But this happens in sports, too. I find it fascinating.' Those comments found their way to Smith himself, and he used them as an opportunity not necessarily to respond back, but voice his opinion on one of her strategies while campaigning for Kamala Harris last year. 3 Michelle Obama on her podcast 'IMO' talking about how ESPN is reality tv. Michelle Obama / YouTube Advertisement 'When you were campaigning on behalf of the former Vice President Kamala Harris … you said a vote for [President Donald] Trump was a vote against you and a vote against y'all as women. I want to say for the record – I took major offense to that.' Smith admitted. 'I think to this day is the only thing that I didn't like that you said, I didn't appreciate it. Because there's so many things that go into deciding where your vote is going to go. For some people, it's all about the economy. For others, it's all about national security. 'For some people, it is immigration. For some people, it's safety in the streets of America. Long before they think about pro-choice or pro-life.' 3 Stephen A. Smith looks on before the game between the Oklahoma City Thunder and the Indiana Pacers during Game Three of the 2025 NBA Finals on June 11, 2025 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis, Indiana. NBAE via Getty Images Advertisement Smith reiterated that he voted for Harris and 'wouldn't vote for Trump,' but 'wasn't excited' how casting his vote for the former vice president 'particularly after I heard about some of the shenanigans that the Democratic Party was engaging in leading up to the election. 'But I'm talking specifically to you, Madam First Lady. You are not just beloved, you are revered. You are sensational in so many ways. I've been on the record on this show and many others stating had you run for president, you would have beat Trump. I still believe that … I believe if your husband elected to come back, he would beat Trump. That's my personal belief . . .' Smith continued. Smith then got into Obama's comments about ESPN, saying he disagreed with those as well. 3 A logo sign at the entrance to the ESPN headquarters on November 03, 2024 in Bristol, Connecticut. Getty Images Advertisement 'So this doesn't have anything to do with what you were talking about, how sports and reality TV mirror one another, even though we would beg to differ. Because a lot of things on reality TV are made-up situations and scenarios to provoke reactions and all of that stuff. 'We're at sports, that's live entertainment, and you're actually competing against one another is big time. No, reality TV is not like that. You're so wrong about that, about that assertion, but that's neither here nor there. . . . 'You will never hear me utter a negative word about you, but I respectfully disagreed and still remain pretty salty about what you said about us,' Smith said, adding that he felt Obama 'sort of blackmail[ed] us emotionally into trying to compel us to vote one way or another.' Perhaps we may get another episode of this apparent Obama-Smith beef.

Sunday shows preview: Trump economy reverberates amid tariff uncertainty
Sunday shows preview: Trump economy reverberates amid tariff uncertainty

The Hill

time21 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Sunday shows preview: Trump economy reverberates amid tariff uncertainty

President Trump's economy reverberated this week amid tariff uncertainty, the weak job report on Friday and the subsequent firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner, Erika McEntarfer. The Department of Labor (DOL) on Friday reported that the U.S. added just 73,000 jobs in July. Additionally, the job numbers for May and June were adjusted downward, cutting down the original tally by 258,000. The country added 19,000 jobs in May and 14,000 in June, far below the original reports After the dismal jobs report, Trump ordered McEntarfer to be fired, accusing her of manipulating previous reports and vowing to find a replacement that will be 'much more competent and qualified.' On Thursday, the White House also announced that tariffs on dozens of nations would be implemented on Aug. 7, sending further shockwaves through the global trading system. The import taxes will range from the baseline 10 percent to as high as 41 percent. Trump raised the tariff rate for Canada to 35 percent. The administration also announced trade deals with countries such as Indonesia, the Philippines and South Korea, along with the European Union and the United Kingdom this week. White House National Economic Advisor Kevin Hassett will appear on both NBC's 'Meet The Press' and Fox News' 'Fox News Sunday' where he will likely discuss the latest on the administration negotiations with other countries over tariff deals and weigh in on the latest jobs report. On the foreign policy front, Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and the U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited an aid-distribution spot in the Gaza Strip on Friday, as international outrage over the humanitarian situation in the enclave continues. Witkoff and Huckabee will brief the president about the situation, according to the White House, as Trump earlier this week acknowledged there's 'real starvation' in Gaza, striking a different position than Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has denied those claims. Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Executive Chairman Johnnie Moore will be on Fox News' 'Fox News Sunday,' where he will likely discuss the current flow of aid into Gaza administered by the U.S.-backed organization and weigh in on reports of Israeli military firing at Gazans seeking food at the aid distribution sites. Those and others topics are likely to be discussed on the upcoming Sunday Shows: NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday': Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin ABC's 'This Week': Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers; former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Doctors Without Borders USA CEO Avril Benoît. CNN's 'State of the Union': Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D) and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin. CBS' 'Face the Nation': New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D); U.S. trade representative Jamieson Greer; Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz; Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan and Canada's ambassador to the U.S. Kirsten Hillman. NBC's 'Meet the Press': White House national economic adviser Kevin Hassett and Sen. Alex Padilla (D). Fox News' 'Fox News Sunday': Hassett; Gaza Humanitarian Foundation executive chairman Johnnie Moore; father of co-pilot killed in DCA collision Tim Lilley and Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store