Canada's steel import duties violate WTO rules, says China
The embassy statement, in response to questions from Reuters, followed an agreement between Canada and China in June to improve bilateral ties and take initial steps to rebuild their fraught trade relationship.
Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Wednesday that Canada would implement 25% tariffs on steel imports from all countries containing steel melted and poured in China before the end of July.
'Such practices violate WTO rules, disrupt the international trade order, and damage China's interests,' a spokesperson at the Chinese embassy said.
Carney is trying to protect the Canadian steel industry, which had complained other countries were dumping cheap steel in Canada as a result of the 50% U.S. tariffs on imported steel imposed by President Donald Trump.
Canada already had 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imported from China and this week tried to crack down on Chinese steel that had been further manufactured in other countries.
China was Canada's second largest trade partner with C$120 billion ($87.48 billion) of bilateral trade last year, but their ties have frayed.
'Canada's approach lacks justification in principle, has no legal basis, and will prove ineffective. It will severely undermine normal economic and trade cooperation between China and Canada,' the embassy said.
Carney's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Carney and Chinese Premier Li Qiang agreed last month to restart trade talks.
Canada's International Trade Minister Maninder Sidhu told Reuters in an interview on Thursday he was keen for Canadian officials to talk to Chinese counterparts 'as soon as possible'.
Last year Canada imposed 100% tariffs on imports of Chinese electric vehicles, squeezing their sales out of the local market.
In March, in retaliation, Beijing announced tariffs on over $2.6 billion worth of Canadian agricultural and food products.
It is conducting an antidumping investigation on Canadian canola, and had expected to issue results of the investigation by September. The embassy said the investigation could be extended for six months under special circumstances.
'If Canada cancels its discriminatory tariff measures against China, China's countermeasures can also be adjusted, suspended or canceled according to procedures,' the embassy said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
2 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Australia, India, Japan, US declare economic war on China's rare earth empire
Foreign ministers from the Quad nations- Australia, India, Japan, and the United States- convened in Washington earlier this month and unveiled a robust strategy designed to counteract China's coercive influence in the Indo-Pacific, as reported by The Japan Times earlier this month. The leaders launched the Quad Critical Minerals Initiative, explicitly targeting China's monopolistic dominance of rare earths and critical materials vital to defence and high-tech industries. The joint statement affirmed their determination "to uphold a region free from coercion" and oppose "any unilateral actions that seek to change the status quo by force or coercion". In language thinly veiled yet unmistakably directed at Beijing, the Quad ministers expressed "deep concern" about the reliability of supply chains dependent on a single actor and criticised China's economic pressure tactics, price manipulation, and threat to critical infrastructure the summit hosted by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the Quad countries committed to diversifying their sources of lithium, nickel, graphite, and other strategic minerals. Rubio emphasised that resilience in supply chains is essential to safeguard against Beijing's ability to weaponise trade flows, reinforcing the need for allied cooperation to break free from China's industrial see this move as part of a broader strategy to economically sideline China. The Japan Times in its article on July 2 noted that the initiative is "an ambitious expansion" of the Quad's partnership and a clear attempt to undercut Beijing's regional leverage. China's dominance in critical mineral processing has raised alarms about future industrial disruption and geopolitical manipulation. Strategic voices within and outside of the group warn against complacency. Former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, speaking at a US congressional hearing, recalled Beijing's retaliatory trade sanctions against Australia and urged deeper coordination with Quad partners to counter Chinese economic coercion. Likewise, former US ambassador Rahm Emanuel advocated for a NATO-style "anti-coercion coalition" pooling diplomatic and economic power to deter Beijing's global muted response to the Quad communique marks a notable departure from its past alarm, leading analysts to suggest that Beijing may be quietly assessing its options as its dominance over rare earth markets comes under critical minerals, the Quad summit addressed broader challenges: increasing military assertiveness in the East and South China Seas, cyber threats, and North Korea's destabilising activity. All ministers reaffirmed their shared commitment to peaceful conflict resolution and rule-of-law principles in the region. While still informal, the Quad's evolving cohesion signals a significant shift in the Indo-Pacific security architecture. As The Japan Times reports, its bold new initiative sends a clear message: regional democracies will not tolerate Beijing's attempts at economic subjugation and geopolitical coercion.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 minutes ago
- First Post
Italy summons Russian envoy over President Mattarella's inclusion in ‘Russophobe' list
The Italian government said on Wednesday that it would summon the Russian ambassador to protest against President Sergio Mattarella being included in a list compiled by Moscow of Western leaders accused of anti-Russian sentiment read more Italian President Sergio Mattarella attends a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (not pictured) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, on November 8, 2024. Reuters File The Italian government said on Wednesday that it would summon the Russian ambassador to protest against President Sergio Mattarella being included in a list compiled by Moscow of Western leaders accused of anti-Russian sentiment. 'Publishing a list of so-called 'Russophobes' who supposedly incite hatred against Russia is yet another propaganda operation,' said Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni in a statement. On July 24, the Russian Foreign Ministry published a list of what it called 'hate speech' against Russia by members of Western elites in which it included a statement from Mattarella at Aix-Marseille University last February. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In his speech, the Italian president drew a parallel between Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the expansionist wars of Nazi Germany. The Russian Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Reuters. Italy has traditionally had close political and economic ties with Russia. However, after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, the relationship deteriorated, and Rome has firmly stood by Kyiv. According to Meloni, Moscow broke international law by invading Ukraine and Western countries have condemned Russia. Mattarella is the only Italian in the list, which also includes German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, the European Union's High Representative for Foreign Affairs Kaja Kallas, the Secretary-General of Nato Mark Rutte, and the President of France Emmanuel Macron.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 minutes ago
