logo
Exports of electronics, iPhones to US may be hit

Exports of electronics, iPhones to US may be hit

Time of India3 days ago
The tariffs have come as a big shock for top electronics exporters like Apple and Samsung. There is fear 'manufacturing business for the US will be lost' if the tariffs persist and no solution is reached through negotiation.
Exports of electronics, iPhones to US may be hit | page 11
New Delhi: The Trump administration's announcement of a 25% tariff on India, along with an additional penalty for New Delhi's trade with Russia, has come as a big shock for top electronics exporters, such as Apple and Samsung. Industry officials fear that 'manufacturing business for the US will be lost' if the rates persist and no solution is reached through the under-negotiation
bilateral trade agreement
with Washington.
The move comes days after India emerged as the biggest exporter of iPhones to the US, with a contribution of 44% in the second quarter of 2025, overtaking China, whose share fell to 25% from 61% in the same quarter of last year, according to Canalys.
This may change if the current tariffs on India persist, say industry officials, pointing out that the US administration has already exempted exports of smartphones and other electronics containing semiconductors from China from the high levies, taxing them at only around 20%.
'We are shocked at what President Trump has announced regarding tariffs on India. If these are maintained, India will lose the electronics manufacturing business to the US. Companies like Apple and Samsung will divert India production to markets such as those in Europe and Asia,' a top industry official told TOI. 'We were expecting more from India's political diplomacy with the US. This is a rude shock. We are now pinning our hopes on the ongoing bilateral trade talks,' the official added.
For Apple, which has been swiftly expanding in India and plans to ramp up manufacturing capacity for iPhones to around 60 million units annually from the estimated 40 million units at present, this may prompt a 'review' of plans. 'We need to see where the bilateral trade talks with the US go, and what will be the fate of talks with China,' an official said.
'The 25% tariff is certainly a negative as it compares to a lower rate for peers such as Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines, which compete with India in a similar category of labour-intensive products and electronics goods. If no deal is signed by Sept-Oct, we see a downside to the full-year GDP growth estimate for India by 20 bps,' Garima Kapoor, economist and executive VP at Elara Capital, said.
For Samsung, the situation is similar. The Korean giant, which also started to ship India-made smartphones to the US, is now likely to go in for a re-assessment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Delhi to have unified portal to issue licences to businesses
Delhi to have unified portal to issue licences to businesses

Hindustan Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Delhi to have unified portal to issue licences to businesses

Delhi may soon get a unified application process and a single office with all departments under one roof for issuing licences to businesses, a move which will streamline business processes and improve 'ease of doing business' in the Capital, officials said on Saturday. Delhi lieutenant governor VK Saxena. (Vice-President of India-X) Lieutenant governor VK Saxena and chief minister Rekha Gupta jointly chaired a high-level review meeting to evaluate the progress of reforms on 'Ease of Living' and 'Ease of Doing Business' parameters on Saturday. The meeting comes in the wake of the Centre's directive urging states and union territories to expedite licensing reforms, officials said. The discussion focused on overhauling Delhi's complex licensing ecosystem with challenges such as fragmented databases, multiple authorities and burdensome fee structures that have long been a barrier to investment and a source of harassment for applicants. 'Initiatives like reducing the role of Delhi Police in granting licences in various categories, deemed permission by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) for factory licence, authority of the revenue department for cinema hall licences, 24X7 opening of shops and establishments and allowing women to work in night shifts, would go a long way in creating a business friendly environment in the national capital,' said Saxena. Key measures on the table included empanelment of third-party auditors for fire safety clearances, simplification of regulatory processes and introduction of a common application form for clearances across departments. Officials also proposed linking data systems of departments like MCD, New Delhi Municipal Council, labour, GST, DPCC and FSSAI to reduce duplication and streamline governance. Officials also discussed developing a unified portal for all licences by taking data of Shop and Establishment Act as base data, officials said. 'This portal encompassing all licences will significantly reduce red tape. Discussions also included rationalising MCD zones to align with revenue districts and requiring local departmental officers to report directly to district magistrates,' an official said. One of the most striking reforms under consideration is the adoption of the 'Tripura model' of self-certification for small industries with investment up to ₹2 crore, and third-party certification for larger enterprises. The city is also looking at extending 24x7 operational permissions for shops and establishments, officials said. Gupta called on officials to fast-track the reforms, emphasising that multiple licensing authorities were a source of unnecessary public hardship. She also asked the chief secretary to explore creation of unified office complexes in each district to co-locate all relevant government departments for public convenience. 'The reforms being carried out under the Prime Minister's guidance will firmly position Delhi as a prime investment destination,' said Gupta, while the LG praised the Delhi government's initiatives to curtail outdated procedures and bring governance closer to the people.

