Focus on growth-oriented companies and stop going by market cap divisions: Alok Agarwal
You Might Also Like:
Reality check: Look for these 3 red flags going ahead: Sunil Subramaniam
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
, Head - Quant and Fund Manager,, says instead of categorizing markets by market capitalization, a more effective approach involves identifying high-growth sectors and segments, many of which are currently found in the midcap space. Consumer discretionary, chemicals, agrochemicals, real estate, EMS, hotels, hospitals, and capital markets demonstrate significant growth potential. Focusing on growth-oriented companies yields better results than solely relying on market cap divisions Certainly, the GST rate rationalisation that was announced over the weekend is welcome news and it was a much needed support for stimulating the economy. Over the last few months, RBI has been taking a lot of steps on the monetary side. Earlier, the government had taken some steps through direct tax adjustments and making a lot of regulations easier as well. But what was required was the stimulus on the fiscal side to ensure that a proper stimulation of consumption happens at the broader level. The suggestion given by the government to the group of ministers to rationalise the GST rates would go a long way in ensuring that the consumption stocks and consumption companies and sectors will start doing well.Certain sectors have been slowing down and are still not showing too many signs of growth. Those remain underweight – the likes of IT, FMCG, and to an extent, oil and gas as well. But the sector that is the most structural sector in India has typically been the consumer discretionary. In the short term, it was showing some kind of a slowdown and now with this GST rate rationalisation, it should start showing a pickup.A lot of newer sectors which were not really part of the frontline indices, have been doing pretty well. The likes of electronic manufacturing, hospitals, realty, consumer durables. A lot of those segments have started coming back very well and we are quite overweight on those segments that are growing at a faster pace and have a great visibility of growth as well.Having said that, a lot of technology-oriented platform companies have started coming in, be it in the fintech space, insurance space, consumption or food delivery. A lot of those companies may not be really part of the frontline indices but they are really growing at a good pace.The whole market has been waiting for these segments to start growing and we have seen that the credit growth and deposit growth has not really been picking up. They have been hovering somewhere around 10%, which is quite a sub-optimal number to have. Given that the rate cycle that we are in, a lot of these banks may still have some more way of NIM pressure to be seen, but yes, with consumption growth likely to pick up, that is likely to have some positive impact on deposit and credit growth as well.We remain selectively positive on the lender side, but within the financial space, we are more positive on the capital market plays and the whole value chain right from the exchanges to the wealth managers to the asset managers and to select brokers are all showing a very good growth and visibility of growth as well.There are two types of narratives in the market. One says that the largecaps are at 21 times one year forward valuation compared to midcaps at 27 times and hence largecaps are cheaper, one should be in largecaps. Coming to valuations in the context of growth, the growth numbers are much higher in the slightly broader markets on the midcap space due to which on a per percentage growth basis as we call as PEG ratios, the valuations don't seem too high.So, instead of segmenting the markets into the large, mid, and smallcap basis, the better way would be to see what among those sectors and segments are growing better and those sectors actually currently happen to be more in the midcap space. We named a few of them, the consumer discretionary, chemicals, the agrochem as well, fertilisers, some real estate names, EMS companies, hotels, hospitals, exchanges and the whole capital marketplace as I mentioned. A lot of these names happen to be in the midcap space. The larger caps are dominated by sectors which are not growing at a great pace. So, focusing on the growth and the segments and cohort of companies that are providing that growth would fetch us better results instead of focusing too much on the market cap divide.That is perfectly true. The auto sector is the poster boy of consumer discretionary play in India. It is one of those rare sectors where predominantly almost the whole market is in the formal zone. There is no informal zone there. The bulk of the vehicles faced around 28% GST. If a lot of them come to around 18% or so, it would be quite a relief for the consumers and the price elasticity in that segment will also be pretty high. That