- First Post
With 25% tariff & threat of Russia sanctions, Trump dashes hope of being India's top partner
With 25% tariff and the threat of further penalties over the trade with Russia, President Donald Trump has dashed the hope of many in the country that he would be India's best friend in his second term. The all-round progress in the India-US relationship under the past four years now stands at risk of being undone. read more US President Donald Trump stands, after delivering remarks on tariffs, in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, DC, US, April 2, 2025. Reuters With 25 per cent tariff on imports from India amid delay in the much-awaited bilateral trade agreement and the threat of further penalties over Indian imports from Russia, US President Donald Trump has posed a fresh challenge to burgeoning India-US trade ties, effectively creating an environment marked by scepticism and coercion that might undo years of progress in bilateral ties. In a post on Truth Social, Trump on Wednesday announced a two-pronged assault on India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Firstly, he used the trade deficit as a premise to slap 25 per cent tariff on India. Secondly, using the same language as Senator Lindsey Graham who has threatened to hit the Indian economy with a sledgehammer, he blamed India for funding the Russian war on Ukraine and threatened additional penalties. India remains the largest buyer of Russian energy along with China 'at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine' and India will therefore pay a penalty starting August 1, said Trump. At a time when India is facing an ever-growing Pakistan-China nexus, what India needs is a reliable partner in the Washington DC. Instead, with his actions, Trump has compromised decades of bipartisan efforts to improve the bilateral relationship and replace trust with suspicion and grudges. Trump shakes foundations of India-US ties Trump's two-pronged assault on India is the starkest display of his irreverence to the principle of mutuality that has been one of the defining features of the India-US relationship. For decades, India respected US concerns and US presidents respected India's red lines. Apparently, that tradition ended on January 20. In his second term, Trump has crossed every red line that India has maintained for decades: he has meddled in the Kashmir dispute, hyphenated India and Pakistan, sided with the jihadists in India's extended neighbourhood, and imposed tariffs and threatened secondary tariffs over the trade with Russia. ALSO READ — Beyond Pakistan: Trump's open embrace of jihadist forces across Asia a new headache for India Unlike previous American administrations that pursued a mutually-beneficial relationship with India, there now exists a trust deficit in the bilateral relationship under President Trump as he does not care what India —or any other partner for that matter— wants and pursues a 'my way or the highway' approach, says Prof. Swasti Rao, who teaches geopolitics at the Jindal School of International Affairs, Jindal Global University. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'This is why he has ignored all the sensibilities of India whether it is the Kashmir issue, the India-Pakistan conflict, or the issue of agriculture and dairy in trade talks. He has complicated the India-US relationship that had been on an upward trajectory not just bilaterally but also multilaterally — look at the progress with Quad and IMEC in the past few years. Now, instead of taking the relationship forward, the focus will be on containing the fallout,' says Rao, who is also a Non-Resident Fellow at the Paris-based think tank Eastern Circles. Trump takes India on a bumpy ride Under the previous Joe Biden administration, US officials occasionally expressed concerns about India's purchase of Russian oil and touched issues of human rights. More often than not, those were acts of pandering to the domestic base that did little to slow the progress of the bilateral relationship. Biden joined Prime Minister Narendra Modi to turn Quad into the fulcrum to counter China in the Indo-Pacific. He joined hands with India to float the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) as an ambitious connectivity and geostrategic initiative. He brought India closer to Israel and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) under the I2U2 initiative. Bilaterally, the two countries expanded ties in security, intelligence, scientific, and defence industrial domains. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Biden followed the trend set by Barack Obama, George W Bush, and Bill Clinton before him in taking forward the progress in bilateral ties, Trump has threatened to undo that progress by pulling India into a bumpy ride in the upcoming years — and tariffs are just one of the ways. Some of the blame lies with New Delhi as well. 'There has been a misreading of Trump in New Delhi. He was not the one-stop solution that many thought he would be. There is no easy way to manage him,' says Rao, the geopolitical expert at JISA. What's the road ahead for India-US ties? India cannot replicate templates that other countries have followed to handle Trump. India's approach to international relations and standing in the world neither allows it to appease Trump by offering him military bases, natural resources, or the Nobel Prize or Nishan-e-Haidar like Pakistan nor pursue the 'Daddy' approach of Nato chief Mark Rutte. India will have to figure its own template. 'India has been non-confrontational so far and rightly so. The only way to steer the India-US relationship is to not be confrontational, manage President Trump's ego, smoothen any wrinkles in the relations quietly, and stabilise other theatres like Pakistan and China. India, or any country for that matter, cannot manage many crises at once. India will likely need to come up with a lighter version of Mr Rutte's approach where you don't stoop too low but manage his ego just enough to get your interests secured,' says Rao, a consulting editor at The Print. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As for the tariffs, Rao says that nothing is certain with President Trump as he can still make a deal and negotiations are ongoing. 'The best-case scenario will be that India gets a trade deal and tariff comes down and India does not get any secondary tariffs or sanctions over the Russian war on Ukraine. The worst-case scenario will be that the 25 per cent tariff continues and India also gets exposed to secondary tariffs or sanctions under the Graham-Blumenthal proposal. In the short term, the focus should be to avoid this,' says Rao.
