
Paying more, getting nothing — the Nelson Mandela Bay ward whose capital budget was slashed to zero
'I have been a ward councillor for 25 years and this has never happened to me,' said DA caucus chief whip Gustav Rautenbach.
The capital budget for Lorraine and its surrounding suburbs — which makes up Ward 8 — has been slashed from R1.2-million to zero in the draft budget scheduled for discussion and a vote on Thursday.
It is one of four DA-led wards in the metro that have been allocated no capital budget — and there is no mechanism for residents to appeal against the decision. The DA caucus chief whip, Gustav Rautenbach, said on Tuesday that there were rumours that the ward might still receive about R500,000 — but this had not been confirmed.
Ratepayers are facing increases of 5% for property rates, 5.50% for water, 5.50% for sanitation and 6% for refuse collection, as well as a 12.8% increase in electricity prices if it is approved by the National Energy Regulator of SA.
Last year, Ward 8 used its capital allocation to tar and repair part of Circular Drive, a major arterial road.
But for the next year, Rautenbach said, there would be no capital allocation.
'It is very problematic,' he said, 'because this means that the Integrated Development Plan and the budget are not talking to each other.
'I think it is important to note that this doesn't mean that no potholes will be filled or no sewage spills will be fixed,' he said. 'That would come from the operational budget.'
However, it does mean that no big new projects will be scheduled for the ward in 2025.
'We contribute millions to the municipal treasury,' said Rautenbach. 'Parts of this ward are old and must be replaced. How is that fair?'
Lorraine has 122 townhouse complexes with around 3,000 houses, in addition to freestanding homes. 'I would say there are about 21,000 residents who live here,' said Rautenbach.
Two of the main roads in the area, Dijon Road and Luneville Road, require major work.
'We don't even have an office,' said Rautenbach. 'We don't have a community hall, and we have no recreational facilities.'
He said they had received only R100,000 for a humanitarian fund, like all other wards in the metro.
Short-sighted
'This is very short-sighted from the municipality,' he said. 'Because it should be clear that the only direction in which Gqeberha can grow is in this westerly direction.
'I am very upset. Residents are making their contributions, and they are getting nothing.'
Three other wards are facing the same outcome.
However, Ward 41, represented by Luyanda Lawu, the mayoral committee member for safety and security, is set to receive about R48-million in the upcoming budget and R42-million and R37-million, respectively, for the next two financial years.
The ward has several informal settlements that need major infrastructure projects.
Last week, the budget was once again 'noted' in the council as Nelson Mandela Bay Executive Mayor Babalwa Lobishe said negotiations around ward allocations were ongoing.
According to the budget document, the metro faces 'significant challenges' with the new budget, including:
A declining collection rate;
The poor financial performance of the electricity service, which now operates at a huge deficit;
Escalating electricity and water losses that are at unacceptably high levels;
Allocation of the required operating budget provision for newly created infrastructure and facilities, with a consequential impact on the level of property rates and tariff increases;
Allocation of the required budget provision for the rehabilitation and maintenance of infrastructure;
Underfunded mandates, such as the Library Services, negatively affect the municipality's budget; and
Financial commitments emanating from previous council decisions, such as the insourcing of security guards, which become an ongoing cost on the municipality's payroll. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Is it right for younger MPs to hold older leaders accountable, irrespective of age?
The clash between youth and experience has again come under the spotlight in parliament. Sport, arts and culture minister Gayton McKenzie recently called out DA MP Liam Jacobs over his conduct in a committee meeting. The heated exchange followed a debate on the appointment of PA member Eugene Botha as chair of the National Arts Council. McKenzie criticised Jacobs for being disrespectful, referencing a past meeting where Jacobs grilled South African Football Association president Danny Jordaan about his leadership and travel expenses. 'What I will never allow is for this member to speak when I'm speaking. You are rude. I will never stand for this rudeness of Jacobs,' said McKenzie. On social media, MP Karabo Khakhau also faced backlash after questioning officials involved in the selection of Seta board chairpersons. This raises a question in South African politics.