is expected to generate volume growth and hence that should be positive.We are positive both on the auto as well as on the auto ancillaries because once the volume growth picks up, the whole engine on the supply chain on the ancillary side also picks up. So, we remain positive on that side of the auto segment.Barring those which could be directly impacted by some imposition of tariffs, other than that, a lot of these chemicals have started showing some decent growth numbers coming back. We have had a period where after a very high pace of growth, a lot of these companies went into capex and hence the consolidation of earnings was underway for the last few years. But now, if we look at the last few quarters as well, the chemicals pack has started showing good double-digit growth as well. So, we are quite selectively positive on those segments where the visibility is high, especially among specialty chemicals names.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Ministerial group in favour of removing GST on health, life insurance
New Delhi: In a significant move aimed at bolstering financial security for citizens in healthcare, a ministerial group appointed by the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council on Wednesday was broadly in favour of exempting health and life insurance premiums from the 18% tax it is subjected to, according to ministers who attended the meeting. 'The group of ministers discussed the proposal to make these insurance services free of GST. States expressed their views," convenor of the group of ministers (GoM) and Bihar's deputy chief minister Samrat Chaudhary told mediapersons after the meeting. 'The group of ministers' report will be placed before the GST Council." Further, Punjab finance minister Harpal Singh Cheema told mediapersons that members of the ministerial group felt the benefit of tax reduction should be passed on to the consumers by businesses. Two government officials told Mint on the condition of anonymity that the tax relief on health and life insurance will be available for individuals and, perhaps, for family health plans as well. However, they did not offer clarity on whether the relief will be available for group policies purchased by companies. As per official data for FY23, total health insurance premiums in India amounted to approximately ₹90,032 crore. Of this, individual health insurance premiums contributed 39% or ₹35,300 crore. GST amounting to ₹6,354 crore was collected on individual health insurance premiums at the current rate of 18%. Experts said the move to exempt GST on health and life insurance premiums would provide significant relief to households. 'At present, the tax burden discourages wider penetration of insurance, particularly among the middle class and lower-income groups. By removing GST, the government would effectively encourage higher insurance adoption, leading to greater financial security and risk coverage in society," said Rajat Mohan, senior partner at AMRG & Associates, a chartered accountancy firm. However, another expert said removing the GST would not lead to a full 18% price cut. 'This is because insurance companies won't be able to claim back the GST they pay on their own expenses, like commissions, office rent, software, etc," said Saurabh Agarwal, tax partner at EY. 'This input tax will now become a cost for them. The final price reduction for consumers will only be the net amount after accounting for this new input tax cost." Agarwal added that if the tax had been 'zero-rated" instead of 'exempt", companies could have claimed a refund for the GST paid on their inputs, and consumers would have seen a full reduction of the tax from their premiums. However, Narendra Bharindwal, president of Insurance Brokers Association of India (IBAI), said while some insurers, especially stand-alone health insurance companies, may find a few difficulties arising from the loss of input tax credit, the overall benefit to the policyholders in terms of a lower upfront cost more than balances the concerns. To be sure, if a service or product is zero-rated, such as the supplies to an SEZ, suppliers will be able to claim refunds for GST paid on raw materials and services consumed in their business operations. However, if it is exempt, for example, in education and health, refund is not possible. It remains unclear which model the authorities are likely to adopt. On the other hand, Gupral Singh Dhingra, joint managing director of Prudent Insurance Brokers said from the point of view of assistance to industry, a calibrated cut to 5% GST may be preferred to a complete waiver. 