Baloch leader to Trump: You've been ‘gravely misled' by Munir, Balochistan's resources don't belong to Pakistan
Baloch leader to Trump: You've been ‘gravely misled' by Munir, Balochistan's resources don't belong to Pakistan

First Post

time16 minutes ago

  • First Post

Baloch leader to Trump: You've been ‘gravely misled' by Munir, Balochistan's resources don't belong to Pakistan

Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch has warned Trump that he was 'gravely misled' by Pakistan about the true location of vast natural resources, saying they belong to Balochistan, not Pakistan. read more Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch has issued a sharp warning to US President Donald Trump, accusing him of being 'gravely misled' by Pakistan's military leadership about the true ownership of vast natural resources in the region. In an open letter, Mir Yar Baloch stated that General Asim Munir and Islamabad's diplomatic channels had falsely claimed that massive reserves of oil, natural gas, copper, lithium, uranium, and rare earth minerals were part of Pakistan, when in fact, he said, they rightfully belong to Balochistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Your recognition of the vast oil and mineral reserves in the region is indeed accurate. However, with due respect, it is imperative to inform your administration that you have been gravely misled by the Pakistani military leadership, particularly General Asim Munir, and by their diplomatic channels regarding the true geography and ownership of these critical resources,' he wrote. He further asserted that these untapped deposits are not located in Punjab—the core territory of Pakistan—but in the 'Republic of Balochistan,' which he described as 'a historically sovereign nation currently under illegal occupation by Pakistan.' 'These untapped reserves of oil, natural gas, copper, lithium, uranium, and rare earth minerals are not located within the territories of Punjab, which is the actual Pakistan. They belong to the Republic of Balochistan, a historically sovereign nation currently under illegal occupation by Pakistan. The claim that these resources belong to Pakistan is not only false, it is a deliberate attempt to misappropriate Balochistan's wealth for political and financial gain,' Baloch added. He also warned that granting Pakistan access to Balochistan's mineral riches would empower its military and intelligence services—specifically the ISI—which he accused of a long record of sponsoring terrorist groups. 'Such access would significantly enhance the operational and financial capabilities of the ISI, enabling it to expand its global terror networks, recruit more militants, and potentially facilitate large-scale attacks reminiscent of 9/11,' he cautioned. Reaffirming Balochistan's stand, he declared the region was not 'for sale.' 'We will not permit Pakistan, China, or any other foreign power to exploit our land or its resources without the explicit consent of the Baloch people. Our sovereignty is non-negotiable, and our struggle for rightful ownership and independence continues with dignity and resilience,' he said in the letter. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The statement came after Trump announced a major energy partnership with Islamabad, under which the US and Pakistan would jointly develop what he described as 'their massive oil reserves.' 'We are in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. Meanwhile, Pakistan's largest refinery, Cnergyico, claimed to have finalised a deal with Vitol to import 1 million barrels of American oil, according to the company's vice chairman, Usama Qureshi, who spoke to Reuters.

Despite Trump statements, Russia oil buys seen still on
Despite Trump statements, Russia oil buys seen still on

Hindustan Times

time16 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Despite Trump statements, Russia oil buys seen still on

New York/Washington : US President Donald Trump claimed on Saturday he had heard India would no longer purchase Russian oil, calling it a 'good step', days after opening an unexpected salvo at New Delhi for its close trade and military ties with Moscow. US President Donald Trump(REUTERS) 'Well, I understand India no longer is going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not, but that's a good step. We'll see what happens,' Trump told reporters on Friday. His remarks bear significance due to his threats of punitive measures against nations that purchase oil from Russia, which is seen as being crucial to Moscow's war on Ukraine. However, new reports on Saturday cited senior Indian officials as saying there had been no change in policy, with one stating the government had 'not given any direction to oil companies' to cut back imports from Russia. India has become one of Russia's largest oil customers since Western sanctions drove down prices, helping Moscow maintain crucial export revenues whilst providing New Delhi with cheaper energy to fuel its growing economy. Earlier in the week, Trump formalised 25% tariffs on Indian exports through an executive order covering around 70 nations, though the document notably omitted the additional 'penalty' he had previously threatened over India's Russian energy purchases – a measure that America could still take. Ministry of external affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, when asked at Friday's weekly briefing about reports claiming Indian oil companies had stopped buying Russian oil, said: 'As far as sourcing India's energy requirements is concerned, we take decisions based on the price at which oil is available in the international market and depending on the global situation at that time.' The US president has repeatedly criticised India's energy ties with Russia whilst announcing punitive trade measures. Declaring a 'massive trade deficit with India,' Trump argued that while 'India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world.' He described India as having 'the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any country,' while noting that 'they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine.' New reports on Saturday stated India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite Trump's threats of penalties. Two Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday, not wishing to be identified, that: 'These are long-term oil contracts. It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight.' Russia is the leading supplier to India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, accounting for about 35% of its overall supplies. India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. Justifying India's oil purchases, a second government source said India's imports of Russian grades had helped avoid a global surge in oil prices, which have remained subdued despite Western curbs on the Russian oil sector. Unlike Iranian and Venezuelan oil, Russian crude is not subject to direct sanctions, and India is buying it below the current price cap fixed by the European Union, the source said. However, sources told Reuters this week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil after July discounts narrowed to their lowest since 2022—when sanctions were first imposed on Moscow—due to lower Russian exports and steady demand. Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp, Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources told Reuters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store