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Droom Troue fined R250 000 for turning brides' wedding dreams into nightmares
If it sounds too good to be true, it usually is — as these brides found out when they entered a 'competition' to win a R500 000 wedding. The National Consumer Tribunal has fined a trustee of Droom Troue, a reality television show, R250 000 for contravening the Consumer Protection Act and ordered her to refund a total of R265 550 to seven participants who filed complaints. The National Consumer Commission (NCC) referred the matter to the tribunal after receiving eleven complaints from consumers about Lana-Jane de Jager, a trustee of the Shabach Trust, trading as Droom Troue. Droom Troue was a reality television show that recruited participants through a competition where they were promised the chance to 'win a dream wedding' worth R500 000. The NCC says De Jager promoted this competition across various platforms, including bridal magazines and social media. Participants had to follow Bruidsgids on Instagram, like Droom Troue on Facebook and text 'Droom Troue' along with their names and e-mail addresses to 36996 at R5 per text message. ALSO READ: Tribunal fines car dealer and home renovator for not respecting consumers' rights Brides complained to the NCC about Droom Troue The NCC received complaints from dissatisfied participants about Doom Troue between August 2022 and April 2023. When the NCC investigated the matter, it found that after entering the competition, Droom Troue informed participants that they had won the prize. And this is where it became too good to be true: to claim the prize, participants were required to sign a memorandum of understanding and pay a non-refundable 'commitment' fee of between R25 000 and R60 000 to claim the prize of a wedding valued at R500 000. After paying up, the participants did not receive any further communication from De Jager. The NCC investigation concluded that by informing participants that they had won a competition while there was no competition, De Jager contravened section 36 (2)(a)(i) of the CPA. Section 36 (2)(a)(i) states that nobody is allowed to directly or indirectly inform someone that they have won a competition if no competition was held. ALSO READ: Tribunal fines used car dealer R100 000 for disregarding consumer's rights NCC case at tribunal about Droom Troue Referring the matter to the tribunal, the NCC asked it to order that De Jager and Droom Troue contravened section 36(2)(a)(ii), (iii) and (iv), section 36(3)(a) and section 36(5)(c) to (f), as well as an order for an interdict prohibiting them from engaging in the same conduct in future. The NCC also asked the tribunal to order that De Jager and Droom Troue refund the complainants the amounts they paid with interest as well as pay an administrative penalty of R1 million. While the tribunal found that there was no competition, Droom Troue's memorandum of understanding referred to the complainants as 'participants' participating in the competition or competition process. According to the tribunal, this gave consumers the impression that the competition they were entering existed. In addition, the tribunal determined that the CPA provides that 'if any provision of the CPA, read in its context, can reasonably be construed to have more than one meaning, the tribunal or court must prefer the meaning that best promotes the spirit and purposes of the CPA. 'In this context, the tribunal found that the definition of a participant includes an instance such as this. The fact that no competition took place does not mean the complainants cannot be viewed as participants, since they still participated in the competition process, which we now know was just a ruse.' ALSO READ: Braai Block restaurant chain slapped with R1m fine for 'ripping off consumers' Tribunal finds Droom Troue intentionally misled brides Section 4(5)(b) of the CPA states that in any dealings with the consumer in the ordinary course of business, nobody is allowed to engage in any conduct that is unconscionable, misleading, deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive. The tribunal found that the conduct of De Jager and Droom Troue was intended to intentionally mislead and deceive multiple consumers, displaying little or no regard for the spirit and purpose of the CPA. Therefore, the tribunal ruled that De Jager and Droom Troue contravened sections 4(5)(b) and 36(2)(a)(i) of the CPA and found their actions unconscionable and declared the conduct prohibited. The tribunal imposed an administrative fine of R250 000 on De Jager and ordered her to refund the affected seven complainants a sum of R265 550. ALSO READ: Consumer Tribunal fines Cell C R500k for unfair, unreasonable and unjust conditions Droom Troue's submission to tribunal De Jager opposed the matter and denied that she contravened the provisions of the CPA. She submitted that Droom Troue is a reality television show and that the complainants were carefully selected to participate in it, not chosen by lot or chance. She also submitted that Droom Troue is not a promotional competition as defined in the CPA, but instead is a reality television show conceptualised in 2018 and which ended in 2024. The complainants were selected to be participants in the show and not a promotional competition. She also said she and Droom Troue did not enter into any agreement with the complainants to supply goods or services in exchange for money. De Jager also submitted that Droom Troue does not sell any goods or render any services for money and is therefore not a business as defined in section 36. In addition, she said participants were not selected by 'lot or chance', as almost all participants won the prize after a careful selection process. The relationship between De Jager was