'It is relief to the consumer balanced with operational efficiency by maintaining the ITC chain for insurers along with cascading costs," Dhingra said. He added that while a nil GST regime would directly lower out-of-pocket costs and make health and life insurance extremely affordable, even 5% GST would be far better than the current 18% and would constitute noteworthy savings while also helping insurance companies and intermediaries to make up their costs. C.R. Vijayan, former secretary general of the general insurance council, said the reduction or exemption of GST on health and life insurance products will benefit customers by way of reduction in premium. "But the real benefit will only flow if GST exemption or cuts on products are also aligned with similar cuts or exemption on GST on insurance servicing and administration charges that are also loaded into premium," he added. Insurers welcome the move Broadly, though, insurance companies, which have sought GST cuts on health insurance for long, have welcomed the development. 'The proposal has potential to boost growth in the sector," said Alok Rungta, managing director and CEO of Generali Central Life Insurance Ltd. 'The benefit has to be passed on to consumers. In a developing nation like us, more affordable health and life care will boost insurance penetration." Jude Gomes, MD & CEO Ageas Federal Life Insurance Co. Ltd. said insurance is an essential safety net for families, and called the looming GST cut a customer-centric move. At the same time, he said that 'it is essential that we tackle some of the structural issues like the inverted duty structure that still affects industry efficiency and margins". Welcoming the development, Sharad Mathur, managing director and CEO of Universal Sompo General Insurance Ltd. said it sends a strong signal about the government's commitment to long-term financial resilience and inclusive growth. 'If implemented, this exemption could encourage higher insurance penetration and support a more robust risk management culture across the country," said Mathur. 'Lower premiums will encourage families and individuals to purchase higher covers, increase penetration in first-time buyers, rural households, and MSMEs, and grow long-term savings and retirement planning," said Bharindwal of IBAI. Other GST changes Meanwhile, the finance ministry said in a social media update that finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman addressed the ministerial groups reviewing proposals on health and life insurance, tax rate rationalisation and the future of GST compensation cess. Chaudhary said a separate GoM on broader GST rate rationalisation, which too he is convenor of, will examine the proposals on tax rate revision on Thursday. The proposals to that ministerial group from the central government include doing away with the 12% GST slab and shifting most of the products and services to the 5% slab. It is also recommended to do away with the 28% slab and shift many of the products to the 18% slab. A new 40% slab will be introduced that will apply to select sin goods such as tobacco and some high-end sports utility vehicles, which currently have an overall tax liability of 48% to 50% including a cess. The effect of these proposals would be a sharp reduction in the tax burden on many commonly used products like packaged food items as well as on automobiles.
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Ashok Leyland is in top gear on margin outlook, potential GST cuts
Ashok Leyland Ltd's shares have risen 11% over the past four trading sessions and hit a new 52-week high of ₹134.31 on Wednesday—not without reason. First, the management's commentary, especially on the margin scenario, in the recently held June quarter (Q1FY26) earnings call, was encouraging. Second, the anticipated cuts in the goods and services tax (GST) rates could potentially lower the on-road prices across auto segments, thus spurring demand, which is expected to benefit many companies, including Ashok Leyland. For the commercial vehicle (CV) maker, profit margin expansion has been a key focus area. For FY26, the management's 'overall aspiration would be to beat the last year's margins by a handsome margin". Its medium-term goal is to achieve a mid-teen Ebitda margin. For perspective, Ashok Leyland's FY25 standalone Ebitda margin had expanded 72 basis points (bps) year-on-year to 12.7%. Q1FY26 Ebitda margin was up 52 bps to 11.1% even though demand was subdued. The metric dipped 393 bps sequentially as Q4 tends to be seasonally stronger. Kumar Rakesh, analyst at BNP Paribas Securities India said, Ashok Leyland has delivered year-on-year margin expansion for the fourteenth successive quarter in Q1FY26 even as we are yet to enter the next CV upcycle. 