purely contractual and not subject to the provisions of section 36 of the CPA. ALSO READ: Consumer Tribunal finds another three used car dealers guilty of prohibited conduct Brides knew about 'commitment fee' to be part of Droom Troue – De Jager De Jager also submitted that the participants were always aware of the commitment fee that had to be paid to secure the potential bride and groom's commitment to follow through with the wedding. She said the commitment fee was introduced to curb wasted costs, effort and time to ensure that the wedding would take place and could be aired on television. She did not believe that the payments were consideration or payment as defined in the CPA, while the so-called goods or services were bequests gifted to the couple. Clause 27 of the MOU clearly stipulates that the commitment fee is a nonrefundable payment to ensure the participants are committed to following through with the wedding, she said. Although the tribunal accepted that it was not a competition, it noted in its judgement that none of the advertisements included in the case record indicate that participants were being recruited to participate in a reality show. The tribunal also said the fact that no competition took place does not mean the complainants cannot be viewed as participants since they still participated in the competition process, which 'we now know was just a ruse'. ALSO READ: Tribunal fines car repairer R100 000 for being 'dishonest and contemptuous' Droom Troue and De Jager deceived consumers making them think it is a competition In addition, the Tribunal found that De Jager and Droom Troue, through their conduct in recruiting potential participants for their television show, intentionally set out to mislead and deceive consumers into thinking that they were entering a competition to win a prize and signed an MOU to that effect. 'By their conduct, De Jager and Droom Troue set out to intentionally mislead and deceive multiple consumers and displayed little or no regard for the spirit and purpose of the CPA. The tribunal finds their conduct unconscionable.' The tribunal declared the conduct of De Jager and Droom Troue prohibited and granted an interdict prohibiting De Jager from engaging in the same or similar prohibited conduct in the future. De Jager must also refund the seven consumers the amounts between R25 000 and R46 400 that they paid. Hardin Ratshisusu, acting commissioner of the NCC, welcomed the tribunal's judgement. 'Consumers should be careful when participating in schemes with a promise of winning money or other benefits. 'In this case, consumers were deceived and promised a dream wedding and robbed of their hard-earned cash. Importantly, this case affirms the role of the CPA in guarding against misleading schemes disguised as promotions targeted at consumers.'


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
MLM expands CCTV, upgrades infrastructure in new budget rollout
Midvaal Local Municipality (MLM) is among the few municipalities in Gauteng to adopt a fully funded budget. This is after the unanimous decision to approve the 2025/2026 Medium Term Revenue and Expenditure Framework (MTREF) and Integrated Development Plan. This means that MLM has enough capital to cover all planned expenditures, including operational and capital costs. According to MLM, the Draft Integrated Development Plan and MTREF came after months of consultations with various communities and stakeholders across the municipality. The Gauteng budget 2.0 for the 2025/26 financial year is R172.3b, an increase of some R886.6m from the budget tabled earlier this year. As Gauteng MEC for Finance and Economic Development, Lebogang Maile, tabled the Gauteng budget 2.0 for the 2025/26 financial year recently, he raised a serious concern that only four municipalities in Gauteng have tabled funded budgets while the rest remain unfunded. According to the municipality, the R2b 2025/2026 MTREF was drafted with careful consideration of the challenging economic climate facing the people of Midvaal, as well as the wider challenges faced by South Africa. This, MLM believes, showcases a government that prioritises the well-being and interests of its residents. The revenue budgeted for the year is R2.126b, an increase of 9.79% over the current year's budgeted revenue. Key service delivery projects included in this budget is R69m to replace old asbestos pipes using the Water Services Infrastructure Grant (WSIG). Phase 3 of the electrification of Sicelo in Ext 5 (Silahliwe) continues. In previous budgets, MLM allocated funding for Phases 1 and 2 in Kuvukiland and Stand 118. A total of R26m will be geared towards the construction of a substation in Savanna City, which will increase electricity capacity to support future housing developments. 'A total of R27m has been set aside in the 2024/25 budget from loan finance for road rehabilitation and the conversion of gravel roads to tar. A further R22m is allocated in the 2025/26 financial year to continue with rehabilitation and gravel-to-tar upgrades.' Furthermore, the MLM said it will give rebates of 25% and 50% on property rates. 'The threshold for qualification has been extended to five times the value of the SASSA Old Age Pension Grant, which equates to approximately R11 000.' MLM reveals that it has procured two high-speed vehicles for crime prevention purposes. 'We have made provision for the employment of law enforcement officers who will drive these high-speed vehicles, working alongside our CCTV cameras and other safety mechanisms to curb criminal activities in our municipality. The rollout of CCTV cameras in the Western and Northern regions has commenced, while a significant portion of the budget is being used to maintain existing cameras.' At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!