'A soft base in H2FY26, better defence business outlook, positive trends in lateral data and multiple product interventions should result in solid FY26 earnings growth," added Kumar in a report on 15 August. Q1FY26 Ebitda margin expansion was mainly led by the 150 bps improvement in gross margin to 29.4%. Despite material cost pressures created by steel safeguard duty and tariff volatility, gross margin improved due to cost-saving efforts, firm price realization and a better mix. However, higher staff costs and other expenses curbed Ebitda margin expansion. Thus, Q1 Ebitda growth came in at a modest 6.4%, which is still higher than the mere 1.5% growth in total operating revenue to ₹8,725 crore, aided by marginal growth in volume and blended price realization. As per the management, the company's MHCV (medium and heavy commercial vehicle) volumes excluding defence rose 2% year-on-year in Q1 versus 2% domestic industry volume drop on a high base. It expects MHCV industry to clock mid-single digit volume growth in FY26 and slightly higher than that for LCV (light commercial vehicle). The management is optimistic on the company's volume and margin uptrend in the second half of FY26 backed by factors like lower interest rates, improved capex and the company's upcoming new product launches. While Q1FY26 defence revenue fell to ₹120 crore from ₹400 crore in Q1FY25, orderbook stands at ₹1,000 crore and revenue should improve going ahead. Within subsidiaries, Switch India achieved profit-before-tax breakeven in Q1 and aims to be profit-after-tax positive in FY26. Switch India has an order book of over 1,500 buses. Ashok Leyland's shares have surged 21% so far in 2025 as investors are hopeful about volume growth. Cyclicality in the MHCV segment has been a concern for investors. But as Motilal Oswal Financial Services points out, 'Over the years, Ashok Leyland has effectively reduced its business cyclicality by focusing on non-MHCV segments." The broking firm expects that a net cash position will enable Ashok Leyland to invest in growth avenues in the coming years. Net cash as on 30 June was ₹800 crore. Still, slower-than-expected MHCV industry growth can weigh on the investor sentiment. The trends in replacement demand are worth tracking.
Economic Times
19 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Data will decide winners in generative AI era: Clearwater
With generative AI changing the way enterprises are run, companies should focus on data, which will be a key differentiator, said Sandeep Sahai, chief executive of Clearwater Analytics, a NYSE-listed investment accounting solution provider. Sahai said people are not thinking enough about where the data is and getting access to the data, as the focus is more on the large language models (LLM). He explained that having the right data to train matters, since businesses require a high degree of accuracy, and makes sure it doesn't hallucinate. "I shouldn't say this, but most LLMs are somewhat similar in their capability. There are differences and all are quite powerful. Then the only question is, what are you training on? And if you can get the data right in a spot which is readable, guess what? Then you win. That is what we are focused on," Sahai said. Clearwater Analytics, which manages $9-10 trillion worth of assets and counts companies such as JP Morgan among its clients, has developed its own proprietary model that has been trained on client data in the last two and a half years. The company recently acquired Enfusion and Beacon, which are in investment management and risk management solutions, respectively, which provide Clearwater Analytics with access to data. "(With the acquisition) We now have the data about trading, accounting, and risk all at one spot. When you think about Google, all the searches everybody does is in one spot. (Similarly), Whoever has the most data wins, those with access to only public data lose eventually," he from data, one of the biggest challenges are rapidly changing business models. Sahai likened this to the taxi industry and Uber, where instead of making the taxi industry efficient, it had given way to said that with AI, the idea is not to make taxi industry more efficient. "The challenge is really in companies being thoughtful about completely changing. If people think of it like an incremental technology, they will be in trouble," he Sahai argued that it is naive to declare software is dead, he agreed that generative AI will significantly alter the current state of the software companies. "It is going to make them transform, become more efficient and provide value. (But) the software companies that do not innovate will have a hard time," he said. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. How an auto giant trapped global investors in an INR1,000 crore heist Fortis Healthcare still heals portfolios, but valuations are running hot. Swiggy, Tencent backer Prosus gets Rajinikanth fan to script India AI play IndiGo's GIFT City unit: Simple expansion or is there more to it than meets the eye? Stock Radar: Rico Auto stock showing signs of bottoming out after about 40% fall from highs; what should investors do now? GST rationalization: You don't become irrational; 10 stocks, from two sectors, some may get more, some less, some nothing Focus on core business and ignore the rest: 5 small-caps from different sectors with upside potential of up to 48% Multibagger or IBC - Part 20: An ICE-to-EV pivot is transforming this small-cap auto